Build better products with our product team
Description -I wish there was the option to modify what columns show up in the "Requests" section. Same as all the other screens, being able to modify the columns and groupings would be helpful in organizing information.
Description - With the recent introduction of the "used in" column for Segments and Calculated Metrics which is super useful, it would be great if this could be extended to not only show the projects they are used in but also to highlight if they are used in Report Builder also!Why is this feature important to you - When cleaning metrics and segments up without knowing if they are in Report Builders requests then these could be deleted and break the requests if people go off the "used in" column which currently doesn't show thisHow would you like the feature to work - When using the "used in" column for it to list all projects and also all report builder requests too so can review when doing cleaningCurrent Behaviour - Not showing Report Builder projects
Its not ideal for us when we clone our salesforce PROD, the newly created sandbox will still have MSI config pointing to Marketo PROD API. We have business need of having multiple full-instance cloned from PROD and unlike any other managed package, MSI keeps the configuration unchanged and we are experiencing same user is being tracked as usage from different OrgID, resulting going over limit of seats/licenses we purchased. Any other managed package would not require any additional steps and ideally, MSI should also reset or update in a way that we are not charged for same user from different orgID. If we have to test in UAT, we can always update the config to point to UAT vs PROD depending on need and this is how almost all managed packages in salesforce works. Thoughts?
It would be nice to be able to add people to groups in Marketo Sales Insight Actions by sorting by state or territory. Our sales team would love this feature instead of having to search and add a person to a group one by one.
The ability to add additional users to an assigned task using Bulk Assignments in Workload Balancer would be very helpful.
Why? Debugging and doing validation with Charles Proxy is time consuming and exposes a security risk by embedding the certificate in the builds.How would you like the feature to work - Possibly a developer companion app that can read deep links produced through AEP Assurance and launch the Android TV or Apple TV with the deeplink configured through AEP Assurance. This will dramatically increase the time for validation and development as we will need to rely either on Charles or on post-processed events in Analytics that typically sees a delay of 30 minutes before we can check the data generated.
Description - URLs are the internet's way to uniquely identifying pages on websites. In many analytics tools, URLs are displayed alongside performance metrics to illustrate the performance of a certain page. And while CJA and AA encourage us to use a human-readable page name instead of the URL as identifier, many stakeholders prefer a plain list of URLs to analyse performance. By having direct access to the URL, stakeholders can simply copy it to the browser's address bar to quickly find out what page is behind the URL. This is a completely legitimate approach, and I think we can make it easier to follow by allowing URLs to be clickable in CJA. Today, users have to copy the dimension item manually, which (in an attempt to be helpful) will also copy that URL's metrics into the search bar, requiring manual work or a detour to Google because of the malformed format: Why is this feature important to you - To allow users to quickly and easily find out which page is behind a URL or which referring URL is bringing them traffic. How would you like the feature to work - In a Freeform table (or maybe even other visualizations?) we could allow URL-typed fields to be clickable. Clicking a URL would open the link in a new tab. It would render something like this in the table: To allow the URL to be clickable, we would have the option in the Data View settings to turn a field into a clickable link. Ideally, we would also be able to restrict the clickable links to certain domains, so we don't bait users into clicking fishy links. In an even more advanced version, maybe hovering over a link would display a little preview of the page, so users don't even have to leave Workspace to see the page. Current Behaviour - A lot of internal URLs accidentally submitted to Google search
Description - Allow the user to color code projects and group projects when entering time into timesheets. More customization for how projects can be organized by the user.Why is this feature important to you - It would make is much easier to quickly recognize projects when entering time.How would you like the feature to work - Right click menu that allows to create a group, add to a group, or color code a project.Current Behaviour - Currently everything looks the same and its easy to enter your time under the wrong project.
Description - Users have been asking if they can bulk edit tasks from the My Tasks widget, but I didn't see this as an option. It does allow you to select multiple tasks, but I didn't see any functionality included at the moment to do anything when selecting multiple tasks. Why is this feature important to you - This could be helpful for those that have to mark a bunch of tasks complete all at once or to reassign tasks that weren't meant for them. How would you like the feature to work - Add an edit option when multiple tasks are selected that has some bulk edit options similar to other areas of Workfront. Perhaps include final warnings and make it clear which tasks and how many will be affected when bulk editing to ensure the user intended to adjust all of the selected tasks. Current Behaviour - No option for bulk editing from My Tasks widget.
Description - Bring "Add Hours" back to the Quick Action menu in the new Home screen. Why is this feature important to you - Much easier to add time to a project or task from there (or the summary screen) than having to make the extra clicks to new windows to log time. How would you like the feature to work - Add it back like it was when the new Home screen first rolled out. Current Behaviour - "Add Hours" is gone, my team is upset that its gone, therefore I'm sad. Make me unsad.
I would like an easier way to report on Challenger/Champion email performance with a basic report.As it stands, either I have to create separate reports for test variants, or run a RCE report that may or may not have updated results.It seems to me that the ability to split an email performance report up by test variations would greatly enhance their value.
DescriptionWhen filtering connected cards onto a Board, only tasks at the root level of a project appear. Sub-Tasks / Children tasks do not appear as a card on the board. To find sub-tasks you have to click into the Card to find its subtask. One problem with this current state: If you try to filter for all tasks assigned to a specific person or team, then the Board will NOT display any cards for sub-tasks assigned to that person or team. Those assignments have to made at the root level parent tasks which does not work for how our team organizes our tasks. We would like the option to have every task appear as their own card on the board. Being able to see all tasks as cards on a Board for a any given filter. How would you like the feature to workCreate a setting that users can toggle: Display all tasks as cards OR combine all subtasks into a single parent task Card.
Description - within Calendars there is currently only the ability to add projects/ tasks/ issues. It would be great to have the ability to add Programs to calendars. This would be a huge win when creating our Marketing Calendar as our initiatives are categorized/ grouped by Program and being able to see that information reflected in the calendar view would be much more helpful for our use case. Why is this feature important to you - better functionality for Calendars (which aren't currently very complex or customizable) and better use case for our purposes. How would you like the feature to work - have the ability to add Programs to calendars Current Behaviour - currently, only specific Projects, Tasks, or Issues can be added to a calendar
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Deleting a Page : Need an option to update Link references of the deleted page Use-case: Content author Deleting a page. Current/Experienced Behavior: When content author deletes a page from AEM then the deleted page link references don't get removed in the Site core and There is no option to redirect the references to a new page or completely delete the references(hyperlinks). Improved/Expected Behavior: When we try to delete a page then it gives us the three options · link to another item (if the page being deleted has been hyperlinked somewhere then it will redirect the deleting page URL to new location before deleting) · To remove the references if the page is hyperlinked anywhere on the site · Leave links – the links will appear in the Broken Links report Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Hello.We do have our Marketo platform connected to various 3rd party tool (Event, Webinar, ...). Integration with these 3rd party tools are running fine. However, making sure that data consistency with our internal system is aligned is often difficult : a slight difference in a picklist value, a fields not matching what is expected with your CRM and you will got some synchronization error.Chasing errors by looking at your batch/trigger results, or looking at Lead log to understand where you got a hit is still a manual task and time consuming.What if we get a smartlist filter that we could set in order to track SFDC synchronization issues, get report or launch some flows to address them if required? Even better, if in such smartlist, we are able to customize type of issue (ie: by adding a constraint), it will be very helpful. Don't hesite to share you thoughts. It just an idea and may be some people looking at this thread may have same interest. 🙂
It would be great if there was a recycling bin or trash can that would hold data for a set amount of time before it's permanently delete. Similar to the SFDC recycle bin where we can go in and see what's been deleted the last 21 days, and also as an admin I'm able to go in and see what other users have deleted out of the system and if need be retrive the files.
Aside from the label denoting the (sandbox) UI environment, would it be possible for it to be made visually a bit more different so that users working across both environment can clearly denote its the sandbox. Maybe the header ribbon be a different colour?
Date Field on custom formCan we have the ability to input and display the date in UK format.It currently displays in US format: Mar 2, 2022Our clients copy dates into these fields and having to type in this format is time consuming and frustrating for them.Time field on custom formPreviously there was a drop down menu to select the time it now auto reverts to the current time. Could we bring the drop downs back.
Thinking this report may have been created by someone already- Report that shows teams, groups, companies with no members towards clean up of unused objects.(thinking of @randyroberts and past amazing clean up report scripts).Thank You.
Custom Forms: Custom fields populated from lookup of (internal/external) data sourceIt would greatly enhance usability for both admins and general users if it were possible to create a Typeahead or Dropdown lists that reference internal-to-Workront sources (i.e. csv file uploaded as a Document? an admin-controlled table?) or external data source like gSheet or database. When the user chooses a value from a custom field from multi-choice options presented, the selected value should be used to start a query that looks up related values and returns them in either read-only fields or to another field presenting a subset of list of options (e.g. dropdown or typeahead) Example 1 - Read Only fields returned: If you have a Typeahead field on a form called "State". User types in string "CA" and the field looks up the external datasource column for State to populate typeahead suggestions User Gets typeahead suggestions of "California", "N. Carolina", "S. Carolina"... & selects "California". This executes a query to a "geo" database using California as search parameter to return the related values for Country and Continent. The following 3 fields are populated on the form: State: CaliforniaCountry: USAContinent: N. AmericaExample 2: Custom Dropdown list gets narrowed down by a selection in a previous custom fieldUser chooses from one dropdown list called "Color Family" the value BlueIn a subsequent dropdown list that contains a super-set of all colors, only the following values are presented as options:SkyAzureTealNavyCeruleanCobaltTurquoiseetc... In other words, when presenting dropdown list values, the list would dynamically suppress any values in the big list that aren't associated with the Color Family, Blue. The relationships between color families and colors would be defined in some table internal or external to Workfront.
Description - add in the ability for a tally count of expense line items to be added to a report.Why is this feature important to you - Currently, only Issues, Tasks, Goals, and Risks tallies can be added. Expenses is the only item missing.How would you like the feature to work - Create a tally field for all expense line items on a project so it can be aggregated across all projects in a report.Current Behavior - function does not exist. If further details are required, Scotty Thompson is currently my remote consultant and can provide further details.
It would be amazing, if the Audio Waveform in the Timeline changes visually when you change volume with Clipkeyframes.
-Current Situation: When an Issue is converted to a Project, the issue requester doesn't get a notification. -Enhancement: When an Issue is converted to a Project, the issue requester gets a notification via email confirming the issue has been converted.
It would be really helpful to be able to export everywhere a Segmentation is used; we have a Marketable segmentation and it won't approve and support suggested we remove some of the references and it's time consuming to pass of where we want to remove it vs. where it needs to stay to other team members.
Description - When a person makes a decision on a proof and comments for that decision are switched 'on': those comments are not currently viewable in Workfront (confirmed by Support in case no. 00352989). These comments contain information, for example, about why a proof requires changes. Make these comments viewable in a Proof Approval or Document report so that proof submitters can see where re-work is required across all assets, rather than needing to go into each proof one-by-one. Why is this feature important to you - to save time and be able to report on rework comments across multiple proofs. Overseers should be able to review all feedback in one pane of glass. How would you like the feature to work - In a report, there is a column that pulls in Proof decision comments so that all decision comments can be read in a report if desired. Current Behavior - there is no way to pull in these comments at the moment, in fact, its hard to even find them (I've just discovered) - these should be simple to view, but they are not.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
