Workfront

Description:I'd like the ability to have a little bit of control over the look and feel of custom forms, particularly how they are displayed when used as a request queue. Ideally we'd be able to adjust font size, font weight, color, bolding, etc.  Even if we could apply a default font-size for the form, and selectively bold some text, that would be a huge improvement. Additionally, a complaint I've received multiple times is that the font size for a question is smaller than the font size for an option within that question.  If we could change the font size we could fix this ourselves. Or, if it's easier, make the question font-size match that of the options below it.  Example: Why is this feature important to you -There are new rules that go into effect in April 2026 around accessibility of internal and external documents for Government agencies. All documents must be WCAG 2.1 AA complaint. Depending on your reading of the guidelines the current request queue f

Description:When you create a checkbox group in a custom form, an 'All' option is added when the form is displayed to your users.  There is no way (that I know of) to disable this option. It also doesn't appear in the form editor, so it was a surprise to see it on the published form.  There are cases where I don't want to encourage the user to select all options, and by putting 'All' first in the list, Workfront is making it look like that's what I want people to select.You should give us the option to disable the 'All' option for checkbox groups.  Why is this feature important to you:The current implementation encourages users to select all available options, which is not what we want. We can get around this by making each item it's own checkbox, but this is very messy.  How would you like the feature to work:In the options for the 'checkbox group' field, have an option to 'Disable 'All' option'.Current Behaviour:'All' option is added at the top of all ch

We relly heavily in Proofing and the proofing custom form.We have multiple automated templates and fields that we capture. When we need to add new proofing fields, automated templates or make updates or changes to existing ones, having only Preview to test and demo those changes makes it very difficult for us as one week is not enough time to have demo and uat for all the required stakeholders.Some of our automated templates can have up to 20 stages so recreating this every week in Preview is very cumbersome and inefficient. We would like to have Proofing available in the Sandbox environments.

Description - In my role, I often create projects, leave them in Planning and then mark as Complete just so there's a record, but I also, do the normal project workflow of Planning, Current, and Complete. It would be helpful if there was an option to prevent email notifications from being sent on a specific project, i.e., the ones that go from Planning to Complete. Why is this feature important to you - It would prevent an emails being sent where there are no tasks for anyone and it's not necessary to know the project is Complete since it was for documentation purposes only. How would you like the feature to work - When a Project goes from Planning to Complete, have a popup that asks "Should email notifications to be sent?" Have checkboxes for Yes or No. Current Behaviour - Email notifications can be changed under User Settings or Globally which we wouldn't want to change because they would be changed on all projects.  Thanks,Kenny

From an enterprise management perspective, controlling and regulating custom form updates and simply the identification becomes very difficult due to limited ability to identify who owns a certain form.  Currently, the only way to really differentiate the different forms between groups is by adding in an abbreviated identifier in the name of the form or description such as "ABC Group - Intake Request" (both are a not optimal).   There does not appear to be a way to even change the group name that is associated with the forms today which at the very least would be extremely helpful. Request:   Add in some simple identification features within custom forms such as an Owner and/or customizable Group identifier Benefits: Ability to filter custom forms based on ownership which creates administrative efficiency and reduces risk of incorrect form updatesIncreases user experience by not having to have group identifiers within the name of the form (more a

Description - Remember my Phone Number and Time ZoneWhy is this feature important to you - So I don't have to enter it every time. How would you like the feature to work - Prepopulate from my account. Current Behaviour - I have to enter it every time. While it's easy to enter my phone number, I have to scroll through to find my time zone which is already selected on my account settings. Having it prepopulate with the information will reduce errors and speed up the process. Thanks

Description -Currently, when printing or exporting a dashboard from the platform, color formatting (such as conditional formatting, status indicators) is not retained in the final output. This can make printed reports harder to interpret, especially when visual cues are critical for understanding project or task status. The exported version often appears in grayscale or with muted visuals, even when the dashboard is fully colored on-screen.While we understand some UI-specific elements are removed by design, color is a critical aspect of dashboard readability. Request -We would like to request the ability for printed and exported dashboards to retain their original color formatting. This includes conditional formatting (e.g., status indicators), and any other meaningful color-based visual cues. Ensuring color consistency between the on-screen view and the printed/exported version would improve clarity and data interpretation.Why is this feature important to you - Prevents misi

DescriptionImprove Timesheet Behavior for Manually Pinned TasksWhy is this feature important to youCurrently, manually pinned tasks remain on a user's timesheet even after being marked as Completed or Cancelled. This can lead to confusion, as users may continue logging hours on tasks that are no longer active. It also affects data accuracy and time tracking consistency.How would you like the feature to workWe suggest enhancing the timesheet functionality to better handle manually pinned tasks by:Automatically removing pinned tasks from the timesheet once they are marked as Completed or CancelledPreventing time entry on tasks that are no longer active, regardless of manual pinningIntroducing configuration options to restrict manual pinning based on task statusAllowing system administrators to disable the manual pinning feature (Alt+P) for specific user profiles or globallyCurrent BehaviourUsers can manually pin tasks to their timesheet using Alt+P or the pin iconPinned tasks remain visi

Description:Our users need a way to categorize comments in proofs. Reviews often include duplicate or similar feedback, and grouping them would make it easier to compare related or conflicting comments and speed up implementing edits. Why is this feature important to you:Grouping similar comments would save time, keep reviews organized, and improve accuracy when resolving conflicts. How would you like the feature to work:Allow users to tag or categorize comments (e.g., “Duplicate,” “Design Change,” “Content Edit”) and filter by those tags. This would let them view all related feedback together for faster, more organized reviews. Current Behaviour:Comments can only be reviewed individually.

Description - Currently, when printing a dashboard directly from the platform, the print view does not automatically adjust to align properly. Although manual adjustments are available on our end to ensure proper alignment in the print preview, the process is not dynamic and requires user intervention.Request: We would like to request the ability for the print view of dashboards to dynamically adjust to ensure proper alignment, without requiring any manual adjustments from the user. This would provide a smoother, more seamless experience for users who frequently print dashboards and improve overall usability. Why is this feature important to you - Eliminates the need for manual intervention each time a dashboard is printed.Enhances user experience by ensuring that all elements on the dashboard are properly aligned in the print preview, making it more efficient for users.Streamlines the process for those who rely on printed reports for presentations or documentation.

Description:There is a critical inconsistency between the activity records in the Adobe Admin Console and the logs shown in Workfront. When users make changes — such as editing profiles or managing access — via the Admin Console, these actions are not properly attributed in Workfront logs.Why is this feature important to you:Accurate traceability is essential for our security, audit, and compliance processes. Without clear identification of the user who performed a change, we face risks in governance and accountability. This is especially critical during permission reviews, account deactivations, or investigations.How would you like the feature to work:Workfront should reflect the actual user who performed the action in the Admin Console, both in the system logs and in Journal reports. Instead of showing “System” or generic labels, the logs should capture and display the authenticated user responsible for the change.Current Behaviour:Changes made in the Admin Console appear in Workfron

Description - Support WebP image file format for document upload and sharing (Not needed for proofing purposes)  Why is this feature important to you - My team manages our corporate websites - those sites primarily use WebP file formatted images for page load speed and other reasons as supported by industry best practices.  As an enterprise we use Workfront for request and project intake - so someone from another group within the enterprise can send a Workfront request to my team to update/create a web page - this included updating images - those individuals need to have the ability to upload and share WebP files with my team via Workfront for us to load to our DAM and websites. We would not need the ability to create WF proofs of these images.  How would you like the feature to work - simply upload WebP file formatted images to documents within Projects and/or intake requests - again, for sharing purposes, not needed for proofing. Current Behavior - WebP