Build better products with our product team
Would love to have the Project > Overview or Issue > Overview forms customizable, but also at a minimum making the Portfolio and Program tags clickable, just like the resolved by or original issue links.Today we can select the Portfolio and Program from a drow down field, but they are not clickable.This would allow all involved in the project to directly click (within 2+ clicks) from the project to the program to see all other related projects to that program. This would be a time saver and increase user adoption across our channel/program managers.The way our company uses Portfolios and Programs is:Portfolios - each fiscal year we create a new Portfolio, i.e. 2025 Workfront Projects - all of our teams utilizing projects (Social, Design, Publishing, Marketo, etc.) their projects automatically tag to this Portfolio based on the template settings.Programs - each project manager based on BAU assets, campaigns, launches, proprietary events, etc. will create a specific program related to such. All projects that related to that individual campaign or event get tagged to that program - this allows all to have one central location to view all project related data - further using the filter, views and groupings in a customized way that best fits their needs.
Description - Azure Secret Key for the Workfront Fusion Email account expires annually, requiring manual updates for all affected connections and associated email modules. The existing "Re-authorize" or "Re-verify" options do not support updating the secret key. That leaves no option except the creation of a new connection each time, which results in a high administrative burden.Why is this feature important to you - Operational Efficiency: Manually recreating connections and updating all email modules in Workfront Fusion is time-consuming and disrupts workflows.Error Prevention: The manual process increases the likelihood of errors, such as missed updates, which could lead to failed automation tasks. How would you like the feature to work - Provide an option to update the Azure Secret Key in the existing connection settings.Include a validation process to verify the new key before applying it. Current Behaviour - Currently, the Azure Secret Key cannot be updated in an existing connection. Users are forced to create a new connection with the updated key, which then requires manual reconfiguration of all associated email modules in Workfront Fusion. This manual process is repetitive, error-prone, and leads to disruptions in automated workflows.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Implement an intelligent content recommendation engine to leverage AI and machine learning to suggest relevant content for each page, driving increased engagement and business outcomes. Use-case: Marketers need a way to deliver the most relevant and engaging content to users based on their behavior, interests, and the current context. By providing AI-powered content recommendations, AEM Sites can help surface the most impactful content to drive conversions and achieve business goals. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, marketers must manually curate and select content for each page, which can be time-consuming and may not always align with user preferences. There is no automated way to surface top-performing content or make recommendations based on user behavior and business rules. Improved/Expected Behavior: With the intelligent content recommendation engine, AEM Sites would analyze user interactions, content performance metrics, and contextual data to suggest the most relevant content for each page. Marketers could set business rules to prioritize certain content types or topics, and track the engagement and revenue impact of AI-recommended content. The system would learn and optimize recommendations over time based on user interactions, providing valuable insights to marketers on content performance and opportunities for improvement. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM + Adobe Experience Platform + RT CDP Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Search functionality in WF Proof doesn't match what's used in Acrobat. Main issue we noticed is the straight apostrophe entered by keyboard won't find word with a curly apostrophe, which is most common, but they can both be sporadic since InCopy and InDesign don't make it easy to keep them consistent. Why is this feature important to you - Since we use both Proof and PDFs at times depending on the process, having the same search functionality is important for consistency. How would you like the feature to work - Apostrophes or quotes will search all instances, both straight and curly/smary apostrophes quotes. Current Behaviour - We noticed that it wouldn't find a word with an apostrophe included in Proof since the keyboard just enters a straight apostrophe when typing it in regularly, so we missed important results that we were supposed to check. We downloaded and searched in the PDF and that shows all instances no matter what type of apostrophe was used.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Environment variables is a good feature in AEMaaCS to change OSGi service configuration in runtime without redeployment. Sometimes, project has to have a lot of env variables, especially if you are running several sites on the same program. That's why I would like to have an option to set a description or note for env variable in the Environment Configuration modal in Cloud Manager. Use-case: I can provide few use cases: 1. Imagine you have 2 brand that are running on AEMaaCS. Each of them should pull data from third-party service by schedule. Sometimes there are cases when you need to change a frequency for pulling data for both services or service URL. For example: BRAND1_SERVICE_URL is an env variable with a 3rd party service URL to provide data for brand1, BRAND2_SERVICE_URL is an env variable with a 3rd party service URL to provide data for brand2, BRAND1_SERVICE_CRON is an env variable with a cron expression for brand1 service, BRAND2_SERVICE_CRON is an env variable with a cron expression for brand2 service. I would like to provide some notes for like "3rd-party service for brand 1. Example: https://api.service1.con/api/v1 " or "Every 5 hours: 0 0 */5 * * ? | Every 5 mins: 0 */5 * * * ?". 2. When you need to follow concept of secrets rotation (like for CDN: CDN_PURGEKEY_081324, CDN_PURGEKEY_111324) you can forget about last changed key even if you named it using data format. Some description or note for env variable might help to provide more clarity. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently such option is absent. Improved/Expected Behavior: - Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager Environment Configuration flow Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Example of the idea how to render it: Code package (if applicable):
Description - In the set up area we input all of our companies holidays. It is read in the resource manager perfectly. However in users personal profiles when they are indicating time off, they don't show up. Each individual is tied to a holiday calendar, so having it up on their personal calendar make sense. Why is this feature important to you - Would help the team while looking at time off schedules.How would you like the feature to work - The holiday schedule that the user is tied to would appear as a non-changing time off in their personal calendar. Ideally even in another color. Current Behaviour - The holiday schedule applies to resource management, but not in personal calendars. So it is integrating just not in all calendars.
We use all levels within the Workfront experience. Each level has critical information pertaining to our clients, programs and projects. As we continue to advance using Fusion, having the opportunity to save something that's been deleted is critical. Currently, Workfront only surfaces Project, issues, tasks or documents in the Recently Deleted Files. We are unable to recover Portfolio or Program files. I'd like to propose that we include portfolio, program and associated custom form data in the "recently deleted files" so that we can recover those files if necessary.
The current state is that we have to create users first on Adobe Admin Console in order to control that the user will be created as Federated ID. Unfortunately, one of the many disappointing things about Adobe Admin Console is that it can randomly create the user as Federated ID or Adobe ID if the user creation originates from Workfront. As we were also forced into Adobe Admin Console and there is already an Adobe Admin Console Systems administrator, we can only get Product Administrator access levels on Adobe Admin Console which does not provide access to the logs. The problem occurs in that when other product administrator or the Adobe Admin Console Systems Administrator creates/deletes a user on Adobe Admin Console, these appear as if actioned by the main Workfront systems administrator in the workfront logs which becomes an audit issue. We can't refer to the Adobe Admin Console logs quickly as that would require requesting from the Adobe Admin Console systems administrator every time we need to figure out a user creation/deletion log. While Adobe is aware that this is an issue and they are looking to rename the log to say system administrator in the long run, there is no ETA on this fix. I am writing this Idea to get this bug(!)/feature fixed as I don't understand how this is acceptable as an audit issue.
Description - Workers are accidentally tagging the wrong people in their tasks or comments field and it's difficult to remove that tag unless you delete the comment then re-post. Why is this feature important to you - The wrong people could possibly reading information they shouldn't be seeing. How would you like the feature to work - Be able to remove the tag without having to delete the comment. Current Behaviour - We're not able to remove the tag without deleting the comment then reposting.
DescriptionI would like to have the ability to create blueprints of objects within my Workfront instance that can be easily shared with other sister agencies. For example, instead of exporting project templates as Excel files and emailing them for manual recreation, I would like to share 2-4 project templates as blueprints that can be directly imported into another Workfront instance.Why is this feature important?This feature is crucial because it significantly reduces time and effort, increasing efficiency and productivity. It eliminates repetitive manual processes and ensures consistency across instances, fostering better collaboration between teams and agencies.How should the feature work?Workfront could introduce a dedicated "Share" section within Blueprints that allows users to:Select project templates, including associated custom forms, assignments, predecessors, and constraints, to compile into a blueprint.Export the blueprint as a file that can be shared externally.Import the blueprint into another Workfront instance, where the recipient can:Open the blueprint in their Blueprints section.Adjust assignments, custom form fields, and other configurations as needed.Save the blueprint as a project template within their instance.This streamlined workflow would empower teams to collaborate more effectively while preserving template integrity.Current BehaviorCurrently, I need to manually export project templates as Excel files, email them to the recipient, and have them:Copy and paste task names into their instance.Manually recreate assignments, predecessors, constraints, and custom forms from scratch.This process is time-consuming, error-prone, and inefficient.
Description -When you update a calculated field on a custom form, the change to the calculated field is not changed in other custom forms where the same field is used. The calculated field needs to get updated in each custom form it is used in. Workfront Support Response > "After speaking with my team and running some tests, this is currently working as designed, and why we recommend copying the calculation into the instructions of the field settings so they can be copied and pasted into the calculation after it is added to the new form. Currently, if you update the calculation in one form it will not carry over to another form where that field lives." REF: Case Number 00431554 Why is this feature important to you -Having to update a custom calculated field in multiple forms adds to the administrative burden and can lead to user error or inconsistencies in the calculated value across forms. How would you like the feature to work -Calculated fields should work like all other custom fields. Updates to the fields show be universal to all the forms it is used in.
Right now if data in a field is long it wraps and extends the length of the line item on reports and in views. I would love to be able to undue this wrapping when I want to to make it easier to view lists with the same spacing between each line. This works that way when you turn on the Gantt view so perhaps it could work similarly or just be extended to work on button push or by default setting in a report or view.
Description - I'm looking for a way to track which users are using the Mobile App at my company. Why is this feature important to you - Data that shows me if people are using the mobile appHow would you like the feature to work - I'd like to be able to see if they have logged into the mobile space and are using it at all. Current Behaviour - No data available.
Customers have asked to be able to have issues automatically convert to a project. The selections from the custom form on the request would essentially map to a corresponding template. For teams that get a large amount of requests this can be very beneficial to automate and remove the manual step of converting each issue individually.
Can an identifier be added to the issue overview form that depicts whether a request was submitted as new or if the submitter utilized the copy and submit as new function. I would love to be able to reference this when troubleshooting with submitters, but our internal COE teams would find this valuable when validating metadata in the forms. I would also like to be able to report on this to see the usage across submitters. Today there is no way of telling when a request is new or the copy and submit as new function is used.
DescriptionEnable the ability to convert a Paragraph custom field into a Text with Formatting field. This functionality would provide users with the flexibility to copy and paste formatted text from other applications and format requirements directly within Workfront using bullets, numbering, bold text, etc.Why is this feature important?This feature enhances user efficiency and maintains consistency within the Workfront instance by:Allowing users to format project requirements or other data directly in the field, reducing reliance on external tools.Eliminating the need to create duplicate fields just to add formatting capabilities, saving time and minimizing administrative overhead.Retaining existing custom fields without requiring redundant work to migrate data to newly created fields.How should the feature work?Within the Custom Form Builder:Click on an existing Paragraph custom field.In the field properties/attributes, navigate to the Display Type dropdown.Change the field type from Paragraph Text Field to Text Field with Formatting.Upon conversion, Workfront should:Preserve all existing live data as plain text (i.e., no formatting will be applied retroactively).Allow new data to utilize the formatting options available in Text Field with Formatting.This streamlined approach avoids data loss while expanding formatting capabilities for future entries. (See attachment for a dropdown screenshot.)Current BehaviorCurrently, this functionality does not exist. Users must create a new Text Field with Formatting, manually migrate data, and delete the original Paragraph field—an inefficient and time-consuming process.
DescriptionIn Customer Journey Analytics, dimensions can be configured to use a date-time schema data type. For example, a dimension showing when a product was added to wishlist could use this data type. Despite dates being akin to numbers, they cannot be used with greater than and less than operators in fitlers. The recommendation is to allow for this type of functionality. Why is this feature important to youAllowing the use of operators on dimensions that use a date-time data type would be useful for filter creation. For example, let's say that a user wanted to see a list of customer IDs that added a product to a wishlist between September 20, 2023, and October 20, 2023. A dimension exists that captures the date that a product was added to a wishlist (Dimension 1), and the dimension's values are in date-time format. If filter operators worked with date-time dimensions, the user could build a filter with logic similar to "greater than or equal to Dimension 1 = Sep 20, 2023, and less than or equal to Dimension 1 = Oct 20, 2023". Currently, the user would have to list out 31 different dimension values to cover each of the dates from Sep 20, 2023, and Oct 20, 2023. How would you like the feature to workTreat dimension values with a date-time data type as numbers, which will allow greater than, less than, etc. operators to be used. Current BehaviourDimensions with date-time data types do not currently work with operators.
Hello, we are missing the GZIP format in the Datawarehouse export, because just as Data Feed exports in GZIP, the processes that we have set up to drink from both sources, would help if they had the same format.Greetings and thank you very much,
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Please add adjustible columns in the UI for Launchess so that you can resize if necessary in case title is shortened Use-case: As an editor I want to find my launches here quickly. Normally you look for the launch title. But the title is cutted after specific amount of characters and you can not distinguish between those which beginning with same letters. Current/Experienced Behavior: Columns are fixed. You can not adjust the width of the columns in order to see shortened/cutted label like the title! Even on 'on hover' is missing! Improved/Expected Behavior: Just make the columns adjustable like in other view. It's so easy!!! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Adding a superscript of "F" to notate a field is in use in a Fusion scenario.Why is this feature important to you - We have had a few instances where the field name was changed causing the Fusion scenario to stop. This field indicator will alert the user to coordinate the change with Fusion before implementing the name change.How would you like the feature to work - Indicator on the Field object that reads: Used in Fusion, user would check box to indicate field is being used in a Fusion scenario. The field name would display with a superscript of "F" to notate the use in a Fusion scenario.Current Behaviour - Updating an excel spreadsheet to track.
With all the focus on keeping spam complaints low it would be great if there was a way to track spam complaints on the campaign level instead of having to create a smart list looking for spam complaints and then having to dive into the activity log to find the campaigns.Spam complaints per email send should be visible like any other metrics on an email performance report and the email tab for each campaign - count and percentage.
I have done AB testing for multiple campaigns. Subject lines, whole emails and Send Name. Now I want to create a detailed reporting for all the campaigns. I want to drill down analysis like winners in each. Is there any way to extract the report which shows the winners too. How to do this?
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Delete page in author should auto unpublish the page. Use-case: Content authors who are new to AEM are deleting the pages without unpublishing them, assuming it will reflect the on actual site. Page is deleted in author but not in publish or in live site. Current/Experienced Behavior: Deleting page on author stays on author without unpublishing it. Improved/Expected Behavior: Expected it to auto publish the page if author deletes the page. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Would like a stopwatch or timer feature available in WF (available in multiple locations). Why is this feature important to you - Our developers and editorial staff are requesting this and think it's a huge miss that WF doesn't have this feature when SO many other PM sites have it. How would you like the feature to work - Start, stop, pause, record to timesheet features Current Behaviour - Our time is using their phones or purchased stop watches to do this and want it within WF.
Description - Allow hours to be allocated by day, week, month in the allocations of the unassigned hours space in the workload balancer on job role assignments.Why is this feature important to you - Our resource managers need to manage upcoming time that could have tasks with hours that vary by day that need to be marked out on a job role for future assignment.How would you like the feature to work - Just as the assigned area can we have the hours in monthly, daily, weekly view to be able to be edited by doubleclicking or by clicking the three-dot menu and clicking edit allocationsCurrent Behaviour -Currently you can only assign job roles and put total planned hours in, the system will average the time but will not allow you to edit the daily allocations.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
