Build better products with our product team
I know this issues has been mentioned before, in the "Just do it!" thread, but there did not seem to be an actual idea linked there, so I'm posting this now. As it stands today, if you are trying to delete a program, and the program contains, for example, a form that is used inside of a landing page, even if the form and the landing page are both inside the program, and thus would be included in the deletion process, you can't delete the program because the form asset is "in use" by the program you are trying to delete. If the only reference to the assets is in the program targeted for deletion, I would like the ability to proceed and delete the entire program. It would be fine to get an "orange" warning about this, but deleting is already such a tedious process and this just makes the entire thing 10x worse. Yes, of course my program assets are referencing each other. I'd be more concerned if they weren't!
Description - Workfront built-in date fields all include time. This has an impact for users like us who only care about the date. The time component affects comparision and localtime conversion. We need a setting that allows us to control whether the built-in fields sets the time component or not, just like custom date fields. Why is this feature important to you - The time component makes it difficult to compare if a date is <, =, > another date due to the time component. A task that should be marked as not overdue, will show as overdue if the date is the same, but the time doesn't match another date field. This is especially problematic for custom date fields that do not include time. How would you like the feature to work - We need an option, probably per project and group, where the built-in datetime fields can turn of the time component (default to midnight). That way, when comparing date fields just for the date component, there is no comparison issue due to time. Current Behaviour - A built-in datetime field sets the time to the moment the field is updated. The time impacts comparisions of dates (cannot ignore the time, even with the function to remove the time) and it impacts localtime conversion (the date can be off due to timezone difference).
Hey there, I am a windows user and I would like to utter some things that I mind in respectively features that I would welcome in a future version of various Adobe CC programs: I am looking forward to get a response from you in case you like my ideas for ameliorations / advancement. Concerning Photoshop: 1.) The gradient-tool is great but why don´t you just display it as a line, with 2 dots at the end, that stays on the screen so you can adjust the gradient more comfortable. In my opinion it is laborious to re-draw the gradient over and over again just to make a tiny change because the line disappears every time. 2.) My workflow could be accelerated if I would dispose over the opportunity to press the mouse wheel and drag in order to move / execute the same function as the hand-tool (letter H) respectively space bar + left mouse key. 3.) Press "U" and draw a shape. If you want to give the shape a border it will be set to a weird spiky style border by default. Why is that and who does not change it to the first option in the drop down menu (which is the normal contour)? Wouldn´t it be smarter to set the contour to a line style by default that 99% of the people want when adding a contour to a shape the way I described right now? 4.) Talking about the path-tool (press "P"): Draw a point and curve it. After you drew a curved point it is impossible to continue with a straight line so you have to hold the "alt"-key and press on the last point in order to be able to continue with a straight line. That is super time-consuming and annoying in my opinion. Can you set it to default that you automatically continue with a straight line regardless of the circumstance if the previous line was curved or not? 5.) Why not integrating "Adobe Firefly" or at least a "text to image AI" directly into Ps? 6.) What about labeling the auxiliary lines (outside of the project frame)? (B1. Press "T" and add a text. In the horizontal menu bar over your project frame you can set a text smoothing option f.e. sharp or windows LCD. I can´t find reliable information which option has the highest possible quality when working on an image that is destined for a social media post / YT-thumbnail. Or is the highest resolution option already set by default?) Concerning Premiere Pro: I would like to make some proposes in order to advance the features and attractiveness of Premiere Pro. It would also be meaningful for other programs that Premiere Pro competes with because you would have to re-consider which program you want to use in the future. Let´s go: Z1) This is my favorite one, please take a look at the attachments. I have elaborated the following: What about an overlay / generator that looks like in AT1? (Ignore the contour at the margin in the attachments - that is just the project frame improvised.) You can drag n drop or import media from your media pool or a folder and it is plugged into the cutout. You could adjust the border color, -style and -thickness as well as the border angle or disable the border in general if you do not want a separation between the videos. You could also drag the line to a desired alignment if you want to have more space for a video respectively if you don´t want to split it evenly in half. (The "S" in the images stands for screen btw.) Before it is getting plugged I could imagine a menu that appears that asks you to set an in- and output point so that you would not have to do it in hindsight in case it wasn´t pre-edited in the media pool. Attachment AT3 is just another example of a potential preset from which you could choose.Attachment AT4 indicates that you could swap the media between the cutouts. It would also be imagineable that you drew your own pattern of cutouts by customizing the grid. A.) Introducing a "Write-On-Effect" for text: it would be advisory to handle this feature through a slider that represents the lengh of the text on a scale from 0 to 1. Then you set the keyframes. (Already exists in DaVinci Resolve, a competitor to Premiere Pro. We need this in Pr too!) A.1) It would also be lit if the Write-On-Effect would feature a function that adds kind of a keyboard typing sound depending on the lenght of the effect. (This would be disabled by default but could be enabled.) B.) Display a text as its contour with adjustable border width in the text options. (No need to do it in the layer style panel like in Ps.) B.1) What about a drop down menu with pre-selected transitions for text layers to swiftly add the effect without the need to search appropriate ones in another panel. A preview of the specific animation is also imagineable when hovering over a certain transition. C.) Adobe Firefly (or a derivative) directly integrated in Premiere Pro. Yes or No? D.) Imagine you want to overlay a random png. What about a "MagicLayer" / hand animation that draws on the png with a stylus like in these whiteboard animation- / explainer videos? E.) What about introducing a "clipping mask" feature (like the one from Ps) but for photos and videos in Pr. Then you could easily clip a video to a desired shape instead of using the masking tool. F.) What about integrating Adobe Enhance directly into Pr so you could apply it directly to your audio lanes or several samples increasing your workflow and prouctivity. G.) What about an option to fast-export a certain video- or audio lane with 2 clicks without needing to do it laboriously. Just a quick right mouse key click on the media and a menu that ask you which lanes you want to export as which file type. (H.) In my opinion the monitor at the left where you can sight the footage to do a pre-selection is redundant due to the existence of the main monitor at the center. Idk if there is already a way to disable this. That is the reason why I set this propose into parenthesis.) I.) What about setting "ease to ease" to default when using keyframes for smooth transitions. J.) Due to frequent crashes of Pr you could introduce a "save automatically" feature that senses when Pr is about to crash to initaite a last save before the crash occurs, because loosing your progress is aggravating. K.) I am unsure if there already exists an aspect ratio preset for an insta story / yt short / tik tok video , but what came in handy would be a temporary overlay with medium- or low opacity, that indicates where the like dislike, comment, share... - buttons will be that the editor knows where not to place sth. because it would be partly covered. When it comes to the export of the video the overlay would be neglected. L.) Imagine you are a YouTuber and you want to place your facecam in a frame and position it adjacent to the right top corner: The clipping mask would also be applicable here, but what about a frame f.e. an iPhone frame in which you can perfectly plug your footage in so you would need to worry about the masking tool again. Or what about an electric rectangular frame for a facecam that has smoke around the border and behaves like electricity like many youtubers use in their endcards. In Ae this would necessitate the saber-plugin but I guess you know what I meant. You wouldn´t need to care about if it overlapped because it would be perfectly plugged to the SmartClippingMask - that how I would term it. Concerning entire CC: X2. What I don´t understand but what is surely immutable: Why were not the keyboard shortcuts assigned uniformly among the programs of the CC? "Ctrl+J" = duplicate a layer in PS, but in AE duplicating a layer requires another keyboard shortcut. If there were a program in which a shortcut wouldn´t make sense the key could have stayed unassigned f.e. "M" for "muting the audio in Audition" does not make sense in Ps (because there is no audio in Ps), so it stays unassigned but in Premiere Pro "M" would also be the shortcut for muting audio. Does this concept sound comprehensible to you? This would have facilitated the prodecure of learning / becoming familiar with the handling of new Adobe programs (kind of a linked shortcut feature how I would label it). X.) What about introducing a new file format (f.e. ".trmp4") that allows you to export a video with transparent background to minimize the effort for the hardware ressources due to the ultra keyer that you would need in order to remove the green background. Kind regards
It would be great to be able to customize our scrum board based on our group's custom statuses. Currently, the board can only leverage statuses that are default or available system wide, which essentially renders the entire custom statuses useless. Would be great to add the ability to add a column based on the Agile team's custom statuses they are using.
Hi,I think it would be beneficial for most Marketers if we could get a report on Marketo logs to see all the records with specific activity type and detail.ex: Lets say a a task creation fails or is skipped, Currently we do not have task report that we could run in Marketo and if there was a report that we could generate using the activity detail or type, it would let us identify or report on the all the records where a specific activity has occurred.Thanks,vineela.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - To analyze the top internal search terms and match the performance with engagement and order and conversion. for example- my website's internal search volume are high for many items but the conversion is very low for the high volume search terms. I can see now the top search terms and al add he metrices as i want. But, i want to sort each column separately to set the value like- search terms with a value btw 1000- 5000 and coversion value btw- 0-1 and the table should show only those search terms How would you like the feature to work - Current Behaviour - I can see now the top search terms and al add he metrices as i want. But, i want to sort each column separately to set the value like- search terms with a value btw How would you like the feature to work
As an integration developer, I would like to extend full-fledged support of Workfront and Marketo Engage to help customers who use both platforms. Today, the integration between the two platforms relies on using My Tokens in order to dynamically push and populate content. Because of this token pushing, knowing what tokens are actually in use by a program and which ones are extraneous or unused is important, especially at scale. Would it be possible to pass a result key-value pair on tokens.json noting whether or not the token is in active use by an asset? This ensures that any token handling is only done to tokens which need it.
Description - Add expand/collapse option for sections in custom forms Why is this feature important to you / current behavior - We have some very long forms that can be hard to see all the information when designing or completing a form. The user must scroll a lot to view different sections of the form How would you like the feature to work - Add an expand/collapse to sections so they can be used when designing or completing a form. It would be optimal to have the option to set the default to be either expanded or collapsed depending on the user need when presenting the finished form to our customers.
Description - I would like to be able to reset an indvidual's approval back to pending without having to reset the entire approval workflow. Why is this feature important to you - We have users that approve things on accident, and it causes issues when we have to reset everyone's approval back to pending to fix it How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to go into the approvals and then right click on an individual's approval and see an option to reset to "Pending" Current Behaviour - have to reset the entire approval back to pending
Description - Why is this feature important to you - We constantly see user allocations 20+ hrs overallocated How would you like the feature to work - Same as the Time-Off feature. This would not allow user's work to be scheduled on any day that is already scheduled for 8 hrs. (6 hrs prefferable) Current Behaviour - Sky's the limit! Project or Program managers can schedule as many hours per day as they want.
Description - Allow Fusion users to refresh Workfront API metadata on demand, rather than every time a module is opened. Why is this feature important to you - Currently every time you click on Workfront modules (or even other connectors), it takes a long time to open because Fusion refreshes the metadata (list of available fields). This makes it very slow to move from module to module and review or edit the configuration. It's actually extremely rare that you really need a metadata refresh due to fields being added/changed in Workfront, and so the negative performance trade-off is not worthwhile. How would you like the feature to work - It would be much better if there was a 'refresh metadata' button in the scenario, which would cause Fusion to refresh the metadata from the APIs of the used connectors. Even if this was only implemented for Workfront's connector it would be a massive improvement. Current Behaviour - It refreshes every time you click on a module. @samtaylor If I could choose an enhancement in any product in the whole world that would make my life immeasurably better, this would be it! Thank you for any consideration. Regards, David Cornwell
Description - Referring specifically to the Agile Board Project view and the Storyboards in Scrum and Kanban teams. There is no way currently to get these boards to refresh automatically. Although the sections update instantly, if you are working across a few users then constant refreshing is required. Why is this feature important to you - Our teams work collaboratively thus are using these boards every minute of everyday and refreshing it not a functional use of time and can lead to mixed messages in terms of project status'. How would you like the feature to work - Look into if there is a way for these boards to refresh actively to ensure all data is consistent across the system.
Description - Currently when in the agile view or in your teams Iterations Story board view if you have lots of tasks then this mean it would require you to scroll down. Currently the Swimlanes do not follow the user down as they scroll which can lead to confusion if the member is new or you have customised lanes. Why is this feature important to you - It would help the user in ensuring they are using the correct columns and assist with the management of larger projects How would you like the feature to work - Simply for the swimlane titles to follow as the user scrolls down. Current Behaviour - swimlane titles do not follow the user as they scroll
It would be nice to be able to do the following: - delete clickstream data feed templates - upload clickstream data feed templates - multi select clickstream data feed templates (to add or remove) - see columns by category of some sort. - give a template a name and not some cryptic guid (or timestamp) the wole experience is lacking here.
Description (Situation): The list of reports and dashboards are quite long in an instance shared by many groups. It makes it difficult to locate and manage reports & dashboards, especially for a system admin that sees everything. Current Behavior (Background): There currently isn’t a way to categorize reports and dashboards based on the group ownership versus the system level so they are easier to locate. The folders that are available in the reports area do not allow for a system level management to provide consistent structure to all users. Why is this feature important to you (Assessment): When managing a group it would be beneficial to easily locate the reports and dashboards for their specific use rather than scrolling a long list of reports. Even though some users do not see all reports, there can be system wide used reports or ones shared across groups that make it hard to locate their own. It is especially cumbersome for the system admin since they view all items in the list and cannot easily locate items to assist a particular group and it takes a long time to load the large number of reports when viewing all. There also isn’t a way to indicate system level reports that may be used across groups which can only be managed by the system admin. How would you like this feature to work (Recommendation): We would like the ability to tie a report or dashboard to a group so it shows up in their group area for easier management. It would also be great to provide a left navigation menu that would be clickable in the reports area so you could choose a set of reports by group. This should be customizable by the system admin to provide a consistent navigation for all users. (Note: we know new reporting is coming with different features, but this functionality would also be important for the new setup). In addition, it would be helpful to be able to change ownership of a report to a group so the group admins could more easily manage sets of reports used by multiple users in their area and not worry about that person leaving the organization.
Description - The progressive disclosure (display logic) in custom forms is challenging when trying to figure out what items are driving each question. The colored square indicators do not visually provide much detail and you need to click on to view the settings. Once in the panel you need to scroll to locate information and if there are many options then it is hard to figure out what is driving what. There are also indicators on both the right and left side (what is driving vs what is being driven) of the question but those are not clear especially to the novice user. There is a learning curve for new form designers to understand all the different symbols and why they are split. Why is this feature important to you - We design many complex forms and need to be able to navigate the form more easily. Without all the extra clicks it is time consuming and confusing to manage the options. How would you like the feature to work - Adding some hover clues that display the question could save steps for the user. They could see what question is driving the action without needing to click to open the panel and then scroll. Also, the icons and their placement should be better identified for the user, so they know what they are looking at in the system. When building a form, it would be helpful to be able to set the progressive disclosure right from the question so you don't need to go to the side panel.
Description and what we would like to see: The system doesn't provide a good way to manage the hundreds of forms in our system. We would like to see additional features added to allow a clearer definition about who owns the form. We currently get around this by sharing the form with a group and then grouping by that field. It isn't always accurate, nor does it allow for system level management to be clearly defined. Ability to assign a form to a group who owns/manages it so ownership is apparent, and it can be viewed at the group level without needing to access the full list of forms which is daunting in a large instance Some forms are shared across groups, but we don't want group admins to think they can edit them. Instead, we would like the forms assigned to their groups to appear in their group area for management purposes. For system admins, the large number or forms are difficult to dig through to find specific forms. Assigning to a group would help in locating ones for a specific group. Ability to assign a form used at the system level to the “system” so it can only be managed by dedicated system admins and displays that ownership is at the system level but can be used by group admins that need it (or as defined by the system admin) Add more descriptive fields suggestion which allows for more detail to be added to the who, how, what the form is used for instead of just a description field. (Related idea: Allow assigning custom form ownership to Groups - Adobe Experience League Community - 518377) Why is this feature important to you - We have a large number of forms managed by many people across nearly 60 groups. It is challenging to maintain a good record of who owns the form and know what it is used for in the system.
Description - We would like to be able to send custom forms exports to our users when designing a new form. Why is this feature important to you - When we are designing new forms for users, they often want to share with many people. We may want to share this form prior to a queue being setup or simply allow them to share a version with others. Being that we cannot set up a new queue topic and hide it when a queue is active, we are forced to create test request queues and then assure these are shared with all the right users, so they aren't visible to customers. This is more work and takes more explanation to the end user as to why it isn't named, or setup as expected. How would you like the feature to work - We would like to be able to do an export of the form as an interactive pdf so any progressive disclosure (display logic) would work. This would be a similar concept to proofing but with more functionality (not static) for the end user. (Related note: You used to be able to do this in the old Adobe Livecycle forms and it may be available in AEM forms - not sure). We liked having an option to share the form with stakeholders because it was quick and easy. It also allowed them to make mark ups to provide feedback on the form that we can then incorporate in the system.
Description (Situation): Workfront does not support opening documents in their native application when stored inside Workfront. A user is required to download the document to view it when it isn’t in pdf format. We need to be able to view documents without the extra steps. Current Behavior (Background): When you navigate to the document area and click a document name it automatically begins a download of the document if it is not in pdf format Click document details, this opens a window, and it appears you can click preview to see the document. When you click preview, you are forced to download a copy of the document if not in pdf format Why is this feature important to you (Assessment): The current functionality of requiring the user to download a document just to view it is cumbersome and inefficient. It also causes problems with staff downloading items and creating different versions that are not then uploaded into Workfront. They also cannot make changes to the document when inside Workfront and need to download and then reload a new version. How would you like this feature to work (Recommendation): When you click a document, it should trigger opening in either in a viewer inside Workfront or the native application (word, ppt, etc).
In the email notifications area in setup, you can turn them off or on, but cannot dictate daily or instant for the default. This article shows which ones WF sets as one or the other - https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=the-new-workfront-experience&topicId=Content%2FWorkfront_basics%2FUsing_Notifications%2Fnotifications-communication.htm&_LANG=enus - but I want the ability to change this. As an admin, I should be able to set instant vs daily on any notifications I choose. Since I can't, I'm having to make tweaks to every account I create. For example, the 'someone comments on a thread I'm in' is only set for daily on default, I can't change it to instant on a setup level, which is what I feel it should be!
Description - Our stakeholders reached out to us in regards to the email notification which is sent out when an issue/request is rejected. Why is this feature important to you - The current email can lead to confusion at first glance and it could use some fine-tuning 🙂 How would you like the feature to work - The subject line could better illustrate that the request/issue was rejected, instead of completed. Also, the 'Rejected' word could be displayed in red instead of green. - Subject line is misleading and the word 'Rejected' is in green. Thank you, S
Description - I would like the option to have one step in a journey where customers are entering into a segment or exiting from a segment from this step. Why is this feature important to you - This would help with orchestrating the journey so customers could at some point (depending on previous steps) enter into segment as part of the journey and that segment could then be used to trigger another journey or offer. I've used this feature in other tools and I find it very handy to connect journeys to each other at different points in time. They could also enter into a segment which excludes them from all email communication for X time for example, and then exit that segment whenever the journey says so. How would you like the feature to work - 1. I would like to have a node/step in a journey that only adds customer to a segment. The segment in itself is only set to accept customers coming from a journey and doesn't have any further requirements when being built. 2. I would like to have a node/step in a journey that only exits customers from a segment. If needed this could also only apply to segments specifically built to be orchestrated from actions in journeys. Current Behaviour - We need to create a complex segment based on actions on commincation within a journey and those don't work as well as we would like them either. The counts differ from the reporting of how many clicked in an email to how many enter the segment based on the same requirement. We can't create segments that are "empty" so of course this would have to be an option as well.
Description - Allow new issue fields from the queue details to be made required, i.e. description, priority, etc. Why is this feature important to you - These system generated fields are not required and users often do not fill them in when submitting requests. Therefore, essential information is being left out. Allowing these fields to be required will reduce the redundancy of creating workaround custom description fields. How would you like the feature to work - Create a checkbox next to the current checkboxes to make this field required - just like how it is within the custom form section. Instead create this option within the queue details section as well. Current Behaviour - have to create custom description fields that do not populate in the system generated description within the overview tab.
Can we add a setting to the Fallout Viz to hide/show the actual volumes that appear under each step (the visits/visitors)? Hiding these would mean that the viz only shows the fallout/fallthrough percentages (on the chart and in the pop-ups). The volumes NEVER match figures elsewhere in a dashboard. Whilst I appreciate the steps are sequential, if I have a Freeform table with "Page A" as the dimension and Visits as the metric, and then I create a Fallout where the first step is "Page A" and its set to use Visits, the numbers don't match, even for this initial step when there's nothing else in the fallout viz. As a result, this is the #1 subject for queries I get... why don't the numbers match those shown in a freeform table elsewhere in the dashboard - and it makes users query the accuracy of Adobe Analytics entirely. Whilst I've tried everything to get them to match they never do. And as the main feature of the fallout is to look at conversion and fallout providing a feature to make viewers focus on the % figures rather than volumes would greatly help.
Description - Allow Project Name to be a field that is transferred over to Jira and allow for links to refer back to Workfront project Why is this feature important to you - Currently most projects are set up with a template on Workfront, which means that all project will have the same tasks. IF there are specific tasks for every project that need to be worked by the Jira team, how would they differentiate the projects since the tasks descriptions are the same? Project name will help and also the link to allow the Jira Team to see the details of the project How would you like the feature to work - Project Name (with link back to Workfront) to be in close proximity of view to the tasks name Current Behaviour - Project name is not transferred over to Jira. So the person receiving this task on Jira has no idea which project this is for, which makes it difficult for them to know what they need to work on. There is also no link back to the project to allow user to understand the details.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
