Build better products with our product team
Please correct sentence to: "You replied to _____"
Description - In the templates creator, with the Gant chart screen, allow the ability to drag and move dependencies and constraints in the chart.Why is this feature important to you - Visual is easier than drop down menus and "choices" of Start no later than... Latest Available Time...Fixed Time... etcHow would you like the feature to work - Use right clicks to bring up a menu to add different arrows to indicate constraints. Drag and drop Task "icons" along chart to indicate start and stop days/hours.
Apologies in advance for submitting this as a new idea as there may already be an idea similar to this one: https://one.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000PSGvAAO. My goal is to expand on what's been proposed and suggest a UI element that could to introduced to control how this feature works.Currently, when a project is pending approval, it is locked so no updates can be made: tasks or items cannot be added, new comments cannot be made by users via the Updates area, custom data cannot be updated, etc. Although this generally makes sense from a compliance perspective (as a way to prevent users from "sneaking in" changes), there's a case to be made that certain folks should still be able to post certain updates and edit certain project data without having to restart the entire approval process. It's tempting to say that one should just "kick" the project record out from the approval process by adjusting the status, make the edits, and re-initiate approvals, however, it certain instances it's simply more trouble than it's worth, especially when an approval process has multiple stages with at least one [or more] of them involving senior leadership.Additionally, there may be automation processes that attempt to make certain functional updates to project records only to encounter roadblocks caused by these records being locked by a pending approval status. Thus, my suggestion for an enhancement would be to implement an extra permission for folks with Manage access to the project that would allow them to make edits during the approval process (see image). When non-system admin users with Manage access attempt to make an edit to a project that's pending approval, they should be given a warning message popup to help them understand that it's not recommended.Users with System Administrator access should always be able to edit a project when it's pending approval; this would allow system accounts / automations to perform project update actions on the background (regardless of the fact that there may be an active approval pending). Thank you!
We would like the capability to expand the column width for the Project name in scenario planner. This would help to identify which project have been imported into a scenario and which ones have not. Currently the column is locked and there is no hover functionality on the name. The only way to understand the full name is to click into the project itself.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - 1. Would directly help our team members working on copied requests identify queue path. 2. Would directly impact queue, queue topic, request reporting.How would you like the feature to work - When a user copies an existing request the request path should populate with the original request path details. Current Behaviour - Currently copied requests display "N/A" in the Request Path.
ページの滞在時間などの経過時間を項目に値として格納したい場合に、00:00:00の形式ではテキストでの格納となってしまうが「:」を省き000000の形式であれば整数型で格納が可能になる。 そのためスマートリストで「指定の値より大きい 010100」とすると「010101」以上の値を持つリードが抽出される。
For our instance, we are looking to implement two different chatbots for our two brands. Currently in my dynamic chat settings, I can upload a single-color theme, logo(icon) and Privacy policy link. However, for both our brands the color theme, logos and Privacy policies are different. Could you help with a way to set up two properties/bots/workspaces in our instance? We have been using Dynamic Chat for 2 months and are extremely impressed by the initial numbers. We want to now migrate our other bots to Dynamic Chat as well. We have a strong buy-in from our leadership to show success with this platform for both the brands.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - we currently review ad copy spreadsheets that are very long in width, but readability is limited with the 400% zoom. We don't want to change the spreadsheet to accomodate Workfront's proofing tool. Instead, we take the review out of Workfront proof if the reviewers can't zoom into the copy large enough for readabilityHow would you like the feature to work - unlimited zoom. The file itself can be the limit to how far we can zoom in, but text based files shouldn't have any real limitCurrent Behaviour - The copy is too small to read on some long spreadsheets at 400% zoom.
By default, all dimensions are included when using Attribution IQ in Adobe Workspace. This includes the Date dimensions. However, I would like there to be an option to disable the modelling for the Date dimensions. This is because the current behaviour when adding a Date dimension (e.g. day) to a metric with a First Touch model is that conversions are attributed to the first day within the lookback window that a touchpoint occurred. For example, if my organisation uses a first touch attribution model, and I want to show the daily trend for conversions attributed to the Organic Search channel in the past week, then I cannot do this. Instead, they are plotted in the previous 37 days (depending on when the first touch for the channel occurred. I believe a visualisation which plotted the success events on the day they occurred, whilst still using a First Touch model, would be more inutitive.
Why is this feature important to you To combine offline geo data with online website behavioure.g we could create calculated metrics such as “Visits per populus” or “Registrations per populus” for each country/region/city and view this in Adobe Analytics. How would you like the feature to work -Country, City, Region to be added to the list of dimensions supported by Adobe data sources. Current BehaviourThese dimensions are not supported by Adobe data sources NB - Using Geo Zip to populate the Zip Code dimension leads to the collection of personal data in the UK so could not be used to satisfy this use case.
Why is this feature important to you? I want to have a geo variable for UK users that can be classified and also used in data sources. This will allow us to combine our offline geographic segments with onsite behavioural data. It will also enable us to create calculated metrics such as "registration per local authority" so that we can analyse regional performance in Adobe Analytics. Using Geo Zip to populate the Zip Code dimension does satisfy these requirement except that it captures full UK postcode (e.g. HP22 5UY). This is considered personal information because some postcodes contain only one address. We do not want to to collect and store this information as it may contravene the Data Protection Act 2018. However, if the last two characters were removed such that we only captured "4 digit" postcodes (aka Postal Sector, e.g. "HP22 5"), then these are sufficiently anonymous. How would you like the feature to work?An additional option in Report Suite Settings > General Account Settings.If the Zip Option is set to "use geo", then provide an additional configuration for UK postcodes ( 1. Use Full Postcode, 2. Remove Last Character, 3. Remove Last Two Characters, 4. Remove Last Three Characters).Current Behaviour?If a Geo Zip setting is enabled in Zip settings, then the Zip Code dimension is populated with a Full Postcode. Other NotesNB - I have considered the argument that because the postcode data is captured via IP address that it is too inaccurate to truly be personal data (insofar that you're not actually capturing someone's postcode but the nearest ping tower - or whatever Safari has produce). But I do not feel this would cover us in all situations. Separately, some of our use cases could be met if this other feature was implemented instead but on the other hand the idea was first raised 10 years ago (!)https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-ideas/out-of-the-box-reports-should-have-the-capability-of-being/idi-p/338900
Within the New Workfront Experience (NWE), the Description field under Teams is extremely small and causes issues with those who use that field to add long hyperlinks for users to click on. The UI of this is poor, it should be a more prominent, much larger field.Steps to Duplicate:1. Log into workfront classic 2. Navigate to a team and edit the teams description 3. Grab any link and paste the URL in the description 4. Stop editing and view the description 5. Notice how big a field description is, how it's obvious to the user6. Switch to NWE and navigate to the same team description7. Notice the hyperlinks are there but the area for this field is extremely small and you have to scroll down to see the full description.
Please make the carrot next to the column name BIGGER. We are constantly try to collapse all but click the column name instead! In most cases this is the task name column and then the tasks get sorted alphabetically when we want them collapsed!
Business Need: Blueprints is great. Love it. But I don't want all of my Workers and Planners trying to shake up our business and creating unnecessary work for our System AdminsCurrent State: Blueprints shows up on the lower bar of the main menu (non-layout template manipulated)Desired Functionality: Blueprint should either be able to be added or removed like most features via layout templates or have a toggle that admins can manage to remove it or add it via layout templates.
Our teams are loving the pin feature however are pinning multiple pins within the same category which results in what looks like duplicative pins thus, clicking into each pin and defeating the purpose of the pin naming. It would be ideal to allow for a renaming or nickname of the pin as part of the pinning feature.
It would be great if I could assign multiple teams to the same task. Currently, I allow my supervisors (resource managers) for their own teams chose who in their team is assigned a task, or someone in that team can take ownership of a task. I have tasks that require input from multiple teams, but I can't assign more than one team to the same task, so for those tasks it's not "business as usual", and I can't allow all the resource managers to chose whom to assign to a task...
How difficult would it be to enable the system to calculate availability using a User's schedule and factor in a User's FTE? Current resource management functionality only factors in FTE when calculating availability if 'The Default Schedule' is selected. This setting is configured via Setup / Resource Management.To account for General Admin time, we set User FTE to .7 which reduces their availability by 30%. When majority of our users were US based and we had a single schedule to account for US/company holidays, availability was calculated by using the "Default Schedule" and factored in the .7 FTE setting assigned to our users.Over time, we've onboarded Global users in Latin America, Canada, India, EMEA, and Asia Pacific. Due to each region having country/area specific holidays, we created multiple region specific schedules.Unfortunately, when setup is changed to calculate availability using the 'User's Schedule,' it no longer factors in User FTE into the calculation. This is problematic because we can no longer easily take 30% off each users availability. The workaround would be to create a General Admin project, add all users to the schedule and then create 30% artificial demand.
Description - Please change the Proof desktop viewer so that it stops trying to update itself. Why is this feature important to you - Our company IT has barred us from being able to install apps on our laptops and everything must go through the Software Center. If for any reason we're able to successfully install the app, IT also has Symantec Endpoint Protection set up to bar the app from successfully running. How would you like the feature to work - We would like the app to stop trying to install itself. We'd also like a heads up from the Proof team whenever the app is updated. Current Behaviour - Every time the desktop Proof viewer is closed, the last act from the application is to check to see if there is a new version, and if there is, it tries to install it. If it successfully installs, the symantec endpoint protection stops the app from running. Our users assume that the app doesn't work, and this causes poor user adoption.
Description - SharePoint integration - incomplete results when searching for applicable SharePoint site Why is this feature important to you - SAIF uses SharePoint throughout many of it's workflows, and this is a hinderance as we cannot find the SharePoint site we need quickly How would you like the feature to work - We'd like the results to not be phantom results, and we'd like to see more than 100 results when searched. Current Behaviour - When we search for the SharePoint site that we need to access, while inside the SharePoint functionality within "docs" in a project - and search for the SharePoint site we need, multiple results are returned, and it appears some of those results are "phantom". Note: this is captured in this open idea as well: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-ideas/improve-sharepoint-graph-api-experience/idi-p/557242 Detailed Description The “Graph API” was recently updated from the previous legacy SharePoint integration. (An update in Workfront) Following the update, a piece of functionality in Workfront was impacted: the ability to search for files or folders in Workfront, but searching in SharePoint. It returns only 100 results (despite having potentially 1000s of results); when those results are returned, it points to “phantom” files that do not exist. For example, a search for “Adobe” rendered 3 results – the results are the exact match of the search term. In this example, 2 of the 3 results are empty – only one folder has data. The Workfront ticket, #344237 describes this issue we are seeing at SAIF. This same ticket also has an additional failure: when SAIF peoples are moving files and folders (inside of Workfront) to different SharePoint folder, or if the file has it’s named changed, then the Workfront metadata is lost for that file. This represents a substantive impact to our users’ workflows.
Using AEM along with Translation project to send pages/assets for translation, We can configure Translation rules to exclude/Include paths with /content/dam/ path allowed. Ex:- My DAM structure is "/content/dam/XYZ/global", "/content/dam/XYZ/us", "/content/dam/XYZ/uk" "/content/dam/XYZ/de" etc.. I have image component which will be used by authors in different sections of the page and browse images from the above paths. Here I want to exclude images from "/content/dam/XYZ/global" but take images from other locales for translation while they submit pages for translation. I have posted similar question earlier to questions section and was asked to submit the "support ticket", hope this is the right place to submit this. https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/skip-assets-from-asset-translation-job/qaq-p/377318
Description - Monthly we run capacity reports based on Planner in attempt to determine if we have enough in-house capacity for Creative job roles. No matter how we filter, we still see projects listed even if a job role isn't associated with the project.Why is this feature important to you - Without the ability to filter out these projects that aren't relevant to the job role, we run into the row limit outrageously fast. Ultimately we're stuck with exporting over a dozen permutations of our filters each time we want to run our capacity planning protocol. I confirmed with Support that there is no good filter to ignore rows of 0s.How would you like the feature to work - Offer a toggle switch to include/exclude rows of 0 data.Current Behaviour - After exporting data to Excel, we have to manually exclude rows of 0 planned hours.
Description - When creating/ updating a custom form, it would be great if it was possible to be able to change a field type (for instance, from a Drop-down field to a Checkbox or Radio Button field). This would be so helpful because you wouldn't have to reenter all the information again and rebuild all the logic/ loig dependencies that might be associated with the fieldWhy is this feature important to you - Time saver, wouldn't have to duplicate work, allow for custom forms/ custom fields to be more easily updated How would you like the feature to work - Ability to change type of custom field to another type without have to reenter data and reset logicCurrent Behavior - Currently, when you change a field type you have to start from scratch and rebuild the entire field and reenter all the logic associated with that custom field
In some instances, work from a timeline task on a project with a default schedule set to exclude weekends shows up in WLB with time assigned to over the weekend. This causes a discrepancy between the project schedule and the WLB resourcing. I understand that for some reason this is intentionally set up this way, but there should then at least be a setting in the WLB to exclude scheduling work over the weekend.
Description: Would like to be able to take a card on a board and convert into a project similar to the way we convert a request to a project with a template. It seems like this would have already been a feature.Why is this feature important to you - Create efficiencies and decrease manual processes. How would you like the feature to work - The same way a request gets converted into a project. Current Behavior - If there is a card on a board and it is determined it should be its own project, you have to manually create a project and then close the card. @suzyf @rudyha1 @hollyse @annapu
In a Workfront Kanban board, the API calls for 50 items to be displayed when the board loads. In order for more items to display, a person needs to select "Show more work items" each time that the page is reloaded. I would like the API to call for a higher number of items (potentially 100) each time the board loads. This will help team members using the board from needing to click "Show more items" each time the board loads.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
