Build better products with our product team
Description - The ability to change font/bolding/italicize fields in custom forms. Why is this feature important to you - Helps keep important info or questions from being missed on custom forms How would you like the feature to work - On custom form editor, an option would be available to customize font. Current Behaviour - No ability to change font.
Per our documentation on enabling SSO:Add Single Sign-On to a Portal - Marketo Docs - Product Docswe only support IdP-initiated SSO, not SP-initiated.The differences are explained here:single sign on - Diffrence between SP initiated SSO and IDP initiated SSO - Stack Overflowand SP-initiated SSO is a stronger choice for ADFSv2 so many IT teams prefer it.It would be great if we supported SP-initiated SSO!
Description - Currently Hour Type can only be managed at System Level and Group Admin does not have the ability to manage their own Hour Type Why is this feature important to you - This is important as our instance is being used Globally and each Group Admin will have their own Hour Type. How would you like the feature to work - Allowing Hour Type to be able to manage at Group Level. This will allow Group Admin to create and manage their own sets of Hour Type. Current Behaviour - Currently Hour Type is share across to all users and we do not have the ability to restrict specific Group Admin view and assign unrelated Hour Type.
It would be great to be able to deactivate fields that are no longer being used. We don't want to delete them, if we do we will loose the data. It would be great to de-activate. Then when building a view or report you would not have to scroll through so many fields and possibly choose the wrong one.
For Custom Forms, it appears that Forms themselves can be Deactivated or Deleted. Fields currently can only be deleted. Please add the ability to Deactivate a field globally, so to ensure no data loss on historical forms.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Support for Amazon Linux 2022(Linux kernel5.x). Use-case: Use as the OS for new servers. Since Amazon Linux2 is reaching EOL, I want to use a new standard OS. Current/Experienced Behavior: AEM 6.5 supports kernels up to 4.x. https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-65/deploying/introduction/technical-requirements.html?lang=en#server-operating-systems Improved/Expected Behavior: AEM 6.5 supports kernel 5.x including Amazon Linux 2022. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - The current Timesheet Layout UI Experience and not too user's friendly due to the un-adjustable Toolbar column and Hour Type not able to display the full name with the character limit. Why is this feature important to you - This will improve the Timesheet UI experience for the users and reduce confusion. How would you like the feature to work - Improve/Increase (the character limit) the Timesheet UI Experience Hour Type to able to view the full Hour Type name. OR make the Hour Type Column adjustable in the Timesheet UI. Current Behaviour - If the Hour Type is more than a specific number character, the Hour Type drop-down list will not display the full Hour Type name. Floating text will only be displayed when hovering over the Hour Type. Screenshot below:
We would like to see three enhancements of functionality with cross project dependencies. The examples below are described from the point of view that project A has a task which is dependent upon a task in project B: 1. Update project A's task % complete as project B's task progresses. 2. When Project B's task is closed, close the task in Project A. Since not all customers may want that behavior, providing the option to choose whether or not to do this when setting up the dependency would be great. 3. Create a notification to project A's PM when project B's task is completed, or gets behind schedule.
Description - Report Builder reports have a few issues, one which many of us are unsure of how this will work come Dec 2023, and one that has always been a pain in our sides.... First, Report Builder schedules are managed in "Scheduled Reports" (along with all the legacy reports that are soon to go away). When Reports is sunset at the end of the year, where will we we able to manage our Report Builder reports? Will this section remain solely for Report Builder? Will it be migrated to the Scheduled Projects area where we can start leveraging tags? If so, we will need a new column to indicate which is a Workspace and which is Report Builder. The second issue, is in regards to asset management. Report Builder reports aren't currently listed in the user assets... when a user leaves the company, part of that cleanup involved transferring assets from that user to another... Report Builder assets are not listed here and are non-transferable. While I realize that we need the Excel document, it would be helpful if these type of reports are listed with the other assets. If there was a way to "download" a copy of the report (so that we can get the Excel doc), then it would make rescheduling the asset a lot easier... or if we could both download AND transfer ownership that would be ideal (I know myself that I have accidentally broken Report Builder reports from accounts that I didn't know were using it then had to track down copies and rush to get them working again). Why is this feature important to you - Being able to efficiently manage these reports, and keep them running, is very important to any company that is using them. How would you like the feature to work - Basically, Report Management would be similar to the new Project Scheduler, with the ability to see the owner, schedule, expiration, and having the ability to add tags. Also, being able to see ALL the scheduled report builder projects (and their owners), download a copy of the report (with all the Report Builder settings) and transfer ownership of said reports will allow us to keep those running smoothly. Current Behaviour - Report Builder assets aren't visible as user assets, so it's easy to overlook and break these reports. Also, the old scheduled reports area is likely to disappear, so we definitely could use a face-lift of the functionality.
Hi Everyone,since the launch of Apples iPad OS in September 2019 we see a huge shift in visits from "Tablets" to "Desktop Devices". Reason for this is the User Agent that´s submitted by Safari, declaring iPads as Macs. A deep look into our data showed that more that 60% of Tablet visits on our Website were reported as Desktop Device (Mac). This caused many problems on our end. All device specific KPIs, including our sales Conversionrates, are not correct. For example: Adobe Analytics shows a Tablet Visit share of 3%. It should be around 10%. Sadly this is still the case in our Adobe Analytics Reports. So it seems that Adobe ist still not able to fix this from their end. Since more that a year now. We did a workaround on our own and had to recreate all used segments that are referencing to device types. Here the workaround we used for our data: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58019463/how-to-detect-device-name-in-safari-on-ios-13-while-it-...In case of an existing multitouch device we write a value into an eVar. When there is a combination of "Device Type = Other" and "multitouch = true" we know it should be Tablet instead of Desktop. I really would appreciate a fix by Adobe directly. But as Google still were not able to fix it for Google Analytics as well, it might be more difficult than it seems from my end. Feedback is appreciated.
Description - Currently while we are configuring fields for date type, it doesnt let us add any kind of validation on it. It would be great if there is a data validation option, eg - you can only enter dates in the future, or dates within a range. Why is this feature important to you -The use case for this is we want to restrict client users to select a date in the past where we are asking when do they want this work to be completed. How would you like the feature to work - Either a Global Setting or a Project based setting preventing certain data selections. Current Behaviour - Users can include any date they want, even dates in the past on current projects.
Description - On default wrap labels to be selected in flow visualization Why is this feature important to you - In the Flow visualization, If the wrap label selected on default, then i don't need to select manually every time i create a flow visualization to see the full name of the page. How would you like the feature to work - By default, wrap label check box should be selected. Current Behaviour - Now, it's not selected by default. User has to select it manually.
Description - Create an automated workflow where the Project Owner and/or Project Sponsor defaults as an approver Why is this feature important to you - Saves time for manually selecting project owner or project sponsor each time for approval of the proofing. How would you like the feature to work - Use the Project Owner and/or Project Sponsor field as the option Current Behaviour - Manually sending out approvals and attaching users to the proofing workflow. Takes time when hundreds of projects are going through review each month.
I came across scenarios where my clients request where they want to limit the number of registrations. We achieved the same with a bunch of effort and some manual things as well. This feature was there in Marketo Sky. I believe Marketo should add this feature and this will be a great plus.
Description - As a global company, we have users who set a date field in different timezones. The problem is that all datetime fields are converted to localtime. This has the potential to show a different date to users in different timezones. When this happens, people have different expectations of when a task is due. Why is this feature important to you - It creates confusion when dates are not showing the same for all users around the world. How would you like the feature to work - Need an option to ignore timezone and show the date as it was set by a user for all users. Current Behaviour - Timezone affects what the date and time is for users
Description - Please create a feature, that allows to schedule Workspace projects with closed panels. All panels within a project should be separately selectable for schedule. Why is this feature important to you - Because a lot of projects contain many panels. To keep the project accessable (not loading data all day long), panels need to be closed. But to send a project on schedule, all panels need to be constantly open. This can really slow down a workspace project and makes it hard to read or do changes. How would you like the feature to work - When a project with e.g. 10 closed panels needs to be send on schedule to stakeholders, it should be possible to have an option like a checkbox for every panel to choose them separately for schedule. Result: The project is send as PDF report with 3 of 10 panels open. But the Workspace project itself will remain as with closed 10 panels for the user. Current Behaviour - Either panels are closed, then you can't send them as scheduled PDF file, or panels are open, you can send it as scheduled report, but the project may load forever with several panels and is not easy accessable for users that like to show or change visualizations there.
Resolving comments is helpful to whoever is making the revisions. When the person resolves the comment a notification goes out to anyone who was on the comment thread. This could be many emails saying comment was resolved. There should be an option to enables an option if a notification should be sent or not for each resolved comment.
Description - While "last updated by" field is available on a task level it doesn't always render correct information (as confirmed by WF support) Why is this feature important to you - We would like to quickly check who was the last user posting update on a task, updating timeline or updating any of the custom fields. This is critical for easy handover of tasks between users How would you like the feature to work - I would like to have a field that would contain meaningful information regarding the task I'm looking at. Last updated by means last user who done anything relevant for this specific task I'm looking at (only!), e.g. posted an update, updated any field (including custom ones), modified the task timeline. Current Behaviour - Currently this field will also capture changes that happened elsewhere, e.g. if someone updates another task's timeline that will result in project timeline update (in which both tasks sit) than Last Updated By will display name of a user who updated another task, which can be really confusing. In other words, in worst case scenario Last Updated By essentially is a field Someone updated Something Somewhere. it's for user to guess what happened and having this field is pointless.
I know this issues has been mentioned before, in the "Just do it!" thread, but there did not seem to be an actual idea linked there, so I'm posting this now. As it stands today, if you are trying to delete a program, and the program contains, for example, a form that is used inside of a landing page, even if the form and the landing page are both inside the program, and thus would be included in the deletion process, you can't delete the program because the form asset is "in use" by the program you are trying to delete. If the only reference to the assets is in the program targeted for deletion, I would like the ability to proceed and delete the entire program. It would be fine to get an "orange" warning about this, but deleting is already such a tedious process and this just makes the entire thing 10x worse. Yes, of course my program assets are referencing each other. I'd be more concerned if they weren't!
Description - Workfront built-in date fields all include time. This has an impact for users like us who only care about the date. The time component affects comparision and localtime conversion. We need a setting that allows us to control whether the built-in fields sets the time component or not, just like custom date fields. Why is this feature important to you - The time component makes it difficult to compare if a date is <, =, > another date due to the time component. A task that should be marked as not overdue, will show as overdue if the date is the same, but the time doesn't match another date field. This is especially problematic for custom date fields that do not include time. How would you like the feature to work - We need an option, probably per project and group, where the built-in datetime fields can turn of the time component (default to midnight). That way, when comparing date fields just for the date component, there is no comparison issue due to time. Current Behaviour - A built-in datetime field sets the time to the moment the field is updated. The time impacts comparisions of dates (cannot ignore the time, even with the function to remove the time) and it impacts localtime conversion (the date can be off due to timezone difference).
Hey there, I am a windows user and I would like to utter some things that I mind in respectively features that I would welcome in a future version of various Adobe CC programs: I am looking forward to get a response from you in case you like my ideas for ameliorations / advancement. Concerning Photoshop: 1.) The gradient-tool is great but why don´t you just display it as a line, with 2 dots at the end, that stays on the screen so you can adjust the gradient more comfortable. In my opinion it is laborious to re-draw the gradient over and over again just to make a tiny change because the line disappears every time. 2.) My workflow could be accelerated if I would dispose over the opportunity to press the mouse wheel and drag in order to move / execute the same function as the hand-tool (letter H) respectively space bar + left mouse key. 3.) Press "U" and draw a shape. If you want to give the shape a border it will be set to a weird spiky style border by default. Why is that and who does not change it to the first option in the drop down menu (which is the normal contour)? Wouldn´t it be smarter to set the contour to a line style by default that 99% of the people want when adding a contour to a shape the way I described right now? 4.) Talking about the path-tool (press "P"): Draw a point and curve it. After you drew a curved point it is impossible to continue with a straight line so you have to hold the "alt"-key and press on the last point in order to be able to continue with a straight line. That is super time-consuming and annoying in my opinion. Can you set it to default that you automatically continue with a straight line regardless of the circumstance if the previous line was curved or not? 5.) Why not integrating "Adobe Firefly" or at least a "text to image AI" directly into Ps? 6.) What about labeling the auxiliary lines (outside of the project frame)? (B1. Press "T" and add a text. In the horizontal menu bar over your project frame you can set a text smoothing option f.e. sharp or windows LCD. I can´t find reliable information which option has the highest possible quality when working on an image that is destined for a social media post / YT-thumbnail. Or is the highest resolution option already set by default?) Concerning Premiere Pro: I would like to make some proposes in order to advance the features and attractiveness of Premiere Pro. It would also be meaningful for other programs that Premiere Pro competes with because you would have to re-consider which program you want to use in the future. Let´s go: Z1) This is my favorite one, please take a look at the attachments. I have elaborated the following: What about an overlay / generator that looks like in AT1? (Ignore the contour at the margin in the attachments - that is just the project frame improvised.) You can drag n drop or import media from your media pool or a folder and it is plugged into the cutout. You could adjust the border color, -style and -thickness as well as the border angle or disable the border in general if you do not want a separation between the videos. You could also drag the line to a desired alignment if you want to have more space for a video respectively if you don´t want to split it evenly in half. (The "S" in the images stands for screen btw.) Before it is getting plugged I could imagine a menu that appears that asks you to set an in- and output point so that you would not have to do it in hindsight in case it wasn´t pre-edited in the media pool. Attachment AT3 is just another example of a potential preset from which you could choose.Attachment AT4 indicates that you could swap the media between the cutouts. It would also be imagineable that you drew your own pattern of cutouts by customizing the grid. A.) Introducing a "Write-On-Effect" for text: it would be advisory to handle this feature through a slider that represents the lengh of the text on a scale from 0 to 1. Then you set the keyframes. (Already exists in DaVinci Resolve, a competitor to Premiere Pro. We need this in Pr too!) A.1) It would also be lit if the Write-On-Effect would feature a function that adds kind of a keyboard typing sound depending on the lenght of the effect. (This would be disabled by default but could be enabled.) B.) Display a text as its contour with adjustable border width in the text options. (No need to do it in the layer style panel like in Ps.) B.1) What about a drop down menu with pre-selected transitions for text layers to swiftly add the effect without the need to search appropriate ones in another panel. A preview of the specific animation is also imagineable when hovering over a certain transition. C.) Adobe Firefly (or a derivative) directly integrated in Premiere Pro. Yes or No? D.) Imagine you want to overlay a random png. What about a "MagicLayer" / hand animation that draws on the png with a stylus like in these whiteboard animation- / explainer videos? E.) What about introducing a "clipping mask" feature (like the one from Ps) but for photos and videos in Pr. Then you could easily clip a video to a desired shape instead of using the masking tool. F.) What about integrating Adobe Enhance directly into Pr so you could apply it directly to your audio lanes or several samples increasing your workflow and prouctivity. G.) What about an option to fast-export a certain video- or audio lane with 2 clicks without needing to do it laboriously. Just a quick right mouse key click on the media and a menu that ask you which lanes you want to export as which file type. (H.) In my opinion the monitor at the left where you can sight the footage to do a pre-selection is redundant due to the existence of the main monitor at the center. Idk if there is already a way to disable this. That is the reason why I set this propose into parenthesis.) I.) What about setting "ease to ease" to default when using keyframes for smooth transitions. J.) Due to frequent crashes of Pr you could introduce a "save automatically" feature that senses when Pr is about to crash to initaite a last save before the crash occurs, because loosing your progress is aggravating. K.) I am unsure if there already exists an aspect ratio preset for an insta story / yt short / tik tok video , but what came in handy would be a temporary overlay with medium- or low opacity, that indicates where the like dislike, comment, share... - buttons will be that the editor knows where not to place sth. because it would be partly covered. When it comes to the export of the video the overlay would be neglected. L.) Imagine you are a YouTuber and you want to place your facecam in a frame and position it adjacent to the right top corner: The clipping mask would also be applicable here, but what about a frame f.e. an iPhone frame in which you can perfectly plug your footage in so you would need to worry about the masking tool again. Or what about an electric rectangular frame for a facecam that has smoke around the border and behaves like electricity like many youtubers use in their endcards. In Ae this would necessitate the saber-plugin but I guess you know what I meant. You wouldn´t need to care about if it overlapped because it would be perfectly plugged to the SmartClippingMask - that how I would term it. Concerning entire CC: X2. What I don´t understand but what is surely immutable: Why were not the keyboard shortcuts assigned uniformly among the programs of the CC? "Ctrl+J" = duplicate a layer in PS, but in AE duplicating a layer requires another keyboard shortcut. If there were a program in which a shortcut wouldn´t make sense the key could have stayed unassigned f.e. "M" for "muting the audio in Audition" does not make sense in Ps (because there is no audio in Ps), so it stays unassigned but in Premiere Pro "M" would also be the shortcut for muting audio. Does this concept sound comprehensible to you? This would have facilitated the prodecure of learning / becoming familiar with the handling of new Adobe programs (kind of a linked shortcut feature how I would label it). X.) What about introducing a new file format (f.e. ".trmp4") that allows you to export a video with transparent background to minimize the effort for the hardware ressources due to the ultra keyer that you would need in order to remove the green background. Kind regards
It would be great to be able to customize our scrum board based on our group's custom statuses. Currently, the board can only leverage statuses that are default or available system wide, which essentially renders the entire custom statuses useless. Would be great to add the ability to add a column based on the Agile team's custom statuses they are using.
Hi,I think it would be beneficial for most Marketers if we could get a report on Marketo logs to see all the records with specific activity type and detail.ex: Lets say a a task creation fails or is skipped, Currently we do not have task report that we could run in Marketo and if there was a report that we could generate using the activity detail or type, it would let us identify or report on the all the records where a specific activity has occurred.Thanks,vineela.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - To analyze the top internal search terms and match the performance with engagement and order and conversion. for example- my website's internal search volume are high for many items but the conversion is very low for the high volume search terms. I can see now the top search terms and al add he metrices as i want. But, i want to sort each column separately to set the value like- search terms with a value btw 1000- 5000 and coversion value btw- 0-1 and the table should show only those search terms How would you like the feature to work - Current Behaviour - I can see now the top search terms and al add he metrices as i want. But, i want to sort each column separately to set the value like- search terms with a value btw How would you like the feature to work
As an integration developer, I would like to extend full-fledged support of Workfront and Marketo Engage to help customers who use both platforms. Today, the integration between the two platforms relies on using My Tokens in order to dynamically push and populate content. Because of this token pushing, knowing what tokens are actually in use by a program and which ones are extraneous or unused is important, especially at scale. Would it be possible to pass a result key-value pair on tokens.json noting whether or not the token is in active use by an asset? This ensures that any token handling is only done to tokens which need it.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
