Contouring in Workload Balancer - How will end users see it?

I agree Anthony, but if the there is only one guy as resource manager. Then possibility to avoid. Just a idea. WIth regards, Kundan. Kundan Kumar KGON - (Kverneland Group Operations Norway AS)

Way back in the AtTask days, the calendar used to do that. It caused SOOOO many problems. Sometimes the date changed when the person meant to just drag n drop to another person Move the task recalculated a whole timeline and really messed up deadlines. For my department leads and resource managers, just moving in between people is the best option. And date changes need to be done by the project manager so that they can see how the rest of the schedule is affected. Anthony Imgrund FCB

Thanks Anthony and Kundan, We are going to add the ability to share the Balancer view with others, as well as plan to add it under Team Working On and Project Staffing tabs. @Anthony Imgrund , specific to your concern on sorting, we are going to make a change on sorting so that both projects and tasks are sorted similarly and aim for a cascading view of information, to bring the work scheduled on the same day together. Thanks, Vazgen Babayan Product Manager

So talking with a bunch of people, here are our thoughts, both are based on Workload Balancer: Adding a widget in Home that is above the right info panel that is the Balancer filtered to just that person and shows them all the contouring the RM did Being able to add the Balancer to a dashboard (like you can with Resource Planner) that can have the $$USER.ID filter so we can put it a dashboard for business units now using Home. The one concern about Balancer though is how it sorts the tasks. For some people, they have to hit Show More Projects a bunch of times to see everything for the day. If there was a way to change the sorting to task start date to eliminate the white space, it would be perfect. Anthony Imgrund FCB

Hi Vezven, Workload balancer is quite usable function. But if we see the possibility to move the task as in Legacy view under Team for the same user is very helpful. It could be most functional if the same functionality is added here also. Since we will get challenge once legacy is removed. Just an idea. Regards Kundan. Kundan Kumar KGON - (Kverneland Group Operations Norway AS)

very true. It doesn't matter that a piece that we are creating might be done in 4-8 hours. What is being indicated here is that the piece has to pass through a certain number of hands (say, create - review - rework - finalize - distribute) and even if it only spends 15 minutes in each set of hands, we span 3 buildings (plus remote workers). so each set of hands is assigned a task in workfront and as each task is completed, the next set of hands is notified. It's deadline driven, e.g. publish at 1pm / 5pm. So the value workfront holds is to be able to say there are 100 such pieces scheduled for this week, every set of hands has to do its task 100 times, and where in the project timeline each piece resides -- plus associated reports to track metrics on these pieces. I'll set up some time. Secretly, I'm hoping that what you're developing can find application within the project timeline as we need better ways to automatically compress and extend the entire timeline without tweaking durations. -skye

Thanks for the feedback, Skye! That's a really interesting setup, as that means that the users have a fairly straight understanding of what are the tasks they are going to complete and at the same time they go into the granularity to specify tasks to the minute level. I can totally see how managing this via contouring can become really manual. Overall, the current first phase of contouring is going to be purely manual, however, moving forward we plan to add automation and recommendations based on historical data. On the prioritization topic, that's something I want to research further as there is a debate on who should allocate that priority to individual tasks and what factors are being considered for that. If you're willing, I would be interested in having a call on this topic, as well as understand how Workload Balancer reflects the setup you have mentioned. This link can be used to schedule time on my calendar directly: "https://calendly.com/wf-product-research/workloadbalancer">https://calendly.com/wf-product-research/workloadbalancer Thanks, Vazgen Babayan Product Manager

I only like Doug's first solution but really since our users will hopefully move away from My Work into Home, it should somehow show up on the worklist (filter and grouping for planned today/planned tomorrow or maybe separately being able to filter/group due today/tomorrow... sorry I'm moving out of scope here), or as Doug mentions, a report view representing their work. I think most users here won't really care. I sometimes see users have 100 tasks a week (all a few minutes long) -- these people know what they have to do and aren't really interested in knowing how much time they need to spend on it as much as what they have to do that day. There's a lot of rote or repetitive work. I'm more interested in hearing how you plan to contour, since we struggle with both the resource planner and the workload balancer to find a way to automatically set a priority in a list of tasks that can be based off where the project is from, the due date, the project priority or condition fields or... well, give us something other than alphabetical order, really. And since there are a certain set of tasks where their planned hours will never ever be split among multiple days, would love a better way to indicate this as well (unless there's already a way that I missed somehow). I apologize for the tardy reply. It's been a busy month. And then I had to consult with our architect to find out what contouring meant. :) Thanks for your time. -skye