Build better products with our product team
Add Calculated Metrics (like Distinct Count) to CJA's Full Table Export capabilities. This is important as right now you cannot include them in Full Table Export, which limits what data we can export. For example, if we have a calculated metric taking the sum of 20 different activities, we currently cannot export that information in one table. Instead, we would need to create and export four different tables with all of those activities, and the VLOOKUP them together in Excel. Also, not being able to include Distinct Count metrics is also a major limitation, as that is a very common metric (e.g. 'distinct count of emails received). In an ideal situation, Calculated Metrics would be included in CJA's Full Table Export's OOTB capabilities.
Description - I would like the ability to have a kanban board feature available in my reports Why is this feature important to you - I would like to have the ability to move my projects from column to column in my Kanban board and focus on only my hot ones. How would you like the feature to work - I could go my current project view report and click on Edit, Charts and the Kanban feature would populate and I could customize my cards and columns for my Kanban boards. I wish reports and Kanbans were more connected and more colorful. Current Behaviour - Currently right now when I want to select a project and create a Kanban board I can only select on project at a time. It's very manual.
It looks like the Select All and Sort By options never appear on any Brand Portal pages. Just needs to be the same as appears in Assets This is simple functioanlity that would imprive the user experience.
I go to the Collections page and click into a collection I've previously created. I get the assets displayed, but I'm then not able to open the left hand search panel to filter the collection From the Files section - if I go to filters and select the saved search (collection) - it obviously does allow me filter them. I want to be able to filter the display of a Collection.
Ability to add Successors to tasks as you can do with Predecessors through the Task left-hand navigation menu, and Tasks Views
Using the Web SDK debugger on a website with two Web SDK instances makes it hard to differentiate the requests to each instance.In the Web SDK section, the debugger shows network requests to different instances just next to each other.In production, this can be seen on www.spiegel.de from February, 1st. Similar to Adobe Analytics requests shown for each report suite, I'd like to see Web SDK requests instance by instance.
When we provide a proof link via email through Workfront, it automatically tries to get them to login via the SAML login if they have a Workfront account attributed to their Microsoft email. A lot of our clients are setup with their Microsoft emails but with passwords NOT SAML whilst internally we are setup as SAML only. This means that clients need to navigate away from the link to the login page directly, login and THEN they can go back and click on the link. It's not a great user experience. Can we have some way for the link to pickup if they are password setup or SAML setup?
As a long-time user of Adobe Analytics, I would like to be able to fully analyze my user's behavior within CJA. CJA data views can consist of one data set or several data sets, but as I understand it the concept a 'web visit' is being expanded and re-labeled a 'session' within CJA. It seems obvious that if the data set has a 'time series' component, then the concept of 'sequencing' applies.As such, I propose that we add, at the AEP identity level, the ability for AEP to automatically add in both an 'Event Hit Depth' and 'Session Number' dimension to be used in our CJA data views. For example, let's assume a PERSON went to a company's website (on day 1), bought something at the company's retail store (on day 2) and called the company's customer service hotline (on day 3).Assuming all data is in AEP and all data sources are connected via that 'identify' feature of AEP, then AEP should be able to define the 'Session Number' based on all the known data in AEP and should be able to determine and correctly sequence all the 'event' data per the time series timestamp within a single ‘session’.For example,Web Data Set:Day 1 - time stamp 1 - user on the website home page --- AEP should be able to set 'Session Number' dimension = 1 (based on all data in known AEP) & should be able to set ‘Event Hit Depth’ dimension = 1 (based on all the event data for that session)Day 1 - time stamp 2 - user on website product page --- AEP should be able to set 'Session Number dimension = 1 & Event Hit Depth dimension = 2thenRetail Data SetDay 2 - time stamp 3 - user's retail POS transaction --- AEP should be able to set 'Session Number' dimension = 2 & Event Hit Depth dimension = 1thenCall Center Data SetDay 3 - time stamp 4 - user's call center data -- AEP should be able to set 'Session Number' dimension = 3 & Event Hit Depth dimension = 1It's all about establishing a 'session start time' and then classifying sessions based on the sequence of those timestamps and similarly within a data set's 'session' using the 'event time stamp' to classify the 'Event Hit Depth' based on the sequence of those time stamps, which I suspect can only be done at the ‘Identity’ level, after all the data gets ingested and gets ‘processed’.Being able to sequence user's behavior across data sets ONLY within the 'flow diagram' visual simply isn't good enough; not for our Enablement Teams, not for our QA Teams, and definitely not good enough for our Analysis & Insights teams.
We use templates to provide our security & project standards (including milestone, approval paths, etc...). We even have a blank template (no tasks) so that if current templates don't apply, a new project still has our basic standards. But, a user with the rights to create a project still can create a project without a template - which then does not follow our standards. We'd like the ability to prohibit users from creating a project without using a template.
We have an existing implementation where teams use a Paragraph Text field to document task/ project updates. A calculated field then captures the date the paragraph text field was last updated. We hoped to improve our users experience by giving them the RTF field in place of the existing paragraph field, however, calculated fields can't be built using RTF fields. We'd like this functionality added along with the ability to see the rich text formatting in reports.
Description - When creating reports for Goals, we noticed that the Goal ID does not actually match the Goal ID. It turns out that Goal ID is pointing to something called an "External ID" which is not available for use in Reports. Why is this feature important to you - Add this "External ID" as a column in our reports so we can use this as a way to reference it in with other features - such as CONCATENATING a URL using the root of our instance / goals / <external id> for example. It seems kind of silly that we can't get the correct ID for a goal if we wanted to use that ID in reporting and other lookups. How would you like the feature to work - A Column added to the GOALS section in reports. Enable it in the GOALS API (if that exists). Current Behaviour - not found anywhere via the existing UI as of 01/22/24 14:31 EST.
Description - We need a better solution to represent the Project Condition when a project goes On Hold.Why is this feature important to you - Users, especially leaders, are easily distracted by any Project Condition that is not On Target. When a project is on hold, the project condition has little to no meaning.How would you like the feature to work - If a project has a status that equates to On Hold, the Project Condition should either be On Target or null.Current Behaviour - The Project Condition will continue to calculate and eventually show an unfavorable value when a project is On Hold.
At the system admin level, I don't always know what a group needs for templates. In fact, I don't always have influence on those types of things. It would benefit those groups to have access to Blueprints for their own enablement.
DescriptionOver the past few months, we have had several Fusion scenarios deactivate without notice. Some of the scenarios are heavily used and the outages have backed up work in the platform disrupting end users. Rather than our team being aware of the outage, our end users were the ones notifying us. That is not a good look when they are aware before our support team. Why is this feature important to youWe have had select Fusion scenarios deactivate for no apparent reason. Depending on what scenario is affected, it could greatly disrupt our production environment and end users’ work. Finding out immediately would allow us to quickly turn the scenario back on before it adversely impacts users. How would you like the feature to workWhen a Fusion scenario is deactivated through any means other than a member of my team turning it off, we would like the system to send an email notification to our team immediately, so we are aware of the outage. Current BehaviourWe are not notified when a Fusion scenario is deactivated. We have to monitor and check Fusion at a regular cadence to ensure all of our scenarios are still active. This should not be something a team needs to manually monitor within a modernized SaaS platform.
Description - We would like to be able to quickly scroll through the document and see outstanding comments needing resolution. Resolving proof comments is a great feature, with the added benefit of the green checkmark next to the comment in the right-hand comment column. To support this it would be great if the comment marker within the proof document also turned green. This would make visually scanning the proof for unresolved comments much faster.Why is this feature important to you - This color change feature would be valuable because often the proof owner/administrator cannot resolve all comments at once—some comments take time to evaluate or research before the can be resolved/approved/declined. In a proof with many comments it is not easy to scan through the document comment markers for unresolved comments; they all stay red, which is probably just the default user comment marker color. They do have a small checkmark, but this is not something you can quickly scan. How would you like the feature to work - Recommend that when a comment is resolved its comment marker on the document gets the same visual indicator of resolved/approved/declined that the actual comment in the right-hand column already does.Current Behavour - Currently a checkmark appears on the comment marker, but this is not quickly scannableAttached is an example of what this might look like with color that changes upon resolution of the comment.
Full Microsoft editing capabilities for word docs and more in the proofing tool, including track changes.
Description - When opening the advanced filter in a freeform table in workspace, it would be very useful to have an option to "equals any of" like in segment builder, as opposed to having to add separate criteria for each unique row you are trying to keep. Why is this feature important to you - It is very time consuming to enter all the rows individually. I am working with a client that is trying to filter a freeform table of page URLs, and the set they are interested in is too large to feasibly do this manually. How would you like the feature to work - There is an "equals any of" operator where you can put a comma separated list of things you wish to match, just like there is in segment builder currently. Current Behavior - I have to manually select "Add row" and do an "Equals" statement for every row in my desired subset I wish to keep. See attached. See a related discussion here: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/quot-equals-any-of-quot-in-advanced-table-filter/td-p/557431
Similar to what we was implemented in the Updates section recently (24.1):
DescriptionWe have LOTS of reports with which our users engage on a regular basis. To help onboard new users and ensure existing users can easily consume new reports, we need some kind of way to provide the user with in-system instructions and tips/tricks/reminders about specific reports.Why is this feature important to youOnboarding new users or existing users to new reports can be one of the most costly ongoing endeavours for a sufficiently large organization. Such training time is often non-billable and interspersed with other activities and training priorities. As such, we need to minimize those costs. One of the best options is to make the reports themselves more intuitive. While we strive for that in design, there is often the need to provide help text that prompts the user just a nudge.How would you like the feature to workTwo ideas come to mind.One is that there is some kind of "side panel" that can pop out when the report title (or a "?" icon next to the report title) is clicked -- or perhaps an explicit "Help Notes About This Report" link/button somewhere next to the report.Another is the ability to have some kind of "below title / above content" note text that always renders, perhaps in a semi-collapsed state unless clicked.From an admin perspective, there would just need to be a new field added with each report module that would allow the admin to input the optional text. HTML would be strongly preferred so that we could format, link to external images/sources, etc.Current BehaviourWe are playing with embedding external reports (like iframe'd HTML pages), but this can make the reporting page appear to be cluttered and isn't the streamlined experience that we're after.
You cannot add parenthesis' when adding questions to a request form. This is silly! For instance, when writing a question, I should be able to write: "Description of the event(s)" rather than "Description of the event/events"
Ability to download to csv the file list of all tags Useful to provide to users to know what's available for searching Work in same way as export of metadata.On selecting an item in tags - provide an option in the actions tab to 'csv download'. Download would operate on that folder and any sub folders.
Something I realized today: I can use "Ends With" as a Visibility Rule filter but not as a constraint or choice filter. This causes issues.For example, if I want to hide Canadian people from seeing a form option, I can set a visibility rule for "Ends With .ca" but I can't make a smart list for "Ends with .ca" Using a "Contains" isn't a good choice since .ca (or anything similar, but using this as a Case In Point) isn't unique and is quite common.I really do like the "Ends With" criteria so I propose putting it in the Constraint / Choice option.
In Brand portal there is no way to sort the items being displayed. In Assets you can This is such a simple feature, but sooooooo essential to optimising user experience. Can be very difficult to find things otherwise.
When moving an image inAssets, when you come to choose the destinations folder the folders are listed in some random order. They should at very least be name order. Or provide user sorting facility. Such a basic thing to optimise the user experience
Description - Allow hours to be approved from an Hours report Why is this feature important to you - Ease of use, Efficiency, and Adoption. Project managers are required to go into each of their projects separately to approve hours so those hours can be included on a billing record. Each project manager can have a huge number of active projects at any one time. We've created a report showing all their projects that contain unapproved hours, but they still have to click into each of those projects separately. Once in the project, they can approve all hours. But if they could approve the hours directly from the report it would save them a lot of time. How would you like the feature to work - From an hours report users should either: have the same approve/reject buttons that are available on the hours page within a project have the ability to bulk edit and change the status of the hour entry (currently when bulk editing from the Hours report, status is not one of the fields that can be edited) Current Behaviour - Each project manager must click into every... single... project... they own to approve hours.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
