Is there any way to customize the behavior of CQ 6.1 SAX parser | Community
Skip to main content
jond1978
jond1978
Level 2
October 16, 2015
Solved

Is there any way to customize the behavior of CQ 6.1 SAX parser

hi,

Is there a way to configure/customize the behavior of SAX parser included in Adobe CQ 6.1 (like a parameter to ignore the attribute validation)? 

Thanks

This post is no longer active and is closed to new replies. Need help? Start a new post to ask your question.
kautuk_sahni
kautuk_sahniAccepted solution
Employee
October 16, 2015

HI

I have found this article, though it is not related to AEM, but there exist a flag where we can be use for ignoreing all validation related issues.

Link:- http://docs.intersystems.com/ens20091/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GXML_parser_options

Setting the Parser Flags
The %occSAX.inc include file lists the flags that you can use to control the validation performed by the Xerces parser. The basic flags are as follows:
  •  $$$SAXVALIDATION — Specifies whether to perform validation. If this flag is on (the default), all validation errors are reported.

I hope this would help you.

Thanks and Regards

Kautuk Sahni

Kautuk Sahni
View reply

4 replies

joerghoh
joerghoh
Employee
October 16, 2015

In what situation do you want to customize (or better: reconfigure) the parser?

kind regards,
Jörg

Translate
kautuk_sahni
kautuk_sahniAccepted solution
Employee
October 16, 2015

HI

I have found this article, though it is not related to AEM, but there exist a flag where we can be use for ignoreing all validation related issues.

Link:- http://docs.intersystems.com/ens20091/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GXML_parser_options

Setting the Parser Flags
The %occSAX.inc include file lists the flags that you can use to control the validation performed by the Xerces parser. The basic flags are as follows:
  •  $$$SAXVALIDATION — Specifies whether to perform validation. If this flag is on (the default), all validation errors are reported.

I hope this would help you.

Thanks and Regards

Kautuk Sahni

Translate
Kautuk Sahni
jond1978
jond1978Author
Level 2
October 16, 2015

Sorry for the delayed reply.

It seems in 6.1 the validations became stringent than 5.6. So, some of the cases which were ignored by 5.6 is being thrown as an exception in 6.1. To be precise we are looking for an option to use the parser in a backward compatible mode.

Thanks in advance,

Translate
smacdonald2008
smacdonald2008
Level 10
October 16, 2015

"some of the cases which were ignored by 5.6 is being thrown as an exception in 6.1. "

Can you give a detailed example of when an exception is thrown.

I do not think there is an option in 6.1 for backwards compatibity.

Translate
Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement

Loading footer...