Build better products with our product team
Email Open Activity in the rest API is missing the client ip address. The Ip is included for the event type Visit Web Page, though. It would be nice to see all information available to the frontend be included for all activity calls on via the rest api - for sanity and consistency.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - many choices don't lend themselves to short answers How would you like the feature to work - choice would show in its entirety Current Behaviour - Choice is truncated and ellipses appear
There are two ‘Documents’ places that we use to save documents on Workfront: Project and Task Saving files in Task – Documents: In our project team, people get assigned to subtasks in tasks. It's easier for the team to go and see what the relevant files are within Task-Documents. However, when we save files and create subfolders in Task-Documents, the related “Project” Documents don’t have the same folder structure that’s in Task. For example, if we save files A, B, C and organize the files in subfolders in Task, then when we go to its Project, files A, B, C are just saved in Project Documents as loose files, not in any subfolders. We have a lot of different tasks in one project, and it makes difficult to know which files are for which tasks unless someone goes into Project Documents and create subfolders and organize files manually. Or people need to go different tasks and try to find the files they need. Often times we have multiple tasks for one work item (i.e., one task for creating website content, another task for content edit/approval, and another task for website build/production, etc.). Either way, I don’t find this is efficient. If we save files in Project – Documents: people go into Workfront and see the subtasks they are assigned to, then they have to get out of the Task and go one level up to find files from Project – Documents. I am not sure if this is ideal either. My goal here is that we save files to Task Documents, then when we go to Project Documents, we can filter the files based on the tasks related to the files. I played around with filter/grouping in WF and I could figure out how to group based on tasks, but document list with tasks looks too busy; I can’t figure out the best way for this. I feel like there must be a way to organize documents in Project without manually creating subfolders. I want to make sure that we have organized folder structure for each project/work so that when we try to find something even years later we can still go in and find what we need, and people know where to look. Ideally, even someone who didn’t get involved with the project, they should be able to find the files when they try to achieve it. Please let me know what you think. Thanks! Sunny Waterman
Description - Include any Images placed inside a custom form when exporting form as a PDF from a Project/Task/Request. We quote design work for Retail customers. I would like to be able to insert a barcode image within a Custom Form created to be used as a Printable Quote sheet for the customer. This barcode can then be scanned at the time the customer pays. Current Behaviour - When exporting PDFs of Custom Forms the images are not included and the field is shown as blank.
Description - Currently, our users are unable to edit story or element/issue card details from the backlog column that displays on a Kanban board. Why is this feature important to you - It would make sense to be able to allow someone to edit the same information directly from the Kanban board without needing to go into the backlog separately. It helps create some efficiency. How would you like the feature to work - Allow users to edit the card details directly on the Kanban board (when it's in the backlog column). Current Behaviour - The users are able to edit the card details from the backlog (when you navigate to it from the left-hand column), however, when viewing from the board itself, they are unable to do so. They are able to edit the information from all other swim lanes/columns except for the backlog column.
Description - Update Resourcing Tool under Planner and Workload Balancer for better visibility of hours comparison on a daily basis and by individuals. Why is this feature important to you - Want to see total planned for Unassigned and Assigned tasks in Workload Balancer for resource forecasting & planning. Want to see Daily View on Planner for resource planning by day. Resource managers need the ability to see the difference between total planned hours for the day and total available hours for the day. Adding either a sum line on the Workload Balancer or a Daily view on the Planner would give resource managers that ability for hours comparison. How would you like the feature to work - Add a daily column option to the Week/Month/Quarter options on the Planner. Add a line that sums together planned hours at the top of Unassigned Tasks and at the top of Assigned Tasks in the Workload Balancer view. Current Behaviour - Planner only shows Week/Month/Quarter options. Workload Balancer only shows hours by individual task or user.
Would be AMAZING if Marketo could include a heatmap for email click performance. Being able to see the literal email body itself with click data on the specific locations of the links that have been clicked would be such a fantastic feature. Our team creates this manually each month with our newsletters and it's always rather time-consuming. Thank you!
Description – Adding Project filters to the Home area so items associated with projects in “Planning” can be toggled on and off. Why is this feature important to you – This is important to me because it will allow greater control over relevant information on the Home area. There can be late tasks on projects in Planning that clutter the Work List section. How would you like the feature to work – Add a “Projects” filter with statuses you can toggle on and off as needed. Current Behavior – The Work List on the Home area contains items for projects in Planning and In Progress.
Description – Adding custom views to Timesheets that will allow specific task details, such as the task planned completion date, to be viewed quickly without having to select and navigate the “Open Summary” section. Why is this feature important to you – This is important to me because it will reduce the time needed to identify the correct task to add time to among similarly named tasks. Examples of where this could be helpful are recurring tasks and identically named child tasks on projects. How would you like the feature to work – Add custom view options to Timesheets, similar to other areas in Workfront such as Projects, Programs, and Portfolios. Current Behavior – You must select Open Summary to see task differentiating details like the task planned completion date and other key fields.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: CSV Import Tool which perfom Publish, unpublish, delete, Move actions on given paths in csv Use-case: Generally in any project we have multiple nodes [Pages, Assets, Renditions...] that need to be Publish/Unpublish/Delete, and example n number of nodes are not in use and cause huge impact on environment performance and we need to unpublish those and then delete it, it could be n number of assets, pages [which used for testing or duplicates etc]. and let say the number could be in 1000+. so in that case we have to write groovy script, servlet, scheduler or worflow etc, to read the path of nodes from particular CSV and do operation like publish, unpublish, and delete using replicator API or in anyway. and writing this code need lot of optimization based on environment behaviour [e.g : making it sync or async]. Instead of this approach if we could have a generic solution where the product have a CSV importer tool which will read the path of nodes from CSV and perform actions like delete, unpulish, publish. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently I have 30,000+ Assets which are duplicate, and the path of those assets are stored into a CSV file by the QA, Stakeholder team and I need to remove those incluing their properties which holds their renditions path since it is duplicate, before deleting I need to unpublish those nodes. Improved/Expected Behavior: a tool which which read the path of nodes from CSV and perfom actions like Publiish, Unpublish and Delete. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM6.5 and above. Customer-name/Organization name: Generic Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable): reference post : https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/aem6-5-unpublish-and-removing-bulk-assets-using-path-from-csv/m-p/562255#M139958https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/aem6-5-servlet-to-unpublish-and-removing-bulk-assets-using-path/td-p/562621https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-experience-manager/aem6-5-read-multiple-properties-from-a-node-and-perform-action/td-p/564264
Description - I would like users to be able to @mention someone when they make a comment in the Approve, Changes, or Reject comment boxes. Why is this feature important to you - This would ensure the comments from the user are seen right away and by the correct person/people. How would you like the feature to work - When typing in the Comments boxes from the Approve, Changes, or Reject section, someone would include an @mention to a person or team and that message would generate an email update to the person/team @mentioned. The update would be connected to the document (like it is when a Comment is made in the Document Summary Updates section along with showing the decision made. Current Behaviour - Users have to navigate to the main Updates page to make comments which requires multiple extra clicks around the Project.
When sorting certain items (tokens are the first thing that comes to mind), uppercase and lowercase letters count as different "entities" and are not sorted together. So all the uppercase A tokens go first, then all the lowercase a tokens are in after that. This doesn't make any sense. Sorting should occur by letter regardless of the letter's case.
Description - If someone posts a document and tags us on it, we get an email notification, but have no way of knowing what folder it is in. We have a detailed folder structure that is in all jobs and without knowing where the document is posted, we can't tell what the document is for. Why is this feature important to you - We have many documents within a project and the folders give clues on what the document is related to. Without knowing what folder it is in, we have to click in all the folders to try and find it. How would you like the feature to work - The same way if you are in a project, it shows the breadcrumbs so you can back track - would like it to be like that - so when you're in document details, it would show you the back log breadcrumbs of what folder it is in. Current Behaviour - There is no way of knowing. @
Description - I would love to be able to display descriptions from the settings menu in the actual timesheets page for all users to see. Why is this feature important to you - I get many questions about what Hour types apply, as we do not track time to task/issue/projects currently since not all time-tracking users have work tracked in the system. How would you like the feature to work - It can be as simple as being allowed to edit the layout of Timesheet bucket and include 'descriptions' Current Behaviour - The only users who can see this functionality are those with System Admin levels, so it is not helpful for day-to-day users.
When exporting custom forms there are odd page breaks that add unnecessary blank space and pages to the PDF file. We would like the export to have appropriate spacing.
Description - According to Case Number Case Number 00347166, EA Tree Map only considers 3 months of project data. This is a problem because many of our projects run longer than 3 months. This means that the EA Tree Map will always be off because not all Completed Hours will be reflected in the metrics. Why is this feature important to you - This is a problem because many of our projects run longer than 3 months. How would you like the feature to work - Consider all Completed Hours in EA Tree Map regardless of project length or duration. Current Behaviour - EA Tree Map only considers 3 months of project data so the numerator of work completed will only ever consider 3 months worth of completed hours even if the project had more completed hours prior to 3 months.
Description - I would like a feature that allowed project templates to automatically update when changes are made to a workflow that is used in more than one project template. Why is this feature important to you - This would save time in not having to manually update multiple project templates that utilize the same workflow. How would you like the feature to work - For example: I have project template X with workflow A and project template Y with workflows A and B. If workflow A is edited in project template X, workflow A should automatically update in project template Y and vice versa. Current Behaviour - Not available. Updates to project templates that utilize the same workflows are each updated manually.
We should have the option to disable / remove the opt-out link in scheduled projects. We’re sending scheduled projects to distribution lists with 200+ recipients. But we can’t manually add 200+ recipients in the Adobe scheduler efficiently. Therefore we only have a single email address in the scheduler (an internal distribution list).Here’s the issue: everyone receives the same scheduled project containing the same opt-out link. If only one person of the 200 recipients clicks on the opt-out link the whole distribution list is removed from the scheduler which this is stopping the scheduled report for the whole list on almost a daily basis.
In the My Updates section, which is extremely helpful, it would be fantastic if, where someone would see the red and green buttons to approve or deny, if on the back end, we could customize the approval/denial setup to require that with either selection of approve or deny, the approver/denier would be required to enter a text explanation. (I wish that there was an option to more or less choose to turn such a feature on or off, to prompt approvers to give feedback.) This would help make sure, for auditing purposes, there was a record of explanation behind an approval.
Description - When projects are submitted the approvals should have the ability to include with their decision, the reason for their approval and/or denial. Why is this feature important to you - This feature is important to the process mostly for auditing purposes. The required comments field in the approval section would explain to the business owner why the project was declined or approval and be visible for all other parties previ to the project details. If and when completed or projects that were never approved are revisited in the future, the required comments within the approvals will give context to why the project was again, approved or denied. How would you like the feature to work - Workfront should allow the ability to include a comments section with project approvals. This feature should offer both optional as well as required capabilities. If this feature is active and required within a project's approval process, managers and sponsors should be required to include comments when approving or declining a project request - any and every time within the project an approval is needed. Current Behavior - Projects are approved and/or denied without documented reasoning or context. Reasons are communicated verbally and/or via email. We may incorporate using the updates tab.
We would like an option to enforce uniqueness on portfolio, program, and project names, respectively. Our users are able to create portfolios, programs, or projects with identical names, but won't realize that until they see them on reports. The same behavior happens via Workfront API that creates those objects. Enforcing uniqueness will eliminate this confusing behavior.
We are finally going to be able to port "Manager" in through our Azure SSO. However, there is no way to bulk map Manager email or name to their Workfront user record and so we will need to do this one by one. Unfortunately, we currently have 184 managers in our business unit that we will need to map. Having the user's Manager update whenever they log into WF will be a great add for us. It will automatically update their org chart and we will always have an accurate manager that we can trigger automatic approvals to. I would like to be able to download the usernames or user IDs from Workfront, then map the name or email address that will be passed through SSO in a template or spreadsheet that could then be uploaded to do the attribute mapping. The current behavior is that I will need to add the rule for each one, one at a time, to map the directory attribute to the Workfront attribute. So I'm guessing it will take me quite some time to do this 184 times.
Description - Would like to be able to customize the axis labels on a bar chart. Why is this feature important to you - I know this can be done by changing the name of a custom field so it reflects as we would like, but I need to be able to change the name of the "planned completion date" to an internal term for our leadership team. For example, the planned completion date field is used as our "customer go live date". How would you like the feature to work - Allow admins the ability to rename native Workfront fields on the backend so we can tailor to our organization's terminology. Current Behaviour - Not currently available. I hope this in the works for Reporting Canvas. 🤞
Request queues have the potential to solve a big need for us, the problem is you can only add them to a project as an issue. We would like to suggest the ability to add them to a project as a TASK.
When I take a look at the list of Email Campaigns / Events on Marketo Sales Insight, there exists all of the Email Campaigns / Events that is planed in the future on Marketo. But if the list only includes the related Email Campaigns / Events to the selected(showed) Account / Contact on Salesforce page, it would become more useful function, I feel.What do you think of this??
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
