Build better products with our product team
We would like to be able to put Marketo user accounts in deactivated status without having to count that person as a seat within our contracted amount. We like being able to see who exactly made a change to Marketo activities even if that person is no longer with the company. Right now, we have 25 contracted user seats (including API users), so we are challenged on being able to keep the user activity history while also staying within our contracted user limits. Our recommended solution is to standardized a deactivated user role and not count users with that role in the contracted limits. We also recommend not including the API users within the contracted limits.
I would like an announcement banner/ribbon system admins can use to make temporary, system wide announcements. For instance, a lot of us will be OOO for Spring Break. I would like to add a banner to let everyone know weekly intake will be canceled that week. I know we have the Notifications/Announcements sections, but users don't always check those daily or weekly. The banner would be highlighted at the top of the screen and everyone would see it every time they open Workfront. I know the capability is there because a yellow banner appeared informing everyone that our instance expired Dec and needed renewing. I know everyone saw it because it caused a slight panic. lol It would be great if we could select the colors for the banner background to indicate the level of priority and select the timeframe the banner would appear. Currently we send an email from our Governance mailbox for these notifications to increase the likelihood users will read the message. Thank you!
The typeahead field on Custom Forms is designed to only have one selection not multiple. We would like the ability to have multiple users entered. For example, we have a field for "Supporting PM", but there may be more than one on larger projects.
Description - Task lists collapsed by default, or at least option of making that the defaultWhy is this feature important to you - Many of our projects have a large number of tasks, and most users end up collapsing the tasks anyhow so we would like to be able to skip that step by having everything default as collapsed. How would you like the feature to work - A systemwide default setting to have tasks lists collapsedCurrent Behaviour - Task lists currently expanded by default and require the user to collapse the task list each time they visit a project schedule
It would be nice to be able to create segments in a test environment to test filtering data through that segment, but then, instead of re-creating all of the segments for a production environment, just transfer them from one report suite to another.
Description - We would like the option to format a date field to show Date and Time on the Header within a Layout Template Why is this feature important to you - Working in an agency environment, our tasks are due in hours not days. Our users work out of their Work List to see work items assigned to them. They use the time due to help prioritize their tasks. We have added the Planned Completion Date to the Task header page to show at the top of the Task page and the Task Summary Panel on the Home page, but it only shows the Date due not the time due. When assignees click on the Planned Completion Date field in the Header to view the time due in the Calendar popup window, it changes the task constraint to MUST FINISH ON (even if they just view the calendar popup and don't modify the date or time). How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to Field Format a date field to show Date and Time not just Date in the Header within a Layout Template. I would like the functionality to be the same as in Reports where under Advanced Options you can select Field Format. Current Behaviour - When adding Planned Completion Date to the Header in a layout template it only shows the Date. If an assignee who has task editing access clicks on the Planned Completion Date field in the Header, even to just view the time from the calendar popup window, it changes the task constraint to MUST FINISH ON and breaks the waterfall timeline.
Description - Requesting the ability to resolve comments after proof is locked.Why is this feature important to you - Resolving comments helps production team keep track of which comments have been addressed and which have not. This is particularly important for very large proofs like email walk the wall where more than one person will be addressing comments.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to resolve comments after proof is locked.Current Behaviour - Comments cannot be resolved unless proof is unlocked.
Add the ability to have conditional formatting on a chart report. Ie: create a bar or column chart and if the count of any of the columns is over a specific number, the color automatically changes to red.This would be great to easily view KPIs.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Download folder without all hierarchy folders Use-case: folder download in AEM assets Current/Experienced Behavior: all hierarchy folder is reconstructed when we download a folder Improved/Expected Behavior: if we have a long hierarchy, in download process, hierarchy is not needed. We loose time to rich the assets after download Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloudservice Customer-name/Organization name: Louis Vuitton Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - similar to Teams in the sense of chat only feature, not meetings.Why is this feature important to you - as teams work together on projects, it would be ideal to get instant responses to questions so that they do not lose focus. How would you like the feature to work - similar to Teams.Current Behaviour - asking questions via updates.
Allow hiding milestones when they are no longer relevant, without removing them from the milestone path to preserve historic data.Just like the functionality to hide/unhide options in a dropdown field, I suggest implementing a similar feature for milestones. This would keep our milestone paths clear and concise, and eliminate the need to create new milestone paths.Additionally, the milestones view on the project page should be made more flexible as the current layout appears rigid and outdated.
It is easy to miss what is a required field on a Custom Form. Once the field with small red asterics is missed, it is not easy to find out which field to fill in.
Currently, there is no single place users can go to see their time off based on their schedule AND the time off they have personally opted to take. Displaying the time off from the user's schedule would make it much easier for them to manage their pto.
Description - When can we expect Workfront to have an AI Bot to assist PMs and System Admins with managing projects and instances?Why is this feature important to you - to alleviate the workload on plan license users.How would you like the feature to work - like ChatGPT bots Current Behaviour -
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As an end user, when I use the download component on a page, then I should be able to see the file size of the document up to 1 decimal point(at least) or a configurable number of decimal points. Use-case: Display exact size of the document to the end user. Current/Experienced Behavior: The file size is rounded to the nearest GB(or KB, MB) Improved/Expected Behavior: The file size should display correct value up to at least 1 decimal. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2021.12.6145.20211216T083234Z. WCM Core Components - 2.17.12 Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
I recently learned that the lifespan of my data in the Adobe Target visitor profile is a max of 90 days (default is 14 days). This is too short! I work in a business that drives toward one day a year - we have one transaction per client per year, but their likely-hood to convert similarly year over year is very high. Can this lifespan be extended to a max of at least 12 months (24-36 would be amazing)?
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Related Case #E-000858459 Use-case: Customer has customized the renditions of an asset to exclude some of the OOTB renditions but when the same asset was used in the "Share Link" option and checked "Allow download of renditions of file" checkbox In the Share Link downloads all the renditions including the OOTB renditions like 48x48 or 139x139 are visible and there is no way to customize the list of renditions on that screen. Current/Experienced Behavior: All the renditions are displayed on Share Link downloads including the OOTB ones. Improved/Expected Behavior: There should be a customization of what is being displayed on "Share Link" download renditions Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently when users have to select assets or folders, they need to hover over for the small tick on the left-corner of a folder (in card view). Use-case: The current approach is not user-friendly and time-consuming. For examples, editors have to select 50 assets out of 800 within a folder. Usually the editors use 'card view' which ensures a thumbnail preview of the assets. Editors then have to select each asset by clicking on top-right corner of each one. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently when users have to select assets or folders, they need to hover over for a small tick on the left-corner of a folder (in card view). Improved/Expected Behavior: More user-friendly way of quickly selecting assets or folders. A big hover-over enabling the selection of assets or folders. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Assets as a cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Hugo Boss Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Background: When an Exclusion is set up there are two options:1. "Add Exclusion" The end result is you get a container that you can drag into in order to correctly exclude an audience.2. "Exclude this Audience" This option adds All Visitors back into the audience and then only removes the audience that you had selected.The first option works as expected and should be left in place. However the second option is confusing and redundant (Everything it does can be accomplished out of the box by only have one “Add Exclusion” option with an audience of choice.)Feature: Please remove this second option from the interface as it is adding a lot of confusion when setting up exclusions.
Let me remove that banner!! It continues to slide up whenever I am working on a modification and go down to save and it's infuriating. Very poor experience that I can't get rid of this.
Missing DOCTYPE declaration on a webpage often disables the Adobe Target library, without which the personalization is not possible on your site pages.Target library at.js requires the HTML5 doctype. The syntax is: <!DOCTYPE html>.HTML DOCTYPE must be the very first thing in your HTML document before the HTML tags. It acts as an instruction to the web browser about the version of the markup language in which the page is written.Initially, the Doctype declaration was used in HTML when it was defined as a language based on SGML and later XML. Since the presence of that declaration was in general a signal that the document author followed the standard practices and then this declaration was used in HTML5 to distinguish between standards-complaint parsing mode and a so-called quirk parsing mode.The HTML5 doctype ensures that the page loads in standard mode. Some JavaScript APIs gets disabled when a site page loads in quirks mode. Target library also depends on some JS APIs which gets disabled with quirks mode. Whether the document is parsed in standard mode or quirks mode, or simply parsing the same way across HTML5 processors, the doctype is a critical component of a quality HTML document.In the past, the declaration was passive – ignored by the browser until you’d validate the document where the validator would use the DOCTYPE declaration to compare your document with the declared Document Type Definition (DTD). But with the technology known as DOCTYPE switching has made using the correct DOCTYPE declaration not only important, but imperative. On finding a correct DOCTYPE in the document, browsers allow page to render in standard mode.The idea here is to -understand how important is DOCTYPE Declaration on a webpage,what makes up a correct declaration, andmost importantly, including the correct DOCTYPE declaration in a page is required to enable Target libraries effectively.Hope this helps!Thanks,Khushboo Kalia
Missing DOCTYPE declaration on a webpage often disables the Adobe Target library, without which the personalization is not possible on your site pages.Target library at.js requires the HTML5 doctype. The syntax is: <!DOCTYPE html>.HTML DOCTYPE must be the very first thing in your HTML document before the HTML tags. It acts as an instruction to the web browser about the version of the markup language in which the page is written.Initially, the Doctype declaration was used in HTML when it was defined as a language based on SGML and later XML. Since the presence of that declaration was, in general, a signal that the document author followed the standard practices and then this declaration was used in HTML5 to distinguish between standards-compliant parsing mode and a so-called quirk parsing mode.The HTML5 doctype ensures that the page loads in standard mode. Some JavaScript APIs gets disabled when a site page loads in quirks mode. Target library also depends on some JS APIs which gets disabled with quirks mode. Whether the document is parsed in standard mode or quirks mode, or simply parsing the same way across HTML5 processors, the doctype is a critical component of a quality HTML document.In the past, the declaration was passive – ignored by the browser until you’d validate the document where the validator would use the DOCTYPE declaration to compare your document with the declared Document Type Definition (DTD). But with the technology known as DOCTYPE switching has made using the correct DOCTYPE declaration not only important, but imperative. On finding a correct DOCTYPE in the document, browsers allow page to render in standard mode.The idea here is to -understand how important is DOCTYPE Declaration on a webpage,what makes up a correct declaration, andmost importantly, including the correct DOCTYPE declaration in a page is required to enable Target libraries effectively.
That will be helpful if there is a feature to upload multiple files in the file resources. There was a solution given in forum - uploading file from ftp then loop back: I want to Upload images to Public resources every morning. Is it possible to automate this process. I achieved this using a workflow - I asked a question in forum and fixed the issues that I faced: Copying file to '/usr/local/neolane/nl6/var/&lt;instance_name&gt;/&lt;file_name.extension&gt;' However, if there is a native method, that will be really helpful as that will reduce human work.Thanks,Somasundaram.
There are use cases where we need to have multiple proofs open at the same time. In the browser, this is not an issue at all, but now that we are doing Interactive proofs, this is becoming an issue. Use cases: User has two monitors and would like to compare versions that way then really tall and thin in one monitorUser is looking at a proof that is similar but not related to the current proof about some global settings for the brand and what was doneThere is an issue with the integration and a proof is create independent of the other versions so both need to be open to compare.They are waiting on a comment from someone else and while waiting they are working on something else. They don't want to lose the proof though so they don't forget about it.I'm sure there are more, but that is all I could think about.
Description: Please add a "Winner" badge, or indicate a Target activity winner to the A4T Analysis Workspace report. Why is this feature important to you - Simple In-your-face results! It was there before turning on A4T, and now it is not. The customer got used to using it, and now they have to lift to determine the winner. How would you like the feature to work - When using A4T to report on a Target activity, indicate which test the winner is of the test in the report. Current Behaviour: Once a customer swaps to A4T, the Target UI uses Analytics data for reporting. I'm told the auto winner indicator, and the green star is missing from the Target UI after swapping to A4T.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
