CQ5.5 to AEM 6.1 migration: Is a mix of old and new way of User/Group Node names okay? | Community
Skip to main content
michael_lemler
michael_lemler
New Participant
October 16, 2015
Solved

CQ5.5 to AEM 6.1 migration: Is a mix of old and new way of User/Group Node names okay?

  • October 16, 2015
  • 1 reply
  • 712 views

Hi there,

we are migration from CQ 5.5 to AEM 6.1. As said in the Deprecated and Removed Features the way the User and Group Node name are generated has changed to a random way using the RandomAuthorizableNodeName. Since the migrated nodes still have the "old" node names I was wondering if there could be any problems with the mix of the two naming ways? Is there a recomanded way how to handle this?

  1. May it lead to any problems having a mix of the naming strategies?
  2. Is there a provieded way to migrate "old" users and groups to the new naming? Would this be recomended?
  3. Is there a problem disableing the new way? As far as I know its for security reason. So the only problem would be to have the same security problem as with older CQ and AEM versions, right?

Thanks and regards

Michael

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
Best answer by Lokesh_Shivalingaiah

It shouldnt be as if you see all the OOB users still has the 'emailIds' as the node names

1 reply

Lokesh_Shivalingaiah
Lokesh_ShivalingaiahAccepted solution
New Participant
October 16, 2015

It shouldnt be as if you see all the OOB users still has the 'emailIds' as the node names

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

Loading footer...