Adobe Target

I would like to be able to tell the type of Offer (e.g. HTML Offer versus Experience Fragment) from the Modifications window. Right now when I view an activity in edit mode I can't tell if the author correctly set up the activity using an experience fragment with the name "My Offer" or if they are pointing to an HTML fragment with the name "My Offer".This is critical to increasing our throughput as authors who use HTML Offers need their code reviewed before activation and authors who use Experience Fragments do not.

Why is this feature important to you -Since this feature is only supported with Recommendation type activities we run a risk of having someone update criteria logic that is actually being used.   Most of our recommendation activities (zones) do not use the  'recommendation' activity type.  How would you like the feature to work -Like it does today when review the criteria logic used in recommendation type activities but for other activity types as well. One can click "i" icon on the criteria, then click on the Algorithm Usage tab to see that the criteria is in use.   Current Behavior -The Algorithm Usage feature is currently only supported for Recommendations activities. It is not supported for  A/B Test, Auto-Allocate, Auto-Target, and Experience Targeting (XT) activities that include recommendations as an offer.      

Description - Currently, we can add only one condition in exclusion rule. In some cases if I need to combine multiple condition for exclusion that becomes difficult. Why is this feature important to you - Having ability to combine multiple condition in single rule would help keep track of all conditions in one exclusion rule itselfHow would you like the feature to work - as we can add multiple rules in collection, it would be great if we do same in exclusionCurrent Behavior - Currently, we can add only one condition in exclusion rule. In some cases if I need to combine multiple condition for exclusion that becomes difficult.

As documented at https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/target/using/implement-target/client-side/upgrading-from-atjs-1x-to-atjs-20.html#… , The following at.js 1.x parameters are NOT currently supported for audience creation when using at.js 2. x :browserHeightbrowserWidthbrowserTimeOffsetscreenHeightscreenWidthscreenOrientationcolorDepthdevicePixelRatioIt would be great if something similar could be made available in at.js 2.x to have access to for sites using Responsive Web Design to enable targeting.

Description - I need the opportunity to send data from a Target activity to more than one AA report suite.Why is this feature important to you - We are an umbrella company that owns, operates and manages many businesses.  Each business (and subsequently website domain) has a different AA report suite and AT workspace.  We also have a "global prod" AA report suite that everyone in the headquarters office uses regularly and houses all data from all businesses.  Since I run the AT program across the organization, I send data for all AT activities to the global prod report suite since that makes the most sense, efficiency wise.  This means however, that the businesses do not get to access their AT data anywhere since they only have access to their specific report suite.How would you like the feature to work - I would like this drop down to be a multi select list and allow me to send activity data to all relevant report suites for that domain and activity, not just one.C

I use folders to organize thousands of offers. I don't always remember what folder a piece of content is in.The search only works within the directory you are currently in - I need for search to search the entire library of offers. Without that function, it is pretty worthless. Thanks.

It would be great if Adobe Target allows to filter activities by user.

Description - It sure would be nice to be able to use RegEx to isolate values in real-time data elements passed to Target for rules-based audiences.Why is this feature important to you - Often data element values are set for Analytics purposes and contain concatenated data that is hard to parse.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to AAM, let us write regex ruleCurrent Behaviour - no RegEx available

Description - Item-based > Items with Similar Attributes algorithm runs at least every 15 minutesWhy is this feature important to you - We recommend related news content that is time-sensitive. We need to display this content to users at or shortly after the time of publication, we can't afford to wait 24 hours for the algorithm to process again as it means news articles may not recommend anything or be eligible for recommendations for up to a day.How would you like the feature to work - Algorithm of Item-based > Items with similar attributes preferably runs every 15 minutes or when Target ingests an entity via the Recommendations API. Should run at least hourly.Current Behaviour - Algorithm of Item-based > Items with similar attributes runs "Daily". This is not often enough for content recommendations on a time-sensitive news/editorial site, where content can have a short shelf life.

Currently if you use at.js 2.0, the tracking server for a4t (analytics for target) is automatically set by the ECID Extension. But if you use a first party proxy configuration where your trackingserver is not your CNAME but your first party domain, the data is not flowing into adobe analytics. So it would great to set the tracking server in the Adobe Target v2 Extension UI, in case you use a proxy configuration on your analytics and ECID. In that case the trackingserver for a4t should be the CNAME and not the firstparty proxy domain, because even with a redirect on the firstparty domain, data will not flow into analytics. 

Problem: When running mboxtrace the output show us if we qualify into or do not qualify into a segment by segment id like this:"evaluatedCampaignTargets": [  {  "campaignId": 123456,  "campaignName": "My Activity",  "matchedSegmentIds": [  1234567  ],Feature: There  should be a place in Target where a customer can translate the Segment ID to the Friendly Name.

Description - Allow AT 2.x access to edge profile from AEPWhy is this feature important to you - it would keep me from removing AT on the siteHow would you like the feature to work - Target audiences have a new drop down for edge profileCurrent Behaviour - It seems that you only get access to AEP segments if you call AT through alloy. For a variety of reasons, trying to take AT off of our site is a major ask. It would be nice to get access to the segments. It looks like the edge profile is at least in scope during a debug session within the trace response.

Description:An API to invoke that pulls in all activities for a given mbox name that match activity audience/refinement rules similarly to how target-global-mbox does, without the need to specify them individually.When target-global-mbox gets called, all activities that are scoped to target-global-mbox get evaluated and returned.The request is to have this functionality extended to any mbox name, which can be programmatically invoked. Why is this feature important to you:This functionality would allow for much better handling of complex situations (ex. data layer dependency, event-driven experiences, behavioral re-targeting)Ex. A targeted experience is shown to the user in target-global-mboxThe above activity then calls [new API] and any activities that want to deploy based on the first experience meeting certain criteria can then be returned and executed. How would you like the feature to work:Similar to getOffers, but instead of specifically listing how many different activ

Description - Increase the number of combined audiences you are able to create in Adobe Target.Why is this feature important to you - we use a lot of combined audiences from different sources and 20 is the maximum that is allowed. How would you like the feature to work - Be able to create an unlimited amount of combined audiences Current Behaviour - 20 is the max number of combined audiences allowed

Today you can set a custom recommendation key (profile param) for existing algoritms like "people who bought this, also bought that". The recommendation key can only hold 1 value (1 entity id = 1 product id). For use cases where more than 1 entity id should serve as recommendation key this is a short coming. For example: wish lists. If a user has created a wish list on an e-commerce website, it would be great to create recommendations based on the content of the entire list (just like with the content of the entire cart). 

Description -ones the audience are deleted from source those can be automatically deleted from the activities where those audiences are used.

The same way we currently train any personalization engine using a "maximize revenue" setup – but allow the revenue to be reduced by negative events (even to below zero).Cancel flows only have one reliably measurable metric for training – and it's the thing we don't want them to do. I can't train it to go with "not" canceling because a large portion of those events are non-actions (i.e. "did not cancel"). There are some buttons that are alternatives to canceling – but what if they come back after clicking those buttons? Same goes for if they navigate away to a non-cancel related page. Training against negative events (like canceling a subscription) is a powerful application that many companies (like BlackBack) are starting to address. I'd prefer not to by a bunch of third party tools to work on something that Target Personalization would be perfect for with this one capability added. Additionally, this goes beyond just canceling as there are all kinds of negative or semi-negative

Description - If an AEM fragment is being used on a live Target activity, allow updates made in AEM to be updated/exported to Target without pausing the Target activity. Right now you have to pause the activity, then re-export the fragment to Target, then re-activate the activity. Why is this feature important to you - Very inefficient to pause and reactivate the Target activity every time a minor change is made to an AEM fragment being used on that activity. Makes it difficult to keep content updated when using AEM fragments on Target activities. Interrupts the visitor experience when activities are paused, especially those that include nearly full-page AEM fragments, because visitors see a nearly blank webpage while activity is paused.  How would you like the feature to work - When updating an AEM fragment, allow us to update/export the fragment in Adobe Target while it's live on a Target activity. No pausing of activity required. Fragment updates on live activity with

Description - All activities created on AEM are going to the default workspace. Seems there cant change the workspace. Why is this feature important to you - Different projects should be allocated in different workspaces, which is more convenient for management How would you like the feature to work - like what you did for ''experience fragment", we can change the settings in "properties->Cloud Servise-->Cloud Servise Configuration--> Target" Current Behaviour - cant find any setting on AEM activity.

Enhance the Data Insertion API that it supports the use of Supplemental Data ID (SDID) We are promoting our server-side interfaces diligently. But if the tracking with AA is taking place on the server side and the Data Insertion API for Target does not support SDID our customers are not able to use A4T.

DescriptionAutomation of Adobe Target Access Management using UMAPI Why is this feature important to you:As a Financial Services organization we would like access management of Adobe Target roles to be automated using the Adobe UMAPI.  The automated process helps us to be compliant, with the right monitoring and controls in place and no manual touches. How would you like the feature to workWe would like Adobe Target access management to be fully automated* using the UMAPI same as other Adobe products in our organization such as Analytics, Launch, et al. This would also help us be compliant and remove the vulnerability written against Adobe Target. More than happy to review our current set up with the Product team and support any way we can.  Adobe Team knows how and where to reach Mary Daniel. Current BehaviorAdobe Target has 4 roles.Approver - Can create, edit, and activate or stop activities. Editor - Can create and edit activities before they are l

When using Visual Experience Composer it would be be incredibly helpful to add an "Insert Before" or "Insert After" function when a specific container is selected.Currently when a container is selected and you choose to edit the HTML, any changes that are made are made within the container that is selected, which can cause some ordering or styling issues if you want to add an additional element before or after the container that is selected.The work around for this is at present to "Expand Selection" and edit the HTML of the parent container, however this often involves updating the HTML for the main body container. If you edit the code for the main body container this will lock it's content, so any subsequent changes made outside of Target (i.e. through the CMS) won't show correctly which can create problems. Adding an "Insert Before" or "Insert After" option would allow us to quickly insert new elements into the page above or below current items without having to lock the code of the

Regular email notifications about upcoming maintenance windows and releases that will impact a user's ability to access Adobe Target.  This will allow Target users to prepare for such outages.

Would like the ability to create JSON offers via the target API

Our team has to separate roles for security reasons.  Because of that, we need an Approver Only role that cannot create or edit.  That way one person couldn't create and approve an activity.  This would be in addition to the regular Approver role.