Description - It's currently difficult to know in which area of a panel in Workspace to right-click for actionsWhy is this feature important to you - I use the feature often and find it difficult to know where to click.How would you like the feature to work - Make it visible somehow, upon hovering over with the mouse, than a right-click action can be taken within that area.Current Behaviour - it's quite difficult to know where to click. Try downloading the csv of a flow report by means of right clicking on the panel. It's hard to know where to click!
Many of our projects have multiple tasks assigned to a Team. When a person from that team is going to work on the project, they have to click on the Work On It button, wait for the page to reload, select the next one, etc.Would like the ability to have a checkbox field that they can select all the tasks they will work on and then click the Work On It button so they will all move at once into their personal task list.
Description - Today, we can utilize the Histogram Visualization in Workspace with any event. Under the hood it creates a lot of Segments, which is also super helpful when we need those Segments for other use cases. However, a lot of engagement use cases would largely benefit from using the Count Distinct function in Segments. Some simple example could be:How many different pages do users view in a Visit?How many Marketing Channels do Visitors use in a month?(for CJA) How many different devices do people use?Functionally, we could just add dimensions as another option for the selector dropdown, which would internally build the Segments based on the Count Distinct function instead of the normal Segment definition.Why is this feature important to you - To better understand user or session engagement.How would you like the feature to work - Allow dimensions to be dropped or selected in the selector: Current Behaviour - Only events are supported and building engagement Segments takes a lot of effort.
We want the ability to combine multiple Workfront Documents into a single Proof. Currently, combined proofs can only be created from a local file upload. We have more than one contributor to some of our collateral, so each adds their documents to the Project's Document library. When a proof is generated we need to "add the collateral together into one proof for our reviewers. Please add the function to also upload from a project's document library.
Existing GET API endpoint for querying the static returns an array of people in the static list - along with that it would be helpful if there's an alternate endpoint to get the count of members or if the existing query endpoint can accommodate returning the member count. Counting the array elements isn't very neat approach for people / services just interested in getting hold of count of members.
It would be helpful if the export icon was changed. Users are always getting Indent and Export confused.Thanks!
It would be great if Adobe Target allows to filter activities by user.
Description - It sure would be nice to be able to use RegEx to isolate values in real-time data elements passed to Target for rules-based audiences.Why is this feature important to you - Often data element values are set for Analytics purposes and contain concatenated data that is hard to parse.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to AAM, let us write regex ruleCurrent Behaviour - no RegEx available
We are looking for a way to pull a list of AEM pages that Marketo forms are on. Right now we use the AEM form component for Marketo forms https://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/marketo-form/index.html and are looking for a way to pull all the AEM pages the forms are on.
I want "Onwer ID" prompts to include deactivated users. This prompt allows me to use WF's predictive text when typing in a name. There is a work around to change the prompt to "Owner Name" and use "contains", but I am guessing at name spellings. I want predictive text to work for both active and deactivated users. Thank you.
Straightforward idea: there are times when clients may need to pass the type of program that is used in a flow step. For example, if you have an Event program with specific channels for Roadshow and Tradeshow, you may want to stamp the channel in a field in a flow step for sales purposes. However, there's no systematic way to note a program's channel in a flow step today--instead, you must create a Program token with the same value, then reference that token. Could a text token that outputs the channel name be created to streamline flow processing?
We would like to have the opportunity to apply for all users the additional proof permission "Resolve Comments & Apply Actions" per default, This default setting should be applied on a user level.This should help to reduce manual effort when setting up an huge amount user accounts where this requirement is needed.
Hi - we utilize the Queue Topic and Routing Rules feature on almost every single project to make things easier for shared services team. In a recent release, a "Drafts" feature was added to the global Request area. We would love it if that functionality could also be added to the Issues area of a specific document.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.