Build better products with our product team
Currently Matched Segments are only queried by Marketo RTP at the start of a visitor's session (lasts approximately 30 minutes) which means that visitor behaviour during that session, although changing the Matched Segments within Marketo, is not reflected in the way RTP behaves on the website in Real Time. A use case is semi-gated content where the content is only directly available if the visitor is known and subscribed to newsletters otherwise a subscription form is displayed. Currently, completion of the subscription form changes the Matched Segments but the visitor sees no change within the session.
Description - Since the latest release, there is a new "home" page for the Adobe Experience Platform Data Collection, this page has a section to help new people to the system, then a few sections for "Recent Properties" or "Recent Rules" etc.. While a "pretty page", for people like me that deal with many different properties every day, I just want to see the full list of properties.. the old behaviour of coming to the full list was actually a better experience for me. Why is this feature important to you - So, I understand the concept of the new home page for new users, or users who are only making changes to the same main properties all the time; this isn't the best experience for all users.... I would like the option to set the "Tags" area (the full list of properties) as my landing page to save me time getting to where I need to be. How would you like the feature to work - There should be a settings or preferences page in the interface that allows users to choose where to land... this could include options like the "Home" page, as it currently works, the "Tags" page (which would be the equivalent of the old behaviour), and for those that only work primarily in a single property, allow them to land directly in the chosen property. Choosing a landing page exists in Adobe Analytics, where you can choose to land in the main Workspace list, or in a specific workspace (and back when it was relevant, you could also land in the old Reports area). This is a really handy feature that allows us to maximize our workflow. Current Behaviour - User lands on the new Home page, which has a lot of extra stuff that experienced user won't need at the top of the page, but also reduces what properties they have immediate access to. This means one more page load and click to get to where you need to be... while one extra step doesn't seem like a lot, it adds up over time...
Description - Currently, the filter/view/grouping cannot be rearranged, and they show in an alphabetical order in reports or for example in project view from main menu. Why is this feature important to you - Because we want them in a particular order, all the status filters at one place, owned by filters at one place etc. How would you like the feature to work - Instead, allow admins to rearrange the order and same should reflect in reports. Current Behaviour - Fixed in LT and in alphabetical sort on reports.
Description - Number of Updates displayed on main navigation area Why is this feature important to you - I could see at a quick glance if there have been some conversations happening before going into the updates section. How would you like the feature to work - We think it would be helpful if the number quantity of updates in a project displayed a number like the number of documents in a project Current Behaviour - Currently we go into updates to read them, and we would still do that. This would help identify if there has been conversation happening at a quick glance from the main view.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - this would be great to down a custom form without creating a report to do so in some cases. In one instance I created a form to be used with some of our printers. It is now being used currently and now they need to go to the reports and pull pull from it. How would you like the feature to work - I would love to have the option to download as a pdf or excel sheet and also landscape or portrait to fit content on a page. This would be less click by users and staying with the Project Current Behaviour - I've created a report to pull the info down. Downloading as is created multiple pages
Description - Bulk-editing tasks does not handle disparate custom forms well. If 2 or more selected tasks have different custom forms, instead of showing the union of the custom forms across the tasks, it doesn't show any of the disparate tasks. On top of that, you cannot remove or edit custom forms in bulk if the same custom forms are not on all the tasks. The better approach is to show the custom forms that exist on all of the tasks, and only apply the changes to the tasks that have the edited custom form. Showing all of the attached custom forms also allows for removal of the custom form on those tasks that have it assigned. Why is this feature important to you - It is impossible to bulk-remove custom forms that are not on all of the selected tasks. It is impossible to bulk-edit any field on a custom form that is not assigned to a task in the selection. How would you like the feature to work - Instead of excluding the custom form because it is not on all selected tasks, show the custom form and only apply the changes to those selected task that are relevant. Current Behaviour - Custom forms that are not on all selected tasks are not shown and are not listed to be able to remove them. Users must find and select only the tasks that have the custom form to be removed or bulk-edited.
As an integration developer, I would like to use calls to the "Browse" endpoints of Marketo's assets more effectively. For example, the following API calls have two optional parameters, earliestUpdatedAt and latestUpdatedAt: /rest/asset/v1/emails.json /rest/asset/v1/programs.json /rest/asset/v1/smartCampaigns.json /rest/asset/v1/staticLists.json This is incredibly useful when trying to manage large-volume instances, as you can constrain to ongoing behavior. However, this ability to filter is missing from several other asset calls, despite them being similar in nature and reporting updatedAt details when called: /rest/asset/v1/channels.json /rest/asset/v1/folders.json /rest/asset/v1/forms.json Would it be possible to get these two parameters added for these three specific calls? There's likely merit in adding them elsewhere (e.g., snippets.json) but I'm only looking specifically for these three.
Hello, as far as I could experience it, when you have a long form, it's quite difficult to find a field already set up (= right-hand side) and it is also quite "difficult" to move a field up or down with the drag and drop logic. It would be good to have a search field and some up and down buttons or a compact view to organize quicker all the fields. Kind regards Sébastien
Workfront has great capabilities for inputing and tracking expenses but is very lacking currently when it comes to estimates. I'd like to see the capability to keep track of estimates and export estimate signoff documents in the system without having to do a massive amount of custom configuring and Fusion workflows. Why is this feature important to you: It's important for us to keep track of estimates, not just expenses, so we have the ability to reconcile the expenses with the estimates. We also require signoff for our estimates do a formal document is beneficial. Currently much of this is happening outside of Workfront through emails and manual calculations. It would be extremely beneficial for this be handled within Workfront so everything stays with the project and calculations are not being done manually. How would you like the feature to work: A specific use case is as follows. Production Manager is tasked with getting an estimate for some premium items Production Manager gets several options and per piece costs for each Production Manager is able to enter several quantities in for each item and the system calculates the total for each quantity based on the per piece cost. A formal estimate document can be exported and saved to documents folder to be sent to client for signoff. When estimate is signed off on the Production Manager is then able to finalize the details for an expense and reconcile the expense against the estimate. Current Behaviour: Currently Workfront is set up to handle expenses. If there are multiple quantities being estimated each quantity is entered as a separate expense which is a lot of extra manual work. Also if we have per piece costs we are manually calculating those costs which leaves greater room for error. Also, there is no mechanism currently for exporting a formal estimate document from the expense. We were able to build something using Fusion but its not an ideal fix.
The ability for end users to select "Ignore/Consider User Time Off" for task durations in projects can lead to unintended consequences if project owners don't fully understand what that field does. For companies where due dates can not be moved because a team member takes PTO, it is important that we are able to proactively set project options without having to build exception reports to find and fix these issues. If admins could hide that field via layout templates, that would go a long way to consistent project management across our company.
There is currently no option with a channel surface or email template to prevent additional channel surface applied URL parameters from being included in external domain based links. For instance, we may wish to only have the additional automated parameters to be included with sender address based links and not externally facing links such as facebook.com.
Description - When a task is dependent on a predecessor (either same project or cross-project), and it impacts my assigned task, I would like to get a notification of this event. Currently, there's no way to get notified of a change in completion date due to a predecessor. This forces me to review all of my chained tasks for date impact. There is notification if my task itself gets its completion updated directly, but not if it's updated by a dependent task indirectly. Why is this feature important to you - This is important because a dependent task has affected my task's planned due date. Without notification for this, I have to monitor for these changes continuously. How would you like the feature to work - When a task that is assigned to me has its planned completion date changed, I want an event notification. It should not be limited to just users changing the planned completion date directly. Current Behaviour - There is no notification of an indirect date impact on assigned tasks.
Description - When an issue is added to a project, an update should be made to the Updates tab so folks know there are some issues reported. The Issues label or number of issues should be in Red so they stand out. Users are not noticing the issues.
The new alert component is a wonderful and powerful tool when it comes to defining alerts for very specific segments and metrics.Though it is still very inflexible in terms of time to trigger the alert. I'll explain the use case: Every night we've got a process to classify the a spefic custom variable X in classification XY via FTP upload, which takes a couple of hours and the classified values are usually available after 7am. Though from time to time this process takes longer than usual (1-2 days) and there are values missing in reports. Sometimes it's obvious for the users, sometimes not, and I'd like to alert them, if this is the case.So I decided to setup alerts with a segment "custom var X exists and classification XY doesn't exist". The problem I am having is that the alerts are triggered straight after midnight, before the classification can take place.If the time to trigger alerts could be chosen, it would solve my issue
Currently time granularity can be set to hourly, daily, weekly, monthly.Idea: Please allow custom time granularities: e.g. last hour, last 6 hours, last 12 hours, last 48 hours, etc.
Description - Why is this feature important to you -It is important because it aides the ability to break up forms. (Competitors, are blowing you away because your form builder is too basic) Smartsheets, MSforms etc. How would you like the feature to work -Just give users the ability to add colors or line breaks that have colors or font enlargements etc. Current Behaviour -You do have section break fields but they are still flat.
Hi all, I was doing some testing and noticed that completed approval processes on Issues get deleted after they are converted to projects. This is not ideal from an audit standpoint since you cannot report on who approved it before conversion. We would like the issue to retain the approval process and all the data associated with it.
Description: Below are some enhancements could really boost the usefulness of the Adobe Workfront plugin. When looking at proof comments, could there be a thumbnail image of the page showing the type of markup and where it was marked on the proof? So you could see an arrow pointing to part of the page, or the rectangle, or where text was selected. Right now, being able to view proof comments isn't useful since there is no context as to where that comment is within the document. In proof comments, if someone attaches a link, could there be a hyperlink to view or download their attachment? Right now, no attachments show. When creating a proof, the ability to add reviewers (or other proof types) instead of only approvers. Could their be a notification icon that reflects the notification icon in Workfront? It would be great if we could adjust task assignments, project owners, or project status directly from the plugin. Why is this feature important to you: I think this plugin has a lot of potential, but there are some key features missing that currently limit its effectiveness for our team.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK