Build better products with our product team
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Provision to show the details of the user who triggered the last build, a tentative time estimate, and a progress bar to show the time left to deploy. Use-case: Implementing features like displaying the user who triggered the last build, a tentative time estimate, and a progress bar helps developers in various ways. It enhances accountability, transparency, and communication among team members. Developers can better manage their time, monitor progress, troubleshoot issues (incase of longer than expected deployment). Current/Experienced Behavior: This feature is not available OOTB. Improved/Expected Behavior: Added capability to show the details of the user who triggered the last build, a tentative time estimate, and a progress bar to show the time left to deploy. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service/ AEM on-premise Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
When working on a project timeline, there are times we may add an assignee either accidentally or the assignee is added then changed. Even when we eliminate/change the assignee name, that person remains on the project and gets email notifications as if they're still assigned. If a person is removed, they should be removed completely, not just pushed to the "Staffing/People" area.
Description - Allow Rules to be defined as to when Custom Dashboards show on Left NavigationWhy is this feature important to you - Sometimes a Dashboard that is added to a Layout Template or by a User to the Left Navigation is only relevant for certain types of ProjectHow would you like the feature to work - Add a Rules / Filter criteria, similar to defining Typeahead fields for when the dashboard displays. Thus if I add a Dashboard to a Project on either the Layout Template or personally, allow it to only show for Projects that meet specific criteria, maybe the Portfolio is a specific one, or there is a custom field on the Project that it looks at and determines whether to display the dashboardCurrent Behaviour - Dashboard always shows up if added
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Using OOTB Content Fragments multiedit resource type, all <strong> and <em> HTML tags are being replaced with <b> and <i> tags. Use-case: Using OOTB Content Fragments multiedit resource type, all <strong> and <em> HTML tags are being replaced with <b> and <i> tags. The OOTB content fragment js should have logic to retain <strong> and <em> tags and not replace them with <b> and <i> tags. This is possible in the OOTB RTE component and is an issue only with multi-edit resource type for CF. Current/Experienced Behavior: We are facing an issue with OOTB Content Fragments multiedit resource type wherein all <strong> and <em> HTML tags are being replaced with <b> and <i> tags. This is causing accessibility issues and based on our analysis, we have to override the StyledTextEditor.js file (located at /libs/dam/cfm/admin/clientlibs/v2/authoring/contenteditor/editors/StyledTextEditor.js) to modify this default behavior. Improved/Expected Behavior: The OOTB content fragment multiedit js should have logic to retain <strong> and <em> tags and not replace them with <b> and <i> tags. This is possible in the OOTB RTE component and is an issue only with multi-edit resource type for CF. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Access to detailed logs of deployment pipelines Use-case: Debugging deployment issues can be a time-consuming process, especially when faced with vague deployment logs from pipelines. This lack of clarity often leads to significant delays in issue identification and resolution, particularly in multi-module projects where pipeline runtimes can range from 1 to 1.5 hours. Example of a vague log: Failed deployment in abc-program-dev Current/Experienced Behavior: Engaging with the support team to obtain relevant logs and resolving the issue through back-and-forth communication can be a lengthy and time-consuming process, often spanning multiple days. Improved/Expected Behavior: While it may not always be possible to obtain detailed logs for the entire deployment, it is crucial to have access to information regarding the specific cause of the failure. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Flexibility to add User group as "owners" for a translation project instead of adding as single users. Use-case: We have multiple country authors who are required to be added as owners for each translation project which is a redundant activity. So having an option to add as a group will make process easier. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently for each translation project, each users(country authors) have to be added as owners. Since every country author do not have admin access , every time a new project is created we have to add each of them as owners to make it accessible. Improved/Expected Behavior: Flexibility to add User group as owners instead of adding only single user. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service Customer-name/Organization name: Cognizant Technology solutions Screenshot (if applicable): Please find the Screenshot attached. Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In a custom ParticipantStepChooser, getParticipant()'s method return type is currently String, which means we can only return a group or a participant in the method. A provision to return multiple groups or multiple participants would be more convenient. Use-case: Custom Dynamic Participant Step Current/Experienced Behavior: ParticipantStepChooser, getParticipant()'s method return type is currently String, which means we can only return a group or a participant in the method. Improved/Expected Behavior: A provision to return multiple groups or multiple participants in getParticipant() Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name: <Confidential> Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add "Page Locked" to the List / Column view. At the moment, it seems to be available only on the Card View. Use-case: The authors would like to see if the page is locked in a Site Admin overview Current/Experienced Behavior: The "Page Locked" is only displayed as an icon in the Card View Improved/Expected Behavior: The List / Column view displays the Lock Icon for locked pages Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.16 Touch UI Interface Customer-name/Organization name: Swisscom Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Zusammenfassung der Funktionsverbesserungsanfrage (RFE): It is possible to go within brandportal into the admin-search-rail and edit the mimetype path for - filetypes.But it is not possible to create mimetypes a mimetype predicate folder that includes only the relevant options.Currently the mimetype within /libs/dam/options/predicates/mimetypes includes so many useless options that it is not useful. Make it possible to create a filetype search that includes only relevant filetypes. Anwendungsfall: Currently the filetype lists the following options: imagesweb -jpg-gif-png-pjpegbitmap-tiff (X)-photoshop-xcf-x-bmp-icon-bmp-ppm-pbm-pnmvector-illustrator-odg-svg-raw-dng-crw-cr2-nrwdocuments-wordpressing-word-ole2-word-ooxml-odt-pdf-html-rtf-text-docxspreadsheets-ods-excelexcel ole2excel ooxmlpresentation-odp-powerpoint-powerpoint-ole2-powerpoint-ooxml-print-indesign-postscript-pdf-quark multimediaaudio-aac-midi-3gpp-mp3-mp4-mpeg-ogg-vorbis-realaudio-wav-wmavideo-dvi-flv-mp4-mpeg-ogg-quicktime-wmv-webm-other-flash-airarchives-tgz-jar-rar-tar-zip Aktuelles/erlebtes Verhalten: User are searching way to long to find the correct option in there and on top there they find many interesting checkboxes that gave them the impression we use quark files, and rtfs but 90% of the options in here do not give them any results. To many irrelevant options are not good and they confuse the users. Verbessertes/erwartetes Verhalten: Make this already existing option field into something that can be used. There are way to many useless options in here. Umgebungsdetails (AEM-Version/Service Pack, ggf. weitere Angaben): Currently AEMaaCS 2023.7.12549.20230704T084019Z Name des Kunden/der Organisation: medi GmbH & Co. KG Screenshot (sofern zutreffend): Code-Paket (sofern zutreffend):
Currently, we cannot limit access to specific folders for users. This could be a helpful security measure, as it would allow us to control who has access to sensitive data. This feature would be especially useful for organizations that onboard new users or share instance access with third parties on a regular basis. I believe that this feature would be a valuable addition to any organization's security toolkit. Thoughts are welcome!
When a custom object record is created it is associated with a person or company record based on the link field. When that company or person is merged with another record, where the other record is the surviving one, the connection of the custom object is not carried across to the surviving record. Instead it becomes an "orphaned" record. It would be wildly helpful to be able to carry this association across in a merge. There are other scenarios too where it can be extremely unhelpful that custom object records cannot be corrected to associate with a different record after creation.
It's great that users can log time in WF via the Creative Cloud WF plugin. However, some of our teams are pretty strict on adding notes when logging time, and this is not currently available in the plugin, so it is an obstacle to get some teams to use this. Thanks for considering!
Description - Add Updates to Boards for commenting similar to functionality in Microsoft Planner Why is this feature important to you - Comments made on the project progress could be date/time stamped How would you like the feature to work - Similar to other objects in Workfront, Boards would have Updates Current Behaviour - Boards do not have Updates
On the Notifications Page, it would be very nice to be able to mark messages as "seen" without having to go into the project or "mark all as seen." Users are often included on notifications as FYI and don't need to go into the project when they have read all the information they need in notifications. This is tantamount to being required to open a message in Outlook versus reading it in the preview pane in order to clear your inbox. @120563 Halverson
DescriptionSystem Admins can restore objects from the Recycle Bin. But, users have to ask every time to get something restored, and many users don't even know the capability exists so may never ask the System Admin to restore something. Each user should have their own Recycle Bin that displays only the objects they've deleted (or owned and someone else deleted) and allow them to restore their own deleted objects. Why is this feature important to youIt will provide additional control to users and make them happy. How would you like the feature to workAdd a Recycle Bin icon to the Waffle Menu. If a user clicks on it, they see only the things that they deleted (or were the owner and someone else deleted), and can restore. Bonus Points for enhancing Access Levels to restrict/allow certain users to restore items they've deleted. Retain the ability for admins to restore anything from System Setup. Current BehaviourOnly admins can restore deleted objects.
Description - Prior to Workfront's "New Experience" we had a lot of functionality, flexibility and customizability with a user landing page. (For those of you who are new to Workfront, the user landing page is the page you are taken to when you click on a user name, that currently shows you their updates, org chart, PTO, and a few details about them. The previous incarnation of this page used to show a lot more than this) This previous functionality was primarily used by team leads as a way to quickly monitor their direct reports, and by admins as a way to quickly take in a user's particulars and footprint in the system. Some of the functionality and areas that was lost in transitioning over to the New Experience include the achievements tab, the ability to see what a user was working on, the ability to put custom tabs (aka sections) on a user object, and the ability to rearrange tabs and specify a hierarchy of what is seen first. Many of these features are what is currently available on other objects such as Projects, Tasks and Issues. We dutifully registered a lot of feedback prior to transition, none of which landed. Current Behaviour - The user landing page currently is a place we go to in order to check their org chart, or the few fields we put on a custom form to indicate their particulars. However, we're unable to move these tabs in order to have them appear "first" -- so this always costs us a few extra mouseclicks. We're also unable to customize and place more comprehensive dashboards that would give us a better indication of the user's footprint in the system, such as what they are working on or items they own, and must instead rely on creating or editing dashboards to indicate this on a per user basis. (this latter costs us a lot more than a few mouseclicks) How would you like the feature to work - I would like an exact return to the functionality from what is known as "Workfront Classic". This would include the ability to place a custom dashboard on the user landing page and re-order the sections on the landing page in order to produce a more efficient default view of each user. It also mirrors the functionality in the majority of other objects in Workfront such as Projects, Portfolios, Programs, Tasks and Issues. Why is this feature important to you - a large part of our admin's work centers around understanding specific elements of a user, that are not currently covered by the user landing page, and must be created/recreated through extensive reporting (the recent post about Blueprint for a departing user is a good example -- 13 reports which we would have to customize with each user's name, vs the ability to add a custom section that would incorporate this on a user object and require no further customization). Similarly, this is something team leads would find useful, either in a similar situation (one of their team members departing) or even just as a regular check of what this team mate is working on, without a need to compose separate reports for each team member, fight through report prompt functionality, or view team members in aggregate. Lastly, there are reasons you provided this functionality for the majority of objects in Workfront, and we want to leverage the benefits around those reasons as well. Reference link to blueprint: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/workfront-discussions/blueprint-released-offboarding-departing-user-dashboard/td-p/604145 -------------------------------- If you liked this idea, please like my other ideas at https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/17528599/contributions/ideas?filter=authored --------------------------------
Allow/ Create a section under user profile, so one can update their primary/ key skills, secondary skills & interested skillset to enhance and focus. This will be useful to view the competency report of an user (usually designers) which will further help and allow resourcing team to view the users before assigning the right project. This should also help in adding the right skill type to resource pool, project management & allow managers to help users skill up.
Description - When we fill out a queue form in the Requests area, a checkbox field will automatically show the All option. However, when using the Preview function for the custom form or, in the queue project, using the Add Issue function, the All option doesn't appear.Why is this feature important to you - It's important for all variations of a custom form to be presented with the same user experience. For example, when I'm building a new form and need a stakeholder to review the user experience, they should see the All box with a checkbox field. I've had more than one instance in which the stakeholder comes back and says, "I don't want that All checkbox." I could have had this conversation sooner.How would you like the feature to work - When testing a form with the Preview button or entering an issue using the Add Issue button of the queue project, the All box should appear.
The fact that you cannot embed screenshots in the description or updates is a major flaw. I get that you can attach them as documents in a different tab, but they are difficult to open (you get either a tiny thumbnail that you cannot see or open it in a new window). Especially for bugs it is nice to say, "it looks like this: [X] " and I expected this: [X]" using inline images. We basically post these images in teams because there is no other way.
Hi,I have noticed that if I use a pdf with links in a custom form (used in a request queue), after clicking them they open in the same window. When you then click back, you do not get to the request but to the main 'Requests' page. Thus, the requestor needs to again select their request queue, select queue topics, etc. This is bad customer experience.My suggestion is to make the links open in a new window by default.BestJustyna
Description - Add a functionality or filter within the Resource Planner to only show Projects that a User has Planned Hours for within the designated timeframe. Currently, if a user can be assigned to a number of projects which will display despite having zero hours assigned to which creates a very long list. This filter can show only the pertinent projects someone is focused on.Why is this feature important to you - Creates a refined list of projects with planned hours making it easier to understand who's actively working on what. How would you like the feature to work - Add a default filter for Projects with Planned Hours Only and exclude Projects where a user has 0 Planned Hours during the set duration.Current Behaviour - All projects will display that a user is assigned to regardless if a user has planned hours or not which creates a very lengthly list.
Somehow it doesn't seem possible to trigger off the program member field "webinar url" being populated. This has best practice programs putting in random wait steps in the registration process for the field to be populated before the confirmation email is sent. If we could trigger off this field being populated in the same way as is possible for other program member fields this process could be made much more reliable.
Description - For our Global Setup, we are interested in receiving Analytics Data Feeds via Delta Share or Data BricksDelta Share: https://www.databricks.com/Data Bricks: https://www.databricks.com/Why is this feature important to you - Current approach for Data feeds with few export options isnt scalable for our global setup. With Delta share or data bricks, it will optimize the data export/ingestion in our systems.How would you like the feature to work - Data feeds becomes available over Delta Share or Data BricksCurrent Behaviour - Data Feeds are supported only via few data export options like azure, google cloud platform, etc.
Issue: Users can currently enter more than 24 hours for a single day in Workfront timesheets.Desired Behavior: Display an error message when total hours on a day exceed 24 hours.
As part of 23.2 release, the option to post a comment on each project during a batch update was removed. This is a feature that we used on a very regular basis for cleanups, etc. Please reinstate this feature!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
