Build better products with our product team
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Query Preformance and QueryBuilder to be available to customers on AEM as a Cloud Service Publish tier Use-case: Currently the Query performance tool /libs/granite/operations/content/diagnosistools/queryPerformance.htmland Query debugger /libs/cq/search/content/querydebug.htmlare not available to customers on AEM as Cloud Service even from the Developer ConsoleThis is useful when customer wants to perform a query on publisher for troubleshooting purposes or if they want to validate something. This is useful for Assets Implementation Projects using Publish tier as well. Current/Experienced Behavior: Not available to customers on AEM as Cloud Service even from the Developer Console. Improved/Expected Behavior: Make it available to customers on AEM as Cloud Service even from the Developer Console. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as Cloud Service , AEM Assets as Cloud Service Customer-name/Organization name: N/A - This is a general feature enhancement request Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Would like to have the flexibility to include the reference number that typically resides on the project overview tab, to be shown on the overall project header. our designers use this number in the naming conventions of their documents and this would be a quicker way to see the number at a glance. I realize not everyone would want this view, but if it were an option for everyone then we could choose
As an automation platform, tracking leads in a holistic manner is crucial. Currently, if your Marketo platform has an additional dedupe rule set other than just an email address, it won't differentiate between leads if the same browser has been used to fill out the form. Let's take an example: Let's say your Marketo platform has a customized dedupe rule of Email + Last name. Ideally when a lead 'A' fills out the form entering both of the parameters exactly the same as per an old lead that exists in the database then it should update the corresponding lead in Marketo else it should create a new lead. Old lead present in Marketo database: email: alokbiswas1@gmail.com, Last name: Biswas New lead fills the form with details: email: alokbiswas1@gmail.com, Last name: Biswas Then the same old lead should get updated. New lead fills another form with details: email: alokbiswas1@gmail.com, Last name: Alok Ideally, a new lead should get created as the 'Last name' is different. Current Issue1: So, when the lead fills multiple forms or even the same form in the same browser, then the old lead is getting updated even if the lead enters a different 'Last name' every time. As per Marketo, it's happening due to the cookies in the browser. Ideally, this concept contradicts the concept of the de-dupe rule Current Issue2: Let's say your Marketo platform has a customized dedupe rule of Email + workspace. Ideally when a lead 'A' fills out the form of workspace 'A' and the same lead fills the form of workspace 'B', then it should create duplicate leads instead of updating the existing one. For now, it will update the existing lead in case the second form fill happens in the same browser due to cookies. Suggestion: So, Marketo should enhance its tracking in the upcoming releases. As we have workspace-level Munchkins as well. Basically, if a lead opens the LP of workspace 'A', its respective munchkin should be linked with the lead record. When the same lead opens another LP of workspace 'B', then it should not link with the munchkin of workspace 'A' and should treat it differently.
Problem: The following filters have limited operator filters and cannot drill down to Date and TIME of activity: - Was Sent Email - Opened Email - Clicked Link in Email Impact: When Marketo has an outage (Recent outage #202305030020) that creates an issue isolated to a specific time frame (Example: 7 AM to 10 AM PT on May 3rd), and Marketo users cannot react to that issue effectively. In this recent outage, anyone who clicked a link in an email within that timeframe was faced with a 404 issue. This resulted in a poor customer experience (cannot access desired content) and lack of trust in our brand (looks like we made an avoidable mistake). Suggestion: Expand on filter operators and filter options so users can drill down into more specific timeframes. Here are some examples:
I'd like to see parent tasks automatically attach the milestones to the child tasks.We need reporting to pull all tasks associated with a milestone phase to see summary duration, planned hours, actual hours on all tasks under that Milestone regardless of the Parent Task Name or Project Name. Currently, the milestone only is can only relate to one task.
We are in the process of implementing time tracking, and in our current maturity model, we only want to track time on the project level, not at the task level (I know we'll get there soon, but for the sake of simplicity....). Can we add something under Preferences, or even a simple filter, to remove tasks from timesheets? And have that be determined on the Group level?
Problem: Marketo has no way currently to pause the sending of ALL emails in an instance. Impact: When Marketo has an outage that results in redirects not working for all links, this creates a very poor experience for email recipients. In this case (Recent outage#202305030020), the 404 page is not descriptive or helpful for the recipient, and they are more likely to unsubscribe and not trust our brand. We also continue to perpetuate the issue as emails continue to send emails with links that will not work. Suggestion: Build a way for Marketo admins to pause and later reactivate sending of ALL emails across an instance.
Description - I don't see a way to do min/max on an Area Chart. Was wondering if this is something quick that can be added to the chart options. Sometimes I don't want to have to hover to bring up the numbers, and it would help a report viewer, at a glance, see if our numbers look better month over month for the max of the chart, for example. Why is this feature important to you - It helps round out features for each chart type available, especially such a similar chart to the line chart - the area chartHow would you like the feature to work - I'd like the area chart to feature a min/max, just like the line chart. Current Behaviour - There is no min/max to the area chart currently.
Description - I thought I was being smart when I set up segments to contain learning assets for each product, then collected those inside segments for the business units that "own" the product, and then nested the BU version into larger org structures. I figured that this way, I could update, say, the product segment and that would populate to the BU and larger org segments. Or that if I updated a smaller segment inside one of the larger ones, the update would cascade down to the product segment. The result has been that if a new asset was created, the changes are only applied to whatever I directly edit. I have to go add the new item everywhere that the related segments are nested into other segments. It is frustrating and time consuming and ultimately can lead to errors where not everything was properly updated. I can see why it might not be desirable for this to be automatic for some use cases, but a toggle to turn on change inheritance would be great. Why is this feature important to you - It would automate manually intensive labor to avoid errors and free up time to focus on bigger work. How would you like the feature to work - Say that I create 26 segments, each for files starting with a letter of the alphabet. Then I create a nested segment including segments a-c, d-f, etc. And then finally, I used the nested segments (a-c, etc.) to create a larger nested segment containing all of the alphabet segments.Then I get 3 new assets, each a different letter of the alphabet. When adding these, I want to make the change once for each. Whether that's in the exact letter segment (a, b, etc), in the nested segments a-c, d-f, etc, or in the larger nested segment of all of the alphabet, I want that change to be automatically applied to all of these in the right places so I don't have to do it individually for each of the 3 new assets.
Description - We need to take the ability to include images in Adobe Analytics descriptions to the NEXT LEVEL. Just as simply as I can copy and paste an image into Experience League, then resize it, I should be able to do the exact same thing in Adobe Analytics Workspace.Why is this feature important to you - One word: SECURITY! For anyone in my organization to see the data I'm displaying in Adobe Analytics, what do they have to do? You guessed it, they have to LOGIN. The problem with the functionality right now is I still have to use a site that may not be as secure as some might wish it to be, even if the place I'm posting my image is considered "hidden."How would you like the feature to work - I want it to work exactly like the functionality in Experience League. I would like to be able to either upload an image or simply copy/paste an image right into the description of any section I'm working within Adobe Analytics, resize it, and voilà!Current Behavior - The only way I may successfully place an image into Adobe Analytics Workspace is to host the image externally where the URL is available publicly - thus the potential root of the problem for any number of customers who may wish to use imagery they may wish to keep secured.
Description -As pointed out in https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/multiple-black-colours-when-using-colour-palette-in-text/td-p/590810 Some of the colour options available in the colour pallet work well for Light Mode and not for Dark Mode... since Light/Dark mode is left to each user to choose, it can be hard to ensure that descriptions and notes are properly visible. While the colour pallet does oscillate between shades, the readability of those shades isn't exactly equal. Perhaps WCAG's colour contrast checker could be used to ensure that shades meet the accessibility standards in each mode, but providing options with similar contrast balance. In addition, to help report creators see what the colours might look like, I am suggesting that the pallets for light/dark be shown with a sample so that the creator doesn't need to switch their modes constantly to see the result. Why is this feature important to you -Notes, descriptions, text blocks, etc are important to provide context to the reports... if these can't be read, they are no longer doing their job. How would you like the feature to work -I am suggesting to display the colour pallet showing both variations (the selection box with a diagonal slash showing the Light Mode variant on the top left and the Dark Mode variant on the bottom right) and providing a Light/Dark Mode Preview sample.The preview should change with hovering over a colour, and when not hovering, show the current selection (The text could just be coded to "Sample", it doesn't need to reflect the actual text in the description) In addition, the colour option in the top right (position 5) the colour contrast in Light Mode is quite different from the contrast in Dark Mode... I would suggest reviewing the colours against WCAG Contrast Checkers to find colours that site within a similar contrast range The Light Mode Variant (Cyan on White) has a contrast ratio of 1.66:1The Dark Mode Variant (Dark Blue on Grey) has a contrast ratio of 1.85:1(Both technically fail WCAG at default font sizes, but the Cyan is more readable) Current Behaviour -There is no way to preview the colour options without switching between Light and Dark mode.. this takes extra time that a lot of report curators wouldn't normally take. The colour options aren't completely one to one between Light and Dark Mode when it comes to readability.. making some information significantly harder to read when in certain modes.
Currently in Adobe Analytics, I have text field elements for recurring, monthly reports that I must manually change before I can send them out.Description:I would like the ability to drag certain components (date ranges, eVars, segments, etc.) into my Text field and choose to display the title or value represented within that component.For example, if I dragged in a date range, it would display the beginning and end date, or if it was Last Month, then Month-YYYY.Why is this feature important to you:I have a number of reports where these are the ONLY updates I need to make, whereas the rolling date ranges inside the reports automatically update themselves. If I can then have these dynamic elements, I would only need to make a periodic QA check of the contents and focus my energies elsewhere. This would be a much-appreciated productivity enhancement for me.How would you like the feature to work:Similar to the diagram above, I would like to either drag and drop a component (easiest) or type in a variable that represents the value I would like to display when the text field is not in EDIT mode (i.e., when the checkmark and 'x' are displayed).If I drag a component into the text area containing more than one value, I would like the option to choose or search for the value I would like to display from a list of existing values, OR, I can choose a value from the List of Items within a component to drag into my text area.A bonus for this feature would allow me, AFTER a component with multiple values is dragged into my text area, I can select it in-line and choose a different value to display, if/when needed.
Description - Unlike all other fields in the Cloud Connector, like the headers and query parameters, it’s not possible to load a data element into the URL.Why is this feature important to you - This makes it impossible to use the Cloud Connector for dynamic URLs, which is common practice in a lot of data streaming platformsHow would you like the feature to work - to have the possibility to add a data element in the URL, the same way as with a query parameterCurrent Behaviour - there is no possibility to do this, so requests with a dynamic URL have to be written in Custom Code
Description - I'd like to be able to copy and paste dropdowns.Why is this feature important to you - Dropdowns are very valuable and it's a pain to manually create them in each panelHow would you like the feature to work - the same way it's possible to copy and paste dropdowns.Current Behaviour - They are stuck to a panel and they're stuck on the position you place them in the panel.
Description - Can we have a feature to identify users who are online / away / Out Of Office? It helps to know when we are responding to comments by tagging them and will not expect an instant reply if we know. Something similar to Office 365 - MST Teams and OutlookWhy is this feature important to you - To collaborate better and faster if we know someone is online/OOOHow would you like the feature to work - when notifying the user on comments / viewing tasks of the user, a Green dot indicates user is online and so forth.Current Behaviour - no indication of user being away / online / OOO
It would be very helpful to have a badge showing the Person Count of a Static List, saving time in checking the Status section, especially when reviewing many Static Lists at once (e.g., checking if all Static Lists of a Program have a Person Count of 0 before running the Campaigns).
It would be great if it would be possible to create a "dynamic module" where you ould add different content based on the segmentation the lead is in. For example different text, image and button (label + URL). Currently buttons "href" cannot made dynamic and you need to create a new email that has this different content.
Currently there is no option to choose the time to send subscription list and we only have daily, every weekdays. It would be great to enhance it by adding the time option to send subscription smart list.
We would like to be able to put Marketo user accounts in deactivated status without having to count that person as a seat within our contracted amount. We like being able to see who exactly made a change to Marketo activities even if that person is no longer with the company. Right now, we have 25 contracted user seats (including API users), so we are challenged on being able to keep the user activity history while also staying within our contracted user limits. Our recommended solution is to standardized a deactivated user role and not count users with that role in the contracted limits. We also recommend not including the API users within the contracted limits.
I would like an announcement banner/ribbon system admins can use to make temporary, system wide announcements. For instance, a lot of us will be OOO for Spring Break. I would like to add a banner to let everyone know weekly intake will be canceled that week. I know we have the Notifications/Announcements sections, but users don't always check those daily or weekly. The banner would be highlighted at the top of the screen and everyone would see it every time they open Workfront. I know the capability is there because a yellow banner appeared informing everyone that our instance expired Dec and needed renewing. I know everyone saw it because it caused a slight panic. lol It would be great if we could select the colors for the banner background to indicate the level of priority and select the timeframe the banner would appear. Currently we send an email from our Governance mailbox for these notifications to increase the likelihood users will read the message. Thank you!
The typeahead field on Custom Forms is designed to only have one selection not multiple. We would like the ability to have multiple users entered. For example, we have a field for "Supporting PM", but there may be more than one on larger projects.
Description - Task lists collapsed by default, or at least option of making that the defaultWhy is this feature important to you - Many of our projects have a large number of tasks, and most users end up collapsing the tasks anyhow so we would like to be able to skip that step by having everything default as collapsed. How would you like the feature to work - A systemwide default setting to have tasks lists collapsedCurrent Behaviour - Task lists currently expanded by default and require the user to collapse the task list each time they visit a project schedule
It would be nice to be able to create segments in a test environment to test filtering data through that segment, but then, instead of re-creating all of the segments for a production environment, just transfer them from one report suite to another.
Description - We would like the option to format a date field to show Date and Time on the Header within a Layout Template Why is this feature important to you - Working in an agency environment, our tasks are due in hours not days. Our users work out of their Work List to see work items assigned to them. They use the time due to help prioritize their tasks. We have added the Planned Completion Date to the Task header page to show at the top of the Task page and the Task Summary Panel on the Home page, but it only shows the Date due not the time due. When assignees click on the Planned Completion Date field in the Header to view the time due in the Calendar popup window, it changes the task constraint to MUST FINISH ON (even if they just view the calendar popup and don't modify the date or time). How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to Field Format a date field to show Date and Time not just Date in the Header within a Layout Template. I would like the functionality to be the same as in Reports where under Advanced Options you can select Field Format. Current Behaviour - When adding Planned Completion Date to the Header in a layout template it only shows the Date. If an assignee who has task editing access clicks on the Planned Completion Date field in the Header, even to just view the time from the calendar popup window, it changes the task constraint to MUST FINISH ON and breaks the waterfall timeline.
Description - Requesting the ability to resolve comments after proof is locked.Why is this feature important to you - Resolving comments helps production team keep track of which comments have been addressed and which have not. This is particularly important for very large proofs like email walk the wall where more than one person will be addressing comments.How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to resolve comments after proof is locked.Current Behaviour - Comments cannot be resolved unless proof is unlocked.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
