Build better products with our product team
Description -Reporting on fields that have display and skip logic in custom forms would be great functionality for system admins. When managing and updating custom forms it can be a challenge to Identify all of the logic that might also need to be reviewed and revised. Currently the only way to review display and skip logic is by color coding in fields that can be time consuming and easy to miss with custom forms that have many fields.
Colour Management : It would be a massive advantage to be able to view and check proofs with a view to printing requirements.For example: Check CMYK colour separations, cutter key overprints and check 4 colour blacks (registration). This is a important part of the checking and approval procedure before printing literature.The feature could work the same as the print production view in Acrobat.Really interested in your alternative solutions.
Description - When using Workfront's "Workfront Proof" (Proofing Tool) to open up Proof Links, users have to put in their email id and password as well as validate their identity with their mobile device via text or call, every time they open a proof. This request is to prevent the validation for every proof that is opened or once it's validated, it doesn't need to be validated again.Why is this feature important to you - This feature will help the users to complete their tasks as fast as possible and would not be time consuming.How would you like the feature to work - When the users open a proof and they are asked to enter their email id and password and also, validate their identity and they click on "Don't ask again for 90 days", it should save their details so that they do not need enter their details again when they re-open the same proof.Current Behaviour - As per the current behaviour, the users have to put in their email id and password as well as validate their identity with their mobile device via text or call, every time they open a proof which is a time consuming process.
Description -We are requesting an enhancement in adobe workfront proofing tool. When proofing, the user should be able to hover over a link and workfront should display a popup of the linkWhy is this feature important to you - this feature will reduce steps and effort as the enterprise continue to adopt workfront for email proofs How would you like the feature to work - While proofing in workfront- user can Hover on tracking code and pop up appears orClick on tracking code link and a pop up window appears with the destination location listed Current Behavior - User has to download proof and manually test links out side of workfront
We ran into issues with list imports the other day that was due to a cluster issue in the sydney datacenter where our instance is hosted. We had 4 lists that were "being imported" and never finished even after 4 days. This got me thinking, we have a Campaign Queue, why not have a List Import Queue/History... This could get cumbersome with how some of us use lists (campaign Triggering) but if it is either tabbed or categorized, based on the following it should be easy to filter and troubleshoot:Possible List Actions:List ImportAPI List ImportFlow: AdditionFlow: RemovalHere is a quick and rough mockup -- forgive any inconsistencies, I'm writing in stream of consciousness.StatusActionList Name(With List ID and Link)Program/Location Name (With Program/Location ID and Link)Start Day Date & TimeEnd Date & TimeView list of...In ProcessList ImportLI 10 -- Import to Program(LI124488)EVSP 2017-07 -- My Sponsored Event -- MKTO-SFDC (PG2430)7/11/2017 10:00:007/11/2017 10:03:00Leads ProcessedQueuedAPI List ImportLI 10 -- Import to Program (LI12498)PROB 2017-07 -- My Promotional Outbound Lead Gen Program -- MKTO-SFDC (PG2410)7/10/2017 14:00:007/10/2017 14:05:00Leads ProcessedCompleteFlow: RemovalLI -- My Global Static List (LI1244)Lead Database (ML0)7/9/2017 15:05:007/9/2017 15:05:32Leads ProcessedCompleted With ErrorList ImportLI 10 -- Import to Program (LI124401)EGEB 2017 -- My Ebook Program -- MKTO-SFDC (PG2435)7/8/2017 08:00:007/8/2017 08:00:00Leads ProcessedLeads with ErrorsIn Process / StuckImport to ListLI 10 -- Import to Program (LI124307)EMOP 2017-07 -- Operational Email -- MKTO-SFDC (EBP435)7/7/2017 10:00:00AMLeads Processed to DateCompleteFlow: AdditionLI -- Static List (LI1244)Lead Database (ML0)7/6/2017 15:00:007/6/2017 15:01:32Leads ProcessedLastly, this type of view could be helpful for any asset, program, smartlist etc. Could be more widely applied.If this is already on your docket as part of an upcoming release mentioned at summit -- my bad, but I hope it helps Cheers,David
Please add the ability to make notes on logged time from the Home or My Work views. Currently, in order to make notes on logged hours, the user has to have admin access to Timesheets & hours. It's also an extra step for the user to have to click on the task, click on the Hours tab, and then log their time from there. It would be nice for the user to be able to make notes on time logged without having to navigate away from the Home or My Work pages.
Description - I think it would be helpful to have EPS files load in the proof tool. It would save us the time of exporting files to PDF and, as an Adobe product, I think it would help with integration between other design applications.Why is this feature important to you - workflow convenienceHow would you like the feature to work - I'd like to be able to view EPS files in the proof tool again.Current Behavior - EPS files not able to be viewed.
Description - While creating the proof, even the proof creator should receive the proof notification.Why is this feature important to you - With a personalized proof notification, the evidence maker will be verified.Current Behaviour - Once the proof is created, proof created won't receive the notification
Description - Since there are only limited possibilities to add a description to a field in the form builder, it would be helpful if it were possible to separate text from the actual label. for example Width (in mm).Why is this feature important to you - i am aware of the Instructions parameter, but this assumes that the user hovers over the corresponding icon.How would you like the feature to work - be able to enter bracketsCurrent Behaviour - brackets are not possible for label names
Description - Today, default Component Names in Customer Journey Analytics are based on the XDM display name of the field alone. However, that leads to potentially many components having the same name (1) while coming from very different paths in the Schema (2): This makes it hard to understand which, in this example, Type a component really is. To help this, CJA admins have to chose between two bad options: Leave the XDM Schema unchanged (using descriptive display names which only describe the current node) but having to manually change the component name in every connected Data View Changing the XDM Schema display name for all fields to include more information than actually required to avoid having to change many fields in CJA To help with this issue in CJA while keeping the XDM Schema clean, I propose to make the duplicate check smarter. Today, a number is added to the name to make the name unique. Ideally, in case of a duplicate component name, the display name of the field in question would be prefixed with the display name of the parent node, like the parent shown below: In this example, instead of showing up as "Type (3)", the component would be named "Web interaction Type" (field's display name prefixed with display name of parent node), possibly with a delimiter, like "Web interaction > Type". If that is not enough, more parent nodes could be added until the name is unique or the full tree has been traversed, in which case numbers could be used as a last resort. This small change would help users of CJA understand the context of a component, while making admin's lives easier.
When more than one user is assigned to a task, only the main assignee gets that task shown on their calendar. The secondary has no idea they are assigned. It doesn't show up on boards, calendars etc. Only in the WF project task list itself. Make it so both people can see the task if both of them need to work on it.
I have a big site with multiple of lines of business using a single report suite. And I am very efficient in how I create our processing rules. Nevertheless, the business size translates into a lot of processing rules within which are even more processing rules. I am the only one that creates the rules and I have a good memory. Still, remembering where a given rules is, or if it even exists can be a challenge. Currently I open all the rules (67 of them) then do a Ctrl-f and do a text search for the context variable, adobe variable, or rule name. It would be useful to have a less clunky way to search the processing rule list.This could be a simple as an expand all and collapse all link. Then folks can use a Ctrl-f to find the rule of interest.I have submitted a previous idea about being able to download the rule list. If this is done, one could text search the downloaded file.Or it could be a regular text search box that returns the rule number. In this case you would need to number both the rule and each rule element (The Then Do the Following items). Numbering each rule element would also be useful when working with others (such as adobe customer care) to point them to a specific rule.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable bulk tagging of pages that are Live Copies Use-case: The client is using MSM to keep thousands of pages in sync with Blueprints. The client wishes to group some Live Copies in Group A and some Live Copies in group B, the obvious grouping method is tagging. However, bulk tagging pages is not possible if the pages are Live Copies. Current/Experienced Behavior: Bulk tagging does not work on Live Copies Improved/Expected Behavior: Bulk tagging works on Live Copies Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM AMS 6.5.16 Customer-name/Organization name: Toyota Motor Europe Screenshot (if applicable): / Code package (if applicable): /
Currently, when logging into Adobe Analytics, the default landing page is "Reports", referring to the old Reports & Analysis interface.But given that Analysis Workspace is the go-to for reporting, the default landing page should be "Workspace".Please change the default landing page.
Ability to report on issues, tasks, and projects together in one report
Hi all, it is a standard functionality in many applications already, to display the last successful login data+time, during each users consecutive logins. For Adobe Analytics, it is only possible to see the last login date of each user in the admin logs right now. It would be great if we could display this information to the end-users directly during login.Users should be aware when the last login with their own account was performed, so that they can detect potential malicious activity immediately.Additionally, it would help if we could display/configure a custom login message together with the date+time information. I post this under Adobe Analytics, but generally this would be a great feature for the entire Experience Cloud. Cheers,Robin
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: This is a request to have a scroll bar added to the bottom of the AEM Guides editor repository. Use-case: Some of our DITA assets have long titles that go beyond the maximum width of the repository. When there are multiple search results with such long titles, an author would have to hover over each one until the needed asset is found (imagine having to go thru hundreds of assets!). Current/Experienced Behavior: Some of our DITA assets have long titles that go beyond the maximum width of the repository. When there are multiple search results with such long titles, an author would have to hover over each one until the needed asset is found Improved/Expected Behavior: With a horizontal scroll bar, the author will only need to scroll left or right to be able to see the search result titles in full. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.12. AEM Guide 4.1 Customer-name/Organization name: Verizon Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - A Source Connector for messaging queus Why is this feature important to you - Backend system uses AMQP for eventsHow would you like the feature to work - A Connector to enable consuming AMQP events, as an alternativt to the HTTP Streaming ConnectorCurrent Behaviour - No current support
Demande de résumé des améliorations des fonctionnalités (RFE) : There was a functionality on AEM 6.3 that allowed users to copy an asset or a page, then refresh the page (go to another folder by modifying the URL on the browser) and then paste the asset or page to the destination folder. This functionality has been removed on AEM 6.4 to avoid a copy/paste from a module to another one (Assets to Sites for example). But it should still be available when you stay on the same module : copy/paste an asset in the module Assets. Cas d’utilisation : Users used this functionality on 6.3 to avoid going through the whole folder hierarchy when they already know the destination path. It's time saving. Comportement actuel/expérimenté : Select an asset or a page Click on “Copy” In the same window, manually modify the browser URL to go to another folder to paste it Example : From : https://{localhost}/assets.html/content/dam/fr/2022/products/hr To : https://{localhost}/assets.html/content/dam/us/2022/products/hr The window will be refreshed and you’ll be located on the destination folder The button “Paste” is NOT present Comportement amélioré/attendu : Select an asset or a page Click on “Copy” In the same window, manually modify the browser URL to go to another folder to paste it Example : From : https://{localhost}/assets.html/content/dam/fr/2022/products/hr To : https://{localhost}/assets.html/content/dam/us/2022/products/hr The window will be refreshed and you’ll be located on the destination folder The button “Paste” is present Click on “Paste The asset has been pasted Informations sur l’environnement (version d’AEM / service pack, et autres informations spécifiques si applicables) : AEM 6.5.12 Nom du client/de l’organisation : Sephora Copie d’écran (si applicable) : Package de code (si applicable) :
Description - A slider/setting in Recommendations criteria to tune how much the algorithm should explore items in the catalog.Why is this feature important to you - Our use case is to show some random/less relevant items in a set of User-based recommendations so the they're not overoptimised to what the user has previously browsed e.g. if user only or mostly views pages tagged "Educate me", they can be recommended a few pages tagged "Divert me" or "Inspire me" too (different values of the same attribute/field).It would also help adoption of Target within the business. Assuring Editorial and Product stakeholders that recommendations are not solely decided by an algorithm so less relevant but still important pages can be recommended would help alleviate concern that recommendations are overoptimised (we are a content/media website).How would you like the feature to work - In the Criteria screen, a slider similar to Attribute Weighting between 0% and 100% or 0 and 1 like AWS Personalize's:Current Behaviour - Adobe Target doesn't have this feature but here is briefly how it work on AWS Personalize:AWS Personalize has a hyperparameter called explorationWeight you can configure to set how much the algorithm should explore the recs catalog. Effectively it adds some randomness into the recommendations so new or less relevant items are recommended, e.g. an explorationWeight of 0.3 would include 3 lesser viewed or less relevant items in a set of 10 recommendations. Adobe Target promotions and Attribute weighting are not really the same.AWS Personalize doco:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/personalize/latest/dg/native-recipe-new-item-USER_PERSONALIZATION.htmlhttps://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/amazon-personalize-can-now-create-up-to-50-better-recommendations-for-fast-changing-catalogs-of-new-products-and-fresh-content/
Description - Allow for calendar views to house the feature to easily adjust dates by dragging and dropping Why is this important to you- Allow for calendar views to house the feature to easily adjust dates - Our marketing teams use the calendar detailed view (report) + calendar view for channel planning. In the previous system they could easily look at only the calendar view and drag & drop the marketing tactics to easily adjust dates as needed and it would auto-adjust the dates in the detailed report/ view. This adds time to the process with WF vs the new system that enabled it. How would you like the feature to work - Enable the option to drag & drop to adjust dates on the calendar viewCurrent Behaviour - You cannot drag & drop/ adjust dates on a calendar view
Description - Across Workfront are typeahead fields that have limits on how many options they list. I confirmed with support that this is by design and occurs in various places across Workfront. For example, in the Project Overview, the Portfolio and Program fields show only the top 14 (approximately) options. In the case of portfolios and programs, I suspect many Workfront instances have more than 14 active portfolios or programs (or other objects that have a max list). There is no indication that other options exist and that a user can/must type to search for those options.Why is this feature important to you - Users are not always informed of the full breadth of options. If the option is not presented, they sometimes assume it doesn't exist and therefore choose something that isn't appropriate. In the case of Portfolios and Programs, I have project managers who aren't familiar with all the Portfolios we have, so they have to look elsewhere. Some project managers, though, might assume that the best option exists and therefore choose the next best fit. This "next best fit" can throw off our reporting and result in unnecessary housekeeping to bring our data back into alignment. I can't expect my project managers to memorize all our portfolios and campaigns, especially since the options change as our business priorities evolve. To help my projects managers work efficiently, I'd like to empower them with the information at the typeahead field instead of asking them to pause their flow to find the information they need to enter the data.How would you like the feature to work - Either increase the maximum that typeahead fields can present OR visually indicate that there are more options. For example, a "See all" button would open the area that lists all the items available to the user, which then informs them of what to search for in the field.Current Behaviour - Users may choose the wrong option, therefore placing an unnecessary burden on system administration to clean up the mistake. At best, users have to stop what they're doing to look up the options in another area of Workfront—if they have access.
We are heavy users of the Time-off Calendar in our Workfront instance but the time-off calendar has limitations and only shows the blocks of time but no option for additional text or notes. It would be beneficial to see some detail in the time-off calendar as our teammates spend time away but that time is not necessarily related to personal time-off nor is it related to a project task. The current design does not permit any additional information and a reportable notes field would be so very helpful.
Description - Add "otherTeamIDs" as Filter optionWhy is this feature important to you - Some of our reports need to be filtered to only show data from members who belong to a certain Team, which is not their home team. How would you like the feature to work - Similarly to the "otherGroupIDs" works; the only difference it would be for the Other Teams associated with a User's settings, rather than the Other Groups.Current Behaviour - Only "Home Team ID" is available as a filter in reporting, several attempts have been made via text mode but there's not an optimal solution. This new filter option would help solve for use cases like the one described below that I (currently) and AlDe (from 2018) are facing:"When attempting to create an hours report, there is no filter option to include only those who are assigned to a team, which may not be the home team. As a result, each individual name must be entered on the report as filter. In the future, if there are changes to employees roles, the filter on the report would need to be maintained. If an option for "Other Team" is available, the report would continue to pull appropriate results as individual account settings are updated." - AlDe, 2018 (Recreating this idea to keep it fresh and will request to merge the idea ordinally posted in 2017.)
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Strong and Em tags in multiline text in Content Fragments Use-case: editing multiline text in RTE components while meeting requirements for WCAG 2.0 Current/Experienced Behavior: b/i/u buttons create <b>,<i>,<u> tags which have no semantic meaning Improved/Expected Behavior: in order to convey meaning to users using assistive technology, we should be able to add <strong> and <em> instead of <b> and <i>. <u> on the other hand has little semantic value and will likely confuse users who will think it is a link. it should probably be removed or replaced with something with similar semantic meaning like the <mark> element Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.4-6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
