Build better products with our product team
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable the ability to add custom fields to the Content Fragment GraphQL schema via code, SlingDataFetcher, or programmatic means, without requiring changes to the Content Fragment Model definition in AEM. Use-case: Developers and integrators need to expose computed, derived, or integration-specific fields in the Content Fragment GraphQL API for headless delivery, without modifying the underlying Content Fragment Model. Current/Experienced Behavior: The Content Fragment GraphQL schema is auto-generated from the Content Fragment Model and system fields. It is not possible to add custom fields via code, SlingDataFetcher, or other programmatic approaches. Business Impact Limits flexibility for headless integrations, increases maintenance overhead, and requires model changes for every new field, which may not be feasible or desirable in large organizations or for computed/integration fields. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to programmatically extend the Content Fragment GraphQL schema with custom fields (e.g., via SlingDataFetcher or similar mechanism), allowing dynamic, computed, or integration fields to be exposed without model changes. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 LTS; Content Fragment Models and GraphQL API; persisted queries; endpoints as described above. Customer-name/Organization name: JPMorgan Chase Code package (if applicable): https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/how-to-expose-a-custom-resolver-field-in-content-fragments-for/m-p/776485 . I have added the code here
Currently, report prompts are only available at the individual report level. There are many times when team members have wanted to change the filtering/report prompts across all the reports in the dashboard. Adding this feature would be huge. Otherwise, team members are stuck updating the report prompt for each individual report within the dashboard and it is too time consuming to do so.
1) Dimension Value Highlight Visualization DescriptionIt would be great to have a new visualization in Adobe Analytics / Customer Journey Analytics that highlights dimension values. For example, showing which product has the highest conversion rate or which page is the most viewed. The visualization would be similar to a Summary Number or Summary Change, but focused on what rather than how much. Why is this feature important?Currently, summary visualizations are excellent for showcasing key metrics, but they don’t emphasize the specific dimension value driving those results. Having a way to visually highlight the top-performing dimension item would make dashboards more insightful and storytelling more effective. How would you like the feature to work?Users could select a metric and a dimension, and the visualization would automatically display the top (or bottom) dimension value according to the chosen metric. Ideally, it would also support conditional formatting (e.g., color-coding by performance) and allow display of secondary metrics for context. Current BehaviourFreeform tables are useful, but not quite visual. Additionally, there are limitations to create something a bit custom.2) Sentiment Analysis–Style VisualizationDescriptionAnother interesting visualization could be one inspired by Sentiment Analysis — designed to highlight dimension values in relation to a specific metric. It would resemble a scatter plot but use text labels instead of points, making it easier to identify and interpret key drivers at a glance. Why is this feature important?This would provide an intuitive way to analyze performance or perception differences among dimension values (e.g., campaigns, products, or pages) in a single, visually engaging chart. It’s especially useful for understanding “how each dimension feels” relative to a metric. How would you like the feature to workThe visualization could plot dimension values (as text) along two axes — for example, performance vs. volume — and apply color or font size to indicate sentiment, change, or relative importance (or even font size). Hovering over text could show detailed metrics or trends.
We recently found some of our users who have the Workfront App installed within Slack were not able to get any of the backslash Workfront commands to Work. Here are the process steps to solve that problem. Current experience league information advises the user to uninstall the app. What we found to work for us was to revoke their access to the Workfront app within slack. Here are the process steps we followed. Go to slack, under “Apps” click on the “more actions” (go to the right side of the bar, you will see three vertical dots)Select “Manage”Select “Browse apps”In the search bar enter WorkfrontIn the search results select “Adobe Workfront” (it is the second choice)Click on the three vertical dots that appear next to the field labeled ‘VIP’ Select ‘configuration’Enter ‘Workfront in the search bar’, then select ‘Adobe Workfront’Click on ‘Configuration’ Click on “Revoke” Completely close out of Slack Re-open slack and enter any of the standard commands such as /wf help
Our team depends on knowing the priority of a task to know which task to complete first. We use the task priority field to indicate if a task has a hard, soft or urgent deadline. That priority needs to be visible as a column in the My Tasks widget.
In previous "Home" versions, there was this amazing option to undo if you hit "work on it". We send tasks back to "work requests" a lot because priorities shifted and they because "not ready to start" again. It would be so amazing if this came back!We keep having to completely wipe off assignments to force it back. Used to be so quick 😞
We need some sort of warning flag/indicator when a resource is on PTO.When a resource is tagged on a task for a date that is marked as PTO, there needs to be a flag/indicator.When another resources tags a resource in an update/comment when that person is marked PTO, there needs to be a flag/indicator.The fact that workfront does not have that continues to be a major problem for all.You cannot expect someone to check the calendar each and every time. yes we have the ability to auto-assign via Fusion. we do get a warning comment/update but not all of our assignments happen through Fusion. Sometimes we manually assign. Or tasks in current projects are delayed therefore tasks need to be pushed out. And project managers or other resources may tag an assigned resource with information or needing information, we need a flag/indicator that the person is out. It is a CONSTANT MISS in Workfront without this indicator. IT IS A COMPLETELY FAIL ON WORKFRONT as a project management tool.
If you have a Conversational Flow with a Meeting Booking, and set info capture to "Skip if value is already in database", the meeting confirmation email does skip these fields as well. That's not a great experience. If the value is skipped, because it already exists in the database, the confirmation email should grab that value from the database. Otherwise the sales person that takes the meeting doesn't get that information. Here's the confirmation email for a new person that doesn't skip values: And here's the same confirmation for a person that is already known in Marketo:Sales Person wouldn't know First, Last, Country and Company Name.
Description - When kicking off a Universal Approval (document approval) we need the ability to add a message prior to sending to the reviewers. Proofing workflow has this ability. Why is this feature important to you - It's consistent for both Workfront owners and reviewers/approvers as they experience in Proofing workflow.How would you like the feature to work - After choosing my reviewers/approvers, I'd like to type in a message that will appear in the notification they receive.Current Behaviour - I have to add a message in the "Updates" feature which then disconnects from the review/approval notification. Leads to confusion and multiple notifications on the same document.
Description:It would be highly beneficial to display the size of an individual profile directly within the Profile Viewer in Adobe Experience Platform (AEP). Why is this feature important?Currently, while we can view various attributes and audience memberships in the UI, there is no visibility into the actual size of a profile. Having this information readily available would help us better understand data volume, optimize storage, and troubleshoot performance issues more effectively. How would you like the feature to work?Within the Profile Viewer, alongside existing profile attributes, display the total size (in KB/MB) of the profile. This could be shown as a summary metric or as part of the metadata section. Current Behavior:There is currently no way to determine the size of an individual profile through the UI, which limits visibility into data usage at the profile level.
Descripción - Me and my colleagues are using the set auto_to_json function a ton while querying, partially it is because it only works for a single session. Therefor, one day, I thought that it would be a low effort hight reward implementation inside the query service UI. This function might be implemented at an account level or just by adding a little toggle inside next to the "copy" or "undo text" functionalities. Something like this: I am really sorry for my drawing skills, as you might have already figured out, I am not an artist haha.
I've had this request from our sales team. They would like to be able to view leads who have visited specific pages and/or content on our website. While I can set this up as an Interesting Moment its still only showing at the person or account level. They want a view where they can filter by using a URL on from our website and see a list of their leads have viewed that content.
User field "reason" should be editable.Since Marketo migrated to Admin Console, this field is no longer available. It used to be available on creating a New user in Marketo, but it isn't available when creating a user in Admin Console.It was always annoying that it couldn't be edited after creation.With a large instance, and almost 100 users, this field is important for managing who is who in the zoo.
Often time there are small steps/items that need to be remembered for a particular task. It's too granular to be it's own task, but it would be helpful for the user/resource to be able to add a checklist/to-do list to their own task and for a checklist to be added to templates. For example, an article creation task may have the following to-dos: Update editorial calendar - Takes less than 5 minutesCreate writing assignment - Takes 15 minutesSend writing assignment - Takes less than 5 minutes Writing assignment accepted - Just a reminder to check in Hopefully you get the idea.
Description - Particularly Billing Record fields should be reportable Why is this feature important to you - currently when a billing record contains billable hours, expenses, and tasks, there is no way to report on the breakdown totals. These fields show on the billing record itself adding up all the hours, expenses, or tasks, but you have to open each billing record to find them and cannot report on all billing records and their respective totals. How would you like the feature to work - allow the below fields to pull into a report of Billing Records Current Behavior - These fields from a Billing Record are not reportable: Billable Hours Billable Expenses Billable Revenues We are currently relying on Fusion to fill in custom fields with these totals so they can be reported on.
When editing any email in the new email designer, Edit Email Content>AI assistant (option on the right bar)>Text settings>Language. The only language option in which the text can be generated is English. There should be support for multiple languages like, German, Polish, French, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Portuguese, etc.
We have received confirmation from Adobe Support that when importing customer attribute data from non-Adobe CDP sources using the Adobe Target Bulk Profile Update API (v2), although the data is transferred in array format, Adobe Target can only process it as ‘single-value strings’.If array format can be received, should it not then be possible to handle it as an array within Target?This would be significantly more convenient when creating audiences, so we would very much appreciate your consideration of this matter. test
It would be great to be able to have multiple dimension columns rather than having the information stacked. Currently whenever you breakdown dimensions it stacks this on a line by line basis which makes it harder to analyse and also looks messy for the end user.Example below
DescriptionCurrently, Adobe Analytics 1.4 API provides several powerful endpoints that allow administrators to manage report suite configurations programmatically. These include the ability to:Fetch and update eVars, props, events, and classifications.Retrieve configured processing rules for a given report suite.Adobe has announced that the 1.4 API will be deprecated in favor of the 2.0 API next year. However, these configuration-level features are not yet available in the 2.0 API. Once 1.4 is removed, these critical capabilities will be lost.For many enterprise-scale implementations, this functionality is not just convenient — it is essential. Proposed ideaExtend Adobe Analytics 2.0 API to include endpoints for:Variable Management: Create, update, and fetch eVars, props, events, and classifications at the report suite level.Processing Rules: Fetch and (if possible) update processing rules for a given report suite.Cross-Suite Comparison: Provide efficient ways to compare variable configurations between report suites via API.This would ensure continuity for projects currently relying on 1.4, while aligning with the modernized API framework. Benefits / Use CasesScalability: Easily update or configure variables across multiple report suites in bulk instead of relying solely on the UI.Transparency: Retrieve all processing rules in one call, making it much easier to audit mapping when there are 100+ rules.Consistency: Compare variable configurations across report suites to ensure alignment in enterprise environments.Efficiency: Save time and reduce manual effort by automating repetitive admin tasks.Call to ActionPlease consider adding these configuration endpoints to the 2.0 API roadmap to avoid losing critical functionality when 1.4 is deprecated. This would greatly benefit customers managing multiple report suites and complex implementations.
Description - I just made an error in my custom form that has layers and layers of display logic. I am trying to create a report to pull the fields I need to fix, but my report is massive since there are so many IF THIS THEN THAT scenarios. Can you create an option to disable display logic for reporting? Why is this feature important to you - This feature would save me/others a tremendous amount of time and help us rectify issues quickly. How would you like the feature to work - Could you include this in the report settings as a check box? Current Behaviour - This feature does not exist. Mistakes happen and the display logic makes it very hard to correct errors.
Description - Allow the versioning of or the replacement of documents that are in a folder in a Workfront project that is linked to AEM Assets. Why is this feature important to you -Our marketing teams use Workfront to route their materials for review and approval. There are situations where minor changes are needed to be made to documents after that are approved and moved into a folder in their Workfront project that is linked to AEM Assets. These changes are typically made by external agency partners and loaded into Workfront for review and approval routing by those agencies. Once the changes are approved, the marketers must move those changed files into the linked folder, either replacing or creating a version of what’s there. Today this functionality does not exist. The Marketer must use the following workaround:Download the document(s) from Workfront.Upload or drag/drop the document(s) into AEM Assets - they either replace what’s there or create version(s).To avoid duplicate documents, delete the document(s) from the Download location.This creates extra unnecessary steps and also creates the potential for duplicate documents if the user forgets to delete the document(s) from the download location, impacting our single source of truth. How would you like the feature to work -The users would like to drag one or more documents (that have the same names as what’s already present in the linked folder), from one folder in their Workfront project into the project's linked folder. They should get a message, like in AEM Assets, to either replace the document(s) in the folder or create version(s). Current Behavior - Once documents have been moved into the linked folders in a Workfront project, users are no longer able to edit, delete, replace, version, or move those documents.
We'd like to have a default "Cancelled" task status (as opposed to using the Complete status with a "Cancelled" label). We don't want cancelled tasks to affect the Actual Completion Date or other project calculations.
Experiencing an issue while creating new event channels in Marketo—specifically, the dropdown under System Mappings isn’t allowing us to input additional values.Need to link the defined Statuses under the Channel with the appropriate System Mappings.
Description - Since the search functionality updates in May 2025, we find the "basic search" feature in Workfront confusing and not useful. It has some serious limitations basically causing it to not display accurate results which leads to confusion. Why is this feature important to you - at this point I've directed my users to pin the "advanced" search page and use that instead, which feels clunky and confusing compared to just being able to use the search bar as one would expect. How would you like the feature to work -When I type in the search bar, recent items are suggested to me (working today well)If I don't immediately see what I'm looking for, I'll click "search" and then I would expect it to flow into the "advanced search" page from there where I could drill down as needed.Basically, go back to before May 😉 feel free to enhance search with AI so it makes smarter suggestions, but having both basic and advanced search feels unneeded from my chair.Current Behaviour -Basic search doesn't display the results I'm looking for..When I enter a keywordWhen I enter the exact name of somethingEven if it is something I've interacted with
When I go to Workfront "Recents", the clock icon in the toolbar at the top right, I want the dropdown list in the "DOCUMENTS" section to open the actual proof instead of going to the "DOCUMENT > Overview" page. I see no benefit to opening the "Overview" page.I use "Recents" to reopen my current WIP proofs. The proof should be one click away not 2 clicks away. It is not a good user experience to first open to the "Overview" page. It would be better to open the actual WF proof.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
