Build better products with our product team
JavaScript activity can give more extension to the workflow engine, and it can be very useful to have a logging interface. Adding js activity to the workflow and a dedicated admin interface to record data for tracking will be a powerful step for ACS.
It would be good to have a option to make it mandatory for a user to log time to a task before than can mark it as complete.
Description - Admins need the ability to govern their own instance. Showing menu items to users that they can never use just adds clutter and confusion to an already complex project management system. Admins should have the ability to show or hide EVERYTHING via layouts.Why is this feature important to you - The Product Managers are more and more taking away our ability to manage what our users see by introducing "features" that the user will never use and are sometimes against company policy, that we as admins cannot hide from them.How would you like the feature to work? - In the Layouts area, have a section for the "More" menu that allows us to hide or show the menu items individually (Add to Boards, Add to Iteration, Add to Kanban Board, Copy to..., Move to..., Duplicate)Current Behaviour - No ability for admins to set up an instance that actually guides the user through the Standard Operating Procedure for their organisation, by showing what the user needs and hiding what will just confuse them and possibly lead them to inadvertently break the rules, ie, copying tasks from 3 year old jobs that are assigned to people who no longer work here and have hard dates from 3 years ago. Or trying to add to a Board when they have no access to any Boards, and as an admin, neither do I.
Currently, although a sorting is defined in a report view, the user can set a own sorting by clicking on the column headers in the report. With this option, one faces the issue, that the default sorting of the report cannot be restored (neither by changing the view nor by the user himself - e.g. when multiple sort levels are defined). Only option is to reset the user preferences, which is not a good solution.We request either one of the following options:to be able to restrict own sorting on reports by userto be able to reset to default sorting directly in the report
As an Adobe Campaign Classic user, I would love it if the application had a general browser that would allow me to quickly find any item within the platform. Currently, I find it quite tedious to have to manually search through different sections and sub-menus to find what I need. Imagine having the ability to search for any template, audience profile, report or any other item by simply entering a keyword in a search field. This would save me a lot of time and effort, and allow me to be more efficient in my daily work. In addition, a general browser would also make the application easier to navigate and more accessible to new or inexperienced users. With an intuitive search tool, users could quickly find what they need without having to spend hours exploring the platform. In short, I think the addition of a general browser would be a great improvement for Adobe Campaign Classic and for users like me who work with the platform on a regular basis. It would simplify the search process and improve the overall user experience.
Description - Why is this feature important to you The primary reason for us to request this is to facilitate information sharing, which would improve readability and its integrity, since formatting it adequately would increase the probability to reach its destination as it was intended. The kind of information shared through this channel includes Project IDs, hashed of CNAME records, domain names, etc. which require to be transmitted exactly as they were generated. How would you like the feature to work Markdown is a relatively simple syntax to implement in these kind of systems and has a low performance cost. In case the support of a complete set of Markdown syntax capabilities is out of discussion, we would like to request the implementation of a "code block" syntax so the text inside it would be shown a mono-spaced type font (where all the characters have the same width and height). 2. Additionally we would like to request the support for key bindings inside the text boxes of the comments, to perform useful actions such as "send" the comment over the system (something similar to pressing the key combination of Control + Enter to finish the current comment and send it). This can improve our productivity by letting us to avoid using the mouse to click on the send button. This is currently supported on sub-comments (replies to parent comments) but not on top comments (parent comments). Current Behaviour - Support for a complete set or subset of Markdown syntax capabilities, you can see some examples at: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown * https://www.markdownguide.org/ * https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
We are migrating to new Adobe Experience Platform Launch for all our mobile apps, and the list of properties in Adobe Launch is growing. I do not see any ways to filter properties by companies, report suites, platforms, etc. Can we get some filters for the property list? Thanks!
The AdBridge ability to send a smart list / list over to Facebook Custom Audiences, LinkedIn, or Google Customer Match is great. But you still need to manually put these over to ensure it stays relevant. Wouldn't it be great if you could set it to keep the audience in sync hourly/daily? Or even in real time?Then, you could automatically drop customers out of ad sets when they have purchased, for example.
Description - Dont include "Parent Task- Do not Assign" on Overdue Task ReportsWhy is this feature important to you - I don't need to filter through 90 overdue tasks only to find 4 that are actually not parent tasks.How would you like the feature to work - Have an option to not include them in reports.Current Behaviour -
お世話になります。 トークンを使用している配信済みメールの内容を 配信後に確認する方法はありますか。 イベントの予約を受けたお客さまに、 予約日時のフィールドのトークンを使用したメールをトリガーキャンペーンで配信しています。 このとき、お客さまに実際に送付されたメールが意図した内容になっているか不安で、 確認できればいいな…と思っていたのですが、方法はございますでしょうか。 アイデアをいただければ幸いです。 どうぞよろしくお願いいたします。
It would be extremely useful to be able to utilize $TriggerObject in Email Script Tokens for the "<Custom Object Name> is Updated" trigger, in addition to the "Added to Opportunity", "Opportunity is Updated", and "Added to <Custom Object Name>" triggers. This would provide the following benefits: Increased flexibility in Email sends using VTL tokens Increased efficiency in API use Increased scope of Custom Object use
Try to do a workflow with a query and a List Update activities Then you have your results like that @campaignerforlife @heku_
Description - Our Resource Managers would love a feature that allows us to move resources around within WLB Why is this feature important to you - As our resource team increases, it would be simpler to be able to move & view for example a writer and designer's capacity next to each other vs creating a filter.How would you like the feature to work - Resource Manager simply moves resources around within WLBCurrent Behaviour - 2 options: sort by primary role or alpha order; Or adding a filter
Description -Why is this feature important to you - It is possible that this feature is important for project managers who want to avoid cluttering their team members' inboxes with notifications for tasks that have already been completed. This could help improve communication efficiency and reduce unnecessary distractions for team members.How would you like the feature to work - If this feature is implemented, it could work by allowing project managers to configure the project settings to disable notifications for completed tasks. Alternatively, it could be implemented as a user preference, where team members can choose to receive or not receive notifications for completed tasks.Current Behaviour - No option to change notification specific to this settings.
It would be great if you could create a Preview Mode where you can open a preview space and then skip through all assets in the program in preview mode.
Choice selections can be sorted A-Z, but not Z-A. Add option to sort Z-A
Description -Measuring the time between events is an area that is often asked about by our users of Adobe Analytics and is an important measure of improvement for many processes. At the moment if we want to find the time between events we can set custom code up for each specific scenario and pass this into an event, build some calculated metrics etc. but this is a very clunky and inflexible way to operate. I can't help thinking this is an area that Adobe could do something really special in. I'm imagining a new visualisation that you could drop 2 events into and it would spit out a whole host of metrics and visualisations (average time, histogram of time take with minute buckets, average time trended over time, percentiles etc.). Why is this feature important to you -Time between events is important metric for our Adobe Analytics users and there is no out of the box support for it (solutions seem to require custom coding which is comparably inflexible). How would you like the feature to work -New workspace visualisationCurrent Behaviour -No out of the box support
Description - there should be a count of text updates made to a project in the side navigation, like there are for documents and issues. Why is this feature important to you - good for multiple users in the project to know that there have been updates made even if they are not a part of that task or comment that was made in the updates. and to keep track of how many updates there are/have been.How would you like the feature to work - include an count icon of the updates just like there are for documents and issuesCurrent Behaviour - no count of the updates
DescriptionWhen a System Admin accesses a sandbox environment, the blue banner at top displays the scheduled refresh date. When non-admin users access a sandbox, the blue banner at top does not display the scheduled refresh date.We would like all users to see the scheduled refresh date, even if they can't schedule or cancel a refresh.Why is this feature important to youUsers become frustrated when they lose data to a refresh for which they did not have an indication was about to happen.How would you like the feature to workJust display the scheduled refresh date of a sandbox to all users, instead of system admins only.Current BehaviourUsers who access a sandbox environment aren't shown when the next refresh is scheduled.
I would like to have the full page available with only 1 click of "+ New User" rather than locked behind the "Show Advanced Options" button.Furthermore, when I do click the "Show Advanced Options" button, or if it were to be the first thing to open automatically, I would greatly prefer for it to not auto-populate the Group and Access Level, especially because it automatically assigns the System Administrator access level.Why is this feature important to you - Less clicking I'd have to do, less chance of accidentally giving someone System Admin access in the wrong group.
Description - Adding the ability to show the planned hours allocation at the individual level in the task / work list view for Planned Hours. Why is this feature important to you - Giving our team quick and accurate allocated hours for their portion of tasks without having to create individual tasks for everyone and everything when they are done together. How would you like the feature to work - Show for the user in their task / work list the planned hours that they are assigned specifically. Current Behaviour - Right now if you have a shared task for 3 people for an internal kick off meeting with each person having .5 hours each that task for the individual in their work list would show the Planned Hours as 1.5.
Sometimes, the display names on report prompts are confusing to the end-user. For example, on a Task Report, a prompt for "task name" just says "name" -- we need to be able to update this to make it more clear.We cannot do this by rewriting the prompt as a custom prompt, because in doing so we lose to ability to allow the user to change the condition of that prompt. Plus, that would be a cumbersome process just to change the display name.
Description When we create a segment, we have to wait till the next day till the segment is filled. But many times, we actually want to use the segment instantly and check the number of customer profiles in the segment. The only way to do this quickly now is to do an API call, but that's not a marketeer-friendly solution. We would expect a button to build up the segment instantly or for it to be done by saving the segment, as available in other (ESP) software. Why is this feature important to you To be able to work fast with segments and don't have to wait days. If you now create a segment and make a small mistake, you probably discover it the next day. But then you change it and have to wait another day till the segment is filled again. How would you like the feature to work - Instantly build the segment instead of doing one batch a day, or have a button do the batch right away.
Description - When trying to add tasks, projects, or issues to a timesheet the default filter is everything over anytime a user has had access to (assigned to them or not). Since it's a timesheet, it really should be specific to a user. While there are filter options available, my users find it difficult to manage and use these for adding items that haven't populated onto a timesheet and then because the filters are sticky when they navigate back to a different area of workfront the filters are applied and they have to un-apply them. Why is this feature important to you - this is important because my users want a system that is easy to navigate for the end user. The more clicks they have to make the more frustrated they get and adoption is already hard enough. How would you like the feature to work - Have a filter option that is specific to the user viewing their timesheet and timesheets area. Preference would be filtering that doesn't stick when navigating back to another area of the tool. Current Behaviour - Users have to filter for "my XXXX"
Description - Need request queue/forms to be able to include proofs as a document. Why is this feature important to you - requesters need to reference proofs of their needs as a part of their request when submitting to our team. How would you like the feature to work - We need to form to funtion/include access to proofs as documents they can include. Current Behaviour - no where to include proofs as a document on a request in the form.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
