Product ideas | Community
Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000 Ideas

J
JoanneDuNew Participant

Remove project limit on calendarsNew

The in-built workfront calendar has a limit of 20 projects that you can add. Please remove this barrier as we can't use the calendar functionality for planning and seeing an overview with these limitations.

0
J
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
mschachtman
mschachtmanNew Participant

A4T Data AvailabilityNew

Description - I need the opportunity to send data from a Target activity to more than one AA report suite.Why is this feature important to you - We are an umbrella company that owns, operates and manages many businesses.  Each business (and subsequently website domain) has a different AA report suite and AT workspace.  We also have a "global prod" AA report suite that everyone in the headquarters office uses regularly and houses all data from all businesses.  Since I run the AT program across the organization, I send data for all AT activities to the global prod report suite since that makes the most sense, efficiency wise.  This means however, that the businesses do not get to access their AT data anywhere since they only have access to their specific report suite.How would you like the feature to work - I would like this drop down to be a multi select list and allow me to send activity data to all relevant report suites for that domain and activity, not just one.Current Behavior - I am only able to select one report suite from this list. 

0
mschachtman
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
B
brmorrilNew Participant

Customize fields to display/hide on specific object typesNew

Now that custom forms can be used by multiple object types, we need the ability to specify if a field should be shown/hidden on certain objects.For example, a custom form that is used for Requests and Projects may have certain fields that are not required when submitting the request, but need to be required to populate when converting the request to a project. Currently the only solution is to copy the form and go back to having separate forms for different object types.

0
B
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
SLuna74
SLuna74New Participant

Ability to assign risk ownership to a user, team, or groupNew

It would be beneficial to be able to assign ownership of risks for continued tracking and accountability.

0
SLuna74
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
Marino_Jules
Marino_JulesNew Participant

Local Asset Expiration Bulk ActionsNew

It would be great to be able to use the asset expiration functionality in bulk and simultaneously set the expiration of assets across programs in bulk.

0
Marino_Jules
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
A
amznJWNew Participant

Autosave / Recovery of Fusion scenariosNew

I'd like to have some sort of autosave or recovery option for Fusion scenarios so that if you are working on a scenario and a browser issue occurs, you don't lose all of your work when you refresh the page. Either an autosave feature, or some kind recovery mechanism similar to the way MS Office or Linux does where it hangs onto the temp file you are working from and offers to load that temp file for you on the next time you try to load it.

1
S
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
S
SupritiSawant-AccentureNew Participant

<User level access> Limit Planners to assign work to Users from Same Company but different GroupNew

Current Scenario -1 single company - comprising of separate Groups by accounts(departments..). There can be common resources working on both the Accounts (part of both the groups) we will called them as "Shared Resources", this feature works fine by having User be part of the 2 groups (Home Group A and Other Group B)However there can also be a situation where there are resources who are meant to work EXCLUSIVELY for 1 specific Group (User's profile comprise of only 1 GROUP i.e. his Home Group), in this case, the system will still allow the select this user on a project belonging to other group (assignment of task) because this Exclusive Resource is still part of the same company as the Project Owner. Currently there is NO SUCH option to restrict assignment of work in a situation where Users belonging to SAME COMPANY, but unique GROUPS have ZERO access to each other (creation of virtual Partition in between Users within same Companies through GROUPS).

0
S
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
AlisonW
AlisonWNew Participant

Improve Approval OptionsNew

Approvals are a great feature within Workfront. Unfortunately, in their current state, their usability is limited. We are requesting improved options and flexibility for approval processes, including: 1. Specify actions (eg status change) to be taken if APPROVED. 2. Increase available options for REJECTION and APPROVAL - eg, change status, add an update, prevent edits, etc. 3. Add comments to rejection issue created (currently, they only appear under project updates instead of in the issue created by the rejection). 4. Add the ability to hold the project/task/issue status at a certain level until the approval has completed. 5. Make approvals an automatic, and enforced, predecessor of project tasks being ready to start.

10
K
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
Gaylan
GaylanNew Participant

Display System Message Banner After Logging InNew

Before we started using Single Sign On (SSO) to access Workfront, there were notifications on the login screen. These were system notifications from Workfront indicating possible issues with Workfront or notifying the users that Workfront would be going down at a particular time. Now that we use SSO, we don't see those notifications, because we don't have a login screen. Is the a way you can put those notifications on a banner on the user's landing/home page? That would be very beneficial. The banner could go away automatically after about 10 seconds, and the user could manually close the banner.

0
Gaylan
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
JennChing
JennChingNew Participant

Proofing - Have a warning pop-up for all reviewers/approvers in proofing window if they close the window without making a decision.New

It would be great if a pop-up could be made that would prevent an approver from closing out a proof without making a decision, once they have provided mark-ups.

3
Madalyn_Destafney
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
Madalyn_Destafney
Madalyn_DestafneyNew Participant

Need Custom Quarters to group in charts properlyNew

When I have a bar chart with a grouping/X axis using custom quarters, it doesn't show the quarters sequentially, it shows them in alpha order. This naturally screws up the order of the bars in the chart. Example, it's showing in this order:Q2 2022Q2 2023Q3 2022Instead of what it should be:Q2 2022Q3 2022Q4 2022...Even if I were to put the year first and then quarter - 2022 Q2 - it would still show out of order. This needs to be fixed so grouping by quarter works!

0
Madalyn_Destafney
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
E
emcguWFNew Participant

Contour Planned Hours by Task - Quick ButtonNew

Our teams are desperate to have an easy way to select a task and automatically contour its planned hours over time for all assigned users. We want a quick way to input that "this task is front loaded/back loaded/bell curved/flat" and have the planned hours automatically spread themselves over that distribution rather than having to fiddle with individual users or manually re-calculate planned hours and resource capacity.We find that the Workload Balancer doesn't allow us to do this simply and reliably enough.

0
E
Forum|Forum|3 years ago

Ability to rename image filesNew

Would be great to be able to rename image files and the related URL.

8
M
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
L
LC_79New Participant

Ability to lockdown naming conventionsNew

We are reliant on naming conventions as we have a shared instance globally. We have adopted naming convention by region and without this, we cannot accurately filter, report or pull analytics. We would like the ability to enforce a naming convention structure by company i.e. | UK | EMEA or | INA so that this always tags on the end of any request, task, project, portfolio or program that is created.

0
L
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
J
JonGe1New Participant

Queue topic announcementsNew

Being able to add time-based announcements to request queues so when certain teams fielding those requests are experiencing higher volumes, or have a larger project prioritized.If this rich text field could be part of the "description" field in request queue projects, and something that could be toggled on and off, that would be ideal.

0
J
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
C
ChristianBa2New Participant

Workfront Home Calendar > Add O365 Outlook Meetings to Projects and TimesheetNew

As a user, I want to add Outlook meetings synced to the Workfront Home > Calendar to projects and / or my timesheet (General Time if not assigned to a project). in order to avoid re-keying meetings as tasks or timesheet time in Workfront.System Functionality Idea: ability to click on an Outlook Meeting in the Workfront Home Calendar that allows you to create a task in a project (pulls the meeting name and duration) or transfer time (duration) to a General Hour Type.Value: this will minimise the need to switch between systems and increase time in the Workfront platform for the source of all work (incl. meetings).

4
C
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
S
Simon_U_LeNew Participant

Add support for Page Up/Down keys for scrollingNew

Need to add page navigation capabilities using keys. Scrolling should be possible using arrow keys as well as page up/down keys. Currently, cursor keys or page up/down keys do not work for scrolling. Same thing with Home/End keys not working to move the cursor to beginning or end of input line.

0
S
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
P
PurviShNew Participant

Month Option on Home Page Calendar ViewNew

The Calendar View on the home page shows a week at a glance. Our users would like to have the option to see a month at a glance as well.

0
P
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
K
KarenLoNew Participant

Ability to Remove +Add More Issues on issue tabNew

It would be great if we could hide the bottom +Add More Issues so users only have access to the top New Issue button. We don't want people o assign other users issues/tasks and we get more info for the top issue button.

1
K
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
D
DanielSu1New Participant

Improve the Business Case functionality & exportNew

The business case automatically picks up any custom form already attached to a project, which is then automatically added to the exported business case (pdf). We have custom forms attached to all project templates, but the information contained in these forms shouldn’t necessarily be included in a business case. Whilst I have seen there’s an option to remove a custom form in the business case view, this though removes the custom form from the project, along with any data already present, which isn’t great. We have a unique custom form created for the business case fields we need that aren’t already part of the standard Workfront build, but we would need the ability to remove any other custom form from being included in the business case export, but without removing it from the project entirely and the data already present. Without this functionality we will have to resort back to a Word based business case template, which would need to be attached to each project in Workfront, which isn’t ideal considering the good functionality and options already present in Workfront. We would also like the exported business case to include our company branding, and if possible, editable, so an option other than export to .pdf would be great.

12
SLuna74
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
D
DomD_New Participant

Print-Friendly Custom FormsNew

Currently no way to print a custom form in a meeting-friendly format. Screenshot and print is the only workaround, but that doesn't have a polished look.‚

1
SLuna74
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
Jennifer_Dungan
Jennifer_DunganNew Participant

Improvements to Scheduled Project Area (More Info about Last/Next Send datetime, bulk re-send, better inter-linkage with Workspace interface)New

DescriptionToday I received multiple reports from people in my organization complaining that they didn't get their weekly reports mailed to them. It seems that there was an issue listed in the status system which likely caused the issue.  Now, at this point you are thinking this is more of a complaint about the failure... it's not.... what comes next relates directly to improvements that would make all our lives easier. When I checked my Scheduled Projects area... I noticed a few things...there is nothing in my "failed" filter (I assume this is because this relates to flat out failures, not temporary failures?)There is no way to see the "last sent" date/timeThere is no way to tell if the reports are delayed (and will send once the queue catches up) or or today's report failed completelyThere is no way to re-send reports from this interface (an no link to the reports) - so if I need to resend 30 reports, I have to go and find them all individually and send them one at a time To Improve this tool significantly, there should be a way to:Have a column showing the last date/time the report was sent successfully (this will help identify which reports failed)Have a column showing the next data/time the report should be sent (this will help identify IF the report is just delayed, or outright failied)Allow us to select multiple reports using the checkbox selectors, and have an option at the top (along with tag, delete, approve and export to csv) to "resend selected" (this will allow us to bulk resend failed reports easierProvide a way to link directly to the report (for editing), this could possibly show up in the popup window where you can edit the schedule.. but it would improve our ability to find specific reports easier when starting from the scheduler) (on that note, it would also be nice to see links to all the existing schedules/ability to edit your own schedule from the Workspace interface - I still have users who create multiple schedules, but don't have access rights to the Scheduled Reports area, so I have to clean it up for them - not realizing they created multiple schedules)  Why is this feature important to youIt will provide much needed optimization to working with scheduled reports.. More visibility into items that failed / were delayed.. better functionality to resend failed items, and better cross functionality between building/editing reports and editing schedules.  How would you like the feature to workSome features would be pure data, showing in the columns of the Scheduled Project interface... they don't even have to be turned on by default... they can be hidden unless shown by using the Config Columns. Some would be a new functionality to force report re-sends (for one or more items - an important bulk management feature) The last would be improvements on interlinking the Workspace Interface with the Scheduler interface, this would be the hardest to achieve, but would improve visibility, usability and workflows significantly.  Current BehaviourTechnically these would all add on to existing behaviour, and that wouldn't change... these are all net new features.

1
K
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
M
MargaretNeNew Participant

Name population based on Job Role assignedNew

When you enter a job role, Workfront will populate people that have that primary job role. Our Marketing team wears many hats, but WF will only populate their primary role, so if they enter "Web Admin", only people with that as their primary will show in the suggestions. There should be a way for any role assigned to a user would populate that users name when the job role is assigned to a task. Ex - Andrea's main job role is as the Assistant Marketing Director. She will be the designer of an ad that will go out in a few weeks, but if she selects "Design" as the job role, her name does not populate because it is listed under her "other roles", not her "primary role".

2
J
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
K
KarenDaNew Participant

New Font used to better align Adobe productsNew

The new font that was pushed out to WF production 'to better align Adobe products and to improve consistency throughout the WF application' is difficult to read. The i's look like l's and the 5 look like S just to name a few of the issues our teams are complaining about.

0
K
Forum|Forum|3 years ago
J
jaspotterNew Participant

Add additional attribute in the Adobe IO Event Payload for an AEM Page Publish event with the "Destination" information (Publish vs Preview environments)New

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In AEM we have an out-of-box capability to have AEM OSGI Events sent to Adobe IO: https://developer.adobe.com/events/docs/guides/using/aem/ https://github.com/adobe/aio-lib-java/tree/main/aem/aio_aem_events/src/cs/content/jcr_root/apps/aio-aem-events/osgiconfig/config.author One of these OSGI events is for the Page Publish event in which we can have an external webhook notified when this event in AEM occurs. Additionally we have the Managed Publication feature which allows for content authors to publish a page to a "Destination" such as the Publisher environment or a Preview environment. In my use case I have an external webhook configured to receive Page Publish event. In my test I used the Managed Publication feature to publish the same page first with the "Publish" destination and then again with the "Preview" destination. In both cases my external webhook is receiving the event properly, however the Adobe IO event payload between these two are identical and there is no way to distinguish which environment the page was being published to. I'm proposing that an additional attribute be added to the Adobe IO event body for the Page Publish event which would identify which "Destination" was selected if a content author uses the Managed Publication feature in AEM. The value could perhaps be the value "publish" or "preview" depending on what the author selected, or maybe even the fully qualified URL of the publisher or preview environment in the event body. Based on this attribute in the Adobe IO event payload my external webhook URL I would be able to add additional business logic to treat these two publish events differently based on the "Destination" that was used. Use-case: By having an additional attribute in the Adobe IO event payload we could have an external webhook have additional business logic to handle the "Publish" and "Preview" destination differently.  In my case I have content that I am hosting on AWS and would like to know if an author as published a page to the publish environment or the preview environment to separate them. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently the Adobe IO AEM page publish event payload sent to the webhook is identical between publishing to publish and preview environments and no way to distinguish the two. Improved/Expected Behavior: By having an additional attribute in the Adobe IO event payload that an author had selected using the Managed Publication feature in AEM my webhook would be able to treat the two page publish events differently by knowing the page to the publisher or preview environment. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Service / Adobe IO  Customer-name/Organization name: Coca-Cola Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):  

0
J
Forum|Forum|3 years ago

Filter by product

  • All products
Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

Loading footer...