Build better products with our product team
Why is this feature important to you - When fixed amount of a parent task is zero, it does not calculate planned revenue based on rolled up planned hours. How would you like the feature to work - The parent task should automatically sum all fixed amounts from child tasks. Current Behaviour - Fixed amount remains at zero until the user opens the tasks and manually enters the sum of all child fixed amounts.
This is a bit out there, but let me provide some context. Today, if you use Marketo Custom Objects, you can link two layers of objects--one that connects to the user record and one that can connect to that previous custom object. As a result, you can take advantage of certain connections between the two custom objects, such as referencing them in Smart Lists. I would like the ability to establish secondary connections to Marketo Activities to provide supplemental details like Marketo Custom Objects can. The main use case is to extend metadata on activities where this is relevant. Some examples might be: If a record has a Change Nurture Stream activity, have a secondary activity that can record the business reason why the stream changed and any nurture-specific scoring If a record is rejected by sales with a rejection reason field, append the rejection reason data to a Change Revenue Stage activity. If a record unsubscribes from email after a message, note in the activity that this send email activity resulted in a later unsubscribe. You'll notice in each example that these extensions come on top of standard Marketo activities--this isn't an issue with custom activities. However, without some way to hook into these existing activities, Marketo users are stuck duplicating system activities with custom ones with extended attributes.
Currently, there's no way to expand all operations within a Fusion module's execution bubble.It takes painstaking efforts when triaging an execution and I have a need to find an ID within a large number of operations on a module. It would save a ton of time to be able to auto-expand all operations within a module's execution, so then I can easily search (CMD+F) all operations for a specific ID.See attached screenshot.Cheers!
It would be great if there was a way to prioritize the programs/email to be sent to a customer when you set up the communication limit.
Making emails work consistently across clients is notoriously difficult, and one of the most popular platforms, Google App / GMail, only allows for inline CSS (CSS style rules embedded directly in each HTML element).This can be very difficult to maintain, especially if you have CSS rules for links and have non-technical people editing your emails who might just copy and paste into an editable filed, versus editing the link href and text values. This scenario and many others can disturb, change or remove your inline styles that exist as children of the marketo editable HTML nodes.The solution is to have the option to have Marketo automatically inline all CSS rules prior to any send. This could be a checkbox in the email settings for an email item.This is not difficult and infact I believe it already exists in other platforms. There are definitely working examples out there in the wild, so this should be pretty easy from an engineering standpoint. The UX work is drop dead simple -- just add a checkbox to settings.Here's one example from MailChimp:beaker.mailchimp.com/inline-cssHere's another example:premailer.dialect.ca/Here's another example in PHP:https://github.com/tijsverkoyen/CssToInlineStylesThis change would literally save us hours and hours of work each month, plus allow us to deliver a more consistent and high quality customer experience to our subscribers. Other enterprise email vendors already do this. Marketo, please prioritize this -- you seem to be behind the times in this department.
Description -Workfront provides functionality to compare static proofs side by side with each other. Workfront also provides the ability to see the previous version of the proof. There's no equivalent for any of this in interactive proofing/Desktop Proofing Viewer. Current Behaviour -There is no way to compare --side by side-- what an interactive proof USED to look like vs what it looks like now.It is also annoying/confusing how you can add one (or multiple) markups to one snapshot but if you return to that snapshot later, you can't add more markups without generating another snapshot.Additionally, each snapshot is only part of the whole picture -- literally allowing you to take something out of context.Lastly, when clicking to open an interactive proof, there's no way to see the previous version. How would you like the feature to work -1) When marking up an interactive proof, you should be able to return to the same snapshot to add more comments. Additionally why can't you use an app like Go Full Page (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gofullpage-full-page-scre/fdpohaocaechififmbbbbbknoalclacl) to take a snapshot of the page and let everyone markup the same snapshot. 2) in the same way, I would like there to be a way to choose to generate these snapshots on a first page of the interactive proof to serve as the historical version -- our use case is one-page web proofs so this would be ideal for us. Why is this feature important to you -"Feature parity" -- why did we think this was important for a static proof but not that important for an interactive proof?
Description - We would like the option to configure Workflows based on Project, starting with a blank slate when creating a new Project. Ideally with the option to enable the ones we'd like to leverage and edit them to create new custom options as needed. Why is this feature important to you - This would allows personalization based on the various areas within our shared instance. I know there is a push to move towards and even great shared instance setup, and that is extremely overwhelming without simple personalization such as workflows. How would you like the feature to work - Currently when an Issue / Request is in 'Waiting for response' Status, and someone provides an update, the Status automatically updates to 'In Progress.' This isn't ideal for governance processes, and we would prefer to have a more robust process of checks and balances to ensure the right content was provided before the Request is moved to 'In Progress.' This will also help with our reporting for each Request being in a certain status for a length of time (less flip-flopping). Current Behaviour - When an Issue / Request is in 'Waiting for response' Status, and any user provides an update, the Status automatically updates to 'In Progress.'
Description -Display sizes: this is a dropdown at the bottom of the Desktop Proofing Viewer that allows you to select a size format you want your interactive proof to display at. Our creative teams work in 4 different display sizes: Desktop = 1280x720 or 1440x810Mobile = 400x711 or 375x667Current Behaviour -The dropdown currently displays 22 different sizes, none of which are what we want, and only one is configurable, and that one doesn't "save", you can just input the same size over and over every time you review a proof. Moreover, several of the sizes, are... a little dated. (for example, I just did a quick google and Apple apparently will stop supporting iPhone X -- anyway, don't want to spend my time doing market research but you get the picture hopefully) How would you like the feature to work -If there’s a way to customize the list of default display sizes (per instance), so that we show the ones that are meaningful to us rather than a bunch of sizes that Workfront thought would be helpful (and are not), this would really help save some time. I would simply configure 4 size settings, and only 4 options would show up in the viewer. Why is this feature important to you -There are no pre-populated options to select that match what we design for. The main issue with users not viewing at the desired dimensions is that text can wrap in odd spots or cut off images where not intended. By not having these as an option, it’s unlikely that the users are looking at the content with the dimensions that were intended. I know people can hand type them in -- we had to create instructions to get our users to review using the display sizes above -- but it’s very unlikely that is happening because 1st they would have to go dig up the dimensions and then type them in. Usually people are in too much of a hurry for that.
Description - We organize all of our projects underneath a program. Usually the roles that are on each project are assigned to the same user. If we ever need to reassign work, it would save time to select uncompleted roles on all projects under a program to bulk edit the role assignment. Why is this feature important to you - It would save an enormous amount of time as we often need to shift work from one user to another. And they are all under the same program. How would you like the feature to work - Select all projects under a program. Then when editing, have a space like for bulk assignments. It could be the same option under bulk assignments on the workload balancer to either assign, replace, or remove a user from all tickets that have that role. It would only affect tasks that are not completed. It would also save time to mass assign all projects under a program at once. Current Behaviour - This feature currently does not exist.
I would like to request that the option to delegate approvals (and tasks and issues) be added to the Workfront app. Some of our users who primarily use Workfront for approvals also primarily use the mobile app. When they are out of the office and have forgotten to set up delegations prior to leaving, they currently have no way to set up delegations on their phone. Instead, they need to contact someone in the office to set up delegations for them, which is not ideal.
Request Workfront to provide a feature to optionally clear field values where a field becomes hidden on the form. It may be of value to retain hidden values in some cases so a checkbox option on a field to Clear Value when Hidden would work. The issue occurs in cascaded drop down lists where higher level list options are changed, but lower level lists retain the data even though not displayed. These get replicated down to the Cosmos parameter values table leading to confusion in reporting. It also occurs for other form fields where the value of a field A determines the visibility of field B. If the field B value is set, then the value of field A is changed so field B is now hidden, the value of field B is still presented in the object's parameter values.
Description - I'd love to be able to offer a curated list of metrics that end users can easily swap out using a dropdown similar to switching segments. Why is this feature important to you - This would allow me to create and perfect one standard view perhaps using unique visitors and/or visits. With a single click, a user could then swap the metric(s) with others from a curated list, perhaps orders and revenue. This would allow the creation of one streamlined dashboard with a variety of views, breakouts, etc., that then has an increased level of interactivity. This would be also be useful for anomaly investigations. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to the segment dropdowns at the top of a panel. Provide metric dropdown(s) (perhaps a few). When another metric from the curated list is selected, all tables and visualizations in the panel update to reflect the newly selected metrics. Current Behavior - You can clone panels and recreate with the new metric. But as further iterations are made, the other metric panels have to be rebuild or get out of sync.
When a proof is added to a request and then the request is converted to a project, the proof comments do not come with it. Instead the document is moved as a PDF without any comments. We have to go back to the request and move the actual proof over. Please allow the proof and it's comments to move.
Hi Marketo,I send out a newsletter (Email Send) once a quarter. I would like to be able to schedule the analytics report send associated to this newsletter only once to the team responsible for the content. Currently, you can subscribe people to the analytics reports and set a cadence that they will receive the report. It would be awesome if we could set a single send date/time for these reports to send. Then I could subscribe users and set the send date 1 time to all, roughly a week after the email is sent. This would make sending these reports out much easier because the current cadence options are too frequent for me to use.Let me know your thoughts or if there is a good workaround for this idea.Sincerely,Keith Nyberg
Why is this feature important to you?This feature is crucial to me because it would greatly improve my workflow and make creating proof galleries much easier and faster. The current cloning/healing tool in Lightroom is extremely ineffective and does a terrible job at cloning. Having the AI generative fill feature would allow me to effortlessly extend or fill areas of a photo, eliminating the frustrations and limitations of the current tool. How would you like the feature to work?Ideally, I would like the feature to function similarly to Photoshop. I envision being able to select a specific area using a marquee tool and then simply clicking a "generative fill" option to initiate the cloning or healing process. This would provide a seamless and efficient way to address areas that need editing. Current Behavior:Currently, the healing and cloning tool in Lightroom is far from satisfactory. Even when attempting to select and clone from a particular area, the results are poorly blended and look unprofessional. Additionally, the tool often lags, causing further frustration and hindering the editing process. Furthermore, the addition of this tool would significantly enhance my workflow by eliminating the need to open each individual image in Photoshop. This would be especially beneficial when I only require quick fills or edits for a proof gallery. The generative fill feature in Lightroom would allow me to accomplish these tasks efficiently within the program itself, saving me valuable time and effort.
When editing a custom field from the "Fields" tab of Custom Forms, admins can easily accidentally click away from the screen and all work is lost. It has happened to me several times, even when I was conscious of the issue and being extra-careful (just a stray click will do it). There should be a mechanism in place that prompts the user to confirm they want to discard unsaved changes.
Description -Inspired by this question: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/how-do-i-add-a-group-as-a-recepient-in-a-custome-alert/td-p/594492Unlike a lot of Adobe Interfaces since the Admin Console was created, to allow us to type in users or user groups, alerts doesn't appear to have this functionality... Well it partially does... when I create a new alert, my own name is added a "standard" object.... but the user auto-suggest doesn't trigger. Since I don't see any errors in the console, or any network calls that would suggest any sort of "user lookup" is trying to occur. The Alerts feature should allow us to choose users within our system, or groups of users (based on permission groups) to send alerts to... rather than having to look up emails individually and manage large lists of users within the Alerts area separate from our Admin Console Groups. This would create a more cohesive, and easier to maintain infrastucture. Why is this feature important to you -Being able to leverage users and user groups that are configured in Admin Console would save us a lot of management time... lets say today we have 20 users getting alerts, and we have 100 alerts.... if we need to add a single user to all those alerts, and remove 3 users as they have left the company (or just changed positions making the alerts no longer relevant to them)... We still have to manage the user groups in Admin Console.. then we have to update 100 alerts, one at a time to remove the three users, and add the 1.... If the alert was tried to the user groups... making the one change there would automatically update all 100 alerts through virtue of the User Group configuration How would you like the feature to work -Similar to how workspaces allows you to share reports based on individual users, or to select a User Group through an auto-suggest interface (using the users and groups from the Admin Console configurations to be selected), so too should alerts. When a user group is selected, the Alerts should send to all users in that group. Since the group is considered one entity, this may require that the "Opt out of this schedule" may need to be suppressed, with a message that your should contact your admin to change the group settings. Current Behaviour -While your own user looks like a standard option from Admin Console when creating a new alert, no other users seem to be able to be added this way... Only emails seem to be accepted... as there is no user auto-suggest, and even if you match the exact spelling of specific user names / groups, they aren't accepted here.
Description - I should be able to copy drop-down segments from one visualization to another, or from one panel to another within the same Workspace.Why is this feature important to you - How many times have you spent building a decent list of items for a drop-down segment, only then to need it again in another section of your report? This should be a time saving way to very quickly copy my drop-down segment, just like I can copy any other segment to another portion of my report.How would you like the feature to work - Just like copying any other segment, I should be able to CTRL+right-click and drag my segment to any other area I can drag a drop-down segmentCurrent Behavior - At present, if I attempt to copy a drop-down segment anywhere in my Workspace, it simply freezes the Workspace, and I will lose any progress I had and I will have to reload the page.
I'd like the option to choose which eVar's value should appear as a label for a graph (see visual below.) When there are lots of stacked variables or filters applied, the label gets quite unwieldy. I spend a lot of time manually updating the values that appear in line charts.In the case below, I would choose "Show" as the variable to appear as the label. I'd set it and forget it. Currently, each time a new show cracks the top 5 line items that appear on the graph I have to remember to go in and clean up its name. Thank you in advance, Jenn!
I currently love and use the "Compare Time Periods" option frequently, but it only works in certain situations (for instance, it isn't an option if I have "days" as a dimension in the report), and I can't drag in Time Periods I've already created. I frequently want that sort of "compare" functionality on all sorts of different columns.What I would love is to always be able to create a column that compares two other columns in the table. Summary change is nice but not if you have a lot of items in the report to compare. Quick calculated metrics and such are nice but don't give you flexibility with time periods.
Would like the ability to delete fields for the following reasons: - Fields are no longer used or relevant - Field was created wrong and does not need to be used
Hi Adobe Team,Please find my feature suggestion below: Description -Add a "Comment" prompt every time a Target Activity is saved to help be able to document changes in a Target ActivityWhy is this feature important to you - This feature would be extremely helpful for documentation purposes; Yes many users utilize secondary ticketing systems or spreadsheets to help manage information, but I find that Adobe Target (being the source of truth) should be able to document changes in the activity from a different angle. There are description fields in the Goals & Settings, but those aren't viewable unless you actually open the ticket, and often are forgotten to be updated.How would you like the feature to work -Every time you save an Activity, before being able to save a user would be prompted with a Comment text field to add a small comment about what was done, which would then be displayed on the Change Log panel in Adobe Target (see example screenshot I created below):This field should be text only and could be somewhat limited in character length if need be.Every time you save a Target Activity, you should be prompted to add a comment (although it could be marked as an optional field if some users find they do not want to organize this way).Current Behaviour -Currently the only way to document text information is by opening an activity and navigating to the Goals & Settings panel Please note this was previously posted in the Questions section of the Adobe Target Community and it was recommended that I add the post here. (OG post: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-target-questions/adobe-target-idea-adding-comments-when-saving/m-p/592886#M8960) Thanks for your time!RC
Objective 1: Create a folder structure to organize web personalization campaigns Use Case Scenario: If you have multiple campaigns you can group them together using folders (by type, audiece, location, initiative, etc.). This will make things look cleaner in the campaigns interface, providing overall better organization, and an easier way to locate existing campaigns. Current Issue: Since we are unable to organize our web personalization campaigns using a folder structure the web campaign page looks chaotic. It's a long running list of campaigns with no organization other than being able to filter by some things that don't really help for the type of organization we are looking for. It takes a lot of time to locate the particular campaigns we are looking for. We don't have any easy way to establish which campaigns are running for a particualar audice or initiative.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content Transfer Tool currently supports only on-premise to AEM as Cloud movement. Use-case: Content Transfer Tool currently supports only on-premise to AEM as Cloud movement. However, there are use-cases wherein content needs to be synced between AEM as Cloud instances for which package manager process can be cumbersome. Especially when dealing with GBs/TBs of data now that disk usage dashboard is also not available in AEM as Cloud. Current/Experienced Behavior: Package Manager has to be used to transfer content and there is no easy way to split packages based on size apart from using include/exclude rules. Improved/Expected Behavior: Extend Content transfer tool to allow content sync between AEM as Cloud instances. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Quick redirect to the homepage of the AEM dashboard. So that we can navigate to other tools pages Use-case: During presentations or quick analysis, the ability to navigate between tools seamlessly without manually updating the URL in the address bar proves to be beneficial. Current/Experienced Behavior: When using a tool and clicking on the AEM logo, it redirects to the homepage while displaying the URL of the current tool's page. However, if you navigate to another tool and then click on the homepage, it redirects back to the previous tool's page instead of the current tool's homepage. Improved/Expected Behavior: Clicking on the AEM logo should not only redirect to the homepage of the AEM dashboard but also update the URL to http://localhost:4502/aem/start.html Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5, AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Bounteous Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
