Build better products with our product team
As a Sys Admin, we often have to clean up QTs attached to projects/templates. You currently can bulk delete routing rules and queue topics, but there is no bulk delete for Topic Groups. I understand why it was designed that way, but if a) you limit this ability to Sys Admins and b) only allow bulk delete on Topic Groups that have 0 QTs - I think that would be safe! And amazing.
workload balancer: Anyone with a Plan License should be able to see and edit all objects/projects right away, without having first to share each individual project/portfolio with a person/team.
Our team has the desire to send multiple proofs from different projects at a campaign (program) level. To explain further, we understand the ability to send multiple proofs in one workflow is possible, but our teams would benefit from an automatic system to pull proofs from several projects into one workflow for a campaign. The concern is that there isn't a clear way to see all pieces in a campaign in one place and we think something like this would be beneficial.
In Classic you could select the proof details on a document and the now 'proofing workflow' would open in a pop-up window. Now 'Proofing Workflow' takes users to a new page. This has caused confusion and frustration on part of our users. If the proofing workflow opened in a pop up window, or was available in the quick summary it would save us time and effort!
When adding a URL for proofing a website, it would be beneficial if we could specify a background color. There are times that there's transparency on blocks, which results in just showing the dark gray UI from Proof HQ. It would be great if we could specify a color to be used as the background.
Description - "Enhanced Security - just in time user provisioning access to Adobe tools". When an employee from a customer company connects to Adobe via SSO, Adobe uses the authentication and authorization information from the customer company to create a secured session with just those permissions the user has been granted, user does their work, then at time of user exiting Adobe tools, the secured session is destroyed. No individual user account information would be stored on Adobe end, only group permission information. Customer company sends the user's group information in SSO handshake.Why is this feature important to you - Financial Services clients are always needing more and better user authentication and authorization methods to reduce risk of cyber crime from external sources. Removing Financial Services employee information from Adobe servers reduces risk exposure.How would you like the feature to work - When an employee from a customer company connects to Adobe via SSO, Adobe uses the authentication and authorization information from the customer company SSO handshake to create a secured session with just those permissions the user has been granted (via user's Active Directory/LDAP group access on customer company side), user does their work, then at time of user exiting Adobe tools, the secured session is destroyed. No individual user account information would be stored on Adobe end, only group permission information. Customer company sends the user's group information in SSO handshake.Current Behavior - user accounts are created on Adobe, provisioned by Adobe groups, and stored on Adobe servers. Customer companies use SSO to authenticate a user, but access and authorization is checked against an individual user account on Adobe-side.
We're testing out the Adobe Extension for our Inhouse group and realized that PDF is not included as one of the export options. We use Illustrator for a lot of our artwork - print ads and event deliverables especially so this is definitely an important feature need for us. Please add as an upcoming feature release!! Current list of supported exported file formats here: https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/articles/218196847-Using-the-Workfront-Extension-for-Adobe-Creative-Cloud#supported-exported-file-formats
I would like to see the custom form fields have functionality to set character limits for both minimums and maximums. That way if I make a field required, it would not allow submission if they don't enter enough characters or would cut off if they tried to write too many.
It would be great if we were able to allow Project Statuses to be set to open on specific statuses by Groups and not just one option for all projects as set under the main set-up Preferences. For example - some groups projects need to always open as Planning while others need to open as Active.
Improve the Search Components capability in Analysis Workspace the way it will be possible to search by keywords in the component description (metrics, dimensions, segments, date ranges) too.The description area contains lots of useful details that will help users find the right metric or dimension.
I love the delegate approvals feature but would love to also be able to delegate assignments as well. For example I will be taking a 1 week vacation in June and have manually gone into all of my projects and reassigned each individual task I am on to another user ( as an Admin I can do this).
Allow users to be automatically logged in once they click on the URL in a notification email
Currently, you can turn off simultaneous navigation for side by side comparison in cases (for example) where the printer returns a sample with additional space around the image and printer marks. When you go to overlay, however, the two versions are back to simultaneous navigation and despite the icon changing colour when you click on it, can't really be disabled.It would be great to be able to use simultaneous navigation to line up the images, then 'flick' between them comparing them.
Enable companies to increase adoption of the Mobile App by creating a one-pager that can be used to put in front of IT and senior leadership to gain approval for a company to utilize the Workfront Mobile App.
Enable users to define custom quarters based on their company's fiscal calendar to accurately align Goals.
Enable the Goal owner to define how progress status is captured. This is similar to how Groups may use different statuses on Projects, Tasks, Issues, thus enabling what may apply to progress a department or group may use.
Please create a feature to allow leaders to hover over goals to see what activities were recently completed and what is coming up next.
Description -How would you like the feature to work -Whenever users drag a dimension to a blank Freeform table, suggest a set of metrics to be added to the table at the same time. Or instead of adding 'Occurrences' , add a set of 'most relevant' metrics automatically. For example, when adding Product dimension, automatically adds Product Views, Order and Revenue. What are the 'most relevant' metrics can be customized per dimension by the administrator, and the user has the option to turn this feature on/off of course. Why is this feature important to you -I notice many users often not adding the 'most relevant' set of metric to a dimension for their analysis, sometimes even adding a wrong metric to a dimension thinking it will answers their question, which leads to a lot of confusions and sometimes even doubt whether the data or the tool is trustworthy.
In addition to the reports, calendars and some external links. It would be helpful to have a WYSIWYG editor/widget option within dashboards. This could be used to share important information with a team or explain more complex data shared within a dashboard. Our specific use case is as follows:Each of our teams has a dashboard that includes a PTO calendar, reports on the status of work in the current cycle, an external link to a document where we list out things like the cycles goals, risks and other team updates. Because dashboard does not have an editor like this, we have to open the document in another application to make changes. It would be more efficient to have an editor that could be updated on the fly. I believe this would also have other uses if were something that could be added, enhancing the usefulness of dashboards.
Use Case: Vendors or internal employees who manage Ad services or others who may present a security risk by giving them Issue: Current "Access Event Partners" either does not work or is limited. Details: The current "Access Event Partners - Gives users access to LaunchPoint in Admin*" is limited or does not work depending on the service. While this role correctly lets them only view LaunchPoint, this role lets them see every single LaunchPoint, and they are unable to authorize services - this was the point of using this role, to have a vendor authorize a service through their LinkedIn / Google Account. A recent example was Google Ads, where a vendor needs to authorize the Google Account, but received this error (which Marketo Support had no comment on): "Limited Access: You do not have sufficient privileges to perform this action." This makes the LaunchPoint only Access Events Role limited. Idea: 1. Change Access Event Partners to be able to authorize services, or have this up as a role option. 2. Have Access Event Partners able to select which LaunchPoint services this Role can access. This is the most ideal: Give access to a specific LaunchPoint, and whether they can authorize, change, delete, etc. *https://docs.marketo.com/display/public/DOCS/Descriptions+of+Role+Permissions This documentation also does not describe what the nature of Access Event Partners even means. So far, it has seemed "able to login, and view a LaunchPoint".
Currently, when you reject a project, task or issue approval from the Home view, a text box appears to allow you to submit the reason for your rejection. When you reject a project, task or issue approval from the object's landing page, you do not get an option to submit a reason for the rejection. Instead, any feedback must be entered directly into the Updates stream. This creates an inconsistent review/approval experience. We would like the ability to submit a reason for a "rejected" decision, no matter where that decision is submitted. Similarly, the ability to add a comment box for an "approved" decision would be a nice feature to have in both places, although this enhancement is not as critical.We would like any comments typed into the "reason for approval/rejection" text box to appear in the object's Updates stream as well.
We would really like a way to export (or for that matter import) values for custom fields that we build. For instance, most of the client accounts come back to us asking for an extract of values for a specific field we have created (with multiple values - more than 100 all the time). Right now we just copy paste from each of the field (which is a cumbersome task). There has to be a better way of doing this. Also when we have to create a field with the same values within a single form, there is no way to copy the originally built CF. Importing values into a CF will really help here too.
Hi There, I am aware that there are limitations that can be placed on sharing and building segments / reports etc however I am in a business that has hundreds (if not thousands) of segments, workspaces and custom metrics that are simply not used. What I would love to be able to do is use the API to find a "LastAccessed" date for these so that I can safely remove things that haven't been used in 18+ months to clean up our workspace (and speedup) for users. ThanksDave
We would like to provide Program Managers with more access, but right now there is no distinction between Portfolio & Program security. Having this separated security would help allow us to have our Program Managers have a stonger role.
We have seen our organization use workspace widely. And a power user has lot many projects created. Currently workspace doesn't support any folder management and it has a plain search to find the report. And this makes it difficult to access projects in future when it is required.It also reduces the visibility of Admin shared projects. As a result, users within org end up creating their own projects to answer their questions instead leveraging admin shared/authorized projects. Net-net, this also pulls down org efficiency
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
