Introducing a sly logic as a parent sly will harm existing data in AEM ? | Community
Skip to main content
JakeCham
New Participant
January 21, 2021
Solved

Introducing a sly logic as a parent sly will harm existing data in AEM ?

  • January 21, 2021
  • 5 replies
  • 1645 views

<sly data-sly-test="logic"> //Newly added logic

    <sly data-sly-test="logic"> //existing logc

    </sly>

</sly>

Here I have wrapped the existing logic by a new logic and all of my existing content related to that inside sly logic got lost.

Any inputs highly appreciate.

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
Best answer by arunpatidar

If your first condition is rely on some new properties then yes the condition will always be a false and you will not see any content. If this is a case then add complex condition 
e.g. <sly data-sly-test="{properties.newProp && logic}">

5 replies

arunpatidar
arunpatidarAccepted solution
New Participant
January 21, 2021

If your first condition is rely on some new properties then yes the condition will always be a false and you will not see any content. If this is a case then add complex condition 
e.g. <sly data-sly-test="{properties.newProp && logic}">

Arun Patidar
New Participant
January 21, 2021

Hi,

 

Case A -

Looks like new logic " data-sly-test='logic' " returning false which don't allow to execute the inner portion

Case B -

If you have 2 different test conditions then define with variables like data-sly-test.new="logic" and data-sly-test.old="logic"

 

Thanks,

Kiran Parab

BrianKasingli
New Participant
January 21, 2021

Try to add variables to your sightly elements.

 

<sly data-sly-test.modelA="com.mysite.core.slingmodels.button"> //Newly added logic <sly data-sly-test.modelB="com.mysite.core.slingmodels.buttonflat"> //existing logc </sly> </sly>

 

Suraj_Kamdi
New Participant
January 21, 2021

@jakecham Please provide some sample code snippet just to know what you are actually doing?

Anudeep_Garnepudi
New Participant
January 21, 2021

@jakecham 

I don't think you need inner test condition because you are already checking on top. Try removing the inner/old/existing test condition.

Hope that works.

-AG

JakeCham
JakeChamAuthor
New Participant
January 21, 2021
I have implemented this way long time ago.so content are on the clients sitte now.then new requirement came and I want to wrap the existing logic by new sly logic. Problem is content will be lost.