When configuring Queue Topics and Topic Groups, the text from those object's description field is displayed as a tool tip when the user hovers over the topic. I would like for this functionality to be extended to the first layer of the New Requests dropdown, where each queue project is listed. I would like the text from the project's description field to be displayed as a tool tip when the user hovers over each queue. Currently the tool tip just shows the project's name, which is duplicative.
Ability to adding urgency to notifications based on time frame (i.e. flag as urgent if needed in a couple of hours, etc.)
To prevent users from selecting date or time options that are truly not options, we need the ability to lock-down what specified date/time ranges are available from which a requester can select as they pertain to specific services. (Example: if a requested service is known to take 3 days minimum, then "next day" should not be an option for the requester to select after they've selected that specific service, as it creates an impossible scenario).
For reporting purposes, would like the ability to merge values within the fields - there is no merge functionality now (Recommendation from Workfront is to use a name that is versatile enough to use across multiple forms - OR - use fields we can concatenate with a calculated field, but this isn’t practical and won’t really suffice long-term).
Please show the rule name when a user is viewing / editing a rule's components. It is very easy to lose your place. In DTM, everything was on the same page, with rule name and different components available there, so it was quick and easy to move thru. Now, everything requires a click, and each click results in a screen without the rulename visible. Example:Create or edit a rule.Click an event, condition, etc.The screen shows "Edit Rule" as the title - that's it. The only way to find the rule name if you forget (or want to verify) which one you opened is to click Discard or Save.IDEA: Use the "Edit Rule" space to provide a descriptive title (e.g., "<Rulename>: <Event/Condition/Action>") or at a minimum the first 60 characters of the rule name (e.g., "Edit Rule: <first 60 characters of rule>...") with ellipsis and title attribute to show rest on hover. For those of us interrupted often, this would save a lot of time of lost work, do-overs, fixes, when we're forced to choose between Save / Discard. Also, some indicator of location is an accessibility requirement in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.
DICK'S Golf & GG Internal Display March - June Digital 2020This is a perfect example of why I miss having the X in the corner of a proof to close out. If I had that I could jump between proofs.With beta test I am having to use back button to get out of proof and it is a pain to keep getting to next proof.
Ability for a user to delete a project/task/comment ONLY if the user created a project/task/comment.
When exporting to excel date fields will bring in a timestamp and hour fields will bring in the word "hours" - regardless of how this is programmed to display in Workfront. Idea: Allow option for this type of data to be included or not included in reporting.
When you click on the "New Task" button on the home screen, the information you can add there is very limited. After you add the new task, you can click on the task, or go to the "requests I've submitted," and add more info. Eventually you can get to an "Edit" button where there is even more options to edit. It would be great if there were more editing options available up front when creating the new task or request from the home screen.
We have users that would like to see all of their tasks in the home screen in a Agile, Kanban board style. This would make each task/request appear as an Agile card, containing the basic information for them to work on.
We'd love to have the ability to view the data from custom forms attached to requests, from the Home page. The Home page used to have an "Edit Custom Form" link where you could at least see the custom form data. That link was removed in the last release and we can no longer access the custom form data on our requests from the home page, thus requiring us to go into each request and click on multiple tabs to get to the info we need to complete the work.
It would be real helpful to be able to add notes / text to each column / image request in the Experience Cloud Debugger. This way, when we click through a journey and send image requests with each click, we can note what we did to generate each request. Then using the wonderfully helpful Download feature, we could get that packaged up in 1 neat file and pass along. C'mon, PLEASE!!!!!
The Transfer File step in a workflow can be configured to optionally delete a source file after transferring the file when the protocol is SFTP or Amazon S3.This option is not available when the protocol is "File(s) present on the Adobe Campaign server".If I am developing a new workflow or am troubleshooting an existing workflow, I may want to run the workflow on the same file several times. It is inconvenient to have to upload the file to the Campaign server each time I run the workflow because the Transfer File step automatically deletes the file.Please add a "Delete the source files after transfer" option for the "File(s) present on the Adobe Campaign server" protocol so that the workflow author can turn this option on and off as needed.
It would be great if we could add issues to a task from the right side task summary panel in the New Workfront Experience.
Kanban cards should be able to have the % completion removed from the card to avoid confusion!
When a task is assigned to multiple people, that task appears in each users HOME screen. However, from the home screen view, there is no indicator as to whether the other users are done with their portion of the task or not. It would be helpful if the users could see who was done with their part from the home screen, and not have to drop into the task object to see this information.This type of functionality is VERY helpful for the "workers" that are using WF to have work assigned to them, but DO NOT do their work in workfront. For example, our graphic design team. They get assignments to build assets through WF, so an aggregate location like the HOME screen is ideal for them to see all the work they need to do.
Linking Production Launch code to DTM is really helpful and a thoughtful feature. One less hassle to handle.If there is a possibility to enhance the linking functionality, we recommend to build the same linking functionality to Staging environment in Launch and DTM as we have it in production.This way, clients do not need to go through the hassle of deploying Launch embed code in their development environments for this migration. It would be an extra consistent approach to production, if we have the linking capability for 1 matching DTM and Launch testing environment. E.g. DTM Staging. Then, when the clients are ready to totally use the Launch embed code, we could deploy it to all environments including dev, staging and production.Meanwhile, as we currently do not have this feature, we use Fiddler, Charles, or Requestly to replace the DTM staging environment code with Launch embed code for testing. just FYI.Hope this helps. Thanks so much
Would like to have the flexibility to create a layout where I can ensure the issue reference number is displayed on the Top Right area of the issue information, just like issue %complete, issue assignment, status and planned completion are displayed.
Currently, we have a Dimension in the left & metric in the right if we want to interchange then it takes around 5 to 8 min for 1 freeform & normally every dashboard have 3 to 4 freeform for analysis & if it's a big project then it might increase to 7 or 8.Suggestion - Adding a button to interchange dimension with metric or metric with the dimension will save around 20 min for each workspace.
UPDATE:Turns out that the time is editable. But it's hidden by a failed user interface design. See https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/Adobe-Analytics-Ideas/Don-t-hide-user-actionable-visual-elements-e-g-in-Scheduled/idi-p/355327 Feature request: allow the user to set the time when he wants to receive a Scheduled Project's report. When scheduling a project, the user cannot set the time for the project's delivery. Instead, it will be sent at the time that the schedule has been last saved. For example, if I setup a Scheduled Project at 2:50pm, the subsequent reports will always be sent at 2:50pm. But that is not the ideal time to receive this reports. This is a ridiculous workflow because it demands that the user be at his computer, setting up the Scheduled Project, at the time that he expects to receive the reports later on.
Please add a column to show Priority of activities on the Activities List page itself, while also allowing sorting on this. This will save a lot of time while setting the priority of an activity where currently we have to maintain a list of all activities in an Excel sheet, and looking up the list to ensure new activity is not going to impact/clash with an existing activity. Regards,Rajneesh
When I click into a report from a dashboard, it would be AMAZING if there were a breadcrumb trail allowing me to easily go back to the dashboard when I'm done editing the report.Since the NWE changes the URL between /edit and /detail each time you edit a report, just clicking the back button on my browser isn't a viable solution. I didn't see any other Ideas for this, but if one exists already please let me know!
As an admin of a mature Marketo Org, it would be extremely helpful to be able to specify what time zone date fields are adhering to when creating lists or global administration campaigns. They can adhere to the instance-wide setting unless you specifically manually change it. I know I can change my personal user timezone, but date fields in lists and campaigns still adhere to the instance-wide timezone setting. It makes it difficult, if not impossible, to filter on date fields for time zones that are not the same as your instance setting. As a use case: we're creating a local data mart of Marketo data, and when we pull it using API, it's in GMT/ZULU format. It's not possible to compare this exported list of people against Marketo's GUI without changing the instance-wide timezone to match. Alternatively, allow us to perform date calculations.
If I've zoomed in to see the gantt by week, i lose that granularity when I export the gantt - even if I select export 'what i see' . (I have the "Zoom To" set to "Project Duration".) I've been told by WF Support that this is 'working as designed'. Their current algorithm is: A) If displayed date range occupies less space than available paper width, gantt chart exports as-is without any change. B) If displayed date range occupies more space than available paper width, gantt chart tries to zoom out enough to fit the displayed date range. This currently results in zoom level changes. Please modify to also export as is for option B.
I would like the ability to manually lock a project from additional updates on a project by project basis. We need the ability to add time and supporting documents to a project for a period of time after the Project Manager "completes" the project. But want to lock it from additional updates after a desired period of time (say 2 weeks).Currently, it is locked at status completion or not at all.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
