Build better products with our product team
Description - Allow the user to color code projects and group projects when entering time into timesheets. More customization for how projects can be organized by the user.Why is this feature important to you - It would make is much easier to quickly recognize projects when entering time.How would you like the feature to work - Right click menu that allows to create a group, add to a group, or color code a project.Current Behaviour - Currently everything looks the same and its easy to enter your time under the wrong project.
Description - Users have been asking if they can bulk edit tasks from the My Tasks widget, but I didn't see this as an option. It does allow you to select multiple tasks, but I didn't see any functionality included at the moment to do anything when selecting multiple tasks. Why is this feature important to you - This could be helpful for those that have to mark a bunch of tasks complete all at once or to reassign tasks that weren't meant for them. How would you like the feature to work - Add an edit option when multiple tasks are selected that has some bulk edit options similar to other areas of Workfront. Perhaps include final warnings and make it clear which tasks and how many will be affected when bulk editing to ensure the user intended to adjust all of the selected tasks. Current Behaviour - No option for bulk editing from My Tasks widget.
Description - Bring "Add Hours" back to the Quick Action menu in the new Home screen. Why is this feature important to you - Much easier to add time to a project or task from there (or the summary screen) than having to make the extra clicks to new windows to log time. How would you like the feature to work - Add it back like it was when the new Home screen first rolled out. Current Behaviour - "Add Hours" is gone, my team is upset that its gone, therefore I'm sad. Make me unsad.
I would like an easier way to report on Challenger/Champion email performance with a basic report.As it stands, either I have to create separate reports for test variants, or run a RCE report that may or may not have updated results.It seems to me that the ability to split an email performance report up by test variations would greatly enhance their value.
DescriptionWhen filtering connected cards onto a Board, only tasks at the root level of a project appear. Sub-Tasks / Children tasks do not appear as a card on the board. To find sub-tasks you have to click into the Card to find its subtask. One problem with this current state: If you try to filter for all tasks assigned to a specific person or team, then the Board will NOT display any cards for sub-tasks assigned to that person or team. Those assignments have to made at the root level parent tasks which does not work for how our team organizes our tasks. We would like the option to have every task appear as their own card on the board. Being able to see all tasks as cards on a Board for a any given filter. How would you like the feature to workCreate a setting that users can toggle: Display all tasks as cards OR combine all subtasks into a single parent task Card.
Description - within Calendars there is currently only the ability to add projects/ tasks/ issues. It would be great to have the ability to add Programs to calendars. This would be a huge win when creating our Marketing Calendar as our initiatives are categorized/ grouped by Program and being able to see that information reflected in the calendar view would be much more helpful for our use case. Why is this feature important to you - better functionality for Calendars (which aren't currently very complex or customizable) and better use case for our purposes. How would you like the feature to work - have the ability to add Programs to calendars Current Behaviour - currently, only specific Projects, Tasks, or Issues can be added to a calendar
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Deleting a Page : Need an option to update Link references of the deleted page Use-case: Content author Deleting a page. Current/Experienced Behavior: When content author deletes a page from AEM then the deleted page link references don't get removed in the Site core and There is no option to redirect the references to a new page or completely delete the references(hyperlinks). Improved/Expected Behavior: When we try to delete a page then it gives us the three options · link to another item (if the page being deleted has been hyperlinked somewhere then it will redirect the deleting page URL to new location before deleting) · To remove the references if the page is hyperlinked anywhere on the site · Leave links – the links will appear in the Broken Links report Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hello.We do have our Marketo platform connected to various 3rd party tool (Event, Webinar, ...). Integration with these 3rd party tools are running fine. However, making sure that data consistency with our internal system is aligned is often difficult : a slight difference in a picklist value, a fields not matching what is expected with your CRM and you will got some synchronization error.Chasing errors by looking at your batch/trigger results, or looking at Lead log to understand where you got a hit is still a manual task and time consuming.What if we get a smartlist filter that we could set in order to track SFDC synchronization issues, get report or launch some flows to address them if required? Even better, if in such smartlist, we are able to customize type of issue (ie: by adding a constraint), it will be very helpful. Don't hesite to share you thoughts. It just an idea and may be some people looking at this thread may have same interest. 🙂
It would be great if there was a recycling bin or trash can that would hold data for a set amount of time before it's permanently delete. Similar to the SFDC recycle bin where we can go in and see what's been deleted the last 21 days, and also as an admin I'm able to go in and see what other users have deleted out of the system and if need be retrive the files.
Aside from the label denoting the (sandbox) UI environment, would it be possible for it to be made visually a bit more different so that users working across both environment can clearly denote its the sandbox. Maybe the header ribbon be a different colour?
Date Field on custom formCan we have the ability to input and display the date in UK format.It currently displays in US format: Mar 2, 2022Our clients copy dates into these fields and having to type in this format is time consuming and frustrating for them.Time field on custom formPreviously there was a drop down menu to select the time it now auto reverts to the current time. Could we bring the drop downs back.
Thinking this report may have been created by someone already- Report that shows teams, groups, companies with no members towards clean up of unused objects.(thinking of @randyroberts and past amazing clean up report scripts).Thank You.
Custom Forms: Custom fields populated from lookup of (internal/external) data sourceIt would greatly enhance usability for both admins and general users if it were possible to create a Typeahead or Dropdown lists that reference internal-to-Workront sources (i.e. csv file uploaded as a Document? an admin-controlled table?) or external data source like gSheet or database. When the user chooses a value from a custom field from multi-choice options presented, the selected value should be used to start a query that looks up related values and returns them in either read-only fields or to another field presenting a subset of list of options (e.g. dropdown or typeahead) Example 1 - Read Only fields returned: If you have a Typeahead field on a form called "State". User types in string "CA" and the field looks up the external datasource column for State to populate typeahead suggestions User Gets typeahead suggestions of "California", "N. Carolina", "S. Carolina"... & selects "California". This executes a query to a "geo" database using California as search parameter to return the related values for Country and Continent. The following 3 fields are populated on the form: State: CaliforniaCountry: USAContinent: N. AmericaExample 2: Custom Dropdown list gets narrowed down by a selection in a previous custom fieldUser chooses from one dropdown list called "Color Family" the value BlueIn a subsequent dropdown list that contains a super-set of all colors, only the following values are presented as options:SkyAzureTealNavyCeruleanCobaltTurquoiseetc... In other words, when presenting dropdown list values, the list would dynamically suppress any values in the big list that aren't associated with the Color Family, Blue. The relationships between color families and colors would be defined in some table internal or external to Workfront.
Description - add in the ability for a tally count of expense line items to be added to a report.Why is this feature important to you - Currently, only Issues, Tasks, Goals, and Risks tallies can be added. Expenses is the only item missing.How would you like the feature to work - Create a tally field for all expense line items on a project so it can be aggregated across all projects in a report.Current Behavior - function does not exist. If further details are required, Scotty Thompson is currently my remote consultant and can provide further details.
It would be amazing, if the Audio Waveform in the Timeline changes visually when you change volume with Clipkeyframes.
-Current Situation: When an Issue is converted to a Project, the issue requester doesn't get a notification. -Enhancement: When an Issue is converted to a Project, the issue requester gets a notification via email confirming the issue has been converted.
It would be really helpful to be able to export everywhere a Segmentation is used; we have a Marketable segmentation and it won't approve and support suggested we remove some of the references and it's time consuming to pass of where we want to remove it vs. where it needs to stay to other team members.
Description - When a person makes a decision on a proof and comments for that decision are switched 'on': those comments are not currently viewable in Workfront (confirmed by Support in case no. 00352989). These comments contain information, for example, about why a proof requires changes. Make these comments viewable in a Proof Approval or Document report so that proof submitters can see where re-work is required across all assets, rather than needing to go into each proof one-by-one. Why is this feature important to you - to save time and be able to report on rework comments across multiple proofs. Overseers should be able to review all feedback in one pane of glass. How would you like the feature to work - In a report, there is a column that pulls in Proof decision comments so that all decision comments can be read in a report if desired. Current Behavior - there is no way to pull in these comments at the moment, in fact, its hard to even find them (I've just discovered) - these should be simple to view, but they are not.
I've created a number of custom views for lead lists, and it'd be great if I could share these views with my team. There should be an option to make your views shareable to the rest of your team, but not editable by anyone other than the view owner. Sharing views would be epecially great for those who are new to Marketo!
Version numbers were added to the URL of every assets in Design Studio. Version numbers are designed to counter act a caching system so that there is always an up-to-date version every time the desired asset is refreshed or changed. This is fine, if there is a caching system that forces you to do so, which Marketo does not. If a cache is enabled that forces you to add a version hook at the end, removing or changing the version number to an older version should change it back to that previous version, again, this is not the case in Marketo as all previous versions of the PDF or image are updated when replaced making version control pointless. This needs to be removed or, at the very least, an option to remove it (and no, copying the url and deleting it manually after pasting is not a solution). Also, FIX THE DESIGN STUDIO SEARCH!!!
Description - With the new license structure every time a user goes over their approval limit an email notification is sent to all system admins. Ideally these notifications can be managed like other notifications. Why is this feature important to you - It creates unnecessary confusion / urgency / internal correspondence every time a notification comes through. And it's only relevant to the Admin who is responsible for user / license management. How would you like the feature to work - The ability to turn on / off the notification for individual system admins and limit only to the person/persons responsible for user/license management. OR that there isn't an email every time this happens and it's managed under Setup (e.g. keeps a log of overages / # of approvals for users that go over) for admins to reference/manage. Current Behaviour - Every system admin receives an email notification for every user that goes over their approval limit.
Description - It seems really odd to me that the functionality available in the CC plug-in does not mirror what is in the platform. If a proof owner is adding a new version of a proof from the CC suite, to the same approval chain. The approvers are not remembered on the new version unless they are fixed from the templated proof workflow. Meaning if the approvers are changed as the template is applied, any future versions will not automatically add the same users to the next round of approval but only when uploaded from the CC suite, if you follow the same logic in Workfront the approvers are retained. Why is this feature important to you - I have clients that do not want to use the plug-in as it makes it more difficult as they cannot use the plug-in for all versions of proofs so its easier for user to be in Workfront for all proofing activities How would you like the feature to work - Match the behaviour in Workfront automated approvals so they same is true when using automated proof approvals the CC plugins.Current Behaviour -
Description My use case:I need to segment and select values for only some of our internal marketing ID's (let's say my "wanted" list involves ID's "A", "B" and "C" and my filter is therefore: "equals any of A, B, C"). The filter however will also include ID's that are not in my wanted list (for example "D"), meaning in a built view in my workspace I will see values for A, B, C and D. Cause: This happens because in our implementation, for some cases the same hit triggers several ID's together (in business terms - we are showing several marketing objects simultaneously). For example one hit would have the ID "A" and simultaneously also "D". (I.e. a list evar then has both values)Result: This means my segment returns ID's and values for both, "A, D" and any table I build in an Analytics workspace will have the unwanted values appear as well. Alternatively phrased - a list evar can not be segmented in such a way. Note. There is a solution - I can manually filter them out, but this is manual work and if any of our stakeholder tries to replicate, this creates confusion and questions.Want. I want to be able to build a segment that would understand list variables and not include values that are not in my "wanted" list. Why is this feature important to youTry explaining to a non-analyst Adobe Analytics user, why a custom built segment is not segmenting and values are being shown that should be excluded. Indeed, there is a manual approach, but it has it's own downsides. In the examples that I provide, to illustrate the point, I am using one request examples and as such might not make sense in aggregated perspective. So keep in mind that a large site with a lot of different marketing placements appearing in many different combinations (A with B, A with C, C with X) and thus when you only want data for a particular ID, the current solution will create a lot of data noise. How would you like the feature to workOn example of a single request. When I build a segment that checks against a list evar in a single occurrence, and the list evar contains ID's "A", "X" and "Z", and I want to return only values (let's say we talk view counts) for "A" in my table/view - the segment should be able to understand the list variable and selectively return values (view counts) for "A" only and not include values for "X" and whatever else. TLDR: Built segments should understand the elements on the list evar and return wanted values only. Current BehaviourAny segment built to filter list variables, doesn't understand to return values only for the elements in built segments.
Currently, users who have the new Commenting Beta enabled can’t see comments made by users without the Commenting Beta enabled when accessing comments from an email notification. They can only see these comments after refreshing the page by accessing a different tab and returning to Updates. Per Adobe support, this is functioning as intended. However, it is not an ideal user experience. We would like users to be able to see all comments, regardless of whether they have the Commenting Beta enabled or not. Further, our team was told that once the new Commenting feature is enabled for everyone, updates made prior to the feature enablement will no longer be visible. It is essential for our users to have access to all previous comments/updates, as we rely on the updates stream for record keeping. Losing access to these comments/updates would cause us to lose critical information associated with projects and issues. We would like all previous comments/updates to remain visible in the Comments stream after the new feature is enabled, regardless of whether the comment was made with the Commenting Beta feature enabled or not.
When working with creative/graphic teams, over & over I hear the request to have coloring or shading options to project plan tasks. I have heard this request so many times, that I am now submitting it to Workfront. ex: Parent Tasks can be a different color/shade. ex: Critical path tasks can be a different color/shade. For some users, having the coloring options would really help with adoption.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
