Build better products with our product team
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: New Contexthub Segments placed at conf location with 6.4 repository restructuring don't have copy-paste options Use-case: Content Authors who are extensively using context hub segments for personalization rely heavily on copy-pasting segments and tweaking some changes in the existing one Current/Experienced Behavior: No copy paste option in new segment location. it was present though in 6.3 with the classic option under miscadmin Improved/Expected Behavior: Copy-paste option would definitely improve time to market for content authors who cater personalization Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.11 Customer-name/Organization name: Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow users to add restricted characters in asset file/folder name through a console/tools menu Use-case: There has been many instances of this use-case, where customer has asked to restrict use of specific chars in the asset file/folder name. Current/Experienced Behavior: Current : There are some restricted chars which are not allowed, apart from that , if you need to add a new one, you need to overlay libs file and and your new chars to the list. Expected: A console/dialog exists in the asset section of the tools where we can add a list of chars we don't want to be included in the file/folder name. Improved/Expected Behavior: No overlaying of OOTB code for a small change such as including a single char in the list of characters not allowed. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We would propose to have an out of the box way to always add the "?wcmmode=disabled" url slug to urls inside the author "Preview as published" environment because without it, we experience custom components breaking in the "Preview as Published". If it was always added, the author instance's "Preview as Published" could be fully navigateable for an author, which is good for demo's to stakeholders or business or testing UX flows. Use-case: An author wishes to test or demonstrate a UX flow to stakeholders on the author's "Preview as Published" to include the most recent visual changes. Current/Experienced Behavior: An author clicks a link on a "Preview as Published" page and is redirected to the correct URL, but without the "?wcmmode=disabled". The new page features components that visually break, visually misbehave or do not load content from content fragments. Improved/Expected Behavior: An author clicks a link on a "Preview as Published" page and is redirected to the correct URL, with the "?wcmmode=disabled". All components on the page render well. The author can gets a perfect visual representation of all components, with the latest changes present. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.8.0 Customer-name/Organization name: National Lottery Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM Support for HEVC / H.265 Videos Use-case: Cinematic videos from the new iphone are a new file type Current/Experienced Behavior: Video previews do not play correctly as MOV files Improved/Expected Behavior: Videos should preview as MOV files Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: DSW Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
As an organisation we are completely gutted/disappointed that the view you get on TEAMS > Scheduling is going. ALL of our teams use daily in their catch-ups and for team leaders to see who has got what on - its a great one page visual view of all members of a work team. You can also see visually a project tracking across the work team as well. Its is also ONE of the MAIN attractions for converting teams to Workfront. Whilst Workload Balancer you can view projects scheduled against a person, you have to use the dropdown to see everyone PLUS for people who are visual only - this view is really hard to read. We would like to see this view stay. Thank you.
We have tried implementing an AWS SFTP location with Adobe Launch, which we discovered is not supported. From our support rep:"I checked internally and found that Currently 'S3 does not support SFTP Symlinks for Launch SFTP Hosts'. It is my understanding engineering is considering this as a feature in the future, but I do not have a guarantee that they will implement support for this. Options going forward are to create an archive and manually place the library on the AWS locationhttps://33sticks.com/how-to-self-host-a-launch-library/ Or host using an SFTP that does not link to AWS." We would like the ability to push files to an Amazon or Azure host.
Description -Currently there are two methods to integrate A4T, either via the sdid approach or the data insertion api.The sdid approach is very limited as it has quirks related to first-time visitors. There is also a complete absence of technical guidance or documentation on how to generate an SDID if you are using server-side target on a modern platform that does not support one of the Target SDKs.This is particularly important as the most substantial/performant types of experiments/activities are likely to be run server-side, but server-side analytics lacks feature parity with client-side.The data insertion api approach is very expensive, as it increments an additional server call each time a user has an activity response from Target. It also introduces significant/unacceptable sequencing issues; either the A4T event arrives before the analytics event, causing misstatements of values related to things like marketing channels or it arrives after the page level hit for which the user actually qualified for the experiment, which requires more complex segmentation.A less expensive and problematic approach would be to enable users to pass the tnta value via context data or an eVar and then map that dimension to tnta within processing rules. This would introduce meaningful flexibility, avoid unnecessary server calls (which is mutually beneficial for clients and Adobe) and mitigate any sequencing issues.Why is this feature important to you -This feature is important as the current A4T implementation choices are limited AND analytics can only support 3 listVars. To be able to analyze users in multiple experiments we need access to the tnta dimensions which behave as listVars.How would you like the feature to work -The tnta dimension would be an option within processing rules. Users would have the ability to map either existing dimensions or context data values to the tnta dimension.Current Behaviour -💢😤
Currently, task commit dates can only be set by going into the task details view or the side panel. Many project owners need to track commit dates as well as planned completion date, without assigning the task, or even when assigned. Allowing the editing of the commit date directly from the project task list would speed up the editing of this field
My VP of Marketing wants me to start reporting on the number of projects my team (Marketing) was working on for the previous month. Right now Workfront doesn't have the ability to pull the number of projects with a particular status within a specific period of time. For example, she'd like to know that Marketing was working on X number of projects in the month of December 2017. This functionality would be great, and I'm sure other teams using Workfront would benefit from this reporting.
Allow "out of office" indicators from Outlook / email source to carry through to WorkFront for all users. This will help in resource planning and scheduling for immediate and future project plans.
Resource budgeting tools are slow to load the larger the data set you're working with. The tool does not appear to be designed to fully support enterprise reporting and doesn't seem to be able to function efficiently with the reality of a larger company's data needs.Improve the efficiency of getting data entered through the project level resource budgeting tool by loading the roles from the resource pool to use in budgeting WITHOUT forcing the massive calculation of data for all available roles. Allow a choice to save the data entry and then run the calculation afterward if a user wants to do this at the project level. It might make more sense for a user to enter data by project but then run the larger planner report for a global look to see which projects need adjusting for which roles.Update the options for the planning tool to allow for retaining history of roles being filled. Right now we see that we lose all budgeted hours for a specific role when the only user gets promoted out of it and before we fill that role again. There are sometimes gaps in filling the same role but we want the reporting data retained instead of deleted.Allow administrative features to let system admins determine if they want to handle budgeting by job role. It would be nice to see the option of entering budgeted hours by job role based on the roles in the resource pool and not the users in the resource pool. the calculation for availability could utilize the current headcount of users with that role rather than the number of users in the resource pool. It's the promotions of users and deactivation of users that starts messing up reporting data.Update the budgeted hour API to include a "last updated" field and ability to detect deleted records to remove.
In the New Experience, on project details, overview allow fields in one section / box to be moved into another section / box. For example: Our company heavily use the following to fields:"status" located in the Basic Information section / box"project owner" in the Project Stakeholders section / boxWe would like to have these two fields in the same section / box. So allowing the system administrator to move one field into the section / box of the other field would make the overview page much more useable - I could put all the important highly touched fields into one section / box.
In the New Experience, in the project details, overview, allow the system administrator to move the sections / boxes around (reorder them). The sections / boxes my Company use most often are lower on the page however, I'd like to move those specific sections / boxes to the top of the page.It would be more user friendly to allow reordering of the sections / boxes on this overview page.
We would like an option in the Report Settings to hide the 'export' functionality.This offers extra data protection controls and saves real-estate on dashboards where the export functionality will be seldom used by the end-user.
These operators were removed from analysis workspace and i have troubles now to find a workaround solution to get the segments based on a numerical dimension.
There is a need to report on task dates aggregated in a calendar view. There are 3 types of calendar view:A sequence of month/year (no day), a traditional calendar (the days per month per year), and the MS Project timeline view (the horizontal line segmented by dates).Please provide additional report types that allows filtered tasks to be shown in one of the calendar views for a specified date field. The report should allow for specific fields to be shown on the dates, and the date range to show for matching tasks.
Currently it displays all users alphabetically. It would be great to have the option to also sort by home team, home group, etc. Currently the only option is to view one team at a time. If you view several teams, they are automatically all sorted alphabetically
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We have an challenge with our implementation of Adobe Assets specifically, that when a user is in the system working in a specific folder of the DAM, and then opens an asset via the inbox, when they close the asset, they are taken back to the folder they were originally in, not to the folder of the asset they were just reviewing. Please see below for the steps to recreate, and what we would like to have happen, and why this is a pain point for my company's implementation. This system design has negatively impacted our company because users are uploading their assets with some frequency in the wrong folder, requiring our admins to help get them moved, or deleting the mis-loaded assets and helping the users re-upload the assets. Use-case: A user is working in a specific folder in the DAM, navigates to inbox to complete a review task, and is taken back to the original location when the review task is completed, not the the most recent folder location where they were working on the asset in the review task. Current/Experienced Behavior: 1. A user is working in a folder in the DAM (for example, DAM>content>BusinessA>Images>Birds)2. The user is notified that they have a review task by email or by seeing a new task showing on the inbox icon in the upper right3. The goes to the inbox via the Inbox link in the upper right or link from an email, and opens a review task assigned to them4. The user goes to the Payload, downloads the asset (for review purposes, if an asset is a multi-page PDF or MS file, in order to view and annotate the entire document, it has to be downloaded and uploaded as a new version) from a different folder (e.g. DAM>content>BusinessA>Documents>Brochures), and reviews and annotates it in Adobe Reader or MS application.5. The user is taken to the folder they were working in in step 1. If the user is not observant, they try to upload the asset they were reviewing in step 4 as a new version, but it's in the Images>Birds folder, not in the Documents>Brochures folder, so it's not versioned there, it's created as a new asset in the folder where it's not intended to be. We have confirmed this behavior several times and with our ACS DAM Strategist. We even made sure to navigate to the main screen by deleting all of the URL except the home part of the URL (https://author-yyyy-prod2.adobecqms.net/aem/start.html) between steps 1 and 2 above. Improved/Expected Behavior: 1. A user is working in a folder in the DAM (for example, DAM>content>BusinessA>Images>Birds)2. The user is notified that they have a review task by email or by seeing a new task showing on the inbox icon in the upper right3. The goes to the inbox via the Inbox link in the upper right or link from an email, and opens a review task assigned to them4. The user goes to the Payload, downloads the asset (for review purposes, if an asset is a multi-page PDF or MS file, in order to view and annotate the entire document, it has to be downloaded and uploaded as a new version) from a different folder (e.g. DAM>content>BusinessA>Documents>Brochures), and reviews and annotates it in Adobe Reader or MS application.5. The user is taken to the folder they were working in in step 4 (e.g. DAM>content>BusinessA>Images>Birds), where they most recently interacted with the system and assets. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5, SP9 Customer-name/Organization name: 3M Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Many programs allow you to delay when a message/email is sent, e.g. I'm writing an email after 5 p.m. but can set it to delay so that it's sent the following day at 9 a.m. Now that people are working remotely, it's more important than ever to allow them to disconnect after working hours. It would be great if we could institute a group setting where we can delay all Workfront notifications for specific groups to be during working hours only, but allow individual users to opt out (e.g. individual users can set notifications sent to them to be always instant).
We would like System Admins to be able to modify the user name part of the notification email address (not the domain). Corporate security departments prefer to write rules for allowing external emails based upon the company name rather than on a generic word such as "notifications".Current email address: notifications@my.workfront.comExamples if we were allowed to modify the user name:mycompanyname.notifications@my.workfront.commycompanyname@my.workfront.com
Right now, you can only move documents. It would be nice to be able to copy documents to other projects, tasks, issues.
It would be very helpful to have the ability to review intranet links within the proofing tool since we have an employee intranet platform that we are required to manage. Different parts of our business reach out to us with the information that needs to be provided to employees through the platform, and we run that work through Workfront the way we do everything else. I know we are not the only ones that work like this which means there is value to gained by many users. I'm excited for this opportunity. -E
At a project level, when a task or issue is assigned to multiple people, it is difficult to see the overall impact of allocation changes on the task/issue in the Workload Balancer.We want to add a function in the Workload Balancer to group allocations by task/issue (see below).This will reduce the back & forth between the task/issue page and the Workload Balancer page at a project-level.
Tasks only appear on timesheets for those listed as primary assignee. ANYONE assigned to a task should be able to add time to it on their timesheet.
Description - Adobe Campaign Classic integrate with Adobe InDesign , to help creative email templates creation more efficient. Why is this feature important to you -With this need of HTML developers and dependency will reduce at the same time business can build and preview own emails. So time to market will increase. Effectively productivity will get increase and its win win situation. How would you like the feature to work -When user open delivery , for creation of Delivery the indesign should seamlessly integrate. Current Behaviour -100% dependent on developers
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
