We have a team of proofreaders that pick up work out of a queue. We also have situations were someone is out of the office and a team could back them up on proof approvals. If we could assign proof approvals to a team, rather than individual, this would be a big win.
It would be great to have the capability to add custom form on document at a template level.Typically document metadata is often custom, and adding the proper custom form manually to each document (even via batch update) is a cumbersome action.Ideally defining a project template should allow to also define the document template that will be related to this project.
Marketo's dynamic chat as of now records 4 types of activities in Marketo which is great. Apart from this the ability to natively configure sending of these and possibly more custom dynamic chat activities to the 3rd party web apps would be great since dynamic chat is added on a webpage via an iFrame, it becomes rather difficult to configure the custom DOM updates on the parent landing page that can trigger sending of the chat activities to the 3rd party apps. Of-course, exporting the activities using API from Marketo is one option, but it would be great if there could be a direct way to send the events w/o having to send / query from Marketo.
Ability to select the "Actual Month View" from within Workload Balancer, from first day of the month to the last day of the month. Currently you can select a 4 week block but often misses the first day/s or the last day/s. 6 week view is a workaround, and works, but if I want to restrict a date range of the full actual month I can't currently do it.
Sometimes a project custom form I want filtered in a task report isn't the first custom form in the project and I'm realizing that it's not pulling tasks from projects where that form isn't the top form. The only option right now is 'Project > Category ID' and no option for 'Categories' (similar to if you pull Assigned To in a task report it'll only show the primary task assignee, not all assignees and should use 'Assignment Users' instead. So then you have task reports that only pull if form you're using in the report happens to be the first form used in the project, so when projects use other forms and this happens to not be first, it’s not including those tasks I want only because of this. WF says because it's two table jumps there is no way around this.
I would like to have the ability to show the date when the status on a project, task or issue changed
When you click on the "Projects I'm On" button, it turns blue and changes the filter to "Projects I'm On".When you clicks on "Projects I'm On" again, the button turns back to gray, as if it is unselected. But the view doesn't return to the previous projects view. It reverts to "My Projects". This happens regardless of what view was selected before or what the user's default view is. This creates confusion. I would like eitherUnselecting the filter returns to the previous filterOr the ability for the system admins to remove these buttons.
When assigning a user to a task, when you start typing their name, the top result needs to be selected with a mouse rather than with the 'enter' key. When tagging in an update, the functionality is better - when you start typing and the resource you want comes up and is highlighted, pressing enter attaches the user. It would be nice if the assignment section also had this capability.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow administrators to create API keys to use to authenticate with Download Center. This feature would also include an API to download from Download Center. This would improve security for customers, as they do not have to maintain the security of downloaded items. Use-case: Be able to download via an automated process without authenticating with individual user credentials Current/Experienced Behavior: Download Center requires an interactive login Improved/Expected Behavior: Download via automated processes, such as shell scripts using curl Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): n/a Customer-name/Organization name: Hilti Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Add the ability to log hours in both Illustrator and InDesign, like you made available in the Photoshop extension.
Allow the System Admin to set Workfront out of the box fields to be required such as "Project Sponsor".We use the project sponsor's department information to drive reporting. If this is not populated, we a) don't know whom the primary contact should be b) do not know which department is paying for the work and c) do not know which portfolio to place the request & project
In our instance, a user is associated with their principal Company (i.e. dentsu International) but we work with thousands of other Companies (i.e. Clients).The current As-Is restriction 'View only companies & groups they belong to' limits our ability to share companies to project managers but at the same time restricts information related to their groups; and vice versa.We propose splitting this restriction into two options.view 'only groups they belong to'view 'Companies associated with Groups they belong to'
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add custom fields to file details Use-case: User needs to see more custom metadata right in Asset Link to pick the correct asset. e.g. different product mutations Current/Experienced Behavior: Asset Link displays a small standard set of information within the file details page. Improved/Expected Behavior: Asset Link file detail can be customized or a metadata page is added which shows a set of extended data stored with the asset. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): InDesign 202217.0.1 AssetLink3.1.65 AEM 6.5SP9 Customer-name/Organization name: Spar ICS + Spar Austria Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow the filter categories in Asset Link to be customized either via a settings json or in the backend of AEM. Use-case: Even the out-of-box version of AEM offers way more metadata fields that would be useful filters. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently there are only two filters in Asset Link. File type and Last modified. Improved/Expected Behavior: Filter would help to speed up workflows and enrich the UX. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): InDesign 202217.0.1 AssetLink3.1.65 AEM 6.5SP9 Customer-name/Organization name: Spar ICS + Spar Austria Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Dear Marketo, It will be great to have the ability to view when a Marketo field was created (Date and Time). Quiet often, we have to figure out when a field was created in Marketo for reporting purposes. But unless we reach out to support, this information is not visible to the users. It will be great to add this data to the Field Management. Many thanksWayne
Description - I would absolutely love to see the ability to set my auto transcriptions to be styled just like the ones available on Instagram stories, where one word appears on screen as the person is saying it. either as a motion graphics template we can select OR simply a setting we can use in the captions. Why is this feature important to you - This style of subtitles is VERY popular on ALL social media platforms but for professional video editors who do not have a plugin, is very tedious to have to manually animate each word. Working in marketing where you want your content to feel native and less ad-like, this would greatly improve performance efficiencies. How would you like the feature to work - 2 options would be great: A) Motion Graphics Templates where you can type in the words being said (with a maximum number of words allowed per mograph) and then afterwards space out the timing for when they appear on screen. B) Simply offer it as a new setting that can be selected after someone uses the auto-generated transcription in premiere pro. Automatically changing the style from basic movie-style captions to Instagram styled subtitles. Current Behaviour - Have to manually create separate text graphics for each word and animate them manually either via After Effects or in Premiere Pro. Very tedious, even in 30 second videos!!
Description -Determine a way we can see how often a report is being used.Determine a way to get a list of all reports that have not been opened within the last 2 years.Determine users that have not accessed AA within 2 years.Why is this feature important to you - I want to find a way to get rid of old reports that are no longer being used in Adobe analytics. I want to get rid of Adobe analytics users that have not accessed Adobe analytics for a while or maybe 2 years and over. How would you like the feature to work - A filter on the table that contains all reports and adobe analytics users. Current Behaviour - I'm unable to find one.
Description - I see Audience Manager already allows Cross-bucket Auth. Our company would love to utilize this for Adobe Analytics. Why is this feature important to you - My company has restrictions that disallow sharing of persistent S3 User credentials. This would allow us to ingest our Analytics data into our own data pipelines for enrichment How would you like the feature to work - Exactly as described by Audience Managers specs works for us: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/audience-manager/user-guide/implementation-integration-guides/receiving-audience-data/batch-outbound-data-transfers/authorize-s3-cross-bucket.html?lang=enHowever, if it could be implemented into the UI in some way, that would be great. Maybe you could link to your account id similar to how you link to your rsa public key for SFTP. Current Behaviour - Currently we must either set up an SFTP server, which is additional unnecessary overhead, or create a persistent user, which our Security team doesn't like.
Currently, the only option for viewing a Word doc is for Workfront to download the document. I would like to be able to open the document in a preview window, similar to how a PDF opens.
At present the removal process of the Marketo instance from the Marketo Measure take weeks of time. While the CRM integration removal takes up to 3 days, if not less depending on the number of touchpoints and other data synced to Marketo Measure from the CRM which is still reasonable and comparatively better than the weeks of time it takes for the process of Marketo integration removal. I agree that removing platform(s) especially MAP / CRM is not something that someone would do often, but it'd be great to be able to quickly remove the Marketo from Marketo Measure if need be.
Many of my users, especially new users, are confused about the difference between Proof Approvals and Document Approvals. People get these mixed up constantly. I want to be able to hide the "Approvals" tab in the left sidebar in the Document Details Landing page. This landing page is currently not covered by Layout Template controls.Thanks!
It would be helpful if we could paste screenshots directly into the Update section without having save it and then attach it.
Currently when an issue is in "awaiting feedback" status, the status automatically changes back to "in progress" as soon as the primary contact takes action. This is frustrating in situations where a user simply comments to confirm receipt and the status should not be changed back to in progress. Admin should be able to disable this feature, or even better, this should be a feature that is enabled at a project level. This often causes disruption for my teams who have to constantly change the status back to 'awaiting feedback' if they still need information from a primary contact.
hi. its 2022. im a person with an unconventional name (perhaps one that is in a cultural minority in the US (ie - not white) and includes punctuation). my name may be conventional in my country, but here it is not. and now i cannot edit my name to be my name. please allow special characters in name field for one.workfront and workfront live. this will also allow people to add their pronouns like this: FIrst: SydneyLast: (she / they) Gregory
Currently, there is no feature to automatically subscribe users to projects whether they are project owners or other users shared with the project.Issue requesters can receive notifications in the updates even if not tagged on them; however this does not apply to project updates.Looking for an automatic subscription or other means in which project owners can receive updates on their projects even if they might have not been tagged on
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
