Build better products with our product team
With large 100+ task projects involving large teams, the Updates section on a project can become overwhelming and hard to navigate. For ease of use and improvement to pace of work, please add an option to filter updates that are directed to, or posted by, the user. As a workaround, I've advised users to just ctrl/cmd+f and search for their name on the page, but there could be pages and pages of updates to wade through in which you'll need to repeat the process.
Description - Workfront should provide the ability for users to download the Board into an Excel document. Why is this feature important to you - Users may need to extract the information for transformation or other reporting purposes.How would you like the feature to work - Data extracted into an Excel document and could be represented in Summary tab (to outline the items on the Board) and separately a Details tab (to indicate the attributes/information within each card).Current Behaviour - Workfront does not allow extraction of Board/s.
Use case 1: We want to leverage the Business Case and Portfolio Optimizer on requests as well as projects to determine whether requests should be approved. Use case 2: We want to use custom fields AND the business case. We use a request to solicit required custom fields. This request prevents us from being able to use the business case and portfolio optimizer. Alternatively, if we go directly to a project and leverage the business case, and we lose our required fields. Use case 3: Requesters submitting the request need to provide the business case details and may not have a WF license.
When viewing images in the updates section, the "view image" option does not work well for full-screen images. The content of the image is hard to see. This option is fine for square images, but not for rectangular ones, leading us to download the image and view. A feature that allows full-screen viewing is needed.See image pop-up window:
If an image is added to a project comment/update, to reference it again, you would have to search for it in the updates section or in the main menu- documents.It would be ideal if the added image would auto populate in the project documents folder for easy access/reference.
It would be great to identify subteams within a parent team. For instance, our team of photographers and our team of stylists are both part of a larger "Studio Team". There are many subteams for the studio. When I add new people and choose "Photographer Team" for instance, they would automatically be included in the parent team as well.
When assigning users to tasks, it would be helpful to be able to see in the same view that person's availability (like in the WLB but without having to toggle). OR like it will alert you when you try to assign a task to someone while they have time off, if there could be an alert icon if you try to assign a task to someone that is overbooked for that time.This would result in more proactive project and resource management.
Hi, I think it will be extremely helpful if we can tag programs with custom tags and then run a smart campaign to change the value of this or that field if the lead was added to a program with this or that tag. In that way we won't have to keep adding every new program we're building to the flow that changes the value of the field.
Marketo’s current permission structure lacks the nuance required to allow users control in areas that are safe, but restrict them from areas that are not.. What would help are features that provide for: Area and folder level permissions Admin only “lock” functionality on specific programs, smart campaigns, and assets
Description - We often use "Category Name" in project/task/issue reports as a quick link from a dashboard report for users to fill in information on the related custom form. This helps when we are on a task report and want the user to fill in details on the project-level (because inline editing isn't possible then) or if their are too many fields that need to be filled for inline editing / if we want to show the conditional logic of the form.With that, the current pop-up window/module that appears is small and cuts off fields in the form; it's a minor ask but it would be ideal for the size of the module to be increased to enhance the user experience.Current Behaviour - The pop-up is small and cuts off text.
It would be great if we had a way of limiting the list of available destination projects in the Move To list.Our users sometimes have to hand over tasks/issues between projects/request queues. Having to enter a name of the project is a bit cumbersome as the list of projects is quickly growing.It would be great if we had a way of limiting the results on the destination project list, e.g. by filtering out closed projects.
Inside Adobe Analytics Admin Data Feeds, when adding a New Data Feed, next to the Manifest, Packaging Type, and Compression Format options add another option to disable the .part file renaming of the delivered zip files.Our SFTP does not allow access to edit files once delivered and .part files are not a recognized file type, and therefore receive delivery failure notice.
Box plots are an ideal way to visualize distribution of a population. It could be used to visualize metrics like:visits per visitororder value distributionjourney completions per visitorIt would be especially powerful if we could click into specific areas of the box plot (including outliers), and identify/further analyze those data points.
As an analyst I'd like to be able to create "calculated" dimensions. I see this working in 3 ways:Simple manipulation of a value - for example like the LEFT/RIGHT/MID functions you have in Excel so I can snip out the relevant bit from a dimension value that I need in my workspace report.Ability to combine two (or more dimension) to create a new oneThe functionality to use a CASE statement (or similar) to change the dimension value.I appreciate something like 3 could be done by classification but the ability to do #1 and #2 at report run-time by the analyst building the report would be great!
Description - Ability to add multiple level dimension in Flow chartsWhy is this feature important to you - Helps us to add more conditions and pathing direction we want to seeHow would you like the feature to work - We can place multiple level dimension to form a desired chartCurrent Behaviour - Only one dimension can be placed in flow charts
Description - Integrated/OOTB Bot detection tool in Adobe AnalyticsWhy is this feature important to you - There are lot of BOT attacks that happen which might elevate the data and cause problems in generating right insightsHow would you like the feature to work - There should be an inbuilt tool to identify BOTs in the customer traffic data.Current Behaviour - I understand that Adobe Analytics tool provides provision to exclude identified BOTs from the data, but we do have a need to have built in tool which might help us identify BOTs based on the traffic/user behaviour.
The Workfront experience for Document->Custom Integrations lacks several critical pieces of functionality that have resulted in extended downtime on our systems. For example, we have had instances where the Adobe Enhanced Connector will stop processing project properly. However there is no indication in Workfront that there is any problem. In the case of a failure is with the Workfront functionality, Workfront will stop sending data to the connector if it detects too many failures when sending data. Although detecting failures and halting communication to avoid complication has merit, the implementation within Workfront is deeply flawed. The communication from Workfront to the Enhanced Connector happens through the Custom Integration system in Workfront (Setup -> Documents -> Custom Integration).The Custom Integration Feature uses an API key that must match between AEM and Workfront. Generally, this works acceptably.The Custom Integration Feature, however, is flawed in significant ways:There is no way to remove old integrations. We have 27 integration configurations in the system, but only 4 are needed.When a custom integration is marked “frozen” or “disabled” in Workfront, there is no indication in the UI.When a custom integration is marked “frozen” or “disabled” there is no notification to alert admins.There is no UI to un-freeze or re-enable a custom integration.There are no logs that we can view that show the state of the custom integration.The authorization token for the interface is not visible, but if it is not the same between systems, the interface will fail.Multiple custom integrations can share the same name and same destination. This can (and has) resulted in confusion regarding which custom integration should be made active.If a new integration is set up, its auth token will be different, and existing project communications will fail. Recently, we had to revert the auth token value to a previous state using methods described below.There is an API call we can use to access the event subscriptions, which are the message identifiers for current integrations:The API results do not show the name of the integration. Only the GUID is shown for the specific event subscription in the API. The GUID is not visible in the UI, so alignment is difficult.The API returns 160,383 results currently, so it can be a fishing expedition to locate the relevant records to determine current state.Even if we locate the record that tells us whether the custom integration is frozen or disabled, we cannot fix the state with this API. It has some benefit for identification.The authorization token is visible in the API results, but to verify it against AEM requires hashing the token (using asystem/console/crypto interface in AEM) to compare to the existing configuration. In addition to not being visible, most of this is not documented and requires getting to the Workfront engineering team to restore our connection communication to resolve the issue. We cannot simply create a new connection, because a new connection would disable all existing communication between the systems and would break all existing projects. So we need to restore the existing connection. Because of the above complications, when we encounter a connector issue, we face hours, and sometimes days, of downtime while we explain to initial support team the issue. We need to repeatedly escalate to resolve. What would we like changed: We would like to be able to remove outdated custom integrations.We would like to be able to see the current status of any custom integration.We would like to ability to unfreeze and re-enable any custom integration.We would like a UI to allow us to match the auth token between the two systems. This ideally would happen automatically.We would like to be able to review logs to understand the current state of the integration without requiring assistance from Adobe.We would like the custom integration process to be documented to ensure both ourselves and Adobe support understand and can resolve the problem quickly.
Description - With GDPR regulation and other government compliance requirements, the ability to store data in different Adobe data centers across the world is a very valuable feature with Adobe Analytics. Unfortunately, Adobe Analytics Workspace Reports (projects) cannot be copied across markets (data centers). I'm requesting that Adobe add the ability to copy Adobe Analytics Workspace Reports (projects) to any markets Why is this feature important to you -Having the ability to work on a Workspace Report in one market and then copy to another market would reduce many hours of duplicate labor in re-building the reports in the other markets. Additionally, this would cut-down on errors, make the reports the same for each market, and free up time to build better reports. How would you like the feature to work -On the Workspace tab, select report that you want to copy.Add a "copy" button click on "copy" buttonChoose market to add copied report Current Behaviour -Does not exist.
Description - Similar to allowing the addition of Tags or changing the Assignee, Board columns should allow the affition of or the auto addition of named Custom FormsWhy is this feature important to you - Data is often only required at stages as the item travels through the stages of a project and is often NOT required to be entered at the initiation of the item, additional information may be required to be added by a specific person. By facilitating the addition of a board combined with the assignment of the card to a person or team, the data will be entered at just the right point in timeHow would you like the feature to work - Add an additional option on the Column Edit under the Update Field Values Automatically, add an option for the user to select a custom form or in the board definition set the form(s) to be added. Could also do this in the same way as defining Members for a Board so that only a limited number of forms can be displayed on a particular Board. Bonus, it would be awesome if values in the form could be set based on being moved into this column. When setting up the custom form on the column you would need to have a switch next to each field to allow the value to either be maintained or to be set (similar to the switches for Project Preferences). If "Enabled" for a field, then the board would allow a value to be set. Bonus Bonus to this, is that the "Overview" or "Financial" fields should be able to be included as if they were custom forms with the same enablement. Bonus, Bonus, Bonus... Allow Project Level Forms to be included based on security, with the same "Enabled" switch on fields.Current Behaviour - Cannot add Forms
Would it be possible to move the Start Task bar next to the Log Time tab?Having this next to the Log Time tab would make it easier to remember to click the Start Task info and keep jobs on track.
Hi Team, If we have multiple programs in the instance and we want to move them to a single folder then we need to move each and every program to that folder. The drag-and-drop feature is helpful here, however, if we have a huge number of programs then this will consume more effort, so would it be possible to have a program multi-select option? This will help us in multi-selecting our assets and moving them all at once. Thanks
Allow "backwards integration" back into a Workfront project. I created a standalone board, but it lacked the full set of features available in project-based boards (more on those features below). I had to manually connect each card into the project. Also, each new card that is created cannot be connected, so I will need to manually connect new cards created by the team (if you use the "Create connected card" feature it only lets you pick from tasks in the project, but doesn't let you create an entirely new task)Allow document upload in standalone BoardsDon't let team members delete standalone BoardsEnable the Tags feature in project-based BoardsMake it easier to change the column names in project-based BoardsAdd an option that defaults each new card in standalone Boards to be connected to a projectAdd a "general information" section to standalone boards so that you can leave general information for the team (i.e. project description, general rules for using the board, links to folder locations, etc.)Allow filters for custom card fields (i.e. Priority)Enable reporting or at least export of data for standalone BoardsWhen you Group cards, it creates a redundant scroll bar that takes up spaceAllow the owner of standalone Boards to change the Status options (the seem to default to System Defaults)The standalone Boards load faster and have a better GUI than the project-based Boards, which seem to be buggy and load slowlyEnable notifications to be customized for standalone Boards
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Image component loads rendition based on screen size, not target image size. Use-case: Google Lighthouse score complains that images are too large. Images should be sized depending on their target size. Our portrait thumbnails are loaded mostly at 1600 px width (based on screen size), although thumbnails only need to be around 500 px width across most screen sizes. Introducing the HTML "sizes" attribute did not solve the issue. The only thing that helped so far is to upload small-scale images for thumbnails. But we don't like that approach. Editors should not be required to think about images resoluition. They should just upload their high-res images and AEM Assets does the magic. Current/Experienced Behavior: Thumbnail-sized images are loaded at 1600 px and scaled down by the browser to fit into the target space leading to unsharp images or image artifacts. See attachments. Improved/Expected Behavior: The Image component loads a rendition that fits best for the target height and width. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: VERLAG DES OSTERREICHISCHEN GEWERKSCHAFTSBUNDES GMBH Screenshot (if applicable): See attachment. Code package (if applicable):
Description - Please add an option to sequential segments for After Current VisitWhy is this feature important to you - Using After 1 visit leaves a data gap of the next visit.How would you like the feature to work - Same as current sequential segments, but allow After Current Visit to optionCurrent Behavior - Limited to after 1 visit, which excludes the next visit. Here's an example from demo data
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Allow AEM Folders and Assets Move in AEM Desktop Version 2.3.0 Use-case: Move Feature in AEM Desktop Application v2.3.0 Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we are unable to move assets and folders in AEM Desktop application. Improved/Expected Behavior: Move feature should be allowed for moving assets and folders (individually at-least if not in bulk) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Desktop Application v2.3.0 Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
