Build better products with our product team
It would great to be able to schedule when a trigger campaign should turn on and off.
Need the ability to send out Notifications to project teams via the Project Actions button for any given project. This is a must have. Need the ability to customize the Notification presentation (graphics and banner) to differentiate alerts, from warnings, from information, from actions required
Right now we don't have the ability to pin Boards to the top navigation area. We'd like to set up our layout templates for all of our users to show Boards as a pin on everybody's top navigation area. We plan to do a lot of our work using Boards, but can't pin it, currently.
Description - Chart color shouldn't repeat by default Why is this feature important to you - Colors repeating make the charts hard to understand for leaders who are just glancing at reporting. They aren't able to identify that the labels are different based key. They are high level individuals just looking for glaring inconsistencies or potential issues. They aren't necessarily reading each line item on a chart. How would you like the feature to work - Build more colors into the charting functionality. Right now it repeats through 8 colors even though there are 18 colors you can pick from by default to customize? Current Behaviour - Charts use the same 8 colors repeated.
Description - Proofs are automatically locking when a new version is uploaded - we do not want this to happen - all versions should remain unlocked so the proofers are able to toggle back and forth between versions.Why is this feature important to you - Manual work of unlocking versions is adding time for those who set up proofs and having to remember to do this is adding unnecessary nuance to an already administrative process for creative teams.How would you like the feature to work - Would like to be able to customize a setting to have new versions be locked or unlocked by default.Current Behaviour - Proofs are automatically locking when a new version is uploaded. Currently, those who set up proofs are needing to go manually unlock every version.
Description - Create a filter that lists what metrics/dimensions are available to use for an EventWhy is this feature important to you - We have lot of events in our data source and looking for a dimension that lists what are the metrics/dimensions available of that event. This way it will be easy for users to use the Tool and understand the data.How would you like the feature to work - We can have a dimension that list all the metricsCurrent Behavior - Right now users are looking manually to individual field
Description - More descriptive error messages that actually tell you specifically what failed, where, and how to resolve it. Why is this feature important to you - We use the kick-start feature several times a year to mass upload projects, tasks, etc.How would you like the feature to work - The error messages should be very descriptive and explain what is needed to correct the issue. Current Behaviour - Currently the error messages are very vague. The one good thing is that they tell you where it failed, which helps. But it if so often unclear why it failed or how to correct it. By far, the one area that gets me the most is anytime I try to upload text into a text field. It fails left and right and I don't know why. Sometimes doing something like changing a single character or copying and pasting the text again will resolve it. It seems very random, but it does not work.
There are many events in which having an unlimited amount of attendees could be a huge logistical problem. I'd love a way to cap the amount of attendees and automatically switch the landing page to a closed registration when registrations have hit its cap. Basically - "If list count = X, then show X landing page"This was also discussed in this thead:http://community.marketo.com/MarketoDiscussionDetail?id=90650000000PFSGAA4
Description - We copy and paste frequently used content from a word document into Updates, so wanting to know if we can create a template in the Updates area rather than having a separate word document.Why is this feature important to you - saves time, all detail maintained in one tool, no need for teams to remember who to @mention b/c the template will be set up accordinglyHow would you like the feature to work - admin sets up templates, users choose template based on title and add detail into updateCurrent Behaviour - We copy and paste frequently used content from a word document into Updates
The current workflow for 'un-archiving' an activity is to make an edit then save the activity.While this is fine, it's not very intuitive.It would be nice if there was an 'un-archive' button in the status options for an activity.
We used the Experience Cloud Debugger to asses the status of our implementation. Per this KB: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/homepage.html the last two versions of at.js are officially supported. Additionally we have made a business decision to stay on v1.7.1 as v2.0 is still overcoming growing pains. We don't like the fact that the audit shows that we aren't on the latest code version. Technically we are on the latest code version we just don't want to be on the bleeding edge of SPA with at.js v2.0 can the Experience Cloud Debugger be improved so that latest version of both the SPA and non SPA version of at.js come up as "Passed"at.js v1.7.1 fails:
Can you create automated notifications as reminders for users assigned to each approval stage for each of the approval paths. Currently this is slow and holding up the approval workflow - we hope the reminders can help speed things up! Many thanks, Jas
We can move documents between a few objects (issues, projects) but not projects, portfolios, or programs. This is useful when transitioning files from a specific project up to a portfolio or when creating a new program and migrating documents from a portfolio scope to a more limited program scope.
The new image elements are great as they enable to secure the way images are insterted in an email and how the image will be formatted CSS-wise.But then it is now impossible to set the image using a token. We can only use real images here:This idea is about having a 4th choice here, that would be a token.Would be great in conjunction with and this one -Greg
It would be good to have the possibility to use the information that is available in the Resource Planner for other types of reports. Having the users, their planned hours, actual hours and percentages available outside the planner will also allow us to put together reports with information that can be found in a custom form or in another section of Workfront. The information on the resource planner is useful but it is impossible to use it outside this section. This development will bring more flexibility and would help us in the weekly reviews we do with our teams. The user can either put together a report outside the planner using the information on the resource planner or can add custom fields to the users rows on the Resource planner. For example a comments field. Current Behaviour - The information in the Resouce planner can only be exported or viewed on this section or Workfront.
Description - Adding a customized report "widget" on the newly designed home screenWhy is this feature important to you - one page with all the information I needHow would you like the feature to work - Add a report widget that you have built that will appear on the home screen dashboardCurrent Behaviour - no report widget
Currently, the global form validation rules primarily focus on email address domains, ensuring the accuracy of email submissions. While this is crucial, I'd like to suggest consider expanding these rules to cover additional fields and criteria to enhance the data quality and overall user experience.
We would like the overall project status not only to reflect that the project is current, on hold, complete, etc. but we would like to tie the current task job assignment into the overall status of the project. For example, if one of our tasks is assigned to design to create version 2, our production management team would like to be able to see in their projects view that this project is current - with design (team or user). We have implemented a manual solution for this by creating customized statuses and manually updating the project each time a task is complete but this has become tedious. We know that the milestone view is able available but this does not give us the granular information we would like to capture. Thank you!
With New Work Experience and custom forms, checkbox seems to make it automatic to give an "ALL" option if there are more than 2 options for the field. We want to be able to not have the ALL option displayed at all as we find that users tick that box often when it is not what's needed.
Having a form performance report where completions could be viewed by day, week or month would be of great benefit to users that embed forms on their web pages vs. using Marketo landing pages. This would allow allow users to analyze form completions week-over-week, month-over-month or year-over-year without having to build smart lists for each time frame. It could also be used to see number of form completions over the course of the year by month.Furthermore, smart lists only report unique people that filled out the form within the defined time period, making it incredibly challenging to account for multiple submissions by the same person within that given time period. This report could have two option 1) to report by unique people that completed the form and attribute the most recent completion to its time frame or 2) to report total form completions.
Hello, Right now it is not possible, when uploading files in batch for a record dataset, to make a full sync that can remove older batches of the dataset to be fully replaced by a new batch. The old batches can be removed from the catalog, but not from the profile when working with record datasets. This is a problem when we work with sources that sends a full snapshot of the data, because records existing in old batches that are no longer in the recent snapshot are not deleted in AEP (think about AI models where the objective users affected by the algorithm may change) Thanks and kind regards
Description - It would be a great feature to be able to edit comments in the Updates section of WorkfrontWhy is this feature important to you - Sometimes, I'm so caught up on making the comment legible and comprehendable, that I delay the notification of an update.How would you like the feature to work - In the three-dotted menu on updates, there would be an option to edit the commentCurrent Behaviour - no edit feature available (at least at my role in Workfront)
Depending on how wide your browser window is, the legend in a line graph will appear above or to the left of the graph. The example above shows the issue where the legend above the graph dominates the presentation. Yes I can change the height of the graph to mitigate that issue. It would be nice to also be able to choose an option to display the legend above or on the left.
Description - I would like more customized functionality in the matrix view of a report. Examples would be sorting by something other than the first column or removing or changing Descriptive titles (example below). Why is this feature important to you - More flexibility in what and how we report on stuff. How would you like the feature to work - Allow options in the matrix settings to toggle things on or off to show, have the field names in the matrix match what we've renamed a column to be and for sorting have the matrix view sort the way the report is sorted. Current Behaviour - limited functionality to customize reporting based on needs.
Our leadership would like to be able to use Workfront to forecast hours, revenues, costs and profits by month. Reporting on the Assignments object does not give project owners, resource managers or leadership information about daily/weekly/monthly totals of upcoming work for users. Under People, the Teams and Scheduling tools do give daily totals for users, but the views cannot be manipulated like a report. Nor can these views give information about future revenue or cost. The solution is to create Assigned Hours as a reporting object. Necessary data fields would include user, task/issue/project, date, forecasted resource revenue, and forecasted resource cost. An Assigned Hours report would function just like an hours report, but would be future looking. The Assigned hours data already exists at the user, date level in the Scheduling and Teams tools, so adding the financial information and exposing as a reporting object are the next step to making the data more powerful. Assigned Hours reporting will enable date based forecasting for both revenues and costs by user, role, team, project, program, portfolio and company. Forecasting using this approach is critical for firms performing time and materials based projects.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
