With the addition of time off calendars, we have begun using them to collaborate on availability. A challenge we face is that only planners and admins are allowed to add events to the calendar. It would be a huge help to allow workers to also add these custom events to calendars.
In many areas of workfront the fields are type ahead fields. This is not intuitive and assumes that you have a level of setup understanding to begin typing. A good example of this is in the layout template field when creating a new user. It would be super helpful if this was a drop down//
Does anyone know of a why to change the width of the left navigation bar on many of the pages in the New Workfront Experience? For example, on the Dashboards page for all of my Layout Templates, every Dashboard name is truncated to 15 characters. (see attached image). Same for the Projects page, and others. It would be nice if we could dynamically resize these, or configure a different width for these pane so our users wouldn't have to hoover over each item or access them to see the full name
Hi,With NWE, it now takes at least an extra 2 clicks to access the details on the Custom Form and takes us to a separate page. Is there a way for the fields to populate once we click on the custom from instead of adding extra clicks and redirecting us?thanksJennifer
For projects identified as a request queue, it would be great if we could have a team automatically assigned to all issues in that project, regardless of whether or not it was added via a queue. OR, at least notify a specific team if a new issue was added to the project.Thank you!
We are currently unable to accurately personalise experiences on a city level in the UK. Instead, we can only personalise on a county level, however this is not granular enough for the type of experiences we want to create. It would be great if you could develop the ability to personalise on a city-level in the UK in the near future.
The exisiting profile substutions option is a great one, but we still have to do all the editing work twice, because it doesn't work with a recurring email delivery. We now save the original email as a template, but sometimes personalisation fields get broken when using a template for test purposes in a single send delivery. What we need is an optional 'confirm' button in a recurring email, so you can prepare a message, test it and afterwards release the 'confirm' button, so the recurring email will be delivered without human interaction after proofing. The problem in a recurring email is that a email message will be sent right away, although the profil substitution option is displayed. Profile substitutions is displayed
Finding a lead by its Marketo lead id does have some real life use cases, so it would be great if the field could be used in smart lists. One example would be a database with a high percentage of duplicates, where list uploads require distinction between two records with the same email address and you would use a smart list identifying the exact record to add to the list. In another, somewhat more obscure, use case I have an instance that is connected to a non-standard CRM where success criteria cannot be measured entirely straightforward with the Marketo data available. In CRM, success is measured at company level rather than person level, but the Marketo Lead Id that originated the lead is known. So therefore I would want to use a static list again to identify successful leads by their id.
Understanding how many hours a discrete task tasks is helpful, and understanding the overall time a PM spends managing an individual project is as well. Both of these are natively supported already. We also have meetings, internal or with clients, to discuss the progress for overall programs and portfolios where we want to record that information against that program/portfolio but not necessarily any particular project itself. I have workarounds with dummy projects/tasks, but it would be nice to have it natively supported as well.
Years ago, when someone would drag in a classification of, let's say, Product, you would be able to see the classification was of Product. For example, we have two "Class" classifications going off two different dimensions (Product and Driver Product). They both have the same values (SKU), but they collect differently. Currently, there's no way to validate whether or not someone had brought over the correct version of "Class" without having to do some breakdowns to verify or re-do the work to know for ourselves. Could the a parentheses be added to the end of each dimension when it is pulled over into a workspace or segment builder so that we can validate that the right dimensions are being used? This existed before and not sure why it went away. Thanks!
My SFDC admin has asked me to update some leads based on the Lead ID (a Salesforce field). We have a lot of duplicates, and I need to merge some of these fields based on the Lead ID. Looking into our database, I can see a "SFDC ID" field in lead records, but I am not able to run a search by "SFDC ID" in Smart Lists. There area lots of ideas in the Marketo Nation forums, but none of them are ideal. It would be greatly appreciated if Marketo could make these fields usable for Smart Lists, Search (in program "Members" and in the Database).
As of now a user has a single Project Layout Template assigned to them based on their access.Our Idea is to change the Project Template dynamically, based on the type of Project or any other custom variable which distinguishes between projects.
Please extend a list of parameters available in the HIT ATTRIBUTES group in Processing Rules as follows:1. Add all query string parameters that exist in the beacon (e.g. pe, pev1, cdp)2. Add a parameter that returns the tracking server (e.g. name.sc.omtrdc.net)3. Add parameters the beacon path consists of (e.g. list of report suite ids, beacon type, library version)
It would be nice when deleted comments in any of the update streams (project, task, issue, etc.) are recorded like a system update. We've recently had a user convinced that their update had been deleted and prompted this idea.
Currently for users without a manager, the close button label is "Save and Close Timesheet".Whereas, for users with a manager, the close button label is "Submit for Approval".We would like an option to change the button labels to "Submit", either as an enterprise system administration control or hard-coded change to the Workfront production environment, to improve the user experience (i.e. minimise confusion).
Hi, We would like to have a table which shows the actual time of completion for each smart campaign,so that we can easily confirm it when needed. ex)CampaignID Date Time1001 2020/10/16 9:011002 2020/10/16 9:151003 2020/10.16 9:401004 2020/10/16 13:00 Currently, we can only check the result of a smart campaign at a time, so it is taking 20 hours a month to confirm the result of all of them when, for instance, we need to adjust the time smart campaigns run at. In addition, at the time when smart campaigns are taking longer than usual, we need to quickly check the result and take counter measures to make sure this does not affect e-mail deliveries. However, taking a lot of time to do this has actually affected our services several times. For these reasons, we would highly appreciate it if you could handle this. Thank you
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.