Build better products with our product team
Create template for Analysis work space for test results for A4T. It should be able to calculate confidence across multiple metrics and can be easily duplicated to apply various segments. Bring back the confidence intervals that were there in older versions of Target. Pulling results for A4T tests in Target can be time consuming if you are looking at multiple metrics across multiple segments. In the advanced functions for Analysis works space - it seems that it should be possible with T Scores and Z Scores already in the functions. Since we sometimes use classifications in conjunction with metrics - not everything can be pulled in Target making additional work to input numbers in another worksheet to calculate confidence.
Current alert e-mail template does not contain any option to Analyze the alert in user specific project. The button link "Analyze Further" leads to a prefabricated project. Another option how to achieve this, could be to put a custom link to Alert notes. If the notes would be a part of template it could fit too.Or prepare the specific element in the e-mail template leading to the specific project in Workspace and assigned by URL at Alert definition page.
Use Case: Would like to be able to create segment in Adobe that shows the top 20% of users based on revenue. This "top spenders" segment could then be used in various reports to understand behavior such as what games they are purchasing on the digital stores, what content they are consuming, and what Marketing Channels were successful at bring them to the site. Feature Request:Have the ability to create a segment to pull back a percentage of a dimension based on user-defined values or a range of user defined values. These segments could then be leveraged on any reports within Workspace to easily gain learnings based on the Top X% or the Bottom X% of any dimension for any reporting period. An idea would be to have functionality similar to Intelligent Alerts where you can define whether the metric(s) is "above or equals/below or equals" a user-defined percentage, along with the capability to drag and drop a dimension.
Hi, We have a fairly large instance and it'd be great to be able to receive automated reports on some items we find in admin. An example: I'd like to get a report of users who have not logged in for the last year. Another example: how many API requests have we had in the past 7 days? Ideally, we'd be able to subscribe to receive this report regularly via email. Adam
Idea: My proposed idea is to implement a global setting in the Salesforce section within Admin that allows you to delay the sync of campaign member for a designated number of minutes. Why: I've often found myself at odds with the practicality of leaving on the Salesforce Campaign Sync feature in Marketo. It's super helpful in that it ensure proper alignment between our Marketo Programs & Salesforce Campaign. We can also easily sync period costs to total cost, saving time, effort, and improving data accuracy across systems. My main issue with leaving the program sync on, is that the sync operates too quickly and sends leads to Salesforce before they're considered "ready" from the operations perspective. I'm sure every business has their own standard of "ready" but in our case, we stamp the Lead Source, populate Lifecycle Stage, fill in some datastamp, and run some data append processes via webhook in market. Ideally we want all of these values populated before the lead ever hits salesforce to ensure accurate lead routing to sales, and leaving the salesforce sync on causes leads to be sent over to salesforce before marketo has had a chance to do its thing.We've gotten around this by implementing wait steps before "change SFDC campaign status" flow steps in every marketo program we run. This works for us in theory, but doesn't work 100% at scale. Sync campaign flow steps can fail at times for various reason (either marketo or salesforce related), and we cannot create reports or receive alerts about those failures within Marketo. Also, the flow step failures never attempt to resync automatically, leaving us in the dark to research for errors in the activities log for all of our marketo programs manually, or pulling logs from the batch API.This solution also doesn't scale particularly well if we ever want to adjust that wait step. Since wait step values can't be populated by global token, we need to go into every single active program to change the wait time. Not fun. Curious what the community's thoughts are on this matter.If you leave the campaign sync on, how do you get around imcomplete records from entering salesforce before they're "ready"Do other people leave the sync off like we do? Have you seen problems flow steps failing? How do you scale managing your wait steps?
Currently, Adobe Launch allows 3 kinds of hosts: Akamai, managed by Adobe, and SFTP.For a CDN host, only Akamai and SFTP are viable options. (For SFTP, this assumes that the CDN replicates the scripts found in your SFTP destination.) So the only external CDN is really Akamai.Depending on one external CDN as a host is dangerous. If something happens at Akamai, it disables all Launch scripts hosted there. Also, clients may not necessarily want to use Akamai for whatever reasons.Idea: partner with other CDNs to allow hosting from them, e.g. Cloudflare.
Every prop and every classification of a prop has a corresponding 'exit' and 'entry' version of the prop. This leads end users to be presented with far too many options which can be very confusing.For example, the below prop has 2 classifications; as a result the end user is present with 9 different options!Please can you consider changing the interface so that the entry and exit version do not show up at the top level? A possible solution would be to make entry and exit variables available from the chevron as the first level of drill down before reaching the items for a prop.leading to....
Use Case:Ability to create various shopper segments that look back for a user-defined period of time based on the number of purchases made. For example, to have the ability to look atOne Time Shoppers (defined as users who placed 1 order in the past 12 months)Casual (defined as 2-5 orders placed in the past in 12 months)Frequent (defined as 6 - 10 orders placed in the past in 12 months)Super (defined as >10 orders placed in the past in 12 months) Feature Request:Ability to create a visitor segment that allows for creation of a container that can look back in time to a user-defined time frame. The time frame defined in the segment should be given priority over the reporting period. For example, if a report were ran for the last 2 full months (reporting period), and the One Time Shopper segment were applied, then segment should look back 12 months to determine if any of the traffic during the reporting period meets the segment criteria.
I use the debugger mostly for Analytics and it would be preferable for me if the new network requests loaded on the left (front) rather then the right (end). I am mostly looking for the latest request and it is a pain to have to go to the bottom of the window and scroll to the right to see the newest request. Maybe make the sort/load direction an option? If that is not possible, maybe the left/right scroll bar could be at the top of the window as opposed to the bottom?
Es wäre so schön wenn sich unter Catalina am Mac die Fenster auf verschiedengroßen Monitoren und iPad (Sidecar) automatisch anpassen könnten.
I find it annoying that the request automatically collapses if I leave the application for a moment. I'd like it to keep the state I've left it in, as long as the window remains open.
I find the contrast too soft, specially when reading in the light mode.
The UI for the date selector in Analysis Workspace has changed to result in more whitespace. On smaller screens, that means a lot of scrolling is needed when toggling the rolling date ranges.See this screenshot where the bottom part got cut off, requiring scrolling.Also, given the absence of a scrollbar, it's not immediately obvious that scrolling is needed.FYI my screen resolution is 1440x900.
With the new v1.8.4 there is a change which I really don't like. To understand the change, first have a look at how it looks in the old v1.8.3: As you can see there are all the default variables easy to access. I understand that in most cases all the fields remain empty and it is a lot of place ... that might be the reason why the change was made in v1.8.4, see here:All the default variables are now hidden behind a simple checkbox - check it and see the additional fields as above. What's bad?There are 2 points that I don't like about thatIf you have the settings closed, you have no indication that you maybe have filled in some of the fields - so easy to forget about a single field that has a value. just had sort of nightmare while debugging an issue...the action remembers the setting of the view in the UI - good. but this setting is written in the final launch library code! it adds an additional string to the action with a boolean value for "showAdditionalSettings".Idea to improveI suggest to change it from a checkbox-feature to an "accordeon", so basically hiding the additional fields until the user clicks on the header (or on an icon to open), closed by default.in case there is at least 1 field with a value the accordeon could either be open at view or the accordeon title could have a badge indicating that there are hidden settings. please change this as soon as possible!
The annotation ability within proof is great but currently limited without the ability to add text over the proof image itself.It would be amazing to be able to add text over the top of a proof image as an annotation, the same way you can add the other elements such as a box or arrow, ie effectively a style of watermark - so may even be useful to be able to adjust opacity as a bonus, but definitely colour, font and size. Even at it's most basic such as you find in Paint would be great.The use I see for these is adding an identifier to the image, in my case a product name or description over the top of the image, or set of images as a visual aid, as opposed to the note itself. This is different from the current text tool that only select text within certain file types, which is not what I need.I've tried adding an image as an example but unfortunately it keeps failing...
Our business has requested for ability to mark/post an update on project/task level as “Urgent”? As we move away from emails, we’re finding that certain messages get lost in the sea of notifications. Is there a way to mark a particular update as “Urgent” or “High Priority” ?
Everything is always slow to load. Navigating DW, updating requests, pivoting views, all seem to take 3-5 or more seconds to updateWhen changing report suites, it’s frustrating that the entire report set up gets reset and must be redoneBeing able to include custom metrics built off segments would be very helpful. This is a big oneNot being able to use more than one segment per extract creates a lot of challenges when trying to get precise extractsThe search functionality for previous reports is very clunky. It’s not easy to use and it’s very tedious to find older reports. Advanced searching functionality would make things easier
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK