Build better products with our product team
We would like a Gantt Chart based on Programs not projects. Currently WF does not have this feature in reporting... WF Gantt charts will only show either Projects or Tasks. Anyone else need this type of reporting?
It'd be great to set by job role or layout template (not on each individual proof workflow set up) the resolve comments feature is enabled. Impact: eliminate clicks for proof creator; consistent experience for workers who are making edits from comments (and can indicate they've resolved that comment);
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM really only supports Basic Authentication, and many commands in the cURL API also use Basic Authentication. The superuser 'admin' account also uses Basic Authentication. It seems overdue that AEM support more secure protocols, even if it's just two-factor. Use-case: cURL API and superuser functions primarily Current/Experienced Behavior: Basic Authentication rules the day Improved/Expected Behavior: Use at least two-factor, but preferably key/certificate base authentication. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5 SP2 Customer-name/Organization name: USAA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Currently integrated with SharePoint. Are there plans to move over and integrate with the MS graph APIs which allow us to have a LOT more flexibility when it comes to managing SharePoint integrations like this?
Currently, if you had a "Date and Time" custom field, and a user inputs information into that custom field, the data will shift based on the time zone of the person who is looking at it. We would like an option to make this field static so that the information remains the same no matter who is looking at it.This is needed for communicating precisely when an event is going to happen within our organization.For example, if I submit a request that says my webinar starts at 8 AM PST (we also capture time zone in a separate field), then "8 AM PST" should display no matter who is looking at the request. Currently, if someone in EST is looking at it, the date/time will shift to show it as starting at "11 AM", which causes confusion. There are certainly use cases for this field being dynamic; however, having a "static" option to check off when setting up the field would help immensely with our problem.
In my opinion the Flow charts visualization in Workspace has a big flaw: it displays the page reloads: whenever I try to see next page, biggest chunk is again the same page. It would be good to remove the page reloads and make it similar to the Google Analytics flow charts, to only see next page. This would make the flows more clear
Because Project Names are not available yet in the Work List, Sort By: Planned Completion, the work around is to Sort By: Project. However, to see the tasks under the project name, each project name needs to be expanded. Provide the ability to expand all the project names at one time to see the tasks under them.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Built-In Grid of Acrobat to be applied onto an printed version of itself Use-case: Printing out documents that detail boring location and spacing Current/Experienced Behavior: Built-In Grid is not print and need to have a work around Improved/Expected Behavior: Built-In Grid was print and did it within the same application Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Antonio Franco Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
We experienced a user innocently changing their email address and name on their own profile which removed them from all projects they owned or were assigned. (without any notification, or red flag issued by the Workfront system.) Respectfully see this as a vulnerable blind spot that has potential to really cripple the functionality of Workfront -- for our group and how we use it. Could a fail-safe be developed? And/or a best practice addressing user profile management?How about providing primary admin the ability to lock user profiles? Or specific user profile data fields like Name and Email address? Or maybe some type of "user profile change order request" that'd enable a more monitored/controlled way to manage user profiles? Thanks for your interest in client feedback.
Proxima Nova is very difficult to read on Workfront sites. lowercase i and l, look the same.I have Clear Type font set, and I tried to turn off Hardware Acceleration, but made no difference.The exact same font rendering problem appears in FireFox as well.It seems to be the Bold rendering of the font specifically.I have not seen this problem on other sites with Proxima Nova fonts.
When a user have 10 documents to send for approval to the same approver/approvers, the user will have go to each document and type in the name of the approver. We need to be able to multiselect documents and send it to the same approver.
It would be great if we could mark custom forms as favorites so that we can add a filter for those that we use most often.
Our users log actual hours at the Task and issue level. Unfortunately, there is no way to mass approve the hours submitted each day. Right now we have to go project by project to approval. The system also doesn't let us use a report to approve the hours. Therefore, I would like to request Workfront build the functionality to approve submitted time in a mass update.Thanks, Rick
We are unable to remove the global Hour Type options from the employees Available Hour Types component (Object: User).We have received feedback from local markets they prefer employees to allocate time against locally approved HOur Types and not include the option to add hours to the generic global Hour Types.We propose implementing some logic here to enable this:if there are no project-specific hour types in the Hour Type database, show global Hour Type as default (i.e. Project Time, Task Time etc).if there are project-specific hour types in the Hour Type database, allow the admin to deselect the global Hour Type(s) (i.e. Project Time, Task Time etc).
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Unrelate option visibility issue : Scenarios: 1] Navigating to a folder and selecting multiple assets in CARD View: 2] Navigating to a folder and selecting multiple assets in LIST View: 3] Running a search and selecting multiple assets from the search results in CARD view: 4] Running a search and selecting multiple assets from the search results in LIST view: Issues : - Unrelate option not visible for above scenario. Use-case: Please enable the unrelate option for single or multiple assets. Current/Experienced Behavior: Unrelate option not visible. Improved/Expected Behavior: Need to make it visible. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.5 (Same behaviour in 6.5.7) Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Our designers have noticed a glitch in the proof tool:Designers are currently having an issue with .pdf's, at times, showing incorrect opacity within the proofing tool. I’ve attached a screenshot of the same .pdf side by side with the proofing tool & without.
Allow the proof creator to get a copy of the proof notification when they send the proof. Our users want to know it was actually sent and want to use the copy of the email to access the proof.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Relate/Unrelate option visibility issue : Scenarios: 1] Navigating to a folder and selecting one asset in CARD View: 2] Navigating to a folder and selecting one asset in LIST View: 3] Searching for an asset and selecting it in CARD view: 4] Searching for an asset and selecting it in LIST view: 5] Navigating to a folder and selecting multiple assets in CARD View: 6] Navigating to a folder and selecting multiple assets in LIST View: 7] Running a search and selecting multiple assets from the search results in CARD view: 8] Running a search and selecting multiple assets from the search results in LIST view: Issues : -Relate/Unrelate option not visible for the scenario 3,4. - Unrelate option not visible for scenario 5,6,7,8. - Relate option not visible for scenario 7,8. Use-case: [1] Can we enable relate /unrelate option for single asset search? [2] Can we enable unrelate option for multiple asset ? [3] Can we enable relate option for searched selected assets? Current/Experienced Behavior: Options not visible as mentioned in attached screenshot. Improved/Expected Behavior: Can we make it consistent? Can we enable options? Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5.5 (Same behaviour in 6.5.7) Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): You can check in vanilla instance of AEM.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like a way for users in author instance to reset their password if they forget it. Use-case: author forgets their password and resets it via the AEM UI Current/Experienced Behavior: Requires manual intervention by a user-administrator Improved/Expected Behavior: User can reset password without intervention Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.3+ Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Checking out an asset will also lock the metadata from being edited by other users Use-case: Prevent multiple users from editing the same asset including asset's metadata Current/Experienced Behavior: Check out an asset, another user can update the metadata for the checked out asset Improved/Expected Behavior: Check out an asset, another user can't update the metadata for the checked out asset Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP7 Customer-name/Organization name: General Motors Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
If you use HTML code in your Email Script token, Marketo displays this code in the text-only version of you email. Example: Your Email Script token has <table width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"> <tr> <td align="left"> <p>Some text</p> </td> </tr> </table> And be sure your customers will see the same code (not only "Some text") in the text-only version.
It would be nice to be able to download ALL T&T campaign data at one time (in bulk). Currently one has to download each campaign's data individually. When you have hundreds of campaigns - well, you know... Also the ability to deactivate and delete campaigns in bulk would be great too.
Can we change how the buttons are named on document approval decisions? Right now the only option is Reject, Approved, Approved with Changes. Our company would like the flexibility to adjust these to our needs.For example:Can the 'Reject' button be changed to 'Reviewed'
Request queues should be independent of projects. Queues play such a huge part of the overall system that having it buried amongst the projects presents a risk and a liability to usability. It is very easy to delete a queue by accident which will greatly affect the instance. If queues were an option similar to templates, it will give system admins greater control
We have established processes for Approvals in our organization - both at the project and the task level (example: the end-result of a task needs to be approved by a manager prior to the team member moving on to the next task). Right now the Approvals associated with Projects or Tasks can be edited, removed, re-created by the Owner of a project. We'd like the option to lock that, so that the project leads can't even edit who does the approvals - they must happen. Additionally, they can delete Approvals that have already occurred. We'd like this to be disabled, so that the Approval can sit within the project's history.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
