Build better products with our product team
Ideally, Gantt chart settings should not disappear after a session has been completed, but should remain "sticky," much like any other user setting within Workfront. And, even better, it would be great to set these on a layout template level for groups.
We have a Global Marketo instance which is synced to the global Salesforce platform. In Marketo, we use segmentations for Regions, Sub-region, languages and more.We can identify regional Marketo programs via our naming convention NNA EMEA PAR LAR in notifications.However, the Salesforce sync errors have no indication of the region.Is there a way to use the Marketo regions segmentation to sort/filter SF error notifications? as currently, all users have to look at all errors and establish their own region or not.We have just integrated Salesforce for EMEA and PAR into Marketo, so looking at all errors to ensure connections and sync are correct.
Currently to do a boolean condition like this : A and B and (C or D)We need to have : A and B and C OR A and B and D It can quickly become misleading with increasing conditions, so would it be possible to add parenthesis or something similar to encase some filters together without interfering with others ?To simplify, would it be possible to be able to create filters with this: A and B and (C or D) ?
We would like to have a user setting for the mobile app that shows who has the mobile app installed and the last login date on the app. That would allow me to make a Workfront group for mobile users and share Mobile related announcements. At this time, I'm unsure who is using the app, so I need to send the mobile announcements to everyone.
We work with a number of project using PowerPoints that need to be reviewed in the native format with speaker notes. WF doesn't currently have the ability to upload a PPT in its native format and be able to view the speaker notes. This is a critical ask for us, and I know others have asked for this as well.
DescriptionAdd formatting options to the Description field on a task. Why is this feature important to youWhen creating tasks we use the description field as a place to hold acceptance criteria. Since it can be long it's nice to be able to format the text in order to organize the requirements. How would you like the feature to workShould be the same as an update where you have formatting options available to you. Current behaviorYou can only input text and don't have the ability to format the copy.
Description - It would be great to have a way to quickly increase/decrease time amounts within the timesheet. I've noticed that in the task Summary Sidebar, in the Hours section, you can increase or decrease by 1-hour increments using the cursor up/down keys after clicking into a cell (unrelated issue, but if you scroll before saving, the value disappears). In the Timesheet, the cursor keys just navigate among the cells. Why is this feature important to you - More efficient timesheet entryHow would you like the feature to work - a few ideas:For quicker entry, either or both of these options: +/- (plus/minus) buttons that appear when you click a cell, so that you can increase/decrease the value with the mousea shortcut key, e.g. SHIFT-UP/SHIFT-DOWN, that allows you to increase/decrease the value with the keyboard, when in a cell.To support the above, customizable increment settings, in timesheet profiles or overall preferences, particularly the ability to set the increment to quarter-hour. The increment setting would control how much the increase/decrease shortcuts above add or subtract to the logged time.I find that we need more granularity than an hour, but nothing more granular than .25 hrs/15 minute increments. Manual entry could still satisfy anything more granular than those standard increments.Tenths or hundredths of an hour don't equate well to actual minutes, since a minute is 1/60 of an hour. If we could switch to minute entry, with a standard 15 minute increment, that would be awesome! But at least .25 hour increments would work great.Current Behavior - No faster way to enter time than manually keying in the value.
It would be really helpful to be able to create folders that can be pinned and then have the ability to add multiple pins into the folder. This would work similar to folders and bookmarks in Chrome. I work with a lot of projects across different teams and I don't have the space to pin everything so being able to group pins into a bucket and expand it from the navigation would be very helpful.
Description - It would help improve our timesheet efficiency if users were able to filter to just the Pinned Tasks. We have complex projects with a large number of active tasks, but don't always need to log time to those tasks for the current timesheet period.Why is this feature important to you - would improve efficiency of filling out timesheetHow would you like the feature to work - I'd expect that there could be a toggle button, similar to the "Show Comments" toggle that could be clicked to filter down to just the Pinned Tasks on projects.Current Behavior - Pinned tasks and active tasks are all shown for each project, which creates a lot of clutter when looking for the tasks that are very frequently used throughout projects.
Currently there is a proof deadline option when selecting "Automated" Proofs but not for "BASIC" Proofs. Since the proof does not have a deadline date when deployed you have to go back into the Workfront system and edit the details within the "Proofing Workflow" with a deadline date. Making the plug-in useless when using "Basic" proof approvals if you want a deadline. See attached visuals. Requesting it to function like the "Automated" proof approval and add the deadline field. (Option with a calendar selection would be a level up.)
I'm making a task report for my creative directors and would love to be able to filter out certain programs and pull in other programs. You could do this by pulling in the resolving project's assigned Program. Hope this is something we could get in the future!
Based on a Program tag, we want to pass the channel to SFDC leads. Today, we must use change data value and type in the value. It would be more reliable if there was a token {program.tag} so that when we clone programs, we can reliably pass that information to the field.
Hoping for the ability to send yourself custom alert messages when triggered by a specific action. Some examples could be: X% of your emails weren't delivered X # of bounces from an email occurred X # of people had a specific data field edited Basically, the ability to send yourself a warning or red flag that something that shouldn't be happening has happened so you can get to the problem faster.
While exporting the Campaign via Engagement Map/Canvas, It is not showing all filters separately like it shows for triggers. If a campaign has 5 filters it is only saying filter(5).If we are exporting campaign for any approval or review then it should have clear picture of all filters so that all filters are visible.
Description - Adobe Analytics has some very useful builtin Reports in Analysis Workspace (and used to have some analysis Templates too). There are some helpful starting points for novice or casual users in there, from Traffic Sources to technical reports. Today, Customer Journey Analytics has no such option, but should. Why is this feature important to you - To help novice users start with something instead of nothing. How would you like the feature to work - Beyond the ability to use company-provided Templates, a Reports-like experience could be achieved if companies use the Adobe-provided AEP XDM Schema fields. For example, using the Web SDK mixin/field group would bring the potential to offer ready-made Reports and Templates in Analysis Workspace. The same is true for other use cases, like industry-specific analysis. Even beyond those, many templates could be built from builtin functionality already, like retention reports. Current Behaviour - 👁️👃👁️ 👄
Description - Proof lock automatically based on expiry date and time on a single stage proofWhy is this feature important to you - In our environment there may be 5 users on a proof and only one or two are responsible to make the decision, but we never never know form the group who that may be depending on travel and office hours. This would also force users to ask if a proof can be reopened, because they missed the proof deadlineHow would you like the feature to work - when the set date & time are reached the proof automatically locksCurrent Behaviour - the proof can lock: Manually, Never, When the next stage starts or When all decisions are made.
Description - There use to be a visual indicator of previously published revisions, now there is no way to see at a glance those revisions that have been previously published - I have to hover over each revision which is a slow and painful experience 😞
Description - Allow users to remove historical edits that were not published Why is this feature important to you - The version history can become littered with small edits that don't get published. Being able to remove historical edits that were never published to prod will allow us remove unnecessary changes if we choose to.. (You could maybe lock this feature to an admin user?) How would you like the feature to work - Any item in the version history prior to the current published version that has never been published should have an option to remove it from the version history. Current Behaviour - There is no option to remove previous unpublished versions.
Description - Send a notification when a task has moved to "ready to work on" statusWhy is this feature important to you - I do not see my new tasks unless I physically refresh my home page. This is annoying, because I can sometimes go hours without doing so and miss tasks that have tight deadlines.How would you like the feature to work - A task moves to my "ready to work on" bucket, and I get a notification: "[Task] is now ready to work on."Current Behaviour - Tasks move to my "ready to work on" bucket, and I do not get a notification. I am not aware of new tasks unless I physically refresh the home page.
The following are either incomplete or not available and are important to run our campaigns effectively: No Landing page performance link report -cannot see the total number of clicks on a link similar to the email link performance report Event cap - not fully automated and sometimes works/sometimes does not - incomplete Triggers - should be able to schedule them to turn 'on' - we can schedule to deactivate but not activate? - incomplete Setup area for 'reports' is like a 1990s version of microsoft - very hard to see/access assets to tick boxes and add to our reports Recipient time zone option for events sends Fills out form trigger - a constraint for 'time' so we can be more specific with our triggers Send all campaign assets as a ‘test’ in one go- time consuming sending individually, should be able to export with one button Revenue explorer is not user friendly and crashed when you get it more than three parameters Comparing campaigns across different workspaces is not easy..getting a 'like for like ' view is pretty difficult
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adding navigation controls to "Select Frame from Video" player in asset properties page when selecting a custom thumbnail Use-case: Users that select custom thumbnails for videos using the "Select Frame from Video" can't navigate forward or backward, forcing them to play the video in real time until they can find the right frame, and reload or play again from the beginning if they go too far. Current/Experienced Behavior: User navigates to asset properties page and clicks on "Change Thumbnail". On the "Select Frame from Video" tab, they can click on the video to play and pause. When the video is paused at the right frame, they can save it as the new custom thumbnail for the asset. Improved/Expected Behavior: The video player on the "Select Frame from Video" tab would have a navigation bar to be able to skip ahead or back in the video. It would also display the current time for the video. This would allow users to skip to the right minute and second and select the correct frame, rather than attempt to get there just using the play/pause button and not knowing what minute/second they have selected. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 SP15 Customer-name/Organization name: 3M Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
We use Workfront templates/schedules to act as workflow for all proofs (thus far). Since nobody "approves or resolves" a proof in proofHQ/ Viewer - they ALL remain with designer who created the object as approvals in their working on view. (I've been able to hide the excruciatingly long lists but that's not a solve). Needless to say, we have thousands of proofs that need to be archived. I would like to be able to bulk approve / archive / resolve any proof for a project that has been completed.
Description:Trend lines in line charts are very helpful. But for the reader of a report/dashboard, it remains unclear what the grey line means and how the trend is calculated.Current behaviour:Lines charts allow to add trend lines, but the line chart is not able to provide a legend for the trend line.How the feature should work:If a trend line is added, show a legend for it, which includes the selected trend line calculation (when legends are enabled).Why this is important:Readers of the report should be able to easily understand the chart.
Description - I am requesting the ability to see what users have accessed / used CJA from a certain date.Why is this feature important to you - We are trying to track user adoption as well as justify use.How would you like the feature to work - Either an option present in an Admin tab similar to AA or something in the admin console functionality.Current Behaviour - Unable to see this information without tracking individual actions through the audit log and tracking use manually in real time.
Currently, tasks that have only roles or a mixture of roles and users show up in the "Unassigned" area of the workload balancer both on the project and on the master workload balancer, but the UI does not distinguish between role and person. It's impossible to determine what task needs to be assigned to which user, based on role information, only. The task should also show the role information so that tasks that have been assigned to a role can also be assigned to the correct user.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
