Build better products with our product team
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: On multifield component dialog: add sufficient space between the validation alert and the up/down arrows so each can be individually selected. This is a bug fix. Use-case: When a user makes an error in the list component, eg by not filling a mandatory field, they cannot view the validation message that would tell them what to fix, because when they click it, they click into the field to drag items up and down. It is impossible to select the validation alert. Current/Experienced Behavior: As above - user cannot select or read validation alert to know what to fix. Improved/Expected Behavior: Sufficient space between the validation alert and the up/down errors so their selection field does not overlap. Then a user can click and read the validation message and / or click and move items up and down. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: University of Sydney Screenshot (if applicable): Added as attachment Code package (if applicable):
When viewing tasks assigned to multiple people in the workload balancer a green checkmark will only appear if all assignees completed their work. It would make things a little easier/faster from a resourcing standpoint if we could see these green checkmarks when an assignee marked their part as complete instead of having to wait for all assignees to complete. I know this can be solved by just creating individual tasks but that's a process issue that would take longer to resolve. THANKS!
When assigning multiple projects, make it more user friendly. Ability to search by program and not just project. It would also be helpful if we could check mark the projects instead of having to add the search in each time. When assigning out a program of work there are sometimes 8-15 projects with the same role assignment and while the bulk assignment is good, it could be more efficient then adding each project in the search individually. Even if we could filter by Project Group AND Project Status to pull up the assignments it would be easier.
Hello Adobe...Will you please create and provide the capability to bulk edit workflows within Workfront Proof. Attached are two images which circle two places you could add this capability in menu. When I selected the few I wanted to edit to add the same person to ALL under the same phase, I clicked "view more details" and it only opens up the first highlighted workflow. Lastly, if this capability is already present, please advise how to do so.
Description We have a front-end developer who is developing e-mail blocks in HTML that we save in the Adobe Library. This is a nice function because this makes it easier the re-use components of an e-mail.Unfortunately, it is not possible to add it to the library with a contextual attribute in it. I understand that I can't use a field that belongs to a specific event in e-mails with other events, but still, I would like to save it.Now our front-ender is creating the HTML components, but then the marketers still need to add the contextual attributes manually. This takes a lot of extra time and is more sensitive to errors.So my request: I would like to save HTML components WITH contextual attributes. Why is this feature important to you: to easily build new e-mails and edit existing ones without making mistakes or spending a lot of time again. How would you like the feature to work: I would like to save HTML components WITH contextual attributes. Current Behaviour: you can't save HTML components with contextual attributes.
Hi, It would be good if we can deploy Fragments from one sandbox to another e.g, from a sandbox in our lower environment (Test to Prod). Why is this feature important to you - We develop our email fragments in Test before adding them to Prod, it will save us time and make sure code is exactly same in both sandboxes.How would you like the feature to work - Deployment from one sandbox to another, similar functionality as with Journeys (Copy to Sandbox)Current Behavior - I have created several Fragments in our test sandbox and are now looking at promoting them to Prod as of now is a thorough, manual and slow process.
Description - We'd highly appreciate an option to restore key objects in the product. At the moment majority of users would like to have ability to modify objects like Decisions/Offers/Journeys etc., however there's no way to restore changes applied to them or even to lookup previous version/status of those objects. Why is this feature important to you - since high volume of users has ability to modify all others objects (mentioned above), and there's no ownership of those objects it's very easy for someone to break others objects, either by accident or because of similarities in naming convention. We need to have this ability to restore to previous version, ability to protect them from others (sharing options) would also be useful. How would you like the feature to work - many options: 1. simple - API endpoint with lookup to previous versions of the object, and ability to append JSON response into another call to update that object to previous version 2. complex - restore button in UI (with a separate permission for Product profile or Role) 3. Optional remedy: - ownership of the object, only creator can modify unless shared with other's (individuals or user groups) - email to object owner (if feature available) about changes to that object in the Production sandbox, with option to subscribe and unsubscribe from Alert/notification Current Behaviour - you can only see current status of above objects even when using API, there's no way to lookup previous versions of the object. Objects are owned by everyone there's no sharing option so easy to break someone else's offers, decisions, journeys etc. There's currently only change log available, which is not very helpful other than finding a person to blame
Description - I would like to have alerts on all the journeys and would like to made aware when these journeys fail. We as of now have no other option other than manually check them. This then leads to journeys being broken for a longer time without us knowing. I am aware that alerts are used for failure of ingestion or when a certain threshold is crossed. I think it should also work with journeys on a individual level. Why is this feature important to you - In the current situation we are not made aware if journeys fail due to any circumstances. this means that customers have a suboptimal experience. How would you like the feature to work - We would like to receive a push notification in the UI and preferably with an email when failed journeys pop up. In the ideal situation we would be able ourselves to set up when an alert is triggered based on how many journeys it fails. Current Behaviour - We currently do not receive any alert and have to manually check over a hundred journeys on failures. Best regards, Rob
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Chance to select which kind of assets(original or renditions or both) to download from shared assets. Use-case: AEM as Cloud Service: when I share multiple assets with a user through the Share functionality, the receiver can't choose if they want to download only the original assets or the renditions, it automatically downloads whatever was set up by the person initiating the share. Current/Experienced Behavior: When I share multiple assets with a user through the Share functionality, the receiver must download whatever was set up by the sender, not for folders or collections. Improved/Expected Behavior: The requirement is for the person receiving the assets to be able to specify what they want to download, similar to the functionality present when you just use the DAM as a normal user, both for folders and collections. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2024.11.18598.20241113T125352Z-241000 Customer-name/Organization name: Jet2 Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
前提Marketoの仕様として、同一アドレスへの配信はIDが古い方に配信されると思いますしかしABテストで配信する場合、テストと勝者の2つのメールが配信されてしまう仕様になっていると思います。これは、プログラムの内部でテストと勝者にそれぞれのスマートキャンペーンが生成されるためと理解しています。 参考リンクアイデアABテストを使用したメール配信でも、重複したアドレスには1メールしか送信されないような仕様に変更いただきたいです。
Wants flexibility to do cross device targeting for some experiences and to not have to do it for all as in certain cases they don't won't experience switching to happen .Ref: Real-time profile syncing for mbox3rdPartyID
Community Manager Edit:This idea is being archived as a duplicate. Please direct all votes, comments, and questions to the new idea.New Idea - Reference Data Elements | Automatically Update Names of Data ElementsAs mentioned before Automatically Update Names of Data Elements Used in DTM Rules with 10 votes by user: @jon_kranzPROBLEMChanging the name of a Data Element does not automatically update the name of the same element when it is used in any Launch rule.SUGGESTED SOLUTIONIF the name of a Data Element has been updated AND that same Data Element is referred elsewhere within Launch (be it a rule or installed tool or anywhere else it is used)THEN system will automatically update the name of the Data Element anywhere it is used.**Note: This solution would exclude areas where custom scripts are permitted. My naive assumption is that having the system change custom scripts would be a very bad/problem-causing idea.Adding support to update _satellite.getVar('dataElementName'); should be in this scope as well, I don't see why this would cause issues since its a simple string replacement.Thanks for listening.
It would be fantastic if we had the ability to set our own fiscal year in a calendar/schedule or even at the company or group level. This would help immensely for reporting purposes.
One of the features we love in Current Home is that it's easy to see at a glance how many overdue tasks the user has.By grouping older tasks it means allow more space for current tasks (this week and next week).Coloring them in red flags to the user that they are overdueWe'd be more inclinded to use New Home if the My Work widget looked more like the Current Home Work List.
Hi, as a product enhancement in the future it would be great to be able to use Dynamic content (language) in an email and have that reflect in the view as a webpage preview. Currently only the default (English) version shows when you click view as a webpage for emails that contain other languages.
As a system administrator I would like to get notified about new and pending user approvals, so I can activate (approve or reject) new users from user creation approval request. Post Adobe Admin Console migration, only system admins are allowed to create new users form within Adobe Workfront. Group admins/users with "create" (edit) rights for users can only submit new users for approval. A system administrator has to approve this request. Currently, there is no notification (neither within Adobe Workfront, nor via email) for such request. Hence, nobody receives these requests and users stay unapproved (without access to Adobe Workfront). The current workaround is to scan the Users list filtered by "Pending Approval" manually, or to send a report with pending approvals frequently.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add Sorting Filter in Card View for various asset display variations Use-case: Use and enable Sort By filter in card view. Open AEM Asset Search and sort in card view. Current/Experienced Behavior: Sorting for Asset Search etc. is only available in List View, which only displays very small thumbnails. Card View Sort Filter function is currently only available at Assets>Files. Improved/Expected Behavior: Card View Sort Filter is available in AEM Search etc. like it is in its functionality DAM where you can sort the assets in the folders. We would like to use this existing function in Asset Search and Collection Detailview. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): v6.5 AEM Assets Customer-name/Organization name: AIDA Cruises Screenshot (if applicable): possible use Code package (if applicable):
Description - there is no way to change the default aggregation behavior for columns within freeform tables. For example, some dimensions have a sum total at the top while some dimensions have an average, with no way to manually change them.Why is this feature important to you - A field our analytics team uses frequently is Visits Per Visitor, however, when looking at certain time dimensions the value does not calculate how we are desiring, so instead of it having a sum at the top, an average would be much more useful. The option to select our own aggregation method would be preferred.How would you like the feature to work - Either in Freeform table settings or within the column gear icon in the freeform table, a way to select if we would like the column to sum total or calculate an average (or median, as another example).Current Behaviour - Certain dimensions total up as a sum at the top of the column and some provide averages automatically (such as Time Spent Per Visit), but being able to manually choose per dimension would be very powerful.
Page events are causing a single visit to switch marketing channels mid-session. With the help of Adobe support, we have tried several options to ignore page events within the rules, but it only causes these page events to get attributed to No Channel Captured. I would like to suggest a report suite setting that would tell Marketing Channel Process Rules to ignore page events.
It would be really useful for my organization when creating a new version of a proof, to have the option to carry over any unresolved comments from the previous version to the new version. This wouldn't necessarily be relevant for all scenarios, so having the option to carry them over would be important. In order for this to be most effective for us, we would need to have the option when creating the new version both from the WF browser, and also from the Adobe Workfront plugin for Creative Cloud apps (specifically InDesign). Ideally, when generating or uploading a new proof, both from within WF and in the WF plugin for InDesign, the user would be asked to tick a box if they wanted to carry over unresolved comments from previous versions. If the box is ticked, then the unresolved comments would appear in the newly generated version. (Any comments marked as resolved from previous versions would remain in their versions without being carried over). Without this feature, our users are manually checking between previous proof versions to ensure they've picked up all the comments, which inevitably results in some comments getting overlooked. It would be great to leverage the technology to ensure nothing gets missed inadvertently.
Within automated workflow it would be really beneficial for us to have different custom messages for different stages of review. For example: Stage 1 goes to these people, they get this message. Stage 2 goes to these people, they get a slightly different message... etc etc We have a range of different stakeholders that need to see proofs for very different reasons and often information we are sharing with one group is confidential from other groups.
Hi all, To enhance the security of our domain, https://planonsoftware.com, we are working to enable nonces in our Content Security Policy (CSP) header. As part of our testing phase, we enabled nonce support in Reporting Only mode in our development environment. During this process, we encountered an issue with Marketo. Marketo injects a <style> tag for the tool 'modernizr', which doesn't comply with nonce-based CSP. We considered adding the hash of the modernizr file to our CSP, which could solve the issue temporarily, as suggested in another Idea. However, this solution would break if Adobe Marketo changes the script in the future. Therefore, it would be ideal for Marketo to address this issue directly by supporting nonces, as it's a basic security best practice.P.S. We also reported this as an issue (Case Number 02814654), but since it was classified as new functionality, it wasn't resolved. We were directed to raise an Idea here on Marketo Nation so that the Product Management team can review it for the roadmap. I'd strongly encourage prioritizing this issue to align with modern security standards.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Optimize the synchronization process to minimize latency, ensuring that user data is available across all pods immediately upon creation. This will enhance user experience by providing real-time data access. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: it takes 200 to 500 ms in synching user across pods in cloud service Improved/Expected Behavior: it should be almost instant or with in few milliseconds Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Munich Re Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Develop functionality to execute user-related code within a single pod, preventing cross-pod requests for user data until it is fully synchronized. This will reduce errors and improve system reliability during user login. Use-case: When user get created on one pod and code check on another pod it results on authentications issues in applications Current/Experienced Behavior: should be able to guide code restrict code to run in same pod for whole flow. Improved/Expected Behavior: Same pod should be getting used for one set of request flow. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Munich Re Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: To have the ability to undo the move or deleted assets/pages Use-case: Sometimes we want to revert the bulk moved or deleted assets or pages, but we don't have any recycle bin or undo changes option Current/Experienced Behavior: No option to get back the deleted or undo the moved assets or pages Improved/Expected Behavior: We should have undo option in the action bar just like paste so that we can get back the unintentional action results Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
