Build better products with our product team
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The AEM RTE Table plugin currently generates tables without <thead> and <tfoot> tags, which can negatively impact accessibility and SEO. Use-case: We are enhancing our site's Accessibility and also need to integrate third-party libraries that support sorting and filtering but we found <thead> and <tfoot> tags in table (generated through rte plugin) are missing . Current/Experienced Behavior: Table generated through AEM RTE Plugin doesn't have options to add tags like <thead> and <tfoot> Improved/Expected Behavior: By incorporating <thead> and <tfoot>, the AEM RTE Table plugin can significantly improve its accessibility and SEO, providing a more inclusive and effective experience for users and search engines. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.21 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Hi all, I tried searching for an answer and have done extensive testing, but have not yet arrived at a solution. Is there a way in the Microsoft 365 calendar module to set the parameter so when an event is created, it creates an all day event in your home calendar? I have been exploring the configuration/parameters in the module but have not seen a way to do this. This will be a great value add to our organization. Thank you for your help, Nick
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Extend the Cloud Manager events to include Audit related events Use-case: I want to be able to monitor changes to environment variables, domains, ip whitelisting etc... Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no audit trail of changes by users Improved/Expected Behavior: Events are to provide the user, change area, previous value, new value and time of change Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager Customer-name/Organization name: Spark New Zealand Screenshot (if applicable): Not applicable, not currently provided Code package (if applicable):
Description - We would love the option to have the ability to start a timer in the system when a worker is working on a project. When they stop the timer it automatically adds their hours to the project timesheet. Why is this feature important to you - Right now, the addition of time is very manualHow would you like the feature to work - We would love the option to have the ability to start a timer in the system when a worker is working on a project. When they stop the timer it automatically adds their hours to the project timesheet. Many other smaller platforms have this option. Current Behaviour - You have to manually add in the time
Description - Workfront should allow comments and actions within the proof to be reportable. Why is this feature important to you - Agencies and Marketing teams usually need to have visibility over the changes requested on a proof in order to trace the timeline of proofing. How would you like the feature to work - Ideally, it would be great to have a proof comments report that can possible include the parent proof's fields as well like proof status, proof decision, proof progress etc.Current Behaviour - There is no way to report on Comments made on a proof within workfront.
In the old Home, users could view information such as the Project Owner and Project Sponsor directly from the Home page without needing to open the task and the project. It would be helpful to add the missing data as column options to the My Tasks widget. It would also be helpful to allow users the option to color code rows like we can with reports, so that they can quickly see tasks that are overdue, etc.
Please build a My Work - Calendar widget on the Home page. Background - A work calendar feature was available in the legacy Home. Users enjoyed viewing their weeks on a visual, weekly interface. Users do not want to switch to a configurable calendar as there are too many clicks to update the work (click into work, opens in a page, click into Updates, click into Documents, click into Issue Details). The legacy preview pane and now Summary feature found on Home widgets is the perfect update spot, but the visualization of work items as line items is not desired.
Description - Add the new Priorities feature as a Home widget optionWhy is this feature important to you - It would alleviate the need to click back and forth from Home to Priorities. It could also be used in place of the My Work widget for some users. The Priorities view is more compact and uses less white space and that would be useful on the Home page. It would also alleviate the need for the left navigation bar.How would you like the feature to work - Add Priorities option to Home widget customization listCurrent Behavior - Not available
2000 characters is not enough to solve the issue of needing to block many email domains/spam from filling forms - especially when commas in between the email domains count as characters. It would be great to increase this, or allow us to upload a CSV file with domains.
Hi there! We would love the new Priorities view to include hyperlinks to both the task or issue and the project so you are not just stuck within that task/issue. Ideally there would either be breadcrumbs at the top, or the project/task names would be clickable URLs within both the list, summary, and in the overview/details when clicking into the object itself. This is important for us because the majority of the work being done around that task requires understanding something about the project. Many updates are at project level. Our documents are stored at project level in particular folders. Yet logging time, accepting/closing the work, etc. are still done at task level. Having hyperlinks to get around to the associated objects alleviates all of this. Thank you so much! 🙂 Brittany
In the new home experience, when using the My Work widget to display projects in various different formats there is no option to 'collapse all' on the project name/heading. Projects are displayed based on name/date/status. Clicking on the project name/date/status will collapse all tasks and requests within the project and 'minimise' it. This is not an issue if the user is working on a small number of projects (around 5-10) but if the user has a large number of projects (30 or more) it can be cumbersome and tedious to collapse each project one at a time to get to the one you are interested in. Users would benefit from this as it would save them time by eliminating the need to collapse each project until they find the one they are interested in.
Description - Either give proper control back to Sys Admins to suppress this feature via groups/layout templates OR at least don't make the feature visible at all to users who are assigned a Reviewer, External User or Requestor license type Why is this feature important to you - Roughly half my instance are assigned one of those license types, and cannot be assigned tasks or issues, making the Priorities feature irrelevant UI clutterThey're also very curious people that like pushing buttons, so I'm fielding tickets about whether I can enable it for them, and explaining over and over that they can't use it anywayHow would you like the feature to work - At minimum, the feature should only be accessible by a license type that could have the ability to use it, much the same way that users who don't have security for Boards don't see the Boards widget Current Behavior - Priorities is globally visible/accessible by every user in the instance regardless of role security permissions, and can also still be used by certain users even though it's disabled globally
Would like to be able to see when Target users last logged-in to be able to properly manage accounts. Currently unable to determine if users are using their accounts, apart from the change logs, which do not apply to all users. This is also an IT security control requirement for auditing capabilities. Ideally, the Last Login date would appear along side user info in the Admin console.
This time of year I find myself creating a lot(!) of recurring tasks as reminders for weekly, monthly, quarterly events for next year. I suspect more users would take advantage of recurring tasks if they were a bit easier to execute. And I've finally documented a host of enhancements that are needed for recurring tasks as they currently function. During set-up of the taks, I'd like to assign the child tasks to a user without assigning the parent task, there is no reason to assign the parent task to someone when all the child tasks are assigned to them. And that parent task just becomes clutter in their work listAllow choice of child task suffix. Currently the suffix auto-populates as a sequential number. I wind up manually editing every task and changing that number to the planned completion date. I can see others potentially wanting to use something else as the suffix, planned start day perhapsAllow entry of both planned hours and duration while setting up the task (we use the Simple duration type). Currently if you enter planned hours only, those fill into the duration column on the task list and the planned hours are 0. If you enter both planned hours and duration days during setup, the days enter in the duration column, but the planned hours fill in as 0. Then when you manually change all the planned hours to what you want there, the duration auto-chages to a portion of a day equal to the hours you enter. So I wind up manually editing both the duration and the planned hours for every task. You also can't change the duration or planned hours through a bulk edit of the child tasks - so still I wind up manually editing both the duration and the planned hours for every task. Allow setting something other than the start date of recurring tasks as well as a task constraint. For some tasks I want a must finish on task constraint and I'd like to set that as the recurring date. For example I want a 3 day duration that must finish every Friday, so I have to enter the start date as Wednesday. Manually edit the duration after the tasks have created, then bulk edit all the child tasks to change the constraint to must finish on. I've found additional ideas regarding recurring tasks as well: Create recurring tasks via a templateCreate sets of recurring tasksOrganizing recurring tasksDurations and planned hours on recurring tasksCreating recurring tasks on additional schedulesCreate child recurring tasks with custom formsAnother variation on additional schedule options
Description - Currently when editing code in the Recommendations section (specifically when updating Designs) there are no line numbers on the code entry.Why is this feature important to you - Makes it difficult to find and amend when working on a number of similar DesignsHow would you like the feature to work - As with other code editors within Adobe Target, display the line numbers to the left of the field
Description - The My approvals widget currently shows PROOF approvals which appears to be great for my org, however does this not tie in with the rest of Workfront, for example the delegate button (see attached) appears to give you that functionality but we know that proof approvals cannot be delegated, only document approvals, SO a separate Proof approvals widget might be an idea.Why is this feature important to you - It takes away the misleading delegate nature of the interface, I have confused usersHow would you like the feature to work - just to separate proofs and document approvalsCurrent Behaviour - as above it's misleading to contain them both in the same widget.
Could we add a button that will allow us to share a preview of emails to the wider company. You can do a sample send with the view in browser option enabled, however once disabled the link breaks and you cannot view. This would be helpful to hold in a shared space for sales and customer services to view
Out of the box (OOTB) Filtering options provided by Adobe on the page is not relevant or useful to the end users When the users click on Filter, this shows the data sources, we do not use so many datasourcesUnable to search/custom sort on the fields providedCustomizable options provided are limited
DescriptionAfter migrating to the Admin Console environment, the WalkMe integration used by IPG has lost connectivity to Workfront. WalkMe previously worked in their original environment before the URL was migrated to experience.adobe.com. The issue seems to stem from the current Content Security Policy (CSP) for adobe.com and adobe.net, which is blocking the WalkMe scripts and resources necessary for the tool to function.The WalkMe team has confirmed that specific URLs need to be added to the CSP for the integration to work again. Why is this feature important to youWalkMe is a crucial tool used by our customers for guiding users through Workfront, providing real-time help and onboarding assistance. Without it, teams are unable to effectively train new users or assist current ones in navigating Workfront, resulting in a negative impact on productivity and user adoption. Restoring this functionality is critical to maintaining seamless operations for large enterprise clients like IPG, who rely on this tool for workflow optimization. How would you like the feature to workAdobe needs to add the necessary WalkMe URLs to the Content Security Policy (CSP) for experience.adobe.com and related domains. This would enable WalkMe's scripts and resources to load correctly, allowing customers to fully utilize the WalkMe integration within Workfront as they did prior to the migration to the Admin Console. The URLs to be added to the CSP are:script-src 'self' *.walkme.com 'unsafe-inline';style-src 'self' *.walkme.com 'unsafe-inline';img-src 'self' *.walkme.com s3.walkmeusercontent.com d3sbxpiag177w8.cloudfront.net data:;font-src 'self' *.walkme.com data:;connect-src 'self' *.walkme.com;frame-src 'self' *.walkme.com blob:;worker-src 'self' blob: *.walkme.com; Current BehaviorCurrently, the WalkMe integration does not work with Workfront after migrating to the Admin Console. The Content Security Policy (CSP) for adobe.com and adobe.net is blocking the necessary scripts and resources from WalkMe, causing the tool to fail. Users are unable to access the WalkMe guides and features that were previously functioning in the original environment before the migration.
DescriptionThe Sign module in Fusion currently only supports RS1 and RS256 as signing algorithms. Many applications are deprecating these in favor of PS256 (RSA PSS variant) or EC (elliptic curve). Why is this feature important to youNetSuite recently announced that RSA PSS is now the minimum required and RS256 is no longer allowed. https://community.oracle.com/netsuite/english/discussion/4490520/end-of-support-for-rsa-pkcsv1-5-scheme-for-oauth-2-0. As such, our Fusion-to-NetSuite integrations using OAuth 2.0 is now deprecated. How would you like the feature to workAdd the additional signing option(s) to the Encryptor modules. PS256 would be minimum, but PS256 and ES256 and EdDSA would be ideal for future proofing since RSA as a whole is generally less preferred than EC. Current BehaviourOnly RS1 and RS256 are given as options.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Implement a mechanism to ensure that user accounts are created simultaneously on all pods. This will eliminate delays in availability and ensure consistent user data across the system. Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: Its take up to 200 to 500 ms in syncing pod Improved/Expected Behavior: User get created in all pods simultaneously Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Munich Re Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
We are a Marketo partner who often assist our mutual customers in cleaning up their Marketo data by identifying specific Lead IDs who need to be deleted or modified. This is the best way for us to identify the records because the ID is unique. Unfortunately, ID is not a filter that can be used in a Smart List. I have heard of the workaround to find the lead by using the URL, but this is not a realistic option if we provide them with a list of 10,000 records to delete. Will the ID ever be available as a filter?
Description - let System Administrators remove the "Priorities" button from the top-right waffle/Main Menu within Layout Templates.Why is this feature important to you - 1) if we've disabled Priorities at the system level, we clearly do not want the icon appearing to our users, 2) we have the ability to add/drop all other icons, and 3) the alt text for the icon tells users to ask their administrator to enable this feature, making the choices we've made (to not enable Priorities) seem unimportant, as if Adobe knows our users better than we do. This also adds confusion to our users when we've specifically coached them to ignore the new left-hand side bar on the Home page.How would you like the feature to work - add "Priorities" as an Active Item/Available Item icon option in the Main Menu settings within Layout Templates.Current Behaviour - "Priorities" does not appear as an Active Item/Available Item icon option in the Main Menu settings within Layout Templates, and instead appears for all users, as a greyed out icon if we've disabled Priorities at a global level.
Description -There is currently a robust set of user permissions that can be set up for A/B testing, however this does not extend to recommendations. There is no way to stop any user who has access to Target from editing a Live Recommendations design/critera/collection.Why is this feature important to you -To ensure accountability and site stabilityHow would you like the feature to work -In exactly the same way the roles and permissions work for A/B testing:Observer - ability to see, but not edit any design/criteria/collectionEditor - ability to edit, but not publishPublished - ability to publish, but not editApprover - ability to edit and publish
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Proposal to Establish Integration Between AEM DAM and AEC Assets Use-case: Establishing a seamless connection between Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Digital Asset Management (DAM) assets and Adobe Experience Cloud (AEC) assets to enhance user workflow and efficiency. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, there is no direct integration between AEM DAM assets and AEC assets, requiring users to manually transfer assets between the two platforms, leading to inefficiencies and potential errors in asset management. Improved/Expected Behavior: Proposing an integration solution that enables users to seamlessly sync and access assets between AEM DAM and AEC, facilitating unified asset management, enhanced collaboration, and improved content personalization capabilities. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Dam /cloud Aseet and AEC Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: TO THE NEW Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
