In Proof HQ you could easily view other proofs in the folder, now in Workfront I am unable to do that, we upgraded (but seems like a downgrade :() Can we please get this feature back into Workfront. To compare proofs I was able to easily select compare in ProofHQ and toggle to a different proof in a folder. Now there are many more clicks involved using Workfront. Also to compare different proofs, I have to close out of the current comparison and select two new ones then launch it again. Was seamless before, now it feels like many steps backwards.Please get this into Workfront as our clients are wondering why this feature would be taken off.Thank you,Junaid
It would be great if Fusion 2 module error handling included exponential backoff, so that 429, 500, and 502 errors don't just throw an error and stop the scenario.
The current document decision options in Workfront are: ApproveApproved with ChangesReject For liability reasons, legal reviewers in the system do not want to tag documents as "Approved." We would like to have the ability to change the names of the available decisions, as they can be edited in Proof.
When filling out a custom form via a request queue and converting the issue/request to a project (where there is no project template) we would like the custom form to attach automatically without a team member having to manually attach the custom form to the project for the information to flow over.
Current UI of embedded custom forms in Workfront is disapointing. It could really use a refresh.Main problems:A lot of useless white spaceeverything left alignedlimited organization of fields (custom fields cannot be mixed with default fields)lack of brandinglack of visual elemntsoutdated UINice interface is like entry door to a store, you want this to look nice and attract customers. With workfront request form design this is hard to achieve.Few random example from internet to show how modern webform should look like
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: As a user, I prefer to see a “relate” function at the top ribbon for ease of use. Use-case: When working with assets, have the ability to access the "relate" function from the top ribbon Current/Experienced Behavior: The "relate" function can only be accessed from the ellipse on the properties screen when working with an asset Improved/Expected Behavior: The "relate" function will be moved to a more prominent place on the top ribbon Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Experience Manager 2021.7.5607.20210705T063041Z-210600 Customer-name/Organization name: Accenture Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When we route websites, the image is a screengrab. When we want to use the Text tool to highlight text to make comments more streamline, we don't have the ability since text is not detectable.
It would be great if you can provide the functionality to extract the list of the leads (that are marked as a bot). This will help us to analyze those leads and then exclude them from our next email sends which will help in improving email deliverability, opens and clicks.
Description - Enable Remote Offers to be used in Auto Personalisation activitiesWhy is this feature important to you - More than 90% of our offers are Remote Offers, managed in the CMS. For various reasons we aren't using experience fragments - and yes, we are hoping to move to experience fragments and complete the integration, but unless you a) Use AEM, b) use Experience Fragments, and c) have the integration to publish into AEC - you can't make use of AP for web unless you hard-code HTML into the Target UI, which seems very limiting from a feature adoption perspective. In our case, manually authoring HTML in the Target UI introduces the risk of human error, inconsistent content, and is a very manually tedious task that makes it hard for us to transition our existing activities into AP. It also causes us issues because our 'offers' are managed by content managers in the CMS, and with the AP limitation we have to introduce more handoffs and additional steps, checks and balances in the end-to-end value chain to get content live.How would you like the feature to work - Enable us to use Remote Offers in AP activities in the same way that we can for other activities (note that we can already use Remote Offers in AT). It would be nice to use other offer types (such as Image Offers), but for now Remote Offers would deliver an enormous benefit to us.Current Behaviour - In AP you can only select from Text/HTML Offers or Experience Fragments.
Need to have the ability to do multi-filter grouping in the resource planner same as report types. This will enable us to analyze set of projects/resources at once that falls to either of the multi-filter groups.
Imagine I have a task called inspect widget. This task will take place over the course of a few days and will all be performed by the same person. This task involves checking the size, color, and electrical performance of the widget. Today I could create a task grouping and make three separate tasks, but that is both ugly and confusing. It would also grow the size of the project which affects display performance. What I envision is a checklist like capability where you could optionally tie each item in the checklist to a % completion of the total task. For example, size might be 25% of the task, color 10% and electric 65%. Checking each item off would drive completion of the task. This functionality would allow for greatly simplified project plans that still have good details as to what steps are needed to complete a task. Bonus points if we could create a way to drive predecessors off of checklist items as well as the task.
Currently when working in the agile project view you can add fields to each Story (subtask) and assign points to each card. You can add up to three fields to the card but none of the fields show the points assigned for that particular card, just the total points of the iteration (all the cards added up). Suggesting to have the ability to add a field to the card to show what that cards assigned points are. In a waterfall style project view text mode would be enables, so that may also be part of this solution.
I am using a Fusion automation to notify users that save their converted tasks into the queue project, asking them to move these tasks. The project should have a toggle "Allow Tasks" in the queue setup panel. Alternately, a class should be added to the permissions model to allow/disallow users from saving tasks into a project. Thanks.
We would appreciate the ability to set up dynamic routing rules for queue topics. This would be especially useful for queue topics that are used to log issues to live projects. For example, if someone logs a code issue to a project, I would like the new issue to use a dynamic routing rule that always routes to the project owner, or certain users that match a certain job role within the project team. This would allow us to automate the issue logging workflow considerably.
We need to have a functionality to allow "watchers" on requests/issues without being a part of the approval path or being an approver. In our environment, we have a group of executives who would like to be informed of activities. However, in our current workfront environment, in order for them to be notified in an automated fashion, they have to be set as an approver. This is creating bottlenecks in our process flow. Rather than having a request be approved by 2 people, it has to be approved by 5 instead, because the other 3 would like to be informed. This would be an extension of the subscribe functionality. Here's why the subscribe functionality fail in our organization: 1. subscribers have to manually stumble upon an issue/request in order to subscribe to it 2. admins can't pre-subscribe a user to a particular group/category of request
In the scenario someone has incorrectly logged time on the wrong project; it would be great if an Admin could transfer the hours to the correct project.
I want to see more relevant results at first. Things that are related to my team, my group or role should show up at the top, as well as things that I have accessed recently.
Inline editing from a broad report is super helpful for my team when maintaining Custom Form info. This feature is currently unavailable for document reports.
When users are "auto-provisioned" through SSO, they are created with the base access level (Requestor) by default. This base level is the requester access. There is currently no way to change the default, this is a limitation of the product. I'd like a way, as an admin, to change the default access level to Reviewer instead of Requester.
This is just a test I have a customer that needs to edit their idea and I am trying to find out how to do so.
Description - To have the ability to mask a cc'd email address on the email notification that the external signer receives Why is this feature important to you - I have multiple customers with this specific use case and would like to offer it as workaround solution for masking email addresses so it's not viewable by external signers. In this scenario, the email address we're trying to mask is the vice president of the company and it's important that their email address not be shared.
Workfront should allow aggregations on calculated fields in a report (or any other column in a list view). For example, right now, if three people are assigned to a task, you can aggregate the cost of their labor based on their role cost per hour or user cost per hour. But in many consulting firms, users work across multiple roles and make a percentage of the billing rate for that role on that work. Right now, there is no way within Workfront to aggregate labor cost for tasks assigned to multiple people that may be making different percentages of the billable rate.
Description - the cookie set function's third argument is an object. Please allow it to be an integer for those who used to old syntax.Why is this feature important to you - seeing too many developers supplying an integer there and failing.How would you like the feature to work - check the type of the third argument and if it's an int, just use it for days as you do with the objectCurrent Behaviour - supplying int does nothing.
Could Marketo modify in the Field Management of the Admin the way the Custom Layout Designer works to enable to have one layout per partition? Many thanks
The Mark as Read dot is pretty small. Can we have a bigger target to click on?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
