Description -Why is this feature important to you - It saves time and prevents selection of wrong dataset.How would you like the feature to work - There should be search button, search by name or label, while selecting Dataset in Source connection.Current Behaviour - Currently, you need to click on next page to identify your dataset. It is time-consuming.
It would be nice if you were able to either preset from a set up perspective or from the task level the ability to have options when duplicating tasks...like: Clear Assignment, Clear Predecessor, Clear Dates, Select Status, Notify Assignee etc.
Would love the ability to send someone a URL so they can go directly to the right folder in the project.
A filter in Updates would be great. Sometimes there are very long strings of updates, and some are nested/collapsed and it can be hard to find one that you know is there. If you could filter by User (if you know who posted it) or search by a word, that would make finding that elusive needle in a haystack so much easier.
If they don't already exist, It would be nice to have folders to store workspaces. My list is getting very large. I like the tagging feature, but would also be nice to file some away.
There can be many reasons users and the system enter updates on an object (project, issue, task, etc). This can make finding the most relevant update for a report challenging. Today's design also assumes that every update the object owner makes is a "condition update".We propose adding functionality to #tag, categorize, or group updates. This would support the ability to filter the updates for a more precise item - such as the last "project status summary" or the "project gate review" or "staffing" topic.The tagging/categorization should support a single update having multiple tags - such as "customer facing update" and "internal project status summary".
From the Resource Management > Planner tool, it would be great if we could create flexibility in the way that the information is displayed. For example, we were hoping to re-organize the order in the planner view to show the available hours from a team first, then the hours for the people within that team, and then the hours per project.The current filters are helpful, but there are a few limitations. When filtering by role, it shows the available hours for everyone in that role, but then it goes directly into the entire list of projects. Adding flexibility in the hierarchy of the way the data is displayed is what I'm hoping to achieve.
We would like to be able to highlight when creating updates and the ability to add highlights to existing updates to call out crucial information and allow for clearer understanding of needs.
Include an "Apply" button with Layout Template setup. While creating an implementing Layout templates for users this will allow minor changes to be made and tested without having to leave the template setup area.
Anytime someone is assigned to a task in a project, is the project owner or has had a project shared with them, they become in the People section of the project. All good. However, anytime a task is removed, a project owner changes, or any people change on a project, the old users are still in the People section of the project. Based on email notifications many people opt into, this means they are getting so many irrelevant emails for projects they are no longer on. They don't want to turn those off, bc need those notifications for projects they are actually on. When someone is removed, the People section should be dynamic to be removed from there too. Also, when we use a template for a project (which is almost always), and in Planning/refinement before changing to Current, sometimes we remove unnecessary tasks, but it is still adding those people to the People section even when we remove them in Planning status. Very frustrating.Lastly, when someone is deactivated, they should also be dynamically removed from templates and the project people section.
Many times for some teams, the whole team is assigned to a task (not individual users, but the WorkFront Team is assigned, like Web Team, or Studio Team for example). In the Team's balancer, it shows tasks assigned to people on the team, but doesn't show any tasks assigned to the Team itself. This is very frustrating and not showing us the full picture of what is assigned to a team and want to be able to see these and then easily reassign from there, like we can reassign tasks to an individual from the workload balancer.
The use case:Project Owners assign a team from a different department to tasks on their project. The team then looks at the tasks in the Workload Balancer of their team view (Unassigned Tasks) and allocates users and hours to the task.Currently doing this we are facing two problems, where the task will not show up in the balancer, and the team does not take notice of the assignment.1.) When the team is assigned to a parent task, but not to a child task. The task will show up in the backlog, but not in the balancer, because we can not plan hours on a parent task. However, it is important to see the assignment in the balancer as well, so the task is noticed.2.) When the team is assigned to a task, but there are also users assigned who are not part of the team. - It is pretty common that a team and not team but project related users are assigned to the same task. However, these tasks are not visible in the Workload Balancer, because they are not unassigned, but also not assigned to a user of the team. It would be great to find a solution where all tasks assigned to the team will show up in the balancer, so teams can use the balancer for reliable planning and do not miss any work items in their planning.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.