Resource Planner - Exclude hours from completed tasks | Community
Skip to main content
New Participant
May 15, 2018
Delivered

Resource Planner - Exclude hours from completed tasks

  • May 15, 2018
  • 12 replies
  • 1932 views

In the Resource Planner tool, there should be a toggle under the settings gear to "Exclude hours from completed tasks". Task Planned Completion Dates are nearly always misaligned with the Actual Completion Date, and no one is planning/budgeting resources for completed tasks. Therefore, users should be given the option to exclude hours for completed tasks, so that they're looking at work that is currently incomplete.

12 replies

New Participant
July 9, 2020

Hi everyone,


In Resource Planner User View, advanced filters can be used to filter out completed tasks. I recommend using Task > Actual Completion Date - Null filter.

For Workload Balancer, we solve this in 2 different ways - with 20.3, we add the ability to visualize actual progress of tasks and for tasks that finished early, we exclude hours after Actual Completion Date from user's workload calculations (currently in Preview). And in 20.4, we plan to add a new setting to exclude completed tasks from the view even when actual progress view is disabled.

As the idea is about Resource Planner, I'm going to mark this as Delivered based on the filter functionality. Please stay tuned for our Preview releases and roadmap calls.


Thanks,

Vazgen

New Participant
May 21, 2020

This is a must have. Without it the Balancer is skewed upward and not accurate.

New Participant
May 20, 2020

This applies to the Workload Balancer too. This is really important for us because we need to know how many planned hours are actually 'remaining'. I no longer need to see completed tasks in the Workload Balancer.

New Participant
April 28, 2020

Yes YES YES! Please, this is a need for our team. The resource managers don't have confidence in the tool because their resources are often "red" and showing that they're over-allocated when in reality they are available.

New Participant
March 3, 2020

Another case study for this one while using the workload balancer (which I love).

I have a designer showing over capacity, so we outsourced some work to a design contractor. Well, turns out what was driving his capacity numbers were quite a few jobs ON HOLD and DEAD, and many more tasks were already completed. Why are we counting those as work to be done? When I took all of those out - he had plenty of capacity. However, too late - money spent with a contractor.


Please upvote this one and let's get it in planning!

New Participant
January 16, 2020

That is a fantastic idea, and a HUGE need. We are not assigning some of our users work based off capacity numbers in the resource planner, when in fact they have worked quickly and ahead and have quite a bit of available capacity.


I would like to see the option to view:

Uncompleted tasks planned hours left in a time frame based off how many available hours left in a week.

New Participant
December 6, 2019

Agreed. This is absolutely vital when looking at role level data, completed tasks should not show as requiring future capacity. It can lead to wildly inaccurate capacity projections

New Participant
December 18, 2018

Completely agree! This is a serious barrier for our managers. They need accurate capacity and they aren't getting it.

It would be great if on tasks with multiple assignees when one assignee finishes their work it drops off their capacity, but assignees still working on the task do not have the capacity drop off.

New Participant
August 23, 2018

Totally agree, we should exclude hours from 'Completed', 'dead', 'On_hold' projects as they are out of the charge plan of the user

New Participant
August 22, 2018

I agree - and not only completed tasks, but projects that are completed and dead. if a project or task has planned hours but is in a "non-active" status, those hours should not be included in the resource planner.