Build better products with our product team
説明 - パッケージデザインの校正において、パッケージ展開図をProofで比較したときに、パッケージに記載の成分の1文字でも変更があることに自動で気が付かせてくれる機能が必要とされています。例えば「薄力粉」と「強力粉」のとても小さな1文字でも気が付けることを希望されています。変更の前後でコメントを手動で入力したりマークを付けることができないという前提での質問です。 There is a request to use Proof for checking product package designs.I am asking this question assuming that this is a request that will be updated in the functions of Proof or Frame.io.Is there any plan to update the function so that even a single character change in the product ingredients listed on the package can be noticed when comparing the overall image of the product package development diagram?1) There is a risk of missing something in the color of the automatic comparison function, as in Proof.2) This is a question based on the premise that it is not possible to manually enter comments before and after the change.3) This is a question based on the premise that it is possible to notice that there is a change without enlarging the image, etc. この機能が重要な理由 -校正システムは様々な業界で使われており、業界を問わずパッケージ上の情報の正確性が求められています。現在、人が比較して確認し、変更やミスをチェックしています。問題は、小さな違いに気づかないことです。ミスが発生すると、商品によっては全出荷分の回収が必要になる場合もあり、非常にコストがかかります。変更点を自動的に明確に表示できるシステムのニーズがあり、この機能が実現すれば、さまざまな業界や分野で活用されることが期待されます。 Proofreading systems are also used in various industries, and the accuracy of the information on packaging is required regardless of the industry.Currently, people are comparing and checking for changes, and mistakes are being made.The problem is that they don't notice the small differences.When mistakes occur, depending on the product, it may be necessary to recall the entire shipment, which can be very costly.There is a need for a system that can automatically and clearly indicate changes, and if this function is realized, it is expected to be used in various industries and fields. この機能をどのように作動させたいか -変更箇所を自動的に目立たせるアップデート（例えば、感嘆符を追加する、赤い四角で囲む、明確な色の線マーカーを追加するなど）をリクエストします。I would also be happy if I could request an update to automatically draw attention to changes (e.g. adding an exclamation mark, surrounding with a red square, adding a clear color line marker). 現在の動作 -Pfoorの自動比較機能では、色がわずかに着色されていることが示されています。しかし、カラフルなパッケージでは、これに気づくのは難しいでしょう。The Auto Compare function in Pfoor shows that the color is slightly tinted.However, it is difficult to notice this on colorful packaging.
Currently, Workfront allows you to limit sharing on fields so that you can determine who is able to view, edit, or delete fields. This is very important, because you can designate globally available fields that cannot be edited by Group Admins. However, the experience for Group Admins are very poor. They can open and edit a view-only access field within a form and then save the form. At that point, an error pops up telling them they are unable to edit that parameter and doesn't save the form. IssuesThe error message doesn't tell them what parameter they cannot editThe field they edited doesn't revert back its previous state Ideal future stateIndividuals with access to custom forms that contain view-only access fields can view the fields on the formThere is a clear indicator in the form designer that the field is view onlyWhen they click the field they can view the field details but are unable to edit any field details (e.g., label, name, options, description, etc.)They can request access to edit the field
Currently Alerts in Adobe Analytics are only sent by email or text message. However with more organisations using tools like Slack, it would be nice to have a feature to notify alerts that occur by webhook. These could then be integrated into multiple different organisational tools.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - to speed up tagging individuals in updatesHow would you like the feature to work - when posting an update, tag "@all or @16227148" to automatically tag everyone on the job, rather than have to type each individual name.Current Behaviour - You have to tag each individual on the job with "@name"
Description -Need a monitoring dashboard to monitor the API Mesh performance and health check status.Also need information on incoming requests (request/access logs)Why is this feature important to you -We are planning to use API mesh to consume data from our AEM Cloud Service and Adobe Commerce Instances in our Mobile Application. Once this functionality goes live in Production we would need a better monitoring setup for monitoring our API mesh.Other API gateways such as MuleSoft etc. offer very good monitoring and health check Dashboards.
In reports, we can sort columns, why can we not sort groupings? For example, I have a report with 3 groupings. One of the groupings is our business units. We have reasons why we want to see these groupings in alpha order. WF confirms that we cannot sort our groupings. Odd that this isn't possible even in text mode (if I'm wrong on this, someone chime in). Please upvote!
Enable the option to customize sort/filter & search on the Activation data page
I'm currently building out a series of custom objects for the explicit purpose of being used with Velocity to get certain custom elements into emails, but I may have to do a 1:N relationship rather than the 1:1 relationship I would have preferred. As such, I'd like a user-friendly (i.e., not having to go into the email script) way of setting a selector to choose which custom object to reference in the email. I'd like to have a variable set by the Marketo campaign name be the selector for the correct object to reference in the email.I'm not even sure if this is a reasonable ask with the current scripting setup but it'd make a huge difference.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The AEM RTE Table plugin currently generates tables without <thead> and <tfoot> tags, which can negatively impact accessibility and SEO. Use-case: We are enhancing our site's Accessibility and also need to integrate third-party libraries that support sorting and filtering but we found <thead> and <tfoot> tags in table (generated through rte plugin) are missing . Current/Experienced Behavior: Table generated through AEM RTE Plugin doesn't have options to add tags like <thead> and <tfoot> Improved/Expected Behavior: By incorporating <thead> and <tfoot>, the AEM RTE Table plugin can significantly improve its accessibility and SEO, providing a more inclusive and effective experience for users and search engines. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.21 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Hi all, I tried searching for an answer and have done extensive testing, but have not yet arrived at a solution. Is there a way in the Microsoft 365 calendar module to set the parameter so when an event is created, it creates an all day event in your home calendar? I have been exploring the configuration/parameters in the module but have not seen a way to do this. This will be a great value add to our organization. Thank you for your help, Nick
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Extend the Cloud Manager events to include Audit related events Use-case: I want to be able to monitor changes to environment variables, domains, ip whitelisting etc... Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no audit trail of changes by users Improved/Expected Behavior: Events are to provide the user, change area, previous value, new value and time of change Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager Customer-name/Organization name: Spark New Zealand Screenshot (if applicable): Not applicable, not currently provided Code package (if applicable):
Description - We would love the option to have the ability to start a timer in the system when a worker is working on a project. When they stop the timer it automatically adds their hours to the project timesheet. Why is this feature important to you - Right now, the addition of time is very manualHow would you like the feature to work - We would love the option to have the ability to start a timer in the system when a worker is working on a project. When they stop the timer it automatically adds their hours to the project timesheet. Many other smaller platforms have this option. Current Behaviour - You have to manually add in the time
Description - Workfront should allow comments and actions within the proof to be reportable. Why is this feature important to you - Agencies and Marketing teams usually need to have visibility over the changes requested on a proof in order to trace the timeline of proofing. How would you like the feature to work - Ideally, it would be great to have a proof comments report that can possible include the parent proof's fields as well like proof status, proof decision, proof progress etc.Current Behaviour - There is no way to report on Comments made on a proof within workfront.
In the old Home, users could view information such as the Project Owner and Project Sponsor directly from the Home page without needing to open the task and the project. It would be helpful to add the missing data as column options to the My Tasks widget. It would also be helpful to allow users the option to color code rows like we can with reports, so that they can quickly see tasks that are overdue, etc.
Please build a My Work - Calendar widget on the Home page. Background - A work calendar feature was available in the legacy Home. Users enjoyed viewing their weeks on a visual, weekly interface. Users do not want to switch to a configurable calendar as there are too many clicks to update the work (click into work, opens in a page, click into Updates, click into Documents, click into Issue Details). The legacy preview pane and now Summary feature found on Home widgets is the perfect update spot, but the visualization of work items as line items is not desired.
Description - Add the new Priorities feature as a Home widget optionWhy is this feature important to you - It would alleviate the need to click back and forth from Home to Priorities. It could also be used in place of the My Work widget for some users. The Priorities view is more compact and uses less white space and that would be useful on the Home page. It would also alleviate the need for the left navigation bar.How would you like the feature to work - Add Priorities option to Home widget customization listCurrent Behavior - Not available
2000 characters is not enough to solve the issue of needing to block many email domains/spam from filling forms - especially when commas in between the email domains count as characters. It would be great to increase this, or allow us to upload a CSV file with domains.
Hi there! We would love the new Priorities view to include hyperlinks to both the task or issue and the project so you are not just stuck within that task/issue. Ideally there would either be breadcrumbs at the top, or the project/task names would be clickable URLs within both the list, summary, and in the overview/details when clicking into the object itself. This is important for us because the majority of the work being done around that task requires understanding something about the project. Many updates are at project level. Our documents are stored at project level in particular folders. Yet logging time, accepting/closing the work, etc. are still done at task level. Having hyperlinks to get around to the associated objects alleviates all of this. Thank you so much! 🙂 Brittany
In the new home experience, when using the My Work widget to display projects in various different formats there is no option to 'collapse all' on the project name/heading. Projects are displayed based on name/date/status. Clicking on the project name/date/status will collapse all tasks and requests within the project and 'minimise' it. This is not an issue if the user is working on a small number of projects (around 5-10) but if the user has a large number of projects (30 or more) it can be cumbersome and tedious to collapse each project one at a time to get to the one you are interested in. Users would benefit from this as it would save them time by eliminating the need to collapse each project until they find the one they are interested in.
Description - Either give proper control back to Sys Admins to suppress this feature via groups/layout templates OR at least don't make the feature visible at all to users who are assigned a Reviewer, External User or Requestor license type Why is this feature important to you - Roughly half my instance are assigned one of those license types, and cannot be assigned tasks or issues, making the Priorities feature irrelevant UI clutterThey're also very curious people that like pushing buttons, so I'm fielding tickets about whether I can enable it for them, and explaining over and over that they can't use it anywayHow would you like the feature to work - At minimum, the feature should only be accessible by a license type that could have the ability to use it, much the same way that users who don't have security for Boards don't see the Boards widget Current Behavior - Priorities is globally visible/accessible by every user in the instance regardless of role security permissions, and can also still be used by certain users even though it's disabled globally
Would like to be able to see when Target users last logged-in to be able to properly manage accounts. Currently unable to determine if users are using their accounts, apart from the change logs, which do not apply to all users. This is also an IT security control requirement for auditing capabilities. Ideally, the Last Login date would appear along side user info in the Admin console.
This time of year I find myself creating a lot(!) of recurring tasks as reminders for weekly, monthly, quarterly events for next year. I suspect more users would take advantage of recurring tasks if they were a bit easier to execute. And I've finally documented a host of enhancements that are needed for recurring tasks as they currently function. During set-up of the taks, I'd like to assign the child tasks to a user without assigning the parent task, there is no reason to assign the parent task to someone when all the child tasks are assigned to them. And that parent task just becomes clutter in their work listAllow choice of child task suffix. Currently the suffix auto-populates as a sequential number. I wind up manually editing every task and changing that number to the planned completion date. I can see others potentially wanting to use something else as the suffix, planned start day perhapsAllow entry of both planned hours and duration while setting up the task (we use the Simple duration type). Currently if you enter planned hours only, those fill into the duration column on the task list and the planned hours are 0. If you enter both planned hours and duration days during setup, the days enter in the duration column, but the planned hours fill in as 0. Then when you manually change all the planned hours to what you want there, the duration auto-chages to a portion of a day equal to the hours you enter. So I wind up manually editing both the duration and the planned hours for every task. You also can't change the duration or planned hours through a bulk edit of the child tasks - so still I wind up manually editing both the duration and the planned hours for every task. Allow setting something other than the start date of recurring tasks as well as a task constraint. For some tasks I want a must finish on task constraint and I'd like to set that as the recurring date. For example I want a 3 day duration that must finish every Friday, so I have to enter the start date as Wednesday. Manually edit the duration after the tasks have created, then bulk edit all the child tasks to change the constraint to must finish on. I've found additional ideas regarding recurring tasks as well: Create recurring tasks via a templateCreate sets of recurring tasksOrganizing recurring tasksDurations and planned hours on recurring tasksCreating recurring tasks on additional schedulesCreate child recurring tasks with custom formsAnother variation on additional schedule options
Description - Currently when editing code in the Recommendations section (specifically when updating Designs) there are no line numbers on the code entry.Why is this feature important to you - Makes it difficult to find and amend when working on a number of similar DesignsHow would you like the feature to work - As with other code editors within Adobe Target, display the line numbers to the left of the field
Description - The My approvals widget currently shows PROOF approvals which appears to be great for my org, however does this not tie in with the rest of Workfront, for example the delegate button (see attached) appears to give you that functionality but we know that proof approvals cannot be delegated, only document approvals, SO a separate Proof approvals widget might be an idea.Why is this feature important to you - It takes away the misleading delegate nature of the interface, I have confused usersHow would you like the feature to work - just to separate proofs and document approvalsCurrent Behaviour - as above it's misleading to contain them both in the same widget.
Could we add a button that will allow us to share a preview of emails to the wider company. You can do a sample send with the view in browser option enabled, however once disabled the link breaks and you cannot view. This would be helpful to hold in a shared space for sales and customer services to view
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
