Build better products with our product team
The integration for Microsoft Teams seems to be lacking. It would be nice to have it built out more and be able to manage conversation/notifications and or tasks through chats in teams. Just to see more options overall with the integration.
The integrations with Outlook and Teams seem to be one-way, from those apps into Workfront. We are looking for functionality that would allow a user to see their assigned work in Workfront in either their Tasks in Outlook or in a channel in Teams. Ideally, this would allow the user to update their assignment, % complete, comments, or status via Outlook and Teams and have that update propagate into Workfront.
Could be used to submit requests, share calendars or reports.
Description - Currently, you cannot hyperlink text within task descriptions. It is similar for many other fields. Why is this feature important to you - We often include lengthy links to documents or resources in the task descriptions and it would make it much cleaner if we could instead add a hyperlink to document names.How would you like the feature to work - Be able to add a hyperlink to text within task descriptions rather than include full link within text. Current Behaviour - Cannot make adjustments to text within task description.
The Encryptor module in Fusion currently only supports ASCII Armor encoded files. Armor-encoding bloats file size significantly and is generally not as preferable for SFTP transfer as binary-encoded files as a result. PRIMARY ASK: Have the Decrypt a PGP message module automatically detect whether the input data is Armor or binary encoded. SECONDARY ASK: Have the Encrypt a PGP message module to have an advanced option to allow the user to select which mode is preferred.
We sell products in virtually every major language around the world. It would be really cool if there was a built in function to enable automatic translation as part of a program by segmentation. Is this on the roadmap anywhere?
Every field choice except Radio Button allows the user to deselect their option to leave the field blank except for radio button. Once you've made a selection within a radio button you are committed to answering the question no matter what; which is great for required fields but results in faulty data with fields that aren't required. The only way to deselect today is to hit cancel / discard and start anew.
To count items in a data store based on a condition (ex: Field = "some value"), a Fusion user has to setup a structure similar to the above:Initialize a counter to 0Search the whole data store based on the conditionGet counter referencesIncrement the counter by one each timeThis is required because the Count records data store module does not allow for conditions.The ask is to enable conditions on the Count records module. Even if you internally have to do it via a looping mechanism like this, it greatly simplifies the life of the Fusion user and makes it an inline module rather than having to do the above PLUS the required router (ahead of the above flow) and another branch off that with a Get Variable module to get the result of the count.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Quick creation of versions for page's language copies Use-case: Create versions for language copies directly from version creation dialogue Current/Experienced Behavior: When Content Author is creating page's version and page has language copies, there is no possibility to create versions of language copies of the page Improved/Expected Behavior: When Content Author is creating page's version and page has language copies, there is possibility to create versions of language copies of the page Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.14 Oracle JDK 11.0.17 Dispatcher 4.3.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Veeam Screenshot (if applicable): As is To be Code package (if applicable):
It would be great to have the unpublish option for the published libraries in Prod environment through Adobe Launch. We have option till staging level to reject and edit the library, However once this is published to Prod we don't have any option to reject or edit the same to modify the rules or publishing latest version in the same library. We need to create additional library with latest version or edited rules to over write the published rules, which unnecessarily creating huge clutter in launch.
We routinely have to do grouping when making API calls. That can be over several thousand objects, grouped into bunches of only 50. It's inefficient to deal with it using the existing mechanisms, such as aggregating to a list and then doing complex slicing with a Repeater. It would be much more resource-efficient to have a module that aggregates up to some number "N" into a single output array.
One of the less-commonly-known facts about Marketo's REST API is that all activities within a record's Activity Log are recorded--even if the Activity itself isn't really an Activity. This is notable in cases where someone has set up a choice in a Flow Step that corresponds to an Activity. For example, someone may have a Change Data Value or Change Progression Status Flow Step with multiple options along the lines of: Choice 1: If condition is met, update this value. Else, do nothing. This is a pretty common setup for Marketo users to have in Smart Campaigns, so when someone hits the Else condition, they get an Activity in their log similar to the following: When this activity is looked at via REST API, however, it simply shows the associated lead ID, step ID, activity ID, etc. without providing any additional context. This can make things look as though there is some sort of error occurring and not that this is intentional behavior. As a result, would it be possible to expose skip as a value that can be seen from Activity extracts? This allows developers to see that this is an intentional omission and not a technical issue.
With the recent expansion of the Event variable in Adobe Analytics, to 1000, events are becoming more and more common. In fact on our site we have events for pretty much every page of the user experience.As such we would like to offer an idea for a new capability in Adobe Analytics; Time Between Events.I know Adobe has 'time prior to event' capability, but that is based on the visit start time. So while I can see how long it takes convert from when the user started their visit, I can't currently calculate the time it took the user to get through the checkout funnel. it also has the event funnels that help visualize conversion funnels, but that still doesn't provide a sense of 'time to complete the funnel'Time between events would allow analyst to set our own start time (event 1-enter checkout funnel) and our own end time (thank you page). This should be a calculated metric and require both events to exist within the same visit to accurately count the difference in time stamps. Adding this to workspace as well as R&A so end user can break it down by all appropriate props & evars would also be preferred.If i'm mistaken and something like this already exists, please advise. Otherwise please consider it as a potential roadmap item.
Description -We use an automated workflow for most projects, which we would like to be in three stages. These are internal team review, internal sales review, and customer review. We currently have to add names. and all of the e-mail notification attributes to the names. This takes an extra step for the proof creator and sometimes needs to be corrected. How would you like the feature to work -I would like for the ability to add a placeholder or Workfront job role to the name field so that all the creator needed to do was fill in the name and not the remaining fields.
This is a very straightforward ask: could the Marketo user permission for accessing Launchpoint be renamed to more accurately reflect what it does? "Event Partners" is language that is not used inside Marketo, and the implication that all Launchpoint connections are Event Partners to begin with is inaccurate at this point.
Description - There many projects in the Report section on the left panel that we don’t want users to use – because they don’t have access to the underlying data or because we use custom dimensions/events instead. We would like to hide individual reports, as we were able to do in the legacy Reports menu.Why is this feature important to you - We want to reduce the number of support questions related to those projects, and prevent users from disseminating inaccurate results. We understand that users can see only the data/metrics, etc. that their Product Profile allows, but we want to reduce noise on the interface.How would you like the feature to work - An interface that allows you to select which projects should be available for each report suite. Admins would still be able to see all reports.Current Behaviour - You can hide the entire Reports section, but not individual projects.
I build a lot of reports that rely on text mode for columns, filters, and grouping. One of my major issues with Text Mode is having to jump back and forth between the Text Mode Window and API Explorer to find the right references to include, or having to manually review my syntax to ensure that the code is accurate. It would be incredibly helpful if Text Mode windows behaved like modern IDEs (ie Visual Studio Code, Eclipse, etc.) where Text Mode can auto complete or suggest field references or even lines of code as well highlight syntax errors to reduce errors and frustrations when using Text Mode.
We should be able to receive a notification triggered from "already uploaded it" See below. All of this occurs during the document upload when the user has been requested a document. If there is no notification how will we know?Email ^^^Click Already uploaded itThen it disappears and requestor of doc gets no notification -
Description - With as much as I work with segments used multiple times throughout a Workspace report, it would be very helpful to have the ability to select that Segment and then when I need to replace it with a NEW segment, simply perform a "global search and replace" to find the old segment anywhere it is used throughout all panels in the report and replace it with the new segment.Why is this feature important to you - The amount of time I currently have to spend moving through a large report and replacing every instance of a segment I used is very time consuming, and being able to do this would greatly reduce the amount of time it takes to update the report, particularly because it is one I use on a regular basis.How would you like the feature to work - Select the cog/gear on a segment and provide a link to change the segment. Take the user to an interface to select a different segment and then provide them with the choice to choice one of two checkboxes: replace all instances in the panel, or replace all instances in the entire Workspace report. Current Behavior - Presently, I have to navigate my entire report and drag the new segment over every instance I want to replace. This takes a LOT of time, because I can often have multiple instances where I need to replace that segment or multiples throughout my report in multiple panels. Also, the interface is not always smooth with quickly allowing me to replace a segment. Sometimes Adobe Analytics gets finicky and only wants to provide me the option to Add in the segment as a new one, because the interface likes to be "temperamental." 🙄
Description - Workfront creates a public URL for the DAM assets being uploaded to task/ request/ project.Why is this feature important to you - This is a violation of company's InfoSec policy.How would you like the feature to work - The link should either be private/ protected.Current Behaviour - The link is a public link valid for 60 secs. A short video of the issue is attached.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use locale param to filter the internal SQL query results in order to improve performance Use-case: On any multilanguage project, the same type of content fragments will be potentially created under each language. When a persisted query is executed to retrieve all the content fragments for a specific model, filtering also by dates and locale, the locale is not used on the internal SQL, causing the query to be really slow.Sample internal SQL Query: SELECT main.* FROM [dam:IndexedFragmentData] AS main WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE(main, '/content/dam') AND main.[@string@model] = '/conf/mysite/settings/dam/cfm/models/news' AND (name() = 'master') AND ((main.[calendar@publicationDate] >= cast('2023-07-05T08:30:57.266Z' AS date) AND main.[calendar@publicationDate] <= cast('2023-07-08T08:30:57.266Z' AS date))) ORDER BY main.[jcr:path] OPTION (INDEX TAG[contentFragments], TRAVERSAL FAIL) As a workaround, we have built a new version of the persisted query where we specify the path to the specific language as a filter, then the query only takes a few milliseconds, but this should be part of the internal functionality when a locale is used, the front might know the language but not the content path. Current/Experienced Behavior: Locale is not used in the internal SQL filter Improved/Expected Behavior: Locale should be used as part of the internal SQL filter Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM CS 2023.4 Customer-name/Organization name: Real Madrid Club de Futbol Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Currently all the product profiles group from all the instances are visible in one particular instance. If we have 3 environments and 2 run modes (author and publish) this means any particular instance like DEV Author will have 6 Product Profile groups displayed for AEM Users and AEM Administrators. Ideally this is usually not required as the Product Administrators are not interested in other groups. So the groups originating from other product profiles should either be hidden or disabled. Also, if you select any other AEM Users Product Profile Group it displays the list of members along with the option to cancel their group membership and allows you to save and proceed. (This is not allowed as if you see the product profile group again the deleted user is still present)Ideally this option to cancel membership for a user for other instance's product profile group should not be displayed. Use-case: Only the users with product profiles to a particular instance are synced. However, all the groups in IMS are synced to all the AEM instances. This leads to a confusion for a product user as one is not able to determine the instance relevant product profile group. Current/Experienced Behavior: All the Product Profile groups are displayed for all the instances in any given instance. The current product profile group should be highlighted to help narrow down your active product profile. The option to delete/cancel a user's membership to other instance's product profile group is misleading. This option should not be shown. Improved/Expected Behavior: Display only those product profile groups which are relevant to the instance. If displaying other product profile groups, remove the option in UI to cancel the group members. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): Below screenshot shows AEM Users Product Profiles from RDE, DEV, Stage and Prod without highlighting which Product Profile group belongs to our current environment (RDE). The user has to take that info from the IMS Admin Console. In RDE Instance, I am able to access AEM Users Product Profile group for Prod Environment and access the members. In UI, I am able to delete this membership for a user account. This is not allowed in backend obviously. When you refresh, the deleted user appears again. The option to cancel/delete the membership should not be shown ideally. Code package (if applicable): @kautuk_sahni
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Request for having a default Adobe SMTP server included by default with product or available as a service on demand which client can purchase and bundle with product.. Use-case: Some of the clients do not want to share their own SMTP for mail notifications and with AEMaaCS are not aware of the proxy host and advance networking port configurations to be done. They want something to be available out of box which they can readily use. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently client specific SMTP needs to be configured. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ready to launch service for clients Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Support for dynamicUrl for video and audio assets in GraphQL query Use-case: To retrieve the dynamicUrl of audio and video assets via GraphQL query Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no field for _dynamicUrl in MultiMediaReference and DocumentRef Improved/Expected Behavior: There should be a _dynamicUrlfield field in MultiMediaReference or DocumentRef Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic offering should provide support for logging, alerting and API integrations. Use-case: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic does not provide support for alerting. This is required in order to identify any issues early on w.r.t the AEM instances and setup APM alerts. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic does not provide support for logging, alerting and API integrations. Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM as a Cloud Service - New Relic should provide support for logging, alerting and API integrations. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
