Build better products with our product team
Replace the current "Only Before Sequence" and "Only After Sequence" options with these options:"Apply to [First/Last] sequence match (Required)"Currently this is not configurable. "Only Before Sequence" setting is applied to (and includes) the first hit of the last matching sequence and everything before. "Only After Sequence" setting is applied to (and includes) the last hit of the first matching sequence and everything after.Presenting this option would also help users understand how "match first/last sequence" is necessary part of how sequential segments work when there are multiple sequence matches within a visit/visitor. "Include data from [All/First/Last] hit(s) within the matched sequence in the results (Optional)""I only want my sequential segment to return just the first/last hit from the sequence." has got to be a common desire among analytics users, as others have requested this in other idea submissions. The "Include First/Last hit in the sequence" option would enable that use case, and the "Include All hits" and No selection (unused) options enable many other use cases.Currently this is not configurable. As previously mentioned, the "Only Before Sequence" setting includes the first hit of the last matching sequence, and the "Only After Sequence" setting includes the last hit of the first matching sequence."Include [All/<number of>] hits of data from [Before/After] the sequence match (Optional) in the results""I want my sequential segment to show me what the user encountered just before/after they encountered <desired sequence>" also has got to be a common desire among analytics users.Currently this is not configurable. The "Only Before/After Sequence" options return everything before/after the sequence from the visit or visitor, plus the first/last within the sequence (as previously mentioned).I think these options would dramatically improve the capability and value of sequential segments, and make it easier for users to understand exactly what data is potentially included in their segment results.
Description - Planner experiences a row limit when the filter isn't narrow enough. While there's a warning message when you hit that limit, it's presented in a hidden spot.Why is this feature important to you - Planner's limitations are vast and hidden. If we don't know what those limitations are, we can only conclude that the feature is broken. It's debilitating to our resourcing work.How would you like the feature to work - Present the row limit warning at the top of the window like you do other warnings or errors.Current Behaviour - The warning that you've hit a row limit in Planner is presented at the very bottom of the list of hits. You have to scroll to find the warning, so if you don't know where to look, you'll just be frustrated that you're not getting all the data you're looking for.
Current Behaviour - In the current set-up, it's easy for Kanban story and issue cards to easily fall-off/disappear from board (if they are changed to the wrong status or if someone accidently removes the team assignment). I'm hoping this can be updated with a more fool-proof method so that cards don't go missing. Why is this feature important to you - It would allow users to have more confidence in the board and not worry about their story/issue cards disappearing and then needing to search to find them. How would you like the feature to work - Some sort of indicator (other than just the assignment or card status) that would indicate it belongs on a Kanban board. Once it is on the board, it's not possible to remove unless completed, cancelled or deleted.
Description - Allow for more flexibility of saving combined audiences to the Audience Library. These should include: audiences that include a previously saved Audience Library audience combined with an AAM audience. Also, an AAM audience, or previously saved Audience Library audience, that is excluded from 'all visitors'. Why is this feature important to you - We reuse several audiences repeatedly and it would save time and minimize error if these combined audiences could be saved to the Audience Library and just referenced as one audience rather than having to rebuild it each time. How would you like the feature to work - Should work the same as creating audiences and saving them to the Audience Library today. Current Behaviour - Currently, there is no option to save a combined audience to the Audience Library. The radio button is grayed out. Those audiences can only be saved to Activity-Only
Description - we would like Workfront reports to be developed further, especially the "Charts" area to enable more than 3 groupings to be pulled into it.Why is this feature important to you - We would like to combine data cuts across 3 different parameters (Count of Projects - across Programs, with different statuses & Dates (planned completion date as calendar Week))How would you like the feature to work - Charts should allow the end user to be able to add more than 2 groupings, be able to pull collection object information, custom GroupingsCurrent Behaviour - Only 2 groupings are allowed in charts
Description - Would like to be able pull a kanban board into a report and create a dashboard using that info.Why is this feature important to you - To more easily show what's going on with projects and tasks in the different flows.How would you like the feature to work - Select a board to pull report info from and then drill down info from there.Current Behaviour - Having to create by user and pulling that information, but that could pull in additional info from other boards.
I would like to be able to condense forms by section headers in the editor. This feature is important because editing large forms in time consuming and being able to condense sections that are not being currently edited reduces errors. In a instance that has been live for almost ten years Names and Labels of fields can be very different, not having to scroll as much in a form will help to find the field that is needed, especially when setting up logic. This feature would be similar to how Custom Forms are displayed in project details where you can condense a one or all the forms. The current behavior is you need to scroll through the form or use a find option on your web browser to find a field or section.
Hi,it would be great to have prerender or selective batch processing option available for AI masks. The way the feature works at the moment is that you can choose between replacing masks or adding AI masks from a sample file when batch processing. I would like to just UPDATE the adjustments of prerendered AI maks. This would save a lot of time when editing galleries.This way you could render AI masks in advance and then just copy and paste the settings/finetune the adjustments for each indiviual AI mask. I.e. prerender all background AI masks, then just copy and paste the settings. At the moment the AI mask always need to be recalculated when batch processing and it is not very efficient.Thank you for considering this.Chistina
Description -Task Share allows to grant View, Contribute or Manage access to Job Roles, Users, Teams, Groups via the Project Task but not via the Template Task.Currently our project settings indicate to grant Manage rights when an user is assigned to a Task; however if the user "volunteers" or is assigned by another user with less rights (i.e. Work instead of Plan license) then the user assigned to the task only receives Contribute instead of Manage rights regardless of the Project task access settings.In our instance, many times the users volunteer to work on a task and end up not having the proper access.All of our projects get a template attached; therefore if we could allow Manage rights to be granted to specific Job Roles for certain tasks in the Template tasks, this will eliminate this problem for us.This problem happens frequently (1-2 times a week), causing delays or incorrect information (i.e. task duration cannot be modified)
It would be great to be able to pull a report that looks at user login frequency by system login, project/program login, etc... not just number of times they logged into the system a month.
Description - We are unable to sort in ascending and descending order in text mode on the Proof Approval Report columns example: Document Name and Approval Creator ColumnsWhy is this feature important to you - It helps to Sort column data as per needed Current Behaviour - unable to sort in ascending and descending order in text mode on the Proof Approval Report columns
Description - When the Project/Task status change Field tracking should start capturing the Data Why is this feature important to you - Helps to filter the unnecessary DataCurrent Behaviour - It is capturing all the records from the first entry
Description - It can be helpful to determine how long a project (or task or issue) has been in a given status. The best example: On Hold. Why is this feature important to you - If we can flag how long a project has been on hold, we can promote cleanup activities.How would you like the feature to work - When configuring report filters, there would be an option to view the total amount of time the object has been in the status it's in right now. We would have the option to show this number by hours or days.Current Behaviour - Per the wonderful Skye Hansen, use a calculated field on all projects or build a journal entry report, both of which have complexities and flaws.
Having a native Workfront connector in Power BI, similar to what Wrike offers, would be highly beneficial. It would simplify the API connection process, eliminate the challenges of pagination and challenges with modifying Power Queries too. We are already using Power BI for reporting, but having such a connector would save time and effort.Reference video: Wrike Power BI Connector
Description - Adobe Experience Cloud Experience Platform Dynamic Data Collection Launch, by Adobe Tags minifies code when a library is built. That feature is super helpful for production environments, where site owners usually want to minimize the impact of loaded libraries. And that is great! Except for when you are actually trying to read the code afterwards. For example, minification turns my horrible, hacky, readable and commented code... into this horrible, hacky, unreadable and uncommented code: While the size advantage justifies the less readable code on production, practically every developer I've ever worked with complained about the minified code on any non-prod environment. If you just want to see what a piece of code does and why it won't work, minification does not help a lot. The usual solution is to remove the .min from the Launch library's file name, but that requires a) knowledge of the feature and b) some manual intervention, browser plugins, or other effort. Even worse, if the library file name would ever change due to changed environments in Launch, an unknown number of people would need to update their already configured stuff too. That's not very cool. In my personal experience, there is a general tendency per environment for either the minified or un-minified version to be preferred. Minified is fine for prod, but un-minified is what you want everywhere else. For that reason, I want to propose an additional toggle in the environment settings that would disable the minification during build, along the lines of this: Disabling this toggle would change the URL in the field below to the un-minified variant and cause all references to other code pieces, like Custom Code Actions, to also not be minified. While it would be enabled by default for all environments, it would give us an easy option to make everyone's life on non-prod a lot easier. Why is this feature important to you - Because I like efficiency How would you like the feature to work - See above Current Behaviour - 😖
We would like to see all fields in Workfront defined and mapped out for reporting and report building purposes. i.e. clearly lay out what data fields are in Workfront.To facilitate report building discussions, to have available for onboarding, and to define field purposes. Similar to how there is a function within Forms, but for the entire Workfront database. There is nothing currently (I created a ticket in EL and this was confirmed).
Description - WorkFront Proofing activity logs be able to download to a txt file or excel file.Why is this feature important to you - Review and additional entry of productivity of the users.How would you like the feature to work - Please give us an option to download the list of logs via txt file or excel file. The list of Proofing activity logs including its comments.Current Behaviour - view only as a report.
Description - Add Sample Size Calculator within Adobe Target interface And/Or add its link while setting up an AB test Why is this feature important to you - Currently Adobe Target users have to either bookmark or search for the link to Sample Size calculator (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/tools/calculator/testcalculator.html?lang=en ), a very crucial tool to estimate the number of days a test should be run. Also, as its not part of the interface, users use different calculators provided by other vendors. As this is not part of the workflow-interface, its easy to miss this step - specially for practitioners who are new to Experience Optimisation or those who do not know that Adobe Target provides its own Sample size calculator. How would you like the feature to work - Adobe Target Product team should add the Sample Size calculator link to Adobe Target top nav. Would be great to have it added to first step of an AB test workflow as well. Current Behaviour - We need to bookmark the Experience League page, or search it or even rely on using sample size calculators provided by other vendors. Regards Rajneesh
Our creative internal and external agencies create GIFs for a lot of marketing activities as its a popular/effective format. At times for one project we create multiple GIFs - so if we create three options, the stakeholder would have to click on three separate links to review them today, We need to have to possibility to send multiple GIFs files to proofing at the same time, for reviwers to see all the different versions in a single proof, today we can upload different versions but that is a lot of manual work and waiting time for different versions to be created.
Description - There should be a way to have project templates added based on selections in Custom Forms used in Request Queues.Why is this feature important to you - It would simplify or in some cases eliminate the need to select a project template upon converting, saving the extra step and therefore saving time.How would you like the feature to work - When building custom forms, allow some logic to tie in project templates to say, options selected in a drop down menu, similar to the display logic function.Example: Apply project template.... XXXX, if Field XxXxX, Option xxxx. is Selected. Also see mock up attached.Current Behaviour - No option to integrate Project Templates into Custom Forms currently
The ability to set predecessors for issues or cross objects like tasks. Being able to set a predecessor between issues for items such as "unplanned work". Would also be nice to create cross object predecessors such as a task being a predecessor for an issue to begin.
Description - It's great that Adobe added data visualizations to our graphs a few years ago, but the way they display isn't very visually impactful... It's a little flag that shows in the X-Axis, leaving the users to still try to identify where exactly that point lies on the graph. Of course, users can hover to have a line show up for the annotation.. but that doesn't really work for PDFs.. and if there are a series of annotations you can only see one at a time... let's say you are reviewing the impact of a multi-site migration rollout, you might want to see each point where sites were migrated and the impact over time of all the sites together... Having the ability to show a permanent visual indicator would allow everyone to see at a glance where the impacts are, and users can still check the annotation details one at a time. Why is this feature important to you - Making the annotations more visible at a glance, and being able to see multiple annotation markers at once allows the data to be ingested by users easier. How would you like the feature to work - This could be an optional checkbox to show or not show the intersections all the time.. as I know that if there are a large number of annotations this could get busy and make the visuals overwhelming.. but for a few annotations this would be a handy visual to have. Right now, in order to have a visual representation, I have to create a custom date/date range, a segment from that custom date, a calculated metric using that segment in an IF statement, and then graph my metric and calculated metric as an area chart: (See https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/graphics-edition/td-p/605264) If we could get a more visual annotation out-of-the-box it would save a lot of time, and I think be beneficial to all. Current Behaviour - It's just a flag that when you hover shows a vertical for individual dates, or a mid-point vertical and an extremely pale range line for date ranges: When it comes to ranges, the user has to use their best judgement trying to understand where on the line the range actually starts/stops because the indicator is separate from the actual data... they can see "in general" where the range is, but don't have the detailed specifics of the intersection.
Description - I would like to be able to set up an email alert to notify me when specific users log in. Why is this feature important to you - This could be used to enhance the users experience of the tool. For instance, it would be very useful to know when a new user logs in or when one of our directors/executives access to the tool - allowing us to provide better support (I know we could technically get this information from the logs but a proactive alert would be much simpler)
Description - The condition builder in Fusion supports a very simplistic Boolean logic, allowing simple expressions such as (A && B) || (C && D). This is functional under many circumstances, though forces a lot of duplication of checks on the UI side. The following is an example of a condition that would be problematic: ID = "foo" && (Error 1 = true || Error 2 = true || Error 3 = true || Error 4 = true) In the existing condition builder, it results in something that looks like this: (ID = "foo" && Error 1 = true) || (ID = "foo" && Error 2 = true) || (ID = "foo" && Error 3 = true) || (ID = "foo" && Error 4 = true) If we have to change the value of "foo", this creates a risk whereby a human may miss all instances of "foo". (This risk increases with increasingly complex conditions.) The ask is to improve the condition builder to allow for full Boolean logic. We have a similar version built into our own product, and I'm attaching an example of what that type of UI might look like as a concept to showcase how to think about the proposal. Why is this feature important to you - We are currently having to implement such complex conditions through either (1) duplicating values/checks or (2) a series of Router and Set Variable modules that perform the evaluation using edge filters between modules. Either way, it's a cost/risk introduced due to a UI that is limited in its current form. How would you like the feature to work - Anywhere that conditions are allowed (event watchers, edge filters, etc.), use the same enhanced UI mechanism. Allow a user to create a Boolean expression similar to how a developer would do it -- through nesting and grouping of logical operators. If the backend needs to translate that down to a simpler form for evaluation, that can be transformed internally. Current Behaviour - Described above in the Description.
Description -The Adobe Workfront custom API module (or any other Workfront API module) is often used to query various API endpoints. That module doesn't appear to have any built-in mechanisms for handling a retry when a 429 (API rate limit exceeded) occurs, though this is a fairly standard and common occurrence in high-volume systems.The existing way to handle this in a reasonable fashion is to:Make the API call with the custom API moduleSet an error handler from the moduleOn the error handler path:Sleep for some amount of timeRetry the API call with a second custom API module that's configured the same way as the firstSet a success handler on that "Resumes"Set an error handler on that second moduleOn that error handler path:Do the same as on the first, and continue nesting this for as many attempts as you want/needThis is super unwieldy and means that the module configuration is duplicated or triplicated, meaning future changes need to be done multiple times, which is risky due to human error being a normal thing. Why is this feature important to you -Given how common the use of the Adobe Workfront modules are and how common the 429 error is, it would make sense to have a mechanism built into the module to allow for retries and some kind of backoff sleep time to be just part of the module's advanced configuration. It reduces the cost to build and maintain these Fusion scenarios. How would you like the feature to work -Have at least one numeric entry in the Advanced Config section of the Workfront modules for "Number of retries if too many API requests", default to "1" to allow for compatibility with existing scenarios.Optionally have another numeric entry in the Advanced Config section that allows for setting the sleep time. It would be most ideal if there were options for constant sleep, linear sleep (increasing by "constant" times the retry count), exponential sleep, and/or random sleep between some range of numbers.If the module exceeds the retry count, execute the error handler path as currently supported. Current Behaviour -See the description above. The following image also shows how a chain of 429 retries gets to be unwieldy after even just a few API calls. Imagine having to propagate a series of changes -- this creates 2x the work, all for a simple "retry" handling.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
