Build better products with our product team
The AdBridge ability to send a smart list / list over to Facebook Custom Audiences, LinkedIn, or Google Customer Match is great. But you still need to manually put these over to ensure it stays relevant. Wouldn't it be great if you could set it to keep the audience in sync hourly/daily? Or even in real time?Then, you could automatically drop customers out of ad sets when they have purchased, for example.
It would be extremely useful to be able to utilize $TriggerObject in Email Script Tokens for the "<Custom Object Name> is Updated" trigger, in addition to the "Added to Opportunity", "Opportunity is Updated", and "Added to <Custom Object Name>" triggers. This would provide the following benefits: Increased flexibility in Email sends using VTL tokens Increased efficiency in API use Increased scope of Custom Object use
Try to do a workflow with a query and a List Update activities Then you have your results like that @campaignerforlife @heku_
It would be great if you could create a Preview Mode where you can open a preview space and then skip through all assets in the program in preview mode.
Choice selections can be sorted A-Z, but not Z-A. Add option to sort Z-A
Description -Measuring the time between events is an area that is often asked about by our users of Adobe Analytics and is an important measure of improvement for many processes. At the moment if we want to find the time between events we can set custom code up for each specific scenario and pass this into an event, build some calculated metrics etc. but this is a very clunky and inflexible way to operate. I can't help thinking this is an area that Adobe could do something really special in. I'm imagining a new visualisation that you could drop 2 events into and it would spit out a whole host of metrics and visualisations (average time, histogram of time take with minute buckets, average time trended over time, percentiles etc.). Why is this feature important to you -Time between events is important metric for our Adobe Analytics users and there is no out of the box support for it (solutions seem to require custom coding which is comparably inflexible). How would you like the feature to work -New workspace visualisationCurrent Behaviour -No out of the box support
Description - there should be a count of text updates made to a project in the side navigation, like there are for documents and issues. Why is this feature important to you - good for multiple users in the project to know that there have been updates made even if they are not a part of that task or comment that was made in the updates. and to keep track of how many updates there are/have been.How would you like the feature to work - include an count icon of the updates just like there are for documents and issuesCurrent Behaviour - no count of the updates
DescriptionWhen a System Admin accesses a sandbox environment, the blue banner at top displays the scheduled refresh date. When non-admin users access a sandbox, the blue banner at top does not display the scheduled refresh date.We would like all users to see the scheduled refresh date, even if they can't schedule or cancel a refresh.Why is this feature important to youUsers become frustrated when they lose data to a refresh for which they did not have an indication was about to happen.How would you like the feature to workJust display the scheduled refresh date of a sandbox to all users, instead of system admins only.Current BehaviourUsers who access a sandbox environment aren't shown when the next refresh is scheduled.
I would like to have the full page available with only 1 click of "+ New User" rather than locked behind the "Show Advanced Options" button.Furthermore, when I do click the "Show Advanced Options" button, or if it were to be the first thing to open automatically, I would greatly prefer for it to not auto-populate the Group and Access Level, especially because it automatically assigns the System Administrator access level.Why is this feature important to you - Less clicking I'd have to do, less chance of accidentally giving someone System Admin access in the wrong group.
Description - Adding the ability to show the planned hours allocation at the individual level in the task / work list view for Planned Hours. Why is this feature important to you - Giving our team quick and accurate allocated hours for their portion of tasks without having to create individual tasks for everyone and everything when they are done together. How would you like the feature to work - Show for the user in their task / work list the planned hours that they are assigned specifically. Current Behaviour - Right now if you have a shared task for 3 people for an internal kick off meeting with each person having .5 hours each that task for the individual in their work list would show the Planned Hours as 1.5.
Description - When trying to add tasks, projects, or issues to a timesheet the default filter is everything over anytime a user has had access to (assigned to them or not). Since it's a timesheet, it really should be specific to a user. While there are filter options available, my users find it difficult to manage and use these for adding items that haven't populated onto a timesheet and then because the filters are sticky when they navigate back to a different area of workfront the filters are applied and they have to un-apply them. Why is this feature important to you - this is important because my users want a system that is easy to navigate for the end user. The more clicks they have to make the more frustrated they get and adoption is already hard enough. How would you like the feature to work - Have a filter option that is specific to the user viewing their timesheet and timesheets area. Preference would be filtering that doesn't stick when navigating back to another area of the tool. Current Behaviour - Users have to filter for "my XXXX"
Description - Need request queue/forms to be able to include proofs as a document. Why is this feature important to you - requesters need to reference proofs of their needs as a part of their request when submitting to our team. How would you like the feature to work - We need to form to funtion/include access to proofs as documents they can include. Current Behaviour - no where to include proofs as a document on a request in the form.
Description - Functionality that will allow people to collaborate on and plan projects/initiatives over a campaign, season, or year (or any timespan) with the ability to assign level of effort/resource needs, at a high level. I understand that Scenario Planner is a thing but it is much too granular to be usable for our purposes. We're trying to look at a holistic high level scope of the year ahead for the entire Marketing department while giving ourselves a high level idea of the level of effort for the initiatives, comparing them to the resources we have. We'd like to be able to combine projects currently in progress along with potential project ideas or anything else that hasn't made it down the pike and been submitted as an official project yet. Why is this feature important to you - Our organization struggles with visibility into what scale of initiatives are actually feasible with the resources on-hand vs what we should actually be prioritizing or where/how we can create more space to do more innovative and experimental Marketing initiatives. We've always just worked with whatever needs to get done, no matter what, but to have the tools and ability to plan ahead for the future and actually be able to more quantitatively back up our position on our planned portfolio of work would help immensely with our confidence in planning.How would you like the feature to work - It could be similar to how the current Scenario Planner works but just at a much higher level without the ability to need to assign hours/FTEs to individual roles per month. That is an extremely tedious process, especially to do over and over again over the course of all the projects we have over a year, and something that can function at a higher level with far less tedium would help. Also the ability to have the tool be collaborative while establishing owners of each initiative/project idea would help us to have better visibility into the high-level plan while seeing into each Integrated Marketing channel.Current Behaviour - We are looking into utilizing Smart Sheet for this level of planning since there is nothing in Workfront that really has been able to work the way we want it to, but we would like to have the ability to keep it all within Workfront.
Description - There are still some settings that can't be managed at the group level and only at the system level but should be able to be group specific. Not all groups share the same process for getting work done and shouldn't have to be dictated by the System Admin and applied globally across the system. Make these available to group admins to set up.Approval SettingsPrioritiesSeveritiesConditionsProof SettingsReview and ApprovalResource Management - Calculate Resource Availability Using:Risk Types Why is this feature important to you - This is important because it's impacting workflows of different groups across our organization. We are having to write processes that include ignoring settings that are in there for other groups or creating our own version of these fields within a custom form - example one group uses a priority of Normal while another group doesn't and needs to only see Low, Medium, High. Another example is that the approval settings have to be set at the system level so while one group might Allow editing the custom form when the project, task or issue is in pending approval status another group might need to lock this down for stricter auditing purposes. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the feature to work similar to the other project/task/issue preferences areas where it can be set at a global level but then a system admin could say they can update or not. Current Behaviour - The whole system has to use the same settings.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Knowing the density of a mobile device (DPI, Dots per Inch) is helpful for mobile developers to understand the requirements of the app users. How would you like the feature to work - An additional mobile dimension named something like "Mobile Screen Density" would capture the dpi of the device a visitor uses. Current Behaviour - This is not an ootb dimension
We are onboarding hundreds of new users and as such they explore Workfront. Many have found the Request button that is on the New Task menu (see below) that lives on the Workfront Home area. When you use this button it allows you to input a request, assign it to whoever you want and it creates a Personal project plan for the person. No notifications, no one is typically aware its been input....its literally a blank project plan, owned by the person you assigned with no tasks and under Requests/Issues lives this item you input. Impacted behavior - The Request button provides an unintentional option for users to subvert the standard intake/request processes with connected custom forms and all the other good stuff that WF admins create. Expected behavior - remove the Request button
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK