Today, users have the ability to use the "New --> New Person" menu option inside the Database section of Marketo to directly add a record if necessary. However, the New Person flow does not account for pre-existing records with the same primary key—even if both versions of the record are Marketo-only and not synced to a distinct CRM record. Would it be possible to update this behavior to either explicitly prevent creating a duplicate in the Marketo database or notify the user that a user with that record's email address is already associated with a record? Again, I'm not sure if this is an "intentional" workaround for creating duplicates, but it's unexpected behavior.
It would be nice to hide the task condition update independently from just turning on or off system updates on task updates. Currently when someone clicks "Work on It" for a task an update is posted saying the task condition is "Going Smoothly". Our users don't agree that just because they start work on a task instantly means that everything is fine for the task. Showing this in the task updates causes a lot of confusion, but we don't want to turn off system updates since other system updates are important
I would like the ability to set up simple year over year daily alerts. Our industry is very cyclical and/or seasonal on a daily, weekly and monthly basis. Trying to set up day over day, week over week or month over month alerts is not feasible. I have done the analysis on basic metrics; visits, transactions, etc. and I see the variance for the highs and lows for those comparisons as follows; Day over Day: -47% to +148%Week over Week: -51% to +150%Month Over Month: -71% to +142%When I do a Year over Year (i.e. -364 days, same day of week) I get the ranges -15% to +21%,So for us having alerts for a Year over Year day are a much more accurate measure of change and allow for setting tighter thresholds
The default alerts report when a user clicks "analyze further" show a bullet chart and trend. Our team has created longer trend chart and some other items that are more helpful for analyzing certain alerts. We are looking for a way to help the recipients of an alert email to see these reports instead of, or in addition to the default report. The easiest solution I can think of is for the creator of the alert to include the link to the preferred Workspace in the Alert Description field when creating the alert. We would then need Adobe to update the alert email to also pull the Alert Description field into the outgoing email (it currently is not included). Once Adobe completes this, the emails will include the Alert Description which has the workspace link our team developed to analyze alerts.... or any other workspace links we may want to include for different alerts. Ask for Adobe:Update the alert email template/format so it includes the Alert Description field somewhere in the email body or email header. Similar to this request: Customizing Alerts
Let's face it - bots are getting smarter. Bot Filtering needs to get smarter too. Bots are getting better at changing user-agents, IP addresses, domains and more in between visits. Bots are now even adding delays between page views to look more like a normal visitor. And don't forget, they're running JavaScript too. Adobe needs to expand Bot Filtering to use look-alike modelling to discover visits with abnormally high page views.Similar to this Idea: http://ideas.omniture.com/t5/Idea-Exchange-for-Adobe/IAB-Bot-List-Segment-in-Analytics/idi -p/11708 we need a way to be able to apply 'Bot Segments' to reports so we can better understand what traffic changes will result prior to committing them as rules. Right now the industry is losing too much accuracy in our data to rely solely on a black box of IP and user-agent based filtering.
In Report Builder, currently we don't have option to prioritize refreshing data blocks.By implementing this option we can easily get complicated data.RegardsAshok
To send an error message to registered email address when FTP transfer failed on DWH.
I'm using Adobe Analytics for the reporting of votes (e.g. go to work by bike) in diverse regions.Due to the fact, that Adobe Analytics shows color according to the amount of votes, the reports is confusing to our users. The votes for "By bike" are shown in orange in region A and are shown in blue in another region. This is because Adobe Analytics shows colors in the way that the highest item is always orange, etc.. If you want to compare one and the same item in different regions, then the report doesn't work anymore and is even confusing.Why not allow the use of static colors, which can be attached to a data type?
Currently we have option to paste query as "Paste > Absolute Input" and "Paste > Relative Input".We need option to paste with combination of Absolute and Relative (Some Inputs as Absolute and Some Inputs as Relative)Which helps many reports..RegardsAshok
If you have a Workspace project that uses the same segment/dimension in multiple dropdown areas or within visualizations itself (i.e. Columns in a Freeform table), it would be cool if you could choose to manually "link" them such that if you change one, any "linked" versions of that would also change.For example, let's say that you have many visualizations in a project and you have chosen to filter based upon Page = Home via a dimension. Now you want to change the focus page from Home Page to Cart Page. Today, unless you are able to use the dropdown area at the top for all items (which is not always possible), you have to manually change all of the individual cases where you have segmented/filtered by Page = Home.It would be great if when building the tables, you could check a box to link the segment/filter to a master one such that changing that one changes all linked ones. This is similar to setting a cell equal to another cell in MS Excel to make the two dynamic.
Hello Adobe Community !I noticed that Summary Numbers don't support conditional formating, nor polarity on the number ( negative numbers are the same font color than positive numbers ).It would be nice to support this, spetially polarity !Thanks again!And cheers for the great work of the Adobe community !
It would be great to be able to compare reports from two/multiple reports suites in workspace similar to legacy Reports & Analytics interface. It will allow us to compare content performance in different countries/geographical reasons in workspace report.
Telecom Customer would like to update a number of Adobe Reports and Analytics segments at one time. Example: Identify segments that use a specific prop like prop 22 and replace it with prop 25. But the segments would not have the same definition.Currently searching for segments and editing one by one is not ideal and very time consuming.
I tend to use the analysis workspace freeform table a lot to organize my segments and metrics in a single table, a single version of the truth if you will.however I find it difficult to share these tables via email / slack because one the table gets more than 10 or so columns the column names get cut off.my primary freeform table that I'm socializing right now with internal stakeholders has 23 columnsso the question is what can be done to wrap the text within these columns headers?I would like to be able to toggle the wrapping, as sometimes it is needed and some times is it not. a solution like this also suggests that we might be able to control the height of column headers, to compliment our current ability to manage the width of the column headersif we're going to wrap it, I prefer center alignment of the text but having the option to do left, center or right text alignment might be helpful for others.I think the way segments work across columns (cells get merged for the lack of a better description) works well as I often have several metrics beneath a single segment
Something very annoying to me is the inability to quickly copy a user group to use it as a template to create another group. I don't see anything similar in the Admin Console at this time, either. As a result, I'm requesting the ability to more easily manage Adobe Analytics User Groups by having a Copy or Save As feature to easily duplicate a User Permission Group.
Telecom Customer needs an export of all Analytics Segments and Definitions. Currently there is not a way to do this from the Analytics UI.Feature Request. Export Analytics Segments and Definitions from UI.
I'm proposing a feature enhancement to the Advanced Scheduling file options to enable choosing PDF for a macro enabled workbook. https://marketing.adobe.com/resources/help/en_US/arb/schedule_macro_wb.html Currently you can only send a macro enabled workbook as a macro workbook but as an analyst who uses macros for workflows, template copying, and data clearing it would be great to still be able to send my macro workbook to my audience as a PDF even though the workbook has macros. I understand sending the file as a macro workbook makes sense if you are sending as an excel file but when I'm using Report Builder to build a report to send to people as a PDF it should not matter if my workbook has marcos.
Background: - There is no option to manipulate values stored in list variables in Processing rules Requirement :There is a need to enable list variables to be manipulated by Processing rules (eg clear or set values)
After enabling Activity Map configuration for a report suites, uses should be able to disable it as well. Or at least a warning message should be added to show up when enabling it stating "You would not be able to disable it once enabled".Use case for this which we saw recently was that when users identify that there are PII present in the links which are automatically being tracked by Activity Map, they want to get it disabled, but aren't able to.Obviously there is a solution by removing the Activity Map code from the pages, but that is not an immediate solution for many and can be delayed due to deployment cycles.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.