Build better products with our product team
I want to be able to combine the content of multiple rich media sources into one proof
When a specific schedule is set up and associated with a user in Workfront, it would be useful to automatically include it in the user's PTO calendar in order to block public holidays, exceptions and leave.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - It is difficult to search for the Adobe Audience Manager ID I am looking for within the workspace Audiences ID dimension if I am unable to filter. I have to manually look through the values until I find the one I need. Normally we use the Audiences Name dimension, which is filterable, however sometimes we have issues with metadata and I have to look through the Audiences ID to see if it is there. A ticket was opened to investigate with engineering and they said it is working as expected since Audiences ID is type int and that is not filterable. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to filter on Audiences ID to simplify my search within that dimension. Current Behaviour - Unable to filter to the value that i am looking for resulting in manually looking through all the values until I find what I need.
Description - Allow options to improve usability of conditional formatting so outliers don't skew the coloring, especially when breaking out by dimensions such as page. Why is this feature important to you - When all the standard values have the same or very similar shading, conditional formatting loses its power. Setting up manually means that future adjustments won't update the color scheme. How would you like the feature to work - I'd like option to be able to use the mean, for example, as the midpoint shade. Or perhaps quartiles.Current Behaviour - Currently the color scheme sets the color midpoint to (max - min) / 2. In the example below, an outlier page has time spent per visitor with extremely high time. Thus the midpoint for the color scheme is above way above average and only a few pages would be green or yellow. This means all pages with even close to normal level of page views, will be varying shades of red. Instead, if we could use the mean (288 seconds in this example), quartiles, or an option to exclude outliers in setting color scheme, we'd have more insight.
Description: Ability to save information within the form that you type without hitting SaveWhy is this feature important to you - Reduce the effort of selecting the save button every time.How would you like the feature to work - When users fill out the custom form, the data should automatically get saved without hitting the Save button.Current Behavior: The User should fill in the data in the custom form and select the Save button to save the information.
Hi,Currently we are able to download only a maximum of 400 rows at a time, although we can see additional records when we are logged in. It will be helpful if Adobe can add a feature so users are able to download more rows. Especially now that Adobe AdHoc being sunset, users are having a challenge with the limitation of the number of rows that can be downloaded from Freeform tables in the Workspace projects.Thanks!
I’m running into cases a lot recently where I need to do a ton of internal text manipulations --- extractions from arrays, text transforms/substrings, etc., but then have to completely re-extract that text out of my variable functions/formulas to pass it through the Transform to JSON module, and then re-cast it to a different variable/module after that. As far as I can tell, the Transform to JSON module looks and acts almost the same as a text function --- you’re passing a single parameter to the function that lives behind the module and consuming its output. The advantage of having it as a function is that you can nest it within the same variable as other functions without having to break out of the variable module, transform it, and then re-introduce the transformed JSON in another variable or module. It’s much more easily self-contained, all in one variable, and you can much more easily nest it as part of a set of string manipulation functions all at once.
The integration for Microsoft Teams seems to be lacking. It would be nice to have it built out more and be able to manage conversation/notifications and or tasks through chats in teams. Just to see more options overall with the integration.
The integrations with Outlook and Teams seem to be one-way, from those apps into Workfront. We are looking for functionality that would allow a user to see their assigned work in Workfront in either their Tasks in Outlook or in a channel in Teams. Ideally, this would allow the user to update their assignment, % complete, comments, or status via Outlook and Teams and have that update propagate into Workfront.
Could be used to submit requests, share calendars or reports.
Description - Currently, you cannot hyperlink text within task descriptions. It is similar for many other fields. Why is this feature important to you - We often include lengthy links to documents or resources in the task descriptions and it would make it much cleaner if we could instead add a hyperlink to document names.How would you like the feature to work - Be able to add a hyperlink to text within task descriptions rather than include full link within text. Current Behaviour - Cannot make adjustments to text within task description.
The Encryptor module in Fusion currently only supports ASCII Armor encoded files. Armor-encoding bloats file size significantly and is generally not as preferable for SFTP transfer as binary-encoded files as a result. PRIMARY ASK: Have the Decrypt a PGP message module automatically detect whether the input data is Armor or binary encoded. SECONDARY ASK: Have the Encrypt a PGP message module to have an advanced option to allow the user to select which mode is preferred.
We sell products in virtually every major language around the world. It would be really cool if there was a built in function to enable automatic translation as part of a program by segmentation. Is this on the roadmap anywhere?
Every field choice except Radio Button allows the user to deselect their option to leave the field blank except for radio button. Once you've made a selection within a radio button you are committed to answering the question no matter what; which is great for required fields but results in faulty data with fields that aren't required. The only way to deselect today is to hit cancel / discard and start anew.
To count items in a data store based on a condition (ex: Field = "some value"), a Fusion user has to setup a structure similar to the above:Initialize a counter to 0Search the whole data store based on the conditionGet counter referencesIncrement the counter by one each timeThis is required because the Count records data store module does not allow for conditions.The ask is to enable conditions on the Count records module. Even if you internally have to do it via a looping mechanism like this, it greatly simplifies the life of the Fusion user and makes it an inline module rather than having to do the above PLUS the required router (ahead of the above flow) and another branch off that with a Get Variable module to get the result of the count.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Quick creation of versions for page's language copies Use-case: Create versions for language copies directly from version creation dialogue Current/Experienced Behavior: When Content Author is creating page's version and page has language copies, there is no possibility to create versions of language copies of the page Improved/Expected Behavior: When Content Author is creating page's version and page has language copies, there is possibility to create versions of language copies of the page Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.14 Oracle JDK 11.0.17 Dispatcher 4.3.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Veeam Screenshot (if applicable): As is To be Code package (if applicable):
It would be great to have the unpublish option for the published libraries in Prod environment through Adobe Launch. We have option till staging level to reject and edit the library, However once this is published to Prod we don't have any option to reject or edit the same to modify the rules or publishing latest version in the same library. We need to create additional library with latest version or edited rules to over write the published rules, which unnecessarily creating huge clutter in launch.
We routinely have to do grouping when making API calls. That can be over several thousand objects, grouped into bunches of only 50. It's inefficient to deal with it using the existing mechanisms, such as aggregating to a list and then doing complex slicing with a Repeater. It would be much more resource-efficient to have a module that aggregates up to some number "N" into a single output array.
One of the less-commonly-known facts about Marketo's REST API is that all activities within a record's Activity Log are recorded--even if the Activity itself isn't really an Activity. This is notable in cases where someone has set up a choice in a Flow Step that corresponds to an Activity. For example, someone may have a Change Data Value or Change Progression Status Flow Step with multiple options along the lines of: Choice 1: If condition is met, update this value. Else, do nothing. This is a pretty common setup for Marketo users to have in Smart Campaigns, so when someone hits the Else condition, they get an Activity in their log similar to the following: When this activity is looked at via REST API, however, it simply shows the associated lead ID, step ID, activity ID, etc. without providing any additional context. This can make things look as though there is some sort of error occurring and not that this is intentional behavior. As a result, would it be possible to expose skip as a value that can be seen from Activity extracts? This allows developers to see that this is an intentional omission and not a technical issue.
With the recent expansion of the Event variable in Adobe Analytics, to 1000, events are becoming more and more common. In fact on our site we have events for pretty much every page of the user experience.As such we would like to offer an idea for a new capability in Adobe Analytics; Time Between Events.I know Adobe has 'time prior to event' capability, but that is based on the visit start time. So while I can see how long it takes convert from when the user started their visit, I can't currently calculate the time it took the user to get through the checkout funnel. it also has the event funnels that help visualize conversion funnels, but that still doesn't provide a sense of 'time to complete the funnel'Time between events would allow analyst to set our own start time (event 1-enter checkout funnel) and our own end time (thank you page). This should be a calculated metric and require both events to exist within the same visit to accurately count the difference in time stamps. Adding this to workspace as well as R&A so end user can break it down by all appropriate props & evars would also be preferred.If i'm mistaken and something like this already exists, please advise. Otherwise please consider it as a potential roadmap item.
Description -We use an automated workflow for most projects, which we would like to be in three stages. These are internal team review, internal sales review, and customer review. We currently have to add names. and all of the e-mail notification attributes to the names. This takes an extra step for the proof creator and sometimes needs to be corrected. How would you like the feature to work -I would like for the ability to add a placeholder or Workfront job role to the name field so that all the creator needed to do was fill in the name and not the remaining fields.
This is a very straightforward ask: could the Marketo user permission for accessing Launchpoint be renamed to more accurately reflect what it does? "Event Partners" is language that is not used inside Marketo, and the implication that all Launchpoint connections are Event Partners to begin with is inaccurate at this point.
Description - There many projects in the Report section on the left panel that we don’t want users to use – because they don’t have access to the underlying data or because we use custom dimensions/events instead. We would like to hide individual reports, as we were able to do in the legacy Reports menu.Why is this feature important to you - We want to reduce the number of support questions related to those projects, and prevent users from disseminating inaccurate results. We understand that users can see only the data/metrics, etc. that their Product Profile allows, but we want to reduce noise on the interface.How would you like the feature to work - An interface that allows you to select which projects should be available for each report suite. Admins would still be able to see all reports.Current Behaviour - You can hide the entire Reports section, but not individual projects.
I build a lot of reports that rely on text mode for columns, filters, and grouping. One of my major issues with Text Mode is having to jump back and forth between the Text Mode Window and API Explorer to find the right references to include, or having to manually review my syntax to ensure that the code is accurate. It would be incredibly helpful if Text Mode windows behaved like modern IDEs (ie Visual Studio Code, Eclipse, etc.) where Text Mode can auto complete or suggest field references or even lines of code as well highlight syntax errors to reduce errors and frustrations when using Text Mode.
We should be able to receive a notification triggered from "already uploaded it" See below. All of this occurs during the document upload when the user has been requested a document. If there is no notification how will we know?Email ^^^Click Already uploaded itThen it disappears and requestor of doc gets no notification -
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
