Build better products with our product team
When someone gets an update from workfront in their email they may add an attachment. Right now workfront ignores the attachment and you have no idea that there was an attachment. We need attachments from our clients, they are used to submitting attachments via helpdesk. Workaround: We built a flow in Azuqua (Azuqua doesn't handle attachments via gmail yet so it took some extra work but it works) that looks at every email coming in and sends them to workfront. This flow beats workfront by 2-40 minutes in processing the attachments before the update is posted to workfront.
It would be nice to have a template to create a program and all the projects within that program, as well as custom fields at the program level. This would be helpful for campaigns. We could remove the projects that are not applicable for the particular campaign. We could fill in the details for the campaign on the program level custom form. There is no capability to copy programs, so we aren't able to copy a similar program. It has to be all manually re-created.
Description - add option to change font colour in text in updates Why is this feature important to you - it would make it easier to selectively highlight important parts of the update How would you like the feature to work - at least basic selection of colours for the font, e.g. just like in reports, conditional formatting Current Behaviour - all black, only bold can be used as highlight
Description - Ability to map in non XDM compliant parquet files Why is this feature important to you - Source systems are not always producing parquet files which are xdm compliant How would you like the feature to work - Ability to map in parquet files from cloud based source connectors. Current Behaviour - No mapping option is present for parquet source files.
Description - When attempting to mark a Project Complete and there is an open issue or task, popup should at minimum list the task/issue stopping the project from being marked complete. Step better would be why the task/issue is not complete if due to missing approvals, bad dates, or anything else definable. Why is this feature important to you - Just wasted time trying to get close a project. First, all tasks were marked 100% and standard view does not include status so wasted time looking for a task not complete but 100%. Second, once the task was found I could not update the status because it was "Calculated by System", but all subtasks were complete and 100%. Waste more time looking through experience league for what could be stopping, try a number of suggestions with no results. Come to find out Planned start and end dates cannot be the same. Update dates to fixed because ASAP is not changing them. Still the parent task remains open. Thinking I have not found what is stopping the status update continue to waste time looking for more suggestions. Circle back to the dates and force time recalculation, things start working. Could have saved time if the popup notification just stated X task is not complete - Dates/Timeline error or message that is stopping the system. How would you like the feature to work - Keep the current popup when attempting to complete a project, but add details Current Behavior - Popup only states project cannot be marked complete with open tasks or issues.
Description - Once you perform a search, you no longer have the ability to adjust what you are searching. Meaning, if you have a typo in your search you have to completely back out of search and restart, rather than being able to click into the search bar again and adjust. Additionally, if you are searching for multiple different items with the same criteria/filters, you have to re-input the criteria/filters for each search, rather than just changing the text in the search bar. Why is this feature important to you - This was a functionality that used to exist and was stripped during new UI implementation. This is a big degradation and requires extra and not standard extra work during search. How would you like the feature to work - The same as the old search functionality - search bar remains visible and editable after performing the initial search Current Behaviour - Search bar disappears once you hit enter/click search
Description - When sending a file from Workfront to Assets, the folder path should be "sticky" so that the next time we send a file we don't need to start from the very beginning of the folder path.Why is this feature important to you - This would save many clicks, reduce frustration, and improve efficiency.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to the way it works in the Enhanced Connector. The location of the last file send is the default for the next file send.Current Behaviour - When the User is sending a file to Assets, the user has to start from the very beginning of the Assets folder structure...every time.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently in AEM we have option to use Oauth2 (CQ Mailer SMTP OAuth2 Provider) for email integration with SMTP server, along with SMTP(Day CQ mail service) can we have option to use the Oauth2 with Microsoft graph API Use-case: Due to security reasons some clients won't enable the SMTP authentication for the accounts as those accounts are shared within multiple brands and SMTP AUTH is also being deprecated by Microsoft. So thinking to use the Microsoft graph API for email integration it will use the same access token generated using the Oauth OOTB implementation. Current/Experienced Behavior: Oauth2 integration with SMTP Improved/Expected Behavior: One more option to have Oauth2 integration with Microsoft Graph API Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Bounteous Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description -Why is this feature important to you - When creating a field in a custom form and viewing item in Preview mode, items are truncated. Would like the ability to stretch the field box in order to see everything. How would you like the feature to work - Be able to stretch the box within the window so items can be viewedCurrent Behaviour - Field box is not very big, so you can't view everything. Items are cut off.
Description - Allow using the "same field" custom field with "different labels" on various forms. Example below:Field Name: "Select Apps"Label 1 (Form 1): Select Affected AppsLabel 2 (Form 2): Select Top 3 AppsWhy is this feature important to you - Currently, the absence of this functionality leads to duplicate fields, increasing maintenance overhead. For instance, if the "Select Apps" field is a dropdown and I need to add two new values, I have to update every duplicate field individually, which can lead to errors if not updated.How would you like the feature to work - When adding a field to a custom form from the field library, the label should default to blank (or the initially set value). Either way, this should allow users to enter a different label if needed, without overwriting existing labels on other forms.Current Behaviour - If a label is modified on one form, it updates the labels across all forms using the field. This forces users to create duplicate fields and manage them separately.
Description:Parent task constraints in a template should yield the same results when applied to a project. Currently, this is not the case.Why is this feature important?If you need a specific phase of a project (with many child tasks) to start on a particular date, it makes sense to have the ability to set a start date for the entire group of tasks. Task constraints work as expected on parent tasks in projects, so it’s essential that a project template behaves the same way when creating a new project. Consistency between templates and projects is crucial for accurate task planning and scheduling. How would you like the feature to work?Parent task constraints in a template should function the same way they do in a project, ensuring that the template creates the project with consistent, expected results.Current Behavior:Some task constraints on parent tasks in templates are not respected when the template is used to create a project. For example, in a template, I have set a constraint on a parent task to start on day 5 (working days). However, when I create a project from the template, the task is pushed to day 10. With the project start date set to 2/4, a constraint for day 5 (working days) should set the task to 2/11, but it is instead set to 2/18. This discrepancy suggests a calculation error.Adobe’s response was that task constraints should not be applied to parent tasks. My counterpoint was: if that’s the case, then why is the option to apply constraints available in the first place? And, why does it work as expected when I apply it in a project? It also works on simple templates but seems to get confused on more complex templates. Adobe could not provide an explanation and reverted back to it's first response of not putting a task constraint on a parent task and to put in this idea. Anyone else having this issue?
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Increase the folder depth limitation for the Export Metadata feature in AEM Assets to support folders exceeding 10 levels. Use-case: Some customers rely on deep folder hierarchies to manage large-scale asset libraries effectively. Their current folder classification system often exceeds 10 levels in depth. The existing limitation prevents the Export Metadata feature from functioning properly for assets stored in these deeper folders, leading to inefficiencies and an inability to extract necessary metadata. Current/Experienced Behavior: When using the Export Metadata feature, it fails to export metadata for assets located in folders deeper than 10 levels. This limitation disrupts workflows for customers with complex folder structures. (Case #E-001458355: Support Response: I checked the code for AssetMetadataExporterProcess and found that the FULL_TRAVERSAL_DEPTH = 10, which means it only allow 10 levels of depth. This limit restriction can’t be increased.) Improved/Expected Behavior: The Export Metadata feature should support folder depths exceeding 10 levels, allowing users to export metadata seamlessly regardless of folder hierarchy depth. This enhancement would enable greater flexibility and efficiency for customers with advanced folder structures. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud (2024.8.17569.20240822T203847Z) Customer-name/Organization name: LG Electronics, Global HQ Korea Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Our Firm has not been able to use Activity Maps since it was re-engineered to v3 due to our security policy that forces us to modify the extensions guid as software is not permitted to update outside of the Firm. Why is this feature important to you - Adobe Extension is a great tool that makes analytics more accessible to users. The work around limits its use for some users. How would you like the feature to work - We would like Adobe to allow custom guid so that our users can authenticate using the extension. Current Behaviour - Authentication is blocked by Adobe as it does not recognize our GUID.
We would like to understand what combination of events equal to what user actions via CJA Audit logs.The CJA Audit logs help doc https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/analytics-platform/using/cja-privacy/audit-log gives insights on very general things but we want to be able to get more specific information.For example: Project Created: Name = #### will that only show up once per project creation? Project Viewed will show up multiple times for a single view of a project(tested) or on a future date after the actual view. This makes it a bit challenging to extract precise usage insights.What are API_REQUEST? Why is there no User Name against some Action Name in the Audit logs? Description would show: Project Viewed: Project Objects - What are Project Objects?
Description -Why is this feature important to you - We want the ability to control whether the select all option appears in a mutifield dropdown or checklist. How would you like the feature to work - Add an option in the custom field that allows the admin to instruct WF to add the Select All option. If not selected, then do not allow the ability for the user to select every option. Current Behaviour - Workfront adds the Select All/ Deselect all option automatically.
We are looking to customize "Forward to Friend" feature in Marketo to have the following result, "When the email receiver forwards the received email from Marketo to a friend, the receiver should receive the email with a customized message in subject or in body of the email before forwarded email content"This customization is not currently not available, could you consider adding this in future developments
Description - I found community threads from 10 years back(?!) where people asking about lowercasing prop/evar values in processing rules. Till date, this still does not seem to be possible, correct? Why is this feature important to you - Why would I use processing rules if even this simple functionality does not exist? How would you like the feature to work - have an option to lowercase as string value as one of the given dropdown items Current Behaviour - still no can do in 2024
We have an app that functions both online and offline, with offline tracking working as expected.A key business question is how often the app is used offline versus online. However, the Connection Type dimension does not accurately reflect this, as offline hits are attributed to the connection type available when they are eventually sent to the server.To address this, I propose categorizing these hits under a new dimension item: Offline.
There are a couple of ideas out there for a better representation of this view in Smart Campaign Schedule: But I wanted to express again how confusing this line can be. 1. Email is operational. Blocked from emails doesn't account for that, but still lists all records which are unsubscribed or marketing suspended. That is not true: These people are in fact not blocked from that email.Also, it blurs the view on people who are really blocked, e.g. due to being email invalid.2. That line also appears if there isn't even a "Send Email" flow step in that Smart Campaign. It is also shown when the flow step e.g. is "Change Data Value" where there is no such thing as a block.I had to explain this misleading information to colleagues or clients countless times.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provide a new report in the Assets Reports which provides the information if asset are referenced and in use or not. Use-case: As an editor I want to ensure that unused asset are deleted from DAM. Therefore I would need a report which asset are not in used anymore = not referenced in pages anymore. With this I can simply go through and delete and free up space in DAM. Current/Experienced Behavior: No report available ootb - need to check each asset individually regarding references. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ootb report which lists all unreferenced assets and provides option for the editors to filter for published or unpublished assets (so, the status of the assets). Background: an unreferenced and unpublished asset could be deleted immediately. An unreferenced but published one could still be in use from some other website using direct link to it - might need some further investigations before deleting it. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - There have been many times I'd love to share instructional text, or something to summarize a portion of a dashboard. Why is this feature important to you - It could help explain portions of the dashboard.How would you like the feature to work - Similarly to building a website, have the abillity to add a singular text box with bold, italic, underlines. Would also like the ability to add a link or graphic with the text.Current Behaviour - There's not a way to do that without creating a graphic, or some external link rigged way to get it to populate.
Description: Currently task approvals are only shown in the task view, but we regularly have projects stuck in task approvals that have gone unnoticed unless we hunt through tasks to see if it's stuck in an approval Why is this feature important to you: In order to keep projects on track, visually identifying approvals in the project timeline view would greatly improve our ability to monitor risks in our projects in the project timeline view. How would you like the feature to work?: Add some sort of visual queue that a task approval is pending approval in the timeline view without having to dig into tasks Current Behaviour: Approvals are only visible in the task view.
Description - It would be really nice if sections and custom fields edit and/or view capabilities could be controlled via a specific user, team, or group on a custom form. Why is this feature important to you - We are working on a way to have multiple people with edit permissions on a form be able to edit only one field or one section of a form, unique to each user/role, while the other fields and sections can either be only viewed or do not display at all. This is all based on the specific user that is viewing the form.How would you like the feature to work - This feature would allow us to control which sections or fields a specific user could edit or view. Different users would look at the form and for each user, a different section or field would be editable, view only, or wouldn't appear. This would greatly reduce the number of forms that we would need to create.Current Behaviour - You can set display logic based on field values in the form, but not based on user, team, group, etc. You can set edit and view permissions for a form based on which users have edit or view permissions for sections on a form, but it does not limit it based on user, team, or group.
Description - Highlight Description field changes (what was added/what was removed) in updates. Why is this feature important to you - This will save users a lot of time when trying to review changes to the Description field How would you like the feature to work - When the text in the Description field is updated, the System Updates section can:Option 1: Record the new text with the old text (combined as one), striking out anything that was removed highlighting it in red, and highlighting anything that was added in green. If colored highlights are not feasible, simply strike out removed text and use bold for added text. Option 2: Record the system update in two columns, the left being the original text and the right being the new text. In the New Text Column, it would also be great to strike out anything that was removed highlighting it in red and highlighting anything that was added in green. If colored highlights are not feasible, simply strike out removed text and use bold for added text. A basic version of Option 2 is available in Jira. Current Behaviour—When the Description is changed, the system records the updated text as-is in the System Updates section. For a user to figure out what was changed, they have to read the entire description (sometimes this can be very long), and even then, it is hard to find what was exactly updated. Users are forced to use a third-party text comparison tool to determine what was changed.
Description - There should be a way to export the query results to a .csv file.Why is this feature important to you -It will help analyzing the data easily. Make any bulk changes and ingest back into AEP. How would you like the feature to work -Ability to save the output data to a file in your local drive. However there should be a limit to avoid storage space issue. Current Behavior -You can view them in the output window which is very small to review or copy.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
