To report on Scorecard questions and answers, you need to use text mode to pull in this data. It would be nice if the scorecard questions and answers could be provided as fields that may be easily pulled into a project report. Right now, I can pull in the scorecard name and alignment value in a project report. But to get the individual questions and responses on that scorecard requires text mode manipulation.
Very often I will figure out the text mode for a report's column or grouping and then days, weeks, sometimes months later someone else will need that same text mode for their report and I have to spend 15 minutes going through the reports I think might have used it to pull that code and put in a new report. Ideally if I have already created it in a report I should be able to pull it from the prompts just like anything else. Maybe it becomes a new section at the bottom of the prompt called system text modes? For example I had a project report that pulls a collection of task name and assignment into the report. Every time I need to make a new report and pull that same column I have to open that report and copy it. I did finally create a Word document to house the codes but I wish it lived in WF so other admins also had access to it easily.
The attached pdf does not show the actual report - so remove it or make it optional - when using send to feature to email a report.Thanks.
We should have the ability to run a report in one common currency instead of having a report with different currencies for different projects. Having one common currency in a report will help an executive to evaluate projects against one another instead of him or her having to do the conversation manually every time.
There is a tagging of proofs ability in the stand alone proofing tool however the proofing tool within workfront has the ability to create and search tags tags but not ability to tag a proofs.I report on tagging in the stand alone instance and now that we have moved over to the built in proofing tool I would like to replicate that there.thanks
It would be nice to have an easier way to report on or at least see an audit trail of all changes to a user's profile set up such as layout template, proof access, auto generate proofs, and other settings not controlled by the average user.
The ability to delete sections or customize the fields when starting a project or editing a project. There are some sections we don't use or don't want others to fill out (almost all projects are created by using a template) and want to make it as simple as possible for our new users and make the set up cleaner. We only want the Overview (and even delete some items on that if possible) and Custom Forms sections. We want to hide the Finance, Settings and Access sections.
Expand the Type Ahead Custom Field to allow multiple users. Will allow to list multiple users using the type ahead feature.
Security is very important to us and we would like to integrate on premise systems using Fusion. It would be helpful if Fusion supported a VPN connection option.
Hello,our client is using the Multi-Site Management (MSM) features a lot.When checking component content in a live copy, they need to break the inheritance of the respective component first, so that they can access the component dialog. Afterwards they need to restore inheritance again.Business Value: This will reduce risks with accidentally not restoring inheritance and also will speed up the content QA process significantly. In AEM/CQ 5.6 (with Classic UI) it was possible to access/open the component dialog on a live copy with enabled inheritance.Can this be added to AEM?Thanks & Many regardsHendrik
Currently we are able to change the Branding in the New Experience Layout Templates for the Home Icon and the Main Menu. We need to also have this change on the exported reports.
Reports and any exports should have the company branding or at least ability. Today only workfront branding exists. We export project plans and reports to clients and it is not good that they only see Workfront.
Description -Currently offered CaaS feature allows content to be available as a Json for consumer systems. But there is no feature to either transform or update the DAM and Content links with the Absolute URL[Fully Qualified URL, Externalized URL with server details etc..] for either Content/Experience Fragments or Custom Components with a single pattern/approach.Why is this feature important to you -It helps onboard the consumers system for readily consuming the contentEliminates custom logic at individual component level or customization for core components/exporter logic [For content/experience fragments]Leverage the recommended OOTB logic and have single pattern for content/experience fragment and custom components How would you like the feature to work -Feature should have a enable/disable logic with configuration associated with itFeature should have a logic to allow transformation for specific patterns for links and configuration associated with itCurrent Behaviour -All the content links are exposed as /content/* or /content/dam/* which cannot be used readily by the consumer system accessing model json via API
It would be great if timesheet line items would highlight when they are clicked. My team members are constantly adding things to the wrong line items because it's difficult to tell which row you are clicking.
Currently in the new experience we have to keep digging for the reference number in the issue by having to go to the overview screen, when in the classic version the reference was available in the same screen when updating an issue. The extra clicks seem unnecessary, as would love to be able to place on the top right corner or where more visible and appropriate per process the reference number via a layout template.Asking for the ability to place reference number where needed via a layout template. Or place as a standard for all issues on the top right corner where you see the issue's % complete, assignment, status and Planned Completion. Thank you
can we get Amazon S3 Bucket option in Data Warehouse ?
Description - Would love the ability to roll back segment changes to previous versions. When segments are updated/saved, previous versions are overwritten, and its possible for important conditions to be "lost" if someone is careless with their updating. Or perhaps they remove conditions and then press "Save" when meaning to press "Save As". Why is this feature important to you - This is important to my team because important segments tend to last years, and the conditions are updated to account for new/different data so that one segment can be used across time. So the segment goal is to "filter for only app data" but the segment starts to look like "includes hits where site name = app OR site contains mobile app, OR SiteSection contains _M" because "app data" may have been tagged/identified differently over time. We have old logic that was relevant 2-3 years ago, and if those conditions are removed from the segment because someone accidentally removes then saves, it would be very difficult for us to know how to re-create. Version control, or the ability to see old segments/saves would help make sure we can always roll back changes when needed. How would you like the feature to work - In the segment editor, next to Save or Save As, there would be a button to "open previous version" and clicking it would show a popup window with a history of saves (date, timestamp, who saved it). These would be clickable, and allow a user to open up the previous version. Potentially would be helpful when saving from a previous version for a popup to say "You are saving from an older version of the segment, which will overwrite the current segment (last saved X date). Are you sure you wish to proceed?"Current Behavior - Save simply overwrites the existing segment logic and there is no way to revert changes if a mistake was made, or explore previous versions.
My international NPD client has what I believe is a common challenge internationally. They have the ability to elect to exchange a regular working day (tied to their holiday's) for a weekend work day to extend their "holiday". This is being done on a business unit level. The project planning, needs to account for these changes as their project timelines/durations are very controlled in order to manage CAPEX and OPEX expenses & Product stage gate timelines accross a large organization. These "exchanges" of working day for a holiday vary from year to year.
Liking the updates to the new Home feature, but we work on and add 'updates' at the project level. There are many fields at the project level that are allowed to be displayed, but we would like the ability to display documents and updates on the Home that pertain to the project the task belongs to.
I think it would be great if admins could leave a "memo" to log what they were doing when they logged in as someone else. It would help with accountability, transparency and security.
Companies may create an AA and AAM with two different Org IDs and later need to integrate them to the same one. Adobe needs to determine a way to do this which does not pose risk of data loss in either instance
We struggle with fields like Portfolio, program that only show so many characters and require a hoover over to see full name. We wish wee could control the size of the box like a custom field.
Currently to launch Proof HQ, there are sub lines under the document name for Creating a proof and Viewing a proof. If there was the ability to add additional items in this line for expansion of tools and/or Custom form action, it would save many clicks along with making Workfront more robust for users.
Hi teamCurrently, Adobe Analytics can only give the read-only access to users which will allow them to view only the report suites names but not the report suite settings. I'm proposing feature request to create new AA profile in the admin console to give permission to users to view conversions/ traffic variables in the read-only mode
With a diverse international locations my client needs the ability to see the impact of regional schedules in planning projects before resources are assigned. The ability to associate schedules with specfic job roles that are already identified by Region, would provide the functionality needed for them to do so.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
