Build better products with our product team
Description - While sharing segments/calculated metrics with a user who have same first & last name i.e multiple users with the same name in an organization. Email ID can be appended for such users in the sharing list, as it is not clear which user to choose from the list, I have noticed Email ID does show up for the users with the same name while sharing workspace project. If this feature can be added to segment & calculated metrics sharing it would be really helpful. Why is this feature important to you - It will be easy to share the component with the user in one go, instead of test and trial which is time consuming. How would you like the feature to work - Append Email ID in the sharing list for the users with exactly the same name.Current Behaviour - it appears as duplicate user account and does not provide clarity which one to choose.
We have a need to be able to post the same update on certain tasks in multiple projects at the same time...task name is the same on every project. This would make our Marketing team VERY happy!
capability to re-baseline projects in a portfolio as a bulk action in Workfront.
In the new WF experience, the notifications in the upper right hand corner display the task name and the person making a note. But it doesn't show a project name or program name as well. For our users, since we utilize project templates 100% of the time, the task names are repetitive so it's hard to distinguish based on the quick notification which project the task may relate to. Is there an option to display the project name in the notification?
Description -Activity Duration currently displays as: "Duration: Mon, 21 Jun 21 12:01 AM until deactivated."Why is this feature important to you -Avoid possible confusion.How would you like the feature to work -Two minor enhancements would clarify the date and time: 1) Display the full, four-digit year; 2) provide the time zone.This would be clearer: "Duration: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:01 AM ET until deactivated."Current Behaviour - "Duration: Mon, 21 Jun 21 12:01 AM until deactivated."
We want to be able to distinguish a true Document approval version count between a business lead and creative review.Possibly counting how many times a Document approval has been Rejected and by which role.Example: A Document Approval can have 10 versions, but how many were Creative vs. the lead?
Currently if you copy the URL from your web browser while viewing a proof and share it with someone else, it "logs" them in as you and uses your name when making comments. I know that you are supposed to utilize the "share proof" link, however, this is a very common action we have found our users trying to do - and is a huge red flag knowing that they can share this proof with anyone regardless if they have access to the proof workflow.
In Classic, when you click timesheets, you are always taken to your Current timesheet but in the new experience you are always taken to a list of timesheets. The list is fine and I like that it makes your timesheets more visible, but customers want a link to their current timesheet like they had in Classic. The only workaround is for them to pin their current timesheet every single week, or make the extra click from the list. Providing a link that always opens their current timesheet seems like an easy win and a helpful way to ease the transition to the new experience.
Hi There,we would like to have an integration between Workfront Agile Backlogs/Sprint Backlogs and Miro Boards. That would allow a more visual and flexible way doing a Sprint Planning in Miro with estimating in Fibunacci numbers or doing a Planning Poker with the team. Use case: The backlog items are created in Workfront by the Product Owner. Then they are synchronised to a Miro Board and displayed as cards. The agile team may add content to these cards (e.g. acceptance criteria, breakdowns into subtasks, refining descriptions, etc.). During a Sprint Planning meeting team members can arrange these card into a Fibunacci scale. All changes of the cards are synchronised back to Workfront. Workfront keeps being the leading system.I'm excited to get your thoughts about it.
It would be so helpful if items were automatically added to the Kanban board from the backlog when a user changes the status. The backlog should be a parking lot for work items/ideas, so theoretically nothing that is in progress should be in the backlog. Currently, the only way to add items from the backlog to the board is to do it manually, which often does not happen when you have a large team.
I found a bug that would require a platform fix affecting multiple customers. Support is maintaining that this will not be fixed without evaluation from the community and product managers.How the Error ManifestsIf an instance has implemented a sync filter, either via SFDC sharing rules or via a Marketo Field Sync filter, errors can occur in Marketo when merging records in SFDC. The error occurs when the master record in SFDC is not synchronized to Marketo.The following behavior occurs afterwards:The errored record is marked as deleted in SFDC. This is true, because losing records in SFDC are deleted.The sync between SFDC and Marketo runs.The master record in SFDC is imported as a new lead/person in Marketo.The only way to resolve the duplicates, is to manually merge the records in Marketo by going through every lead/person that's been marked as deleted. This method also assumes that the 'sync to marketo' flag was properly updated on the master record. If it wasn't, then the record in SFDC has to be restored and the previous master record must be updated to be synchronized to marketo. Only then, can the two records be merged correctly in marketo without error and updated to have the correct SFDC Ids.Also, I had a separate case logged where I discovered if the original record with the error is left for too long in Marketo, the only action that can be taken is to delete the record and thus delete the prior history.It is not possible to run a report on synchronization errors with the current SFDC sync product, but there is an idea posted for it: Sync Error tab for the SFDC connectorRequested Resolution PossibilitiesAllow reporting on these records if a real fix is unavailable.If the master record is unavailable, wait until the next sync cycle and try again. Records in this 'queue' should accessible via a report in case they do not get resolved.(Preferred Resolution) If the master record is unavailable, update the existing record in marketo with new field information, campaigns, tasks, and SFDC Ids.
My team at Denso would like a solid vertical line on the gantt view that represents today. The closest thing I can see is a faint pink highlight when you zoom the scale all the way in to the day view. I would also think it would be really useful for pretty much anyone who uses the gantt view for anything.
There is currently an option in Proof HQ to manually archive a proof, but no such option for proofing within Workfront. It should be added.
Ability to generate proofs from Keynote
At present when a role is assigned to task it shows in Primary assignment entry date field. However, when the role/team is updated by actual user who would be working on task, in Updates section we see he/she has been assigned to work on this item on so and so date.Whereas in API we do not have field which would capture user assignment date. Also when multiple user are assigned to work on task one can mark their part as complete from notification but it is impossible at this time to know who and when their piece of work is completed at task/issue
お世話になります。 コントロールパネルのスケジュール入力欄について、手入力を許容しているにも関わらず、手入力すると変な制御が入ります。（画像は「16:00」と入力を試みた場面です） ABテストの設定画面も同様です。 整合性チェックはあった方が良いと思いますが、一文字入力すると勝手にゼロ埋め＋00を入力する制御は無くせないでしょうか。
お世話になります。 ウェブサービスのエラー通知を、一日一回ではなく即時反映させて欲しいです。 CDPからリードを連携していますが、エラーで中断した際にCDP側にエラーコードが返却されず、原因が特定できないことがあります。 また、CDPから連携成功したように見えてもMarketo側で何か起きている可能性もありますので、すぐ把握できるように即時通知して欲しいです。（メールの配信登録もしています）
Description - As part of Snowflake Summit, it is confirmed that Adobe is running Snowflake as their data warehouse engine. Therefore it would be logical to use the Snowflake Data Marketplace to allow Adobe customers to access their data.Why is this feature important to you - This feature would ease the access to our data, while enhancing the security profile, since no account key would have to be shared in order for us to get the data.How would you like the feature to work - The user should be able to request a data set from the Snowflake data marketplace containing their raw data as delivered by a Data Feed, a customer stage would be created as a secure view, and this view would be shared. This would allow the customer to query their own data, with their own compute. This would reduce the cost and ecological footprint for both Adobe and the customer to make the data available for analysis outside of the Adobe platform.Current Behaviour - At this point, we are reliant on the Data Feed functionality, which in our case is a feed going to a Azure Blob. This requires us to allow the data feed to have the Azure Storage Account Key, which basically allows full access to the blob. This is less than ideal from a security standpoint. Furthermore we are required to do a full ELT or ETL workload in order to make the data ready for consumption, instead of only needing to do a transformation step.
Color of phrases generated automatically in comment box of Workfront Proof(e.g. DELETE, REPLACE WITH, INSERT) is light gray on browser.But when I copy them and paste to Notepad, the color is changed to black.So, to make it clear which phrases were generated automatically, I want Workfront to add brackets to the light gray phrases.
With Workfront now being added to the Adobe set of tools, a WF feature that our team would like to see is the ability to be able to access files directly from creative cloud storage in Workfront – similar to how we can do from Microsoft OneDrive via the SharePoint integration.
A timesheet profile was recently added to a user profile with standard hour types. This user is unable to enter time for timesheets before the timesheet profile was added to her user profile. We are now unable to accurately log hours for time before this timesheet profile was introduced resulting in lost data.
Having the ability to check/confirm barcodes, QR codes, etc… directly in the proofing tool would be a big win for agencies in the packaging environment.
I was surprised to find that this is not an option already. We could really use a Project system configuration setting that allows us to default all new projects "Completion mode" to automatic. Because not all projects are created from templates we have to manually report on and track down projects where all tasks are marked 100% complete, but the project is not closed/completed and manually change it. Yes, sometimes there are open approvals and/or issues/requests on the project. But in our instance, more often there are not.
It would be great if there would have an option to filter the Performance Program Report by date. At the moment, Marketo Support says there is no way to set dates regarding this specific report if there is no cost tag on it, which means that we can use the filter "Period Cost" and set the dates on it, but if there is no cost tag in the program, it won't work even if you select this filter and set the dates up.
In one of the discussions in the nation we were exchanging ideas on use cases for program member custom fields. One of the ideas entered there was to use program-specific scoring. I happened to have a use case for that this week and investigated, but it turns out PMCFs cannot be set up as Score fields. Does anyone else have this use case? Would it make sense to have this field type added?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
