Build better products with our product team
When a requestor fills out my form, they choose the Start date (which defaults to today's date). Then they choose the End date (which also defaults to today's date). Is there a way (maybe in Text Mode?) that we can make the second field (End date) defaulted to select the previously entered Start date value, since the End date should always come after the Start date?I'm always trying to reduce form clicks for my team. Requestors are noticing the behavior when entering numerous issues with the same form, specifically when using Start and End date fields in tasks and issues (also with default Calendar month at load-in). It takes extra time to select the End date, and is very obvious when flow is repeated numerous times. Maybe when a date field is added following after another date field, or, maybe when two date fields are set side-by-side (same line), then the second (End) date would allow the user to reference the first (Start) date. You could use the "Add Logic" menu and UI to reference the first form, with a function drop down with the option/value to "reference start date". That would be very cool. Right now, even if you select a Start date of Jan 1, 2035, the End date field will always default back to today's date, causing you to have to click a lot to get back to the year 2035, just to select the next day for the End date, resulting in double the amount of clicks for each issue created. Thanks!
Description - We have fusion users who create fusion scenarios, but are not acting as system admins within Workfront. To create fusion scenarios, users must be given the access level of System Admin. For example we have users within our Corporate IT team who are experts in Jira. They create fusion scenarios that link Workfront into Jira, but their expertise in within Jira. They take training on how to work in Fusion, but their focus is not on being a Workfront system admin. They own, document, update their fusion scenarios.Why is this feature important to you - We have users in Fusion who show as System Admins, when in reality they are not system admins. They only author and maintain fusion scenarios. We would like them to be assigned a newly created access level to denote that they are Fusion only users. We don't want or need them to be viewed as system admins, because in reality they are notHow would you like the feature to work - We would Adobe to develop an access level that allows users to interact between Workfront and Fusion, but not give them System Admin access level. Would it be possible for a fusion person to only be required to have group admin access level?Current Behavior - Our Workfront instance gives the appearance of having System Admins, who don't act as system admins, and we don't expect them to act as System Admins. We need visibility on who is a "fusion only user". Yes, I know we could create a job role or team, but the reality is we don't want these users to have the same access levels and permission as a System Admin. All feedback is welcomed.
I'd like to suggest the ability to create custom tracking links in Marketo for referencing who (known and unknown visitors) clicked on a given link (i.e. one possibly attached to a QR code at a tradeshow or used for a banner ad on an online advertisement). This would provide necessary visibility into the effectiveness of specific marketing channels and provide additional insight into which leads are engaging with a given piece of content from one place. Pardot/AE provides this capability as a custom redirect. I think Marketo should provide this same sort of functionality.
When I got to work this morning, I was met with messages from several users very excited about our new Adobe Creative Cloud rollout, wanting to know how they could get access to it. After some VERY confusing pre-caffeinated back and forth, they sent me the re-designed email notifications that Adobe started sending as of yesterday(?) that feature a giant advertising banner all about an integration between Creative Cloud and Workfront. This is not an integration project we are doing, nor is it a tool we plan to subscribe to for our users. I am not looking forward to repeating this to hundreds of people today. Making this gratuitous and unauthorized advertising initiative even worse, that link quite "helpfully" takes all of my end-users to installation instructions they'll never be able to complete. While I do like the much cleaner email notification layout, leveraging it to spam my users with product ads while making it appear to come from me as an internal initiative is not acceptable. Requested Fix: Remove the advertising banner from all email notification templates being sent to Workfront instance users.
Description - Allow a user to immediately add board tags to a task/issue they are connecting to a board from a project.Why is this feature important to you - Would save a lot of steps and timeHow would you like the feature to work - When you are on a Project, select a task or issue, click to add to a board, select the board name, then get the option to add the Tags (from that board) onto that connected card right away.Current Behaviour - After you manually add a task/connected card to a board, you then have to navigate over to the Board, unfilter by tag, search for the task you just added, open task/connected card, add a tag, close, reset your tag filters. A LOT of steps
When creating a Project and Task there should be a more robust feature for creating the description. Wrike has this ability and it's amazing. A lot of times, a project's description reaches far beyond plain text and custom form fields. How most people at our company communicate is through email, and although email is a complete mess, what email is good at is allowing the person to format a message and description is multiple ways: through documents, screenshots, HTML text formatting (BOLD, underline, strikebreaking, bullet points, numbering, indenting, tables, charts, font colors, etc). Most project and tasks have supporting information in the form of images and charts, and there isn't a way currently in WF to communicate this within the system. We now have to go outside the system and go back to emailing or using other project management tools. Workfront has a lot of amazing features, but I feel as though you have to think back to the basis of a project management tool - and this tool should focus on the easy communication of project and task creation. This could also be applied to requests and documents as well, but not as important as projects and tasks.The creation of a task should be a bit simpler and less cluttered. Workfront has so many options and features, which is fantastic, but it can be completely overwhelming for users who are not necessarily tech savvy and just want to use the system for creating a task, description, dependencies, assignee, and due date. This information should be at the forefront of the design and the rest of the functionality can be shown differently. And custom form fields should really be considered part of the projects description and be within that same area. Right now it's not very intuitive where to get necessary details about the project in order to do someone's job. The user needs to go to project details, look at the main overall timeline details then click custom form to get the actual full description of the project.
Include 'Actual Hours' column in both the 'View by Role' and 'View by Project' views of the Resource Planner. This would show how much time was actually spent on each role or project, in addition to the other metrics like Available, Planned, Budgets, etc (as shown below). At least gives this as an option in the settings.
Currently in order for a user to view Views on their Home Workspace Tasks widget, they have to have Create access to Views. As a System Administrator I don't want users to be able to Create their own Views but would like for them to have access to manage a View on their Home Workspace. Would like for users to have access to Views if they have view access to Views.
Currently, a project can't be changed to Complete status until all tasks are complete and all issues are closed. It would be helpful if all proofs were required to be closed before the status can be changed to Complete. The system will remain much cleaner if all parts of the project are closed. This could be a manual change to the proof status, or ideally, the system could close the proof automatically when the project status is changed to Complete.
Description - Currently, only one project owner can be assigned to a project. It would be great to have the ability to assign more than one individual as the project owner. Why is this feature important to you - There are use cases in which more than one project owner would be useful. For example, if two project managers are collaborating on one project. Or, if a colleague is on vacation, you could temporarily be added as a project owner while they are out, so that the project appears in your project list, etc., but not removing your colleague so that it is still on their radar when they return. With a high volume of projects, this would be one less thing to think about. How would you like the feature to work - Just like other fields where multiple individuals can be assigned.Current Behaviour - Only one individual can be assigned as a project owner.
Would love to see Marketo add temporary email domains (e.g., mailinator.com) to the consumer email domain blocking list for form validation. OR, alternatively, allow users to add more domains to block for their own instance. Currently you're not able to add to the existing consumer email domain blocking list, nor are you able to create an additional rule to block additional domains because the system does not allow two validation rules that reference the same field.
Description - Allow analysts to apply a "Configurable Object" to multiple panels in a workspace report (such as Quick Insights, next/previous etc) that will allow a report to become a template that other stakeholders can easily use on the fly. This will allow users to just define their page or dimensional item of interest one time and that would then change all panels that are using this "configurable object". Why is this feature important to you - speed and adoption of reporting templates. Ease of use for newer users. How would you like the feature to work - Allow analysts to apply a "Configurable Object" to multiple panels in a workspace report (such as Quick Insights, next/previous etc) that will allow a report to become a template that other stakeholders can easily use on the fly. This will allow users to just define their page or dimensional item of interest one time and that would then change all panels that are using this "configurable object". Current Behaviour - you need to define your dimensional item (ex: page) manually per panel in the report.
Description - Ability to clean up batches which have been ingested into the datalake. Why is this feature important to you - This feature is important to clean up batches which have been ingested into the the AEP datalake which may no longer be relevant. How would you like the feature to work - Ability to delete batches ingested into the datalake based upon dataset or based upon timestamp. The job would delete batches from the datalake. This would be to clean up record data which is no longer on profile and TTL datasets which have gone past their profile TTL. Current Behaviour - Current behavior does not exist in the Adobe Experience Platform framework
Description - Currently it's possible to create review proofs with .XLSX but not .XLSMWhy is this feature important to you - We would use the review feature for files that are .XLSMHow would you like the feature to work - Exactly the same as the proofing feature.Current Behaviour - The proof fails to generate. Thank you !
Description - In CJA, there's a function called Split to split a value from a field into a new derived field, and the output can be an array. Would like to have a function which is like a reverse-split i.e. to take a array field and join them back with a delimiter to become a string field.Why is this feature important to you - To support reporting of a combinations of items as a bundle of items.How would you like the feature to work - A new drived field function or enhance the current Concatenate function to take an array field as input with a delimiter.Current Behaviour - Currently there's no such feature. Details please refer to the below link, https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-platform/cja-multi-values-concatenated-in-a-field-lookup-challenge/m-p/676279#M4663
Can you please add a search feature to the reports page in Workfront? We have hundreds of reports, and it is frustrating to have to scroll to find the one you are looking for. The dashboards page has a search option, but not the reports page. Thanks!
Description - I used shared column function to merge information (View: merge information from multiple columns in one shared column | Adobe Workfront) from two columns into one in a custom view in the project section, but I am only able to edit the information of the first one and I would like also to edit the information of the second one, third, fourth, etc. Why is this feature important to you - It will be faster editing several fields in a merge column so I could edit several information at time. How would you like the feature to work - I attached a screenshot. I would love all rows in my merged column will be in-line editable Current Behaviour - So far only the first (left) column is in-line editable (if applicable). So, if I am wanting to in-line edit both (or more) of the fields in my report or view I need to separate all my columns to edit them. I think I could do the same but in my merged column. Please see my concern is the community too. Re: [Event Follow-Up] 10 Text Mode Tips in Adobe W... - Page 2 - Adobe Experience League Community - 667300
Description - a feature in AEP that allows the user to visualize all of the relationships between schemas/datasets/datastreams/tag properties/rules/data elements etc.. in one image. Imagine a DAG visual like in DBT where the bubbles explain what the component is with text and color coding, then there are lines between the bubbles that show how they are connected e.g., an individual schema would have the name of the schema in one bubble, then lines from it to the datasets (separate bubbles) that its being used in. Why is this feature important to you - It would speed up the validation process to be able to quickly view all the relationships involved from a schema to an actual rule in Tags. Instead of having to click around between two different tool sets you could see in one place all of the relationships and ensure you're pulling from the right dataset, datastream etc.. How would you like the feature to work - ideally there would be a global button in AEP next to the drop down to pick your sandbox, or something similar, and when you click the button you get a popup visual that illustrates all of the active relationships in the sandbox you're working in. The bubbles could be color coded or shaped differently depending on the type of component and if that component is live (already been published) or still in draft (still in testing). Current Behavior - none
Requesting that an Email Notification be sent to the team that is assigned to a request with an approval, once the request has been approved. Currently, it sounds like this Email Notification is sent when an individual is assigned to the request but is not possible when the request is assigned to a team. We have a number of Request Queues that are assigned to Teams rather than Individuals and it is important for the Team to be notified when the request is approved so that they can assign to a specific individual and begin work. As a work around, we have assigned the team as a Stage 2 approver, however, this adds an additional step.
It would be useful to be able to create calculated metrics in the data warehouse, or at least to be able to use in the data warehouse the calculated metrics you built in the analysis workspace. For instance this feature would, among other things, allow you to customize the attribution model by which the metrics that you use in your reports are calculated. As long as this feature isn't implemented you are stuck using the "last touch" attribution model.
Would like to add hyperlinks into the comment area of proof to direct users to the right internal web area for reference the way we can in the updates area.
We would like the custom email message when sharing a proof in Digital Proofing to also post an update on the project update stream. A small checkbox could be added to allow that trigger to happen. This custom message is an important part of the process and there is no record of it once you hit send and it's off to the user's email.
We want the custom messages, which may have special instructions or additional details to the project, to be saved and accessible either in the Proof details tab or Proof Comments tab. Often, people may have lost the custom message email, and the special instructions or details need to be recovered. Currently, you can access them by adding a new recipient and copying and pasting. However, many users need to be made aware of this and need help finding the messaging.
Description - Identify changes in Workfront made by Admin console in a clear way instead of showing as "Lou Ann Kleiman" who is the customer sys admin email/user. This confuses troubleshooting how an update got made.Why is this feature important to you - E-001202782 | E-001222120 we had cases open in relation to users who got removed from Workfront and it was showing up as Lou Ann removed the user when it was truly a User sync process run by a vendor.How would you like the feature to work - When admin console updates a record it should display "admin console" userCurrent Behaviour - currently it shows as "Lou Ann Kleiman" due to her being the sys admin.
Description - Please make available a production-ready Fusion API for back-end management purposes.Why is this feature important to you - Customers often have use cases where they would like to be able to automate the management of their Fusion environment. Currently there is no publicly documented and supported way to do this. This could allow Fusion customers to be more responsive when there are errors with their scenarios, or they wish to monitor the usage volumes of scenarios, or they would like to automate other DevOps style processes such as cloning scenarios, datastores etc.How would you like the feature to work - Allow API interaction with objects including Connections, Data stores, Data structures, Webhooks, Notifications, Organizations, Scenarios, Scenario folders, Teams, Templates, UsersCurrent Behaviour - Everything must be done via Fusion's UI without automation.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
