Build better products with our product team
Description - it would be great to have the ability to combine AND and OR logical operators in segments/ filter. Why is this feature important to you - let me bring an example here. I work in the education industry and we are responsible for communicating students about a variaety of subjects. For the businesses teams, technical details are irrelevant, they just want to see how communications are performing (note that we use AJO). For example, enrollment team wants to see enrollment results. Therefore, I would like to develop a CJA report with a segment like (Campaign Name contains enrollment OR Journey Name contains enrollment OR customActionJourneyName contains enrollment) AND not test event AND Journey Name does not contains count. Two important notes here:1. we currently use SMS as custom action. So the journey name for SMS is stored in a non-native AEP dataset. For AJO emails, journey name is stored in ajo_entity_dataset normally. In this situation, I am unable to create a derived field to combine the names, since three looks up would be needed to achieve such a result, which at this moment is not possible. 2. journey count. We started working with AJO recently. Since we are still learning how to work with AJO and there has been some delays with data ingestion and audience evaluation, we sometimes create journeys with no actions, just to confirm the evaluation is correct. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to have the ability to combine AND and OR logical operators in segment builder in CJA. Current Behaviour - currently, segments only accept AND or OR as operators, even if you have different containers. You either use condition1 AND condition2 AND condition3; or condition1 OR condition2 OR condition3.
Description -Ability to create a template for issues object. Ability to create a template where I can add multiple issue custom forms, that can be used when submitting a request or creating a request from the queue itself at project level.Why is this feature important to you - I need to control visibility of certain areas only for process managers, however I want to avoid them adding a form every time they have to work on a request. Having a template would create a request with the custom form the user would complete, and custom form that the process manager would complete and would be only visible to the process manager.How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour - Does not exist
This is just a small idea to work more aligned with who other applications use folders, and how we as users are used to work with folders. It would help the way of working if AJO could adopt what is established way of working with folder structures. I am sure it is created in AJO for a reason, but for us as and users it creates a lot of irritation and frustration. Why do we need to unpublish a published landingpage just for moving it into another folder - that dont make any sense. And if we then connect access right issue with it, it becomes even worse. You can unpublish, move - but not publish it again. It could be local sett rules, but this seams a little over complicated. If you have access rights to the landingpages, you sould be able to create a folder, and move a page to that folder without unpublishing the page, move it and publishing a gain. I guess the page had the same ID where ever in the structure the page is. This process creates frustration on several levels - first because of the inconvenient process , then for the challenge that there are several access right in play to get it completely done.
Our business is currently using Marketo Dynamic Chat and are looking to explore using the Meeting Booking functionality. We’ve run into a key limitation with the Round Robin feature. Here’s a scenario:We have three agents available for booking.Agent A and Agent B are only available on Tuesdays.Agent C is only available on Wednesdays.When a visitor web visitor interacts with our dialogue, the Round Robin feature will cycle through Agent A, B and C without accounting for individual availability.So if a web visitor is only available on the Wednesday, Agent A would show up on the first session - even though the agent is not available on the Wednesday. If the web visitor closes the session and revisits the dialogue again, Agent B would appear. The system doesn’t recognise that Agent C is the only one actually available on Wednesdays.This results in:Missed meeting opportunities for our sales team.Manual workarounds or inefficient routing logic outside of the intended Round Robin function.Suggested Improvement:Update the Round Robin logic in Marketo Dynamic Chat to:Filter agents based on their calendar availability before selecting them for rotation.This would ensure that:Only agents who are available on the Lead's desired day for booking the meeting are surfaced for that session.Visitors are shown accurate, bookable time slots.This change would significantly improve the reliability and performance of the Meeting Booking tool in Dynamic Chat.
With companies becoming more security-aware and device manufacturers blocking requests to certain domains, people are looking for opportunities to bring their marketing tools in a first-party context. With Launch, we can either host the library on Adobe's domain or our own webserver, but not behind a transparent reverse-proxy. After some experimentation, I have found that the individual extensions and files are still loaded from Adobe's domain, even if the initial Launch library is hidden behind a proxy. Conceptually it should be an easy addition to allow users to hide the adobedtm Domain behind their company's proxy. From a feature perspective, I would like to specify both a domain and a path from where Launch should attempt to load files instead of the standard Adobe domain and path. The files should still be pushed to Akamai and be available there, but should not reference files from the Adobe domain. This would make it significantly easier for companies like my own to bring Launch into a first-party context (a bit like Googles Server Side GTM) and harden it against blocked third-party domains.
Description - It would really be helpful to extend the options on posting an update, with something like "Private for object's group members", to be able to define the users who are able to read an update.Why is this feature important to you - This would give us more possibilities to hide an update from specific users.How would you like the feature to work - Add an option "Private for object's group members", which depends on the group the object is happening on. Another option could be a possibility to define the groups who should be able to read an update using a multi-select dropdown, or an option "Make private to tagged users / groups / teams only".Current Behaviour - Currently the only option is "Private to my company".
Description - Releases of new features often correlate with new Libraries in Adobe Experience Cloud Experience Platform Dynamic Data Collection Launch, by Adobe Tags. Unfortunately, bringing a new Library to production always involves manual work in the interface, which is not always desirable for the poor person in charge of pushing buttons. Releases on weekends or at midnight are therefore rare. To help with this, I want to propose the option to schedule the release of a successfully built Library on a Development or Staging Environment to a higher Environment (Staging or Production for Development Libraries, only Production for Staging Libraries). This could be added to the options for a successfully built Development or Staging Library: This would move the Library to the next column already, but not build it yet. If a Library is not "releaseable" anymore (due to rejection, for example) the schedule would be reset. Why is this feature important to you - Because the only thing I like more than Launch is sleep! How would you like the feature to work - See above Current Behaviour - Much 😪 but not much 😴
Description -The current Workfront Fusion Anaplan connector only supports CA certificate-based authentication for custom API calls via the HTTP module. The standard Anaplan modules (e.g., Run Export, Get File, Run Process) do not support CA certificate-based connections, limiting their usability for customers who have adopted certificate authentication for security and compliance.Why is this feature important to you -Our clients organization and many large enterprises enforce CA certificate-based authentication for Anaplan as part of IT security policies. Without native support for this connection type in the standard Fusion Anaplan modules, we are forced to reimplement core Anaplan actions using low-level custom API calls, increasing development time, reducing maintainability, and exposing us to higher error rates.Full support for CA certificate authentication would allow us to take advantage of Fusion's no-code modules for Anaplan without compromising compliance or system integrity. How would you like the feature to work - We would like the standard Fusion Anaplan modules (such as Run Export, Run Process, Get File, and Upload File) to support selecting an Anaplan connection that uses CA certificate-based authentication, in the same way these modules currently support Basic Auth or OAuth connections.Ideally, this would simply involve enabling CA-cert-based connections in the existing “Connection” selector dropdown used across Anaplan modules. Current Behaviour - The standard Anaplan modules in Workfront Fusion only accept connections using Basic Auth or OAuth. If you configure an Anaplan connection with a CA certificate, it is only usable inside custom HTTP requests via Fusion’s HTTP module, and not within any of the built-in Anaplan modules. This restricts functionality for organizations that enforce CA-cert-only authentication.
Description - Undo button available for system admins when designing/creating within a custom form, layout template, reporting, text mode. Please make this available when designing scenarios in Workfront Fusion as well. Why is this feature important to you - Eliminate unnecessary rework.How would you like the feature to work - Start by adding the undo button in custom forms, so if you delete a field by accident you can undo the action.Current Behaviour - There is no undo button
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: On our application, due to member firms structure, non-ISO locale are used (e.g. DE-DL Germany Legal). OOTB "JcrResourceBundleProvider" implementation doesn't recognize non-ISO code and returns the default value instead of locale specific translated value. A support ticket was created [1] and got a confirmation that non-ISO codes are not supported. I am raising this enhancement request to recognize the non-ISO locales as there many sites with this format. [1] https://experienceleague.adobe.com/home?lang=en&support-tab=my-cases&case-id=E-001650678&org-id=BEAD1EB7647ED25F0A495C7C%40AdobeOrg#support Use-case: Same as above Current/Experienced Behavior: non-ISO locales are not recognized by i18n (JcrResourceBundleProvider), due to this expected translated value is not returned Improved/Expected Behavior: expectation is to get the value of non-ISO locales Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS v19149 Customer-name/Organization name: Deloitte Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Currently we can use "Program member data was changed" filter in the smartlist, however if we use the attribute "New value" then we cannot use "Contains" or "Not Contains" operator option like we can use for other string type fields.Other string type field has : is, is not, starts with, not starts with, contains, not contains, is empty, is not empty For PMCF string type: is, is not, starts with, not starts with, is empty, is not empty
Description:We would like Adobe Workfront to expand mobile app capabilities beyond basic task management. A key missing feature is the ability to access reports and dashboards through the mobile app, particularly when those links are included in Workfront system notifications. Why is this feature important to you:We use dashboards that consolidate custom form data into reports, which are embedded within each project and shared via system generated email notifications. These reports provide critical project updates to our users. Currently, when users receive these links on mobile, they cannot open them within the Workfront app. Instead, the links open in a web browser, where formatting issues make the content nearly unreadable. This limits usability and makes it difficult for stakeholders to stay informed on the go. How would you like the feature to work:When a Workfront-generated notification includes a report or dashboard link, tapping the link on a mobile device should open the relevant report directly within the Workfront mobile app or mobile browser, preserving proper formatting, readability, and alignment. Ideally, the mobile app would support viewing and interacting with standard reports and dashboards, including filters, drill-downs, and custom form data visualization. Current Behaviour:Currently, links to reports and dashboards are rendered as plain text in the project updates within the app, and when tapped, they open in the mobile browser. In the browser, the layout is distorted and difficult to read, with alignment and formatting issues that degrade the user experience. There is no current support in the Workfront mobile app for accessing reports directly.
Dear Product Team, We have tried the new user interface in the Design Studio for Images and Files. For some reason, using the new interface, we cannot search for an image or files based on a key word in their names. Instead, in the new interface, we could only research an image or file by its first letter. This has caused a huge inconvenience for us to search for images and files. We have hundreds of images and files in our Design Studio, and it is impossible to search based only on the first letter of the file name. We have reached out to support regarding this change, and this is their response: "They mentioned that this is an updated performance related function for the New Interface. "Search works differently in the new UX for performance related reasons and cannot be changed to the classic "contains" behavior. At some point in the near future the classic experience will be removed and search across all assets will be consistent." It seems silly to remove the 'contain' logic in the search bar, as the whole point of the research bar is to perform search so that the user could quickly find things. Hope that's enough information for the situation. Thank you! Wayne
Now that we can attach custom forms to group objects (thank you!), can we have the ability to edit multiple groups at once? I am updating all our groups with custom data but it's slow and tedious without the ability to edit multiple groups at once.
Description -We want to move from legacy report builder to new report builder but when looking for calculated metrics across many report suits we have more than one with the same name. The description doesn't display on hover and searching metrics with tags is not an option.How would you like the feature to work - another box in the panel where you can search by tag or display the description on right click or hoverCurrent Behaviour - No way of telling which is the correct calculated metric/ segment if they have the same name for different report suites. I tried to search using the id: cm155_682f229e9f88e8cc7e5b8bf. https://experience.adobe.com/#/@astrazeneca/so:astraz9/analytics/spa/#/components/calculatedMetrics/edit/cm155_682f229e9f88e8cc7e5b8bfd that didn't work.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add a “View as Published” button directly in the Site Content View for each page, without needing to open the page in the editor Use-case: Content authors and reviewers frequently need to preview how a page will appear on the published site. Currently, they must: 1. Go to the AEM Sites Content View. 2. Select the page node. 3. Click Edit to open the page. 4. Then click View as Published from the editor toolbar. This process is repetitive and time-consuming, especially when reviewing multiple pages Current/Experienced Behavior: “View as Published” is only accessible from within the page editor. Users must load the page in editor mode just to preview a page. Improved/Expected Behavior: A “View as Published” option should be available directly in the Site Content View, perhaps as a button in the toolbar for selected pages. This allows quick and efficient access to the published view without entering the editor, improving productivity and user experience. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When adding a new template tasks to an existing project, the date gets set to the start of the project. For some long projects, you could have to click through the months of a few years to select the new dates. A "today" button or advance year button would save a lot of time.
Description - Add the time off icon (airplane) next to the assignees name that has already been assigned a task. Also, adding a notification to project owners that someone assigned to their task has added time off.Why is this feature important to you - Make it easier for Project Owners to track time off for their tasks assignees. How would you like the feature to work - When a user puts in Time off, a little airplane would pop up next to their name on the task they are currently assigned too. Also, if the users puts in time off and they are assigned to a tasks, the project owner gets a notification letting them know this user has time off and its pushing back their dates.Current Behaviour - The time off icon only appears as you are assigning tasks, not after the task is assigned. There are currently no notifications around time off for Project Owners.
DescriptionWe need a way to reassign all open and completed tasks from a deactivated user to an active user in bulk. Why This Feature Is ImportantWhen an employee leaves the company, there is currently no method to transfer their tasks directly from their profile. This creates administrative overhead and risks losing visibility on critical tasks that may still require action or tracking. Proposed FunctionalityUpon deactivating a user, the system should prompt the administrator to select an active user to whom all open and completed tasks will be reassigned. This should occur automatically as part of the deactivation process, minimizing manual intervention and ensuring continuity of work. Current BehaviorThere is no built-in functionality to support bulk reassignment of tasks from a deactivated user.
Description - My managers cannot log time via the Hours subtab unless granted admin access. I need my managers to be able to log time for their direct reports to ensure we are tracking time to the best of our ability. Why is this feature important to you - I need my managers to be able to log time for their direct reports, especially when sometimes workers are away on shoots. The responsibility is always on the worker but if they are having status meetings and reveal the information why not help them out and allow managers to log on their behalf? How would you like the feature to work - The feature would work identically to those with admin rights to timesheets. When the user goes to the hours subtask on a work object they will see a log time button. From there they can select themselves or anyone that reports to them and log hours for a specific date. Current Behaviour - I set managers to their own access level and grant them admin rights to timesheets. As you can imagine, this is not ideal since this gives all managers the ability to edit any time logged in even if it is not by someone on their staff. Although the odds are low that someone would abuse this power, I prefer not to open ourselves up to the chance.
Description - I would want to receive customized alerts dashboards. Imagine clicking "Analyze Further" and it shows supplementary information for each alerts so users dont have to manually dig deeper.Why is this feature important to you - This would alleviate a lot of the work and troubleshooting required once an alert is triggered.How would you like the feature to work - we configure a specific dashboard to be sent along with each alert. Current Behavior - We only receive the default alert analysis which shows the last 30 days or longer of the underlying metric trend
Description:Add a built‑in Data Quality Dashboard in RT-CDP that continuously monitors incoming streaming data for schema deviations, missing key attributes, duplicate records, and outlier values. When anomalies exceed configurable thresholds, trigger:Automated alerts (email or slack)Visual drill‑downs showing the offending eventsGuided remediation steps (e.g., map this unexpected field, fill missing email, merge duplicate IDs)Why is this feature important?Proactive Hygiene: Catch ingestion errors the moment they occur, before they corrupt unified profiles.Faster Troubleshooting: Teams spend less time hunting for what broke in the data pipeline and more time fixing it.Higher Confidence: Marketing and analytics users trust that every profile and audience segment is built on accurate, complete data.
When someone is granted access to a report, project, issue, etc. Workfront generates an automatics notification outlining what the object is that the user is being granted access to and who is granting it. It would be nice to be able to add a custom message to explain what the object is and why the person is getting access to go with the notification.
We would like an option to clear selected Mentions once an update has a response. Currently the Mentions Widget retains mentions and it is hard to sort through them to determine what needs follow-up. It would be nice to have the option to clear or hide selections Mentions once an update/reply has been made.
Description - Right now, the People tab of a project is not dynamically updated to people actually in that project. Anytime someone is added to a task or issue in the project, they are added to the People tab (or are the PO or other reasons). But then they remain in the People tab even if they are removed from the project tasks. Why is this feature important to you - If users are opting into emails for 'updates about projects I'm on' then they are getting these unnecessarily. This is a big issue when it comes to projects that act as the projects receiving issues/requests - those projects will never go away as long as we have the request queue feeding it, but more people are randomly added to the project and after a while they aren't needed to be there but are still getting the notifications.How would you like the feature to work - The People tab should be a reflection of the current state of the project, and should not include users who have been removed as assignees. Current Behaviour - Users are added to the People tab when assigned to a task or issue, but if a user is removed as an assignee, they remain on the People tab.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
