When uploading a document, you can request a document approval. This is great! But, you can't assign a deadline to the document approval. We have some projects in which we just want a user to approve a document, without assigning them a formal request. Workfront allows this, but without a due date, there's no way to indicate to the user by when their approval is needed. The workaround is to indicate that detail in a directed update, but this results in the user receiving two email notifcations (one soliciting approval, and another with the directed update.) Document approvals should have deadlines just as request approvals do.
On custom forms, is there any way to create rules around an open field? Meaning using Fusion or some other technology, whatever is written in the field must follow a certain format (i.e. AA-1234)? If they don’t follow the format, it won’t push the request forward.
Description - As per current behaviour, as long as the Virtual Report Suite is Data Warehouse compatible, you would be able to run the request. However, if it is not compatible you will still be able to create the request with this VRS, with failed status and no prior warning.There should be a warning or an error message on selection of Virtual reports which are not DWH compatible. Why is this feature important to you - It is quite misleading as there are several VRS and we won't remember which all are DWH compatible and which are not. How would you like the feature to work - The VRS which are not compatible should either do not appear in the DWH interface OR there should be a warning on selection of the VRS.
We would like all the existing Adobe Analytics dimensions (eVars[1-200], props[1-75], and events[1-1000], list[1-3]) to be automatically mapped using a supported or new schema mixin. In addition, this would be needed for product syntax eVars and events. This is important for existing implementations with a significant number of custom dimensions. It will ensure customers will not have to manually map every single custom dimension via processing rules. In addition, it will allow customers that leverage the raw data feed to use the AEP SDK. At this time, only specific dimensions are automatically supported.https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-platform/edge/data-collection/adobe-analytics/manually-mapping-variables.html?lang=en#context-data This is already supported for standard dimensions like products, commerce, and page details. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-platform/edge/data-collection/adobe-analytics/automatically-mapped-vars.html?lang=en#data-collection For us, the raw data feed is critical for our customer data platform and processing rules are not a viable option. We cannot migrate without this feature.
In Email Insights and anywhere else applicable, there should be an option to display the date in the International Date Format (ISO) standard format i.e. DD/MM/YY. This is in line with W3 and general usability guidelines. See here: https://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/iso-date Marketo users only have the option to use the Americanised MM/DD/YY, which is a counter-intuitive format to all users outside of the U.S. and aren't to usability and accessibility standards. Currently, the Date format showing in Marketo's UI is hard-coded in the software and cannot be changed based on one's region/instance.
As of now ACS provides ability connect to only one report suite on analytics side when you configure the ACS -> Analytics integration. If it's provided to configure more than one report suites, it will help for business using multiple BU's from ACS send data to adobe analytics for further business processes.
Description - Make the Schedule Renewal page use the Analytics page template. Currently, the page design looks like an afterthought.Why is this feature important to you - It allows users to navigate to other parts of Analytics immediately.How would you like the feature to work -E.g. include the top main menu, shortcuts to other parts of Analytics, etc.Current Behaviour - The Schedule Renewal just shows a message to renew the schedule and whether the renewal is successful or not. There are not other calls-to-action.
As a Sys Admin, we often have to clean up QTs attached to projects/templates. You currently can bulk delete routing rules and queue topics, but there is no bulk delete for Topic Groups. I understand why it was designed that way, but if a) you limit this ability to Sys Admins and b) only allow bulk delete on Topic Groups that have 0 QTs - I think that would be safe! And amazing.
workload balancer: Anyone with a Plan License should be able to see and edit all objects/projects right away, without having first to share each individual project/portfolio with a person/team.
Our team has the desire to send multiple proofs from different projects at a campaign (program) level. To explain further, we understand the ability to send multiple proofs in one workflow is possible, but our teams would benefit from an automatic system to pull proofs from several projects into one workflow for a campaign. The concern is that there isn't a clear way to see all pieces in a campaign in one place and we think something like this would be beneficial.
In Classic you could select the proof details on a document and the now 'proofing workflow' would open in a pop-up window. Now 'Proofing Workflow' takes users to a new page. This has caused confusion and frustration on part of our users. If the proofing workflow opened in a pop up window, or was available in the quick summary it would save us time and effort!
When adding a URL for proofing a website, it would be beneficial if we could specify a background color. There are times that there's transparency on blocks, which results in just showing the dark gray UI from Proof HQ. It would be great if we could specify a color to be used as the background.
Description - "Enhanced Security - just in time user provisioning access to Adobe tools". When an employee from a customer company connects to Adobe via SSO, Adobe uses the authentication and authorization information from the customer company to create a secured session with just those permissions the user has been granted, user does their work, then at time of user exiting Adobe tools, the secured session is destroyed. No individual user account information would be stored on Adobe end, only group permission information. Customer company sends the user's group information in SSO handshake.Why is this feature important to you - Financial Services clients are always needing more and better user authentication and authorization methods to reduce risk of cyber crime from external sources. Removing Financial Services employee information from Adobe servers reduces risk exposure.How would you like the feature to work - When an employee from a customer company connects to Adobe via SSO, Adobe uses the authentication and authorization information from the customer company SSO handshake to create a secured session with just those permissions the user has been granted (via user's Active Directory/LDAP group access on customer company side), user does their work, then at time of user exiting Adobe tools, the secured session is destroyed. No individual user account information would be stored on Adobe end, only group permission information. Customer company sends the user's group information in SSO handshake.Current Behavior - user accounts are created on Adobe, provisioned by Adobe groups, and stored on Adobe servers. Customer companies use SSO to authenticate a user, but access and authorization is checked against an individual user account on Adobe-side.
We're testing out the Adobe Extension for our Inhouse group and realized that PDF is not included as one of the export options. We use Illustrator for a lot of our artwork - print ads and event deliverables especially so this is definitely an important feature need for us. Please add as an upcoming feature release!! Current list of supported exported file formats here: https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/articles/218196847-Using-the-Workfront-Extension-for-Adobe-Creative-Cloud#supported-exported-file-formats
I would like to see the custom form fields have functionality to set character limits for both minimums and maximums. That way if I make a field required, it would not allow submission if they don't enter enough characters or would cut off if they tried to write too many.
It would be great if we were able to allow Project Statuses to be set to open on specific statuses by Groups and not just one option for all projects as set under the main set-up Preferences. For example - some groups projects need to always open as Planning while others need to open as Active.
Improve the Search Components capability in Analysis Workspace the way it will be possible to search by keywords in the component description (metrics, dimensions, segments, date ranges) too.The description area contains lots of useful details that will help users find the right metric or dimension.
I love the delegate approvals feature but would love to also be able to delegate assignments as well. For example I will be taking a 1 week vacation in June and have manually gone into all of my projects and reassigned each individual task I am on to another user ( as an Admin I can do this).
Allow users to be automatically logged in once they click on the URL in a notification email
Currently, you can turn off simultaneous navigation for side by side comparison in cases (for example) where the printer returns a sample with additional space around the image and printer marks. When you go to overlay, however, the two versions are back to simultaneous navigation and despite the icon changing colour when you click on it, can't really be disabled.It would be great to be able to use simultaneous navigation to line up the images, then 'flick' between them comparing them.
Enable companies to increase adoption of the Mobile App by creating a one-pager that can be used to put in front of IT and senior leadership to gain approval for a company to utilize the Workfront Mobile App.
Enable users to define custom quarters based on their company's fiscal calendar to accurately align Goals.
Enable the Goal owner to define how progress status is captured. This is similar to how Groups may use different statuses on Projects, Tasks, Issues, thus enabling what may apply to progress a department or group may use.
Please create a feature to allow leaders to hover over goals to see what activities were recently completed and what is coming up next.
Description -How would you like the feature to work -Whenever users drag a dimension to a blank Freeform table, suggest a set of metrics to be added to the table at the same time. Or instead of adding 'Occurrences' , add a set of 'most relevant' metrics automatically. For example, when adding Product dimension, automatically adds Product Views, Order and Revenue. What are the 'most relevant' metrics can be customized per dimension by the administrator, and the user has the option to turn this feature on/off of course. Why is this feature important to you -I notice many users often not adding the 'most relevant' set of metric to a dimension for their analysis, sometimes even adding a wrong metric to a dimension thinking it will answers their question, which leads to a lot of confusions and sometimes even doubt whether the data or the tool is trustworthy.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
