Build better products with our product team
It would be great if we could track when tasks and issues are added to or removed from an iteration. Use cases: 1. Some tasks are added mid-sprint and it would be nice to know which were committed to in sprint planning and which were added later. 2. When tasks aren't completed in a sprint and they carry-over / move to the next sprint it would be nice to easily see and report off of that. 3. If something is moved out of a sprint to the backlog it would be nice to easily see and report off of that. All of this would be helpful in seeing a team's velocity and knowing what their trends are. It's currently difficult to see the life of a task.
We'd like to have the option to collapse all groupings in the My Work widget, so that we can more quickly scroll through project/status/due date groupings to find what we need. Ideally, this would function similarly to the My Projects widget/a report with groupings where there is an expand/collapse option in the top left corner.
Description While using segments containing 'Unspecified' in the definition, in case the workspace project is seen in a language other than English (say Spanish), data discrepancy is observed in reports. This is because the name 'Unspecified' changes to 'No especificada' in Spanish and the segment is unable to filter data correctly. Why is this feature important to youIt becomes extremely cumbersome to share such workspace projects with a large number of users who are using different languages in Analytics workspace to view reports. How would you like the feature to work A pop-up warning to come up on screen while changing the language in workspace to alert users that they might expect data discrepancy in case segment being used contains Unspecified. Current Behaviour No such pop-up is displayed on screen
Hello,It would be great if Campaign had an option for preheaders built into the delivery. Sometimes called a 'super subject', a preheader is the text that shows below the subject line in a recipients inbox.While there is a way to accomplish a preheader through HTML, it is not easily put together for all emails and not user friendly for our email marketers.Thanks
Description - I've had to run bootcamp on my Mac for years just so I can run Adobe Campaign Classic, everyone else is using Macs and I'm using a Mac running windows.Why is this feature important to you - It's annoying to have to jump back and forth between Windows for Adobe and Mac for everything else I doHow would you like the feature to work - I'd like to be able to install the ACC client on my Mac and run it on their OS instead of Windows.Current Behaviour - I can not install ACC on my Mac and have to boot it as a Windows machine.
Description - It would be great to have an Android/ios client app for Adobe Campaign Why is this feature important to you - To have quick access to the platform to manage workflows/deliveries during a coffee break or when in commutes 😛Current Behaviour - i've tried to install a Windows VM on my smartphone with Adobe client. Not working great
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: If an editor decides to have a sorting by a column and he clicks on a column header therefore, this setting should be kept until be changes it. Use-case: As an editor I often have the need to sort the item by e.g. last modified date to find currently updated pages much faster. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently if you click on a column header in order to sort by this one and afterwards open a page properties of a page and cancel or save&close, this one the set up order in the list view is gone. This is annoying for editors. Improved/Expected Behavior: If editor decides to have a sorting by a specific column this should be kept until he changes this. Please compare to CUI - here it was the case and it was for a good reason! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We are using multi tenancy. In the cloud configuration can't able to see any child tenants if we are not configuration any cloud configurations in the root folder. Use-case: We are using multi tenancy. In the cloud configuration can't able to see any child tenants if we are not configuration any cloud configurations in the root folder. Current/Experienced Behavior: In the cloud configuration can't able to see any child tenants if we are not configuration any cloud configurations in the root folder. Improved/Expected Behavior: In cloud configuration need to able to see all child tenants if we are not configuration any cloud configurations in the root folder. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Allianz Screenshot (if applicable): Attached Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Please provide an ootb feature to create reports for Sites within AEM. Currently there are Asset Reports (Tools > Assets > Reports) available in AEM which provides some very helpful ootb reports which can be generated by the user. The same I would really like to have for Sites as editors often have the request to provide information about their websites, especially about the web pages and their status (unpublished, published). Basically the Publish Report that is available for Assets would be perfect. Use-case: As an editor I need to provide an overview to my stakeholder about my websites. They want to know how many pages they contain of and if they are published/unpublished. Similar to Publish report that is available under Tools > Assets > Reports Current/Experienced Behavior: Unfortunately no ootb AEM feature available which can be used. Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide a Publish report for Sites (under Tools > Sites) similar to the one which is available for assets under Tools > Assets > Reports) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We've created several smart crops that are applied to an image on upload. For a specific image these smart crops can then be changed and saved - for that image only. Use-case: If we then create an additional new smart crop to be applied to all images on upload from then on, we run Dam Update Asset or Dynamic Media:Reprocess assets to update existing images so they too have this new smart crop. Current/Experienced Behavior: However, we've found that after running either of these w/flows - any changes that were made to a specific image (as described above) are lost. Any images run thru the w/flows get the new crop - but lose any specific changes that may have been made to the existing crops. Improved/Expected Behavior: Changes to smart crops for specific images should NOT be overwritten if the image is re-processed. Or at least the option to save/overwrite should be given Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Geraint Jones/British Airways Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable Preview for referenced content in AEM as Cloud Service Use-case: Currently, Preview service is limited in the sense that referenced content associated with the page does not automatically get pushed to Preview and there is no option to Push to Preview for Assets, Tags, etc. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, Preview service is limited in the sense that referenced content associated with the page does not automatically get pushed to Preview and author has to use Add content option to include Referenced assets, tags, etc. The only option to do this in Bulk is to use a Workflow but that does not allow author to selectively distribute content. Improved/Expected Behavior: Page and all referenced content associated with the page should automatically get pushed to Preview or at least author should get an option to select the references and decide whether to push those. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Latest release Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Preview option missing for Assets. Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Please enhance the information which is displayed if you hover on the publish date with exact time of publishing Use-case: As editor I maintain a lot of pages per day. And, I also publish them. The UI provides me just the date of publication, even on hover it shows me not the time when publication took place - it just provides the weekday which is pretty useless at all. For investigation reason it is a lot of effort to mark the page and check timeline in left rail to get the information about the publishing time. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently if you hover on the publish date just the weekday is displayed in addition to date. Improved/Expected Behavior: On hover the exact time should be displayed as well like it was the case in Classic UI. This should be an easy task! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enhance External Link Checker page Use-case: As en editor I want know about broken external on my website which I'm responsible for and want to fix the links efficiently. Current/Experienced Behavior: Under /etc/linkchecker.html you get a list which but you can not export it to a csv. Imaging you have a lot of editors working on AEM instance each responsible for different subtrees reflecting different business groups. Now it is hard to figure out the error for specific paths in order to fix this. It is even harder if error occurs not just on a single page but in blueprint page and the connected livecopy pages (imagine 20 livecopies) - here the column get's flooded (just very long comma separated list) and hard to retrieve the information out of that. Link to documentation: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-65/content/sites/administering/operations/external-link-checker.html?lang=en#external-link-checker Improved/Expected Behavior: Enhance the existing overview with option to export: with the exported list you could filter for paths in the referrer column and assign the list to responsible editors. Maybe a filtering directly in the UI regarding the referrer column would be even better, to see just the paths of /content which I'm responsible for not the ones of whole instance and to export this filtered view. It would be even better if I would informed about broken external links via email providing all the necessary information, meaning path to page and the external link which is not working there. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Our system has some DAM folders with more than 1000 PDFs in a single folder. We are encountering an index error when using the default Assets interface. Use-case: This should occur in an AEM system with no custom code, provided that some DAM folders have huge numbers of assets in them. The user opens Assets and traverses the system using various views. Some folders may fail to open in certain views. Current/Experienced Behavior: This appears in the log: *WARN* [10.240.32.86 [1693910873433] GET /mnt/overlay/granite/ui/content/tree.0.html/content/dam/document-library/corporate-pensions HTTP/1.1] org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.Cursors$TraversingCursor Traversed 1000 nodes with filter Filter(query=select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], * from [nt:base] as a where ischildnode(a, '/content/dam/document-library/corporate-pensions') order by [jcr:created] desc /* xpath: /jcr:root/content/dam/document-library/corporate-pensions/* order by @6655266:created descending */, path=/content/dam/document-library/corporate-pensions/*); consider creating an index or changing the query Subsequent investigation showed the most common places this query was coming from is:/mnt/overlay/granite/ui/content/tree.0.html (117 in 4 hours)/assets.html (97 in 4 hours) Improved/Expected Behavior: Currently the system seems to pick the ntBaseLucene query, which doesn't have the jcr:created in the index. Either that index should be changed, or the system should use the ntFolder index, which does have that. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP17 Customer-name/Organization name: Not disclosed Screenshot (if applicable): N/A Code package (if applicable): N/A
s Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: in pipeline process choices, enhance a choice to Stop/Terminate after stage installation the pipeline beside current choices of "Ask every timeFail ImmediatelyContinue Immediately" Use-case: Current/Experienced Behavior: only these three options of Ask every timeFail ImmediatelyContinue Immediately Improved/Expected Behavior: add option of Stop/Terminate after stage installation Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Pipelines | Cloud Manager (adobe.com) Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I would like you to modify it so that hyphens are not automatically converted to underscores. Use-case: When creating a folder in XF, I entered a hyphen in the title (required) and saved it, but the name (optional) was automatically converted to an underscore. Current/Experienced Behavior: When creating XF settings, hyphens entered in the title are automatically converted to underscores. Improved/Expected Behavior: When creating XF settings, Hyphens entered in the title are not automatically converted to underscores. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2024/3/8version Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Requesting time off on behalf of an user in a different time zone results in 2 days booked in the systemWhy is this feature important to you - We would like to have the ability to book days off on behalf of the end users regardless of time zones, as we have user located Globally in AMER, EMEA and APAC region.
Hi there! It would be highly beneficial if there was a way to rename tasks in bulk on projects that are under current status. For example, I have 100+ projects that are current in the system, all with a task titled "Project Launch." I now want to rename this task on all active projects to include an internal code (example- "A1 Project Launch") , however Workfront doesn't have the means to do a bulk update on current projects. As a company that is fairly new to Workfront and still refining our platform and workflows, there should be a way for us to implement these types of improvements without it being a manual update on each project. Hoping this is something that can be implemented sooner rather than later.
When a proof is sent to someone to approve, their Work List indicates the date the proof was submitted on. This pulls the Proof Creation Date and not the date the stage was activated or when the proof was sent to the approver. It is very common in our company to activate a stage and sent for approval several days, weeks or even months after the Proof Creation Date. So when the document is sent to an approver, it looks like it has been sitting in their Work List for a long time when it hasn't.In addition to that, most of our proof approval requests are lumped in the "No Planned Completion Date" grouping because the deadline for the stage they are on is not pulling to the Work List. We need to be able to sort by the deadline for the approver. Or at least pull the deadline for each proof to the Work List.
Description -Create an API that allows fetches several profiles using an attribute and value as input. This way it would be possible with a single call to know which profiles have the value X in the attribute Y without having to make the call profile by profile. Why is this feature important to you -It helped to validate the information that is on Target without having to make an invocation per profile. How would you like the feature to work -Passing an attribute and a value as input, obtain all profiles that have that value and that attribute. Put the response in Json or XML due to the volume of data it may contain. Current Behaviour -Validation of attributes per profile (single request)
Description - When a Target user creates a copy of an activity, the reporting presets are not copied to the new activity. Why is this feature important to you - I have some activities with lots of metrics added to reporting presets and having to redo them when I copy the activity is time consuming. How would you like the feature to work - When a user creates a copy of a Target activity, copy the reporting presets to the new activity. Current Behaviour - When a user creates a copy of a Target activity, the reporting presets are not copied to the new activity.
Description - We notice the Resourcing Area is not manageable in the Layout Template setting which is not ideal as most of the page (UI) is manageable in Layout Template.Why is this feature important to you - Resource Page is being used heavily in our instance and we would like to ensure users are using the tools without confusion. How would you like the feature to work - We would like to have the ability to edit/modify the ‘Resourcing’ area by Layout Template. Specific requirements we have be asked to deliver are:Remove ‘resource pools’ from the left-hand menu (we manage resource pools differently to standard functionality so it is causing confusion)Add a Dashboard for all users to the left-hand menu (adding manually for thousands of users as an enterprise customer is not realistic or sustainable)Current Behaviour - Currently, there is no option to manage these in the Layout Template.
Allow for Kickstart to add more than one custom form to an object when importing data.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Support for Amazon Linux 2023(Linux kernel6.x). Use-case: Use as the OS for new servers. Since Amazon Linux2 is reaching EOL, I want to use a new standard OS. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM 6.5 supports kernels up to 5.x. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-65/deploying/introduction/technical-requirements.html?lang=en#server-operating-systems Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM 6.5 supports kernel 6.x including Amazon Linux 2023. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When creating flow steps, allow user to duplicate the current flow step and either add to the current flow or add to another flow.Use case: When creating a Change Score flow step with fairly complex logic (multiple choices, tokens, etc.) that will update the Demographic Score, a user may additionally want to update the Lead Score. Current functionality requires the user to add a new Change Score item and then recreate all of the logic. A clone option would allow the user to duplicate the previous step and then change the few fields that need altered. Alternatively, allow for AND/OR logic on the Change Score step to allow multiple scores to be updated with a single choice.(Example of use case in action shown below)
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
