Build better products with our product team
Description - Currently if an issue form is inactivated in the set up the form still remains active on the queue topics of a project. This leads users to continue using that form and creating entries with that form that shouldn't be used. Why is this feature important to you - this creates a huge governance and system clean up issue. The form was deactivated for a reason, thus it should be not usable on projects if it is part of the queue topic! How would you like the feature to work - I open on this one, but ideally the user should get an error message when trying to create the issue saying this form is deactivated and contact a system administrator for a solution.
Currently, if a channel is hidden, its statuses are still selectable in program status picklists, which can lead to major bloating since all channel statuses are now shown in picklists instead of only the relevant channel. It would be nice if these statuses behaved the same way as archived lists - technically hidden from the dropdown but possible to populate by typing in the exact name (for historical reporting, etc).
Being able to use conditional formatting, specifically background/row colors, is very useful in reports. I want to be able to use this for GROUPINGS in a report so I can visually separate the groupings in reports where we have repeated groupings (like different groupings for different teams that may have more than 1 grouping). I don't want the rows within the grouping all a color because that can get busy, but really wish I can add background color to the grouping rows themselves.
Description - There is no way to report on the dates specified in user Schedules. Why is this feature important to you - It would be helpful to have proactive views of the dates identified in Schedules to support advanced, aggregate planned. For example, plotting Schedule dates in a calendar report would help cross-reference when news items should be published. How would you like the feature to work - Much like a Time Off report, allow a report or calendar to list dates in a Schedule. Current Behaviour - As discussed in this Question, workarounds are duplicative and labor-intensive. For any admin with more than a handful of Schedules, workarounds are likely not worth the work.
Description - Make the Boards functionality available for use in Sandbox so we can conduct better configuration testing. Boards is only available in Preview which means all testing must be built and complete in 5 business days before the environment refreshes. Why is this feature important to you - Would like the option to build out a new system configuration to better leverage Boards. We need the the ability to test over a longer period of time vs the time frame provided for us in Preview. How would you like the feature to work - same functionality as preview, just in Sandbox. Current Behaviour - No access to Boards in Sandbox, only preview and production.
Description - We have tested, and plan to deploy, the WebsiteBot Plugin - https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/analytics/implementation/vars/plugins/websitebot.html?lang=en#:~:text=Adobe%20plug-in%3A%20websiteBot%201%20Prerequisites%20Adobe%20recommends%20the,4%20Use%20the%20plug-in%20...%205%20Examples%20.In our testing we found that this plugin views users utilizing accessibility features to navigate the site as it does bots thus collecting their IP. Are there any plans to enhance this plugin to recognize accessibility feature use and refrain from collecting IP address in those cases? Why is this feature important to you - It is important for us to respect data privacy of our users and that includes guarding/obfuscating IP addresses with the exception of suspected bots. Site accessibility is also very important to us and this combination of features would accommodate both requirements. How would you like the feature to work - Not flag users utilizing accessibility for site navigation as bots. Current Behaviour - Users with accessibility features flagged as bots.
Description - While we have the ability to adjust field sharing and access, we apparently can't report on it like we can with other objects. Why is this feature important to you - Reporting on object sharing is essential to system administration governance and maintenance, especially when conducting an operational change like reimagining how fields are managed. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to other objects (like custom forms), add a Shared with as a reportable field for custom fields. Current behaviour - To overcome the absence of a Shared with field, I have to click into each field—thousands of fields!—to view these settings.
Could you make New Project Button more editable?To have a chance to hide or show all options you in the drop-down and not just a New Project.
Currently Matched Segments are only queried by Marketo RTP at the start of a visitor's session (lasts approximately 30 minutes) which means that visitor behaviour during that session, although changing the Matched Segments within Marketo, is not reflected in the way RTP behaves on the website in Real Time. A use case is semi-gated content where the content is only directly available if the visitor is known and subscribed to newsletters otherwise a subscription form is displayed. Currently, completion of the subscription form changes the Matched Segments but the visitor sees no change within the session.
It would be great if the files attached to proof comments could be visible in the Documents tab. We've got users, who sometimes find proof a bit clunky/inefficient for large files with a lot of comments (even a few dozen per page). They can work around it by attaching files with Indesign/Acrobat comments to a proof comment. This way they can still utilize proof approvals, versioning, etc., however It would be much easier for them if they could also see the comment attachments in the Documents tab (e.g. in a separate, auto-generated folder).
Description - Since the latest release, there is a new "home" page for the Adobe Experience Platform Data Collection, this page has a section to help new people to the system, then a few sections for "Recent Properties" or "Recent Rules" etc.. While a "pretty page", for people like me that deal with many different properties every day, I just want to see the full list of properties.. the old behaviour of coming to the full list was actually a better experience for me. Why is this feature important to you - So, I understand the concept of the new home page for new users, or users who are only making changes to the same main properties all the time; this isn't the best experience for all users.... I would like the option to set the "Tags" area (the full list of properties) as my landing page to save me time getting to where I need to be. How would you like the feature to work - There should be a settings or preferences page in the interface that allows users to choose where to land... this could include options like the "Home" page, as it currently works, the "Tags" page (which would be the equivalent of the old behaviour), and for those that only work primarily in a single property, allow them to land directly in the chosen property. Choosing a landing page exists in Adobe Analytics, where you can choose to land in the main Workspace list, or in a specific workspace (and back when it was relevant, you could also land in the old Reports area). This is a really handy feature that allows us to maximize our workflow. Current Behaviour - User lands on the new Home page, which has a lot of extra stuff that experienced user won't need at the top of the page, but also reduces what properties they have immediate access to. This means one more page load and click to get to where you need to be... while one extra step doesn't seem like a lot, it adds up over time...
Description - Currently, the filter/view/grouping cannot be rearranged, and they show in an alphabetical order in reports or for example in project view from main menu. Why is this feature important to you - Because we want them in a particular order, all the status filters at one place, owned by filters at one place etc. How would you like the feature to work - Instead, allow admins to rearrange the order and same should reflect in reports. Current Behaviour - Fixed in LT and in alphabetical sort on reports.
Description - Number of Updates displayed on main navigation area Why is this feature important to you - I could see at a quick glance if there have been some conversations happening before going into the updates section. How would you like the feature to work - We think it would be helpful if the number quantity of updates in a project displayed a number like the number of documents in a project Current Behaviour - Currently we go into updates to read them, and we would still do that. This would help identify if there has been conversation happening at a quick glance from the main view.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - this would be great to down a custom form without creating a report to do so in some cases. In one instance I created a form to be used with some of our printers. It is now being used currently and now they need to go to the reports and pull pull from it. How would you like the feature to work - I would love to have the option to download as a pdf or excel sheet and also landscape or portrait to fit content on a page. This would be less click by users and staying with the Project Current Behaviour - I've created a report to pull the info down. Downloading as is created multiple pages
Description - Bulk-editing tasks does not handle disparate custom forms well. If 2 or more selected tasks have different custom forms, instead of showing the union of the custom forms across the tasks, it doesn't show any of the disparate tasks. On top of that, you cannot remove or edit custom forms in bulk if the same custom forms are not on all the tasks. The better approach is to show the custom forms that exist on all of the tasks, and only apply the changes to the tasks that have the edited custom form. Showing all of the attached custom forms also allows for removal of the custom form on those tasks that have it assigned. Why is this feature important to you - It is impossible to bulk-remove custom forms that are not on all of the selected tasks. It is impossible to bulk-edit any field on a custom form that is not assigned to a task in the selection. How would you like the feature to work - Instead of excluding the custom form because it is not on all selected tasks, show the custom form and only apply the changes to those selected task that are relevant. Current Behaviour - Custom forms that are not on all selected tasks are not shown and are not listed to be able to remove them. Users must find and select only the tasks that have the custom form to be removed or bulk-edited.
As an integration developer, I would like to use calls to the "Browse" endpoints of Marketo's assets more effectively. For example, the following API calls have two optional parameters, earliestUpdatedAt and latestUpdatedAt: /rest/asset/v1/emails.json /rest/asset/v1/programs.json /rest/asset/v1/smartCampaigns.json /rest/asset/v1/staticLists.json This is incredibly useful when trying to manage large-volume instances, as you can constrain to ongoing behavior. However, this ability to filter is missing from several other asset calls, despite them being similar in nature and reporting updatedAt details when called: /rest/asset/v1/channels.json /rest/asset/v1/folders.json /rest/asset/v1/forms.json Would it be possible to get these two parameters added for these three specific calls? There's likely merit in adding them elsewhere (e.g., snippets.json) but I'm only looking specifically for these three.
Hello, as far as I could experience it, when you have a long form, it's quite difficult to find a field already set up (= right-hand side) and it is also quite "difficult" to move a field up or down with the drag and drop logic. It would be good to have a search field and some up and down buttons or a compact view to organize quicker all the fields. Kind regards Sébastien
Description -Allow time to be logged from within a report as an inline editing feature like so many other fields. Why is this feature important to you - it would save a lot of clicks and help improve accurate "actual hours" vs planned because they could be edited in same view How would you like the feature to work - just like using the "is ready" field in a report...you can move right down a list and update that answer immediately Current Behaviour - have to go to updates for each tasks - if you have to retrace and add hours after the fact it's very time consuming!
Workfront has great capabilities for inputing and tracking expenses but is very lacking currently when it comes to estimates. I'd like to see the capability to keep track of estimates and export estimate signoff documents in the system without having to do a massive amount of custom configuring and Fusion workflows. Why is this feature important to you: It's important for us to keep track of estimates, not just expenses, so we have the ability to reconcile the expenses with the estimates. We also require signoff for our estimates do a formal document is beneficial. Currently much of this is happening outside of Workfront through emails and manual calculations. It would be extremely beneficial for this be handled within Workfront so everything stays with the project and calculations are not being done manually. How would you like the feature to work: A specific use case is as follows. Production Manager is tasked with getting an estimate for some premium items Production Manager gets several options and per piece costs for each Production Manager is able to enter several quantities in for each item and the system calculates the total for each quantity based on the per piece cost. A formal estimate document can be exported and saved to documents folder to be sent to client for signoff. When estimate is signed off on the Production Manager is then able to finalize the details for an expense and reconcile the expense against the estimate. Current Behaviour: Currently Workfront is set up to handle expenses. If there are multiple quantities being estimated each quantity is entered as a separate expense which is a lot of extra manual work. Also if we have per piece costs we are manually calculating those costs which leaves greater room for error. Also, there is no mechanism currently for exporting a formal estimate document from the expense. We were able to build something using Fusion but its not an ideal fix.
The ability for end users to select "Ignore/Consider User Time Off" for task durations in projects can lead to unintended consequences if project owners don't fully understand what that field does. For companies where due dates can not be moved because a team member takes PTO, it is important that we are able to proactively set project options without having to build exception reports to find and fix these issues. If admins could hide that field via layout templates, that would go a long way to consistent project management across our company.
Description The chart visualization ignores applied filters. Selecting the sparkline as the data source always shows all data for the respective dimension. Selecting one metric as a data source shows the first attribute of the dimension for all metrics. Warum ist Ihnen dieses Feature wichtig In practice: it makes it hard to find out, at what point in history a dimension starts being populated. Imagine you implement the dimension somewhen in last year and need to find out, when it was. You create a table/chart for the last year. But what you see is traffic for this dimension for the whole year. Also the chart gives a wrong picture of the data, if you apply filters to your dimension. It's just a bigger representation of the sparkline, which always shows the history of all data, including datapoints, where there is no actual data ("unspecified"). If I select one metric as a data source, the chart will show all metrics and the first dimension attribute only. This seems to be counter intuitive. Wie soll das Feature funktionieren: It should be possible to get the history of the selected data considering applied filters. If not by a single click, but by an option that says "show actual" data. If I select one metric as a data source, I'd like to see the data for this metric only. Either of them should allow me to see the actual historical data for the selected dimension and metric. Aktuelles Verhalten If you create a line chart based on a table and select the sparkline cell as the data source, the line chart will show the data from the sparkline. It will not change even if you apply a filter to the dimension. Reproduce: 1. create a Workspaces > Project > Table with rows showing a dimension, columns showing a metric (e.g. Occurences, Page Views, Visit) 2. make sure, that "show unspecified" is enabled 3. create a line chart for this table, select one cell containing a sparkline to make this the data source. The chart shows one line representing the sum of all dimension attributes 4.disable the option "show unspecified" The chart will reload, but it will be the same as before. 5. select three attributes of your dimension and choose "display selected rows only" from the contextual menu Again, the chart will reload, but it will be the same as before. 6. select the actual metric (the green cell) as the data source Again, the chart will reload, but now it will show ALL metrics, but only the first attribute of the dimension
There is currently no option with a channel surface or email template to prevent additional channel surface applied URL parameters from being included in external domain based links. For instance, we may wish to only have the additional automated parameters to be included with sender address based links and not externally facing links such as facebook.com.
Description - When a task is dependent on a predecessor (either same project or cross-project), and it impacts my assigned task, I would like to get a notification of this event. Currently, there's no way to get notified of a change in completion date due to a predecessor. This forces me to review all of my chained tasks for date impact. There is notification if my task itself gets its completion updated directly, but not if it's updated by a dependent task indirectly. Why is this feature important to you - This is important because a dependent task has affected my task's planned due date. Without notification for this, I have to monitor for these changes continuously. How would you like the feature to work - When a task that is assigned to me has its planned completion date changed, I want an event notification. It should not be limited to just users changing the planned completion date directly. Current Behaviour - There is no notification of an indirect date impact on assigned tasks.
Description - When an issue is added to a project, an update should be made to the Updates tab so folks know there are some issues reported. The Issues label or number of issues should be in Red so they stand out. Users are not noticing the issues.
We need a way for admins to be able to see all email notifications that were sent per object. As an admin, I get several questions about email notifications and need to know what emails were sent on a certain project, issue, etc. There should be a new tab in each object that shows an audit log of every email notification that was sent regarding the object. This would function similar to the Updates tab so any notifications sent regarding tasks, documents, or issues on a project would also roll up to the email notification tab on the project. This report would contain the following:-subject of email-sent to-email notification type-date sent-body of email
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
