Build better products with our product team
This idea is meant more as "guidance/something to think about," as I know MEUE is in the middle of development, and I want to ensure this detail is not missed. Today, when you use the Marketo UI, users are allowed to enter content into areas such as filters or flow steps despite there being practical limits on the amount of content Marketo itself can process. A common example of this would be filter criteria in Smart Lists--I've been asked many times over the years to pull lists of specific email addresses, and there are practical limits on the total length of text that can be listed inside a certain filter (roughly 2KB). Likewise, this also appears in other contexts--Send Alert seems to have a practical limit of 2KB' worth of email addresses, but the UI does not enforce this limit. This results in confusion when these steps fail or do not work as expected. As areas of Marketo Engage continue to be redesigned, can maxlength attributes be set on these sorts of input areas to reflect what the platform can handle accurately?
Hello, As a company we need to shift to begin using Contact Role Attribution instead of the standard Account based attribution. It would be very beneficial to have the ability to suppress BATs/Touchpoints based on Contact Role fields when we do so, but this is currently not possible. Please consider making this change. Thank you.
Would like to have a Wiki added to be able to take project meeting notes like you can in Microsoft Teams. This could be added to the left Navigation Bar where you find tasks, issues, etc. Then you can always click there and enter your project notes. Need to be able to add additional pages of notes so you can have a log from all your project meetings.Currently my team keeps all their project notes in OneNote or Teams and it would be great to have all work consolidated in Workfront and that includes Project meeting notes.
お問い合わせ用のフォームで、 備考欄を設けて「テキストエリア」で意見を複数行で書いてもらいたいときに PCだと可視行どおりに表示されるのですが、 スマホだと可視行を増やしても、すべて1行で表示されるようです。 1行だとなかなか自分が打った文章が見えにくいこと、 またヒントテキストもほぼ隠れてしまうため スマホでも、指定した可視行どおりにしていただけると とてもありがたいです。 ご検討ください。 よろしくお願いいたします。
Description - There are several reasons why Adobe will ignore a hit going to Adobe Analytics, although it is still billed to the client. I would like to see as a dimension and metric that mentions why it was ignored and a count. This way, we can use alerts to notify when there is a significant increase in ignored hits, indicating that something has gone wrong. For example, an ignored hit is when Analytics is received before Target as this is classified as incomplete data. Why is this feature important to you - We have had an impact in data quality due to hits being ignored when it included our campaign data. This is currently only available in the Data Feeds, which makes it harder to do trend analysis on this information. How would you like the feature to work - There will be a new dimension for "exclude hit reason" and a metric for "exclude hit instances" within Analysis Workspace. Could be a new template that is dragged on and shows the information if it makes it easier. Current Behaviour - Currently - this information is not made available in Adobe Analytics - only in Data Feeds where it is not very useful.
Description -create a set of APIs for managing Data Feeds and Data WarehouseWhy is this feature important to you - having API's would allow us to automate the resending of data when we find the need, such as a bad run, or a bad file received.How would you like the feature to work - create a set of API's that would allow the same features that exist to users in the Data Feed and Data Warehouse UI's, especially, getting a list of Data Feeds, getting a Data Feed's most recent export / status, rerunning a specific hour for a Data Feed, or re-running a specific day for a Data Warehouse extract.Current Behaviour - no API's exist
Description In our Adobe instance we have several systems connected to Adobe and each is represented as virtual report suite.We are using product profiles to set permissions for individual virtual report suites and user groups to share the project dashboards with the user groups. We want to roll out a delegated user management concept, so that for each application a specific user should be responsible to give other users access to the statistics of their application. This specific user is a user group admin and can add or remove other users. Unfortunately, it is only possible to add a user if the user has been added to another user group before / added to the organization. We have been informed that the responsible user must be an admin in the product profile to add new users to the user group/organization.BUT we cannot give them these product profile permissions as they will then be able to change the permissions of the product profile or add other virtual report suites to their product profile. => So from security point of view we cannot do this. My request would be that it is also possible for a user group admin to add a new user to the group. We are connected to our company user management system via Azure ID. So actually all the users exist already. Why is this feature important to youTo have a secured delegated user management process in place. How would you like the feature to workUser group admins should be able to add a new user to the user group / organization that exist already in the connected user management system. Current BehaviourOnly product admins can add new users from the connected user management system to the user group. But with this permission the user can do much more and assign additional permissions to the product profile. SO it is then an admin with more permissions than just permissions for the user management.
I would love to see the ability to search for a report either with a search or filter button (similar to the filter that we can use in Custom Forms). Right now I have built my own filter which I call "Name Contains', but I have to go in and modify the filter every time I am searching for a report. As a system admin - searching for existing reports in the list that generates would be useful so that I can reuse reports versus creating a new report that may already be out there and available.
Description - The option to use many Segments in AA or Filters in CJA at the same time in Analysis Workspace is amazing. Especially with the new Dynamic Dropdowns, users can easily dive deeper and deeper into their data sets and truly understand user behavior. However, adding more and more Segments during analysis or using many Filters usually leads to a picture like this, where many types of Segments are used together, creating clutter in the interface, confusion for users, and potential for errors when adding or removing Filters: To help with that, I want to propose a "Merge Segment" option for Panel filters in Analysis Workspace. Why is this feature important to you - To prevent confusion and friction through long lists of Components, Segments, and Filters, while allowing for new, sophisticated segmentation workflows. How would you like the feature to work - As part of the Filter row of a Panel, introduce a new button to merge currently applied Filters: Clicking this button does two things: It builds a merged Segment, containing all of the currently applied Segments It replaces all manually applied Segments with the merged one Currently applied Dropdown filters would remain untouched: Some research will certainly be needed to nail the exact user expectations, but a feature like this will be highly useful to allow novice users to create advanced Segments. Current Behaviour - Many things, much confusion
Description - Building and using Segments in AA and Filters in CJA can be a daunting task. While there are many options available already to build Segments and Filters, there is always at least one more step required to apply them. Because of this, I want to propose a new right-click action in Analysis Workspace that builds and applies Segments and Filters with only one click. Why is this feature important to you - When it comes to enabling non-technical users to conduct advanced analysis, every click counts and unclear functionality will create friction and lower adoption. While the process to create a Segment is quick already, having to find the Segment after its creation and dragging it to the right place in Workspace can be a point of friction. Having a one-click user flow would allow users to explore data more freely and continuously expand the depth of their analysis by adding more and more Segments and Filters to a Panel from within visualizations. How would you like the feature to work - In Freeform tables, highlighting and right-clicking on rows of a table would show two new options: "Use as table filter" and "Use as panel filter": Selecting "Use as table filter" would build the Segment and automatically apply it across all columns of the table, like this: Selecting "Use as panel filter" would also build the Segment, but apply it to the full Panel instead: The "Use as panel filter" option could also be applied in many other visualizations, like the Flow, Fallout, or Cohort table. This would allow users to build a sophisticated list of Panel filters without much work. Current Behaviour - Many clicks, much frustration
1) Please refer to the screenshot. In my project Kanban board, I have included two custom fields: 'Milestone Type' and 'Milestone'. While Milestone Type is editable, I noticed that the Milestone field is not. Can we have Milestone field editable too? This is important for us as we rely on milestones for reporting and work management. 2) Additionally, In the Kanban Board, I observed that parent tasks are included but there is no clear indicator to distinguish them from regular tasks. During my testing, this has led to instances where parent tasks are mistakenly moved to the complete column, only to be reverted back to the In Progress column because their child tasks are still incomplete. I kindly request the implementation of an indicator or visual cue to clearly identify parent tasks within the Kanban Board.
It's kind of crap that the minimum time for an A/B test to determine a winner is 4 hours. Imagine it's on Friday and you're trying to finish up something around noon. There's already a 15-minute forced lag to get the thing out, but now if you're A/B testing (which someone on your team could be adamant about), you're basically struggling to get the bulk of your email into people's mailboxes before 5. So maybe shorten that? Seems arbitrary anyway.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Option to exclude a page/child page under site from live copy/language copy Use-case: we can have site with 100 pages out of which client may like to exclude 10 pages from hosting in es/fr sites. Current/Experienced Behavior: As of today we dont have option to exclude some pages from rollout/livecopy/lang copy wizards, as client authors always rollout from parent site to create live site or lang copy Improved/Expected Behavior: We should have option to exclude a page from Live copy/Lang copy/Rollout wizard or at page properties level to get it excluded. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): All AEM environments Customer-name/Organization name: Everyone Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
We are using Adobe Analytics via Adobe Experience Platform implemented via Adobe Data Collection. We’ve turned on automated link tracking, but we could not find the download or exit URL in Adobe Analytics Workspace. We’ve contacted Adobe Support and tried to add this to the processing rules, but did not find a solution. It would be great if we could see URLs for link tracking in Workspace, as we had before via AppMeasurement. Some additional information: Image1: Download URL is not sent to Adobe Analytics. We can see it in the xdm object. Image2: web.webInteraction.URL is available in the schema. The variable is sent do Adobe Analytics as pev1, but this cannot be mapped.
Description - When you share a project in Analytics Workspace, you have the option to share a dashboard with "anyone", which also includes anonymous users without an Adobe account.Why is it important - It's a good security feature to not allow every anonymous user to see a dashboard by default.How should it work - If you open the dialogue to share a project with anyone, the checkbox to require the Experience Cloud login should be activated by default.Current behavior - If you open the dialogue to share a project with anyone, the checkbox to require the Experience Cloud login is deactivated.
Description - When I looked into what the Default Filter was doing, it turns out it's "All my Teams." This includes inactive Teams, which I confirmed with support that this is intentional. This idea makes a case that the default should be active only.Why is this feature important to you - Admins deactivate things for good reason, ultimately because we no longer need to use them. Especially as a filter that is offered universally, it can be confusing to users to see filters pull in data that no longer applies, which can affect adoption, compliance, and retention.How would you like the feature to work - Set the Default Filter in Workload Balancer to All my active Teams."Current Behaviour - The Default Filter includes all teams, including inactive. The workaround is to copy the Default Filter and apply the active limitation manually.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Avoid cyclic references of the experience fragments OR Show warning message of cyclic references of the experience fragments Use-case: Avoid cyclic references of the experience fragments to impact overall instance performance Current/Experienced Behavior: We had multiple critical situations on Production recently where a misconfiguration by author (causes Cyclic reference) started having huge impact on overall instance performance, taking almost 100% of CPU as well. Publishing the same page resulted in showing service outage exception (Referencetoodeep in the logs) page to the end user. Improved/Expected Behavior: If author configures cyclic reference of the experience fragment, there will be a warning message OR cyclic reference cannot be configured Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a could service & AEM Release: 2023.3.11382.20230315T073850Z Customer-name/Organization name: Vergölst GMBH (Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH) Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
It is not possible to set the Access Expires date back to 'Never' once it is set. We can only set the expiry to a future date (date value is valid until Dec 31, 2037). Would you please consider to display a warning message that 'Access Expires' date cannot be cleared when we try to delete the Access Expires date? https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/administration/users-and-roles/managing-marketo-users.html?lang=en == Steps to reproduce == 1. Move to 'Users & Roles' 2. Choose a test account 3. Set the date in 'Access Expires' (e.g. Dec 31, 2022) and save 4. Edit the same user and try to delete the value of 'Access Expires' 5. The same date is still displayed
Description - chronological order in the proof document Why is this feature important to you - It helps to review and correct the document in order.How would you like the feature to work - There should be an option to reorder the inside document in chronological order.Current Behaviour - showing the comment in chronological order
Description -Document comment notification is displayed as a group instead of an individual notification.Why is this feature important to you - It Helps to review the notification in a chain conversation.How would you like the feature to work - When users click on the Notification tab, they should be able to view all unseen notifications related to a single document in a group conversation, rather than individual notifications.Current Behaviour - If there are multiple notifications related to the same record, they are displayed as individual notifications for each entry.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Related case #E-000856273 Use-case: Editor has to select one image --> create live copy. Then select second image --> create live copy. As there is no option for multi live copy option, this process needs to be followed individually for all the assets that needs live copies. Current/Experienced Behavior: Separate live copy request for each and every image Improved/Expected Behavior: Editors need to create Live copies of mutiple images in one click. It should work similar to creating Live copy of an entire folder. (Select folder --> create live copy). This copies all images from the source folder and creates live copies of images in live copy folder. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Have the ability to monitor segment usage such that we can know impact of either deletions or modifications of segments. Why is this feature important to you - Allows a fast and quick way to manage segment usage and speed up QA of any segment changes How would you like the feature to work - Perhaps some extra column info in segment manager where once a link is clicked all impacted dashboards or scheduled reports are listed. Also notes if any segment is not used by either dashboard or scheduled report Current Behaviour - No way exists to day to do this
Description - Add a setting to custom fields that displays whether or not the field is being used in Fusion or in an API integration.Why is this feature important to you - In order to ensure the Fusion and API integrations are accurate, when making changes to custom fields it would be beneficial to know if an update is needed in Fusion and API integrations as well.How would you like the feature to work - We would like the feature to look at all Fusion scenarios and API integrations to search if the fields is being used or not and display that information in the custom field settings.Current Behaviour - Currently there is nothing within the custom field settings that lets us know if the field is used in Fusion or API integrations. It would be a manual and time consuming process to search everything for the field.
It would be great to have the ability to move hours from one project to another. Long story short, a new contract was signed which means that I should have created a new project in the system but didn't realize it, and now my team has to go back and fix their timesheets (they are paying the price of my mistake). It would be nice if I didn't have to bug them and could fix it myself.
Would be great to be able to format (Bold, Italics, etc) in Project Details since that section can be very long. Would like to call out (Bold) areas that are important.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
