Build better products with our product team
We would like to include the WLB on dashboards by using the external link. The Unassigned are currently does not display but it is information we would like to have available there.
A way to group the assignments in the Workload Balancer by portfolio or client to make it easier when having planning meetings with Resource Management. Currently you can only group by project.
We use the phone more and more for ENG - and now also frequently to edit. Unfortunately, audio transitions are too complicated on Rush on the iPhone. Simple audio transitions by default would be a huge advantage over iMovie and others. Separating audio and video tracks is of course easy, but when producing very fast and frantically, it is still a very cumbersome way. Please implement "Audio transition only" as a preset!
Feature request to add click through rate for the entire page, in addition to the existing dimension that analyzes the click through rate for each button on the page. Would be great to have both as out-of-the-box metrics.
Description - When trying to select a project (cross-project dependency, adding projects to a program, etc.), the search dialog only allows filtering by name. It would be helpful to add project filters to the dialog box so that I can limit the matching projects. For example, I want to only filter for projects that I own or that I created rather than seeing every project that matches the name. Also, the name matching is not doing a contains for the whole string. It is only matching by each keyword. This should be fixed as well. Why is this feature important to you - It's difficult to find projects that are mine and not someone else's with the same name How would you like the feature to work - Need additional project filter option to scope the name search Current Behaviour - Name search match each word instead of the whole string as a "Contains". This doesn't filter the project set enough to know which project is mine and it generates a long list to scroll through.
Description - When you notice an error after you post an update, there is not a way to edit it. Instead, you have to delete it, re-type/paste the content, fix, and re-submit, which also sends an additional email notification to any tagged users.It'd also be nice to allow for attachments in an Update. For example, when training new users, it'd be beneficial to show screenshots of where to navigate to. This isn't pertinent to the project/tasks so it doesn't need to be added to the Documents (and if it's a new user who needs visual support, they won't know how to get to the Documents anyway!). I can see many use cases for this. Why is this feature important to you - It would improve efficiency instead of re-doing work. It'd also allow for better user experience, no matter the level of knowledge. How would you like the feature to work - To edit an Update, there should be an option to edit when you select the 3 ellipses next to the Like button.In the Updates field, add an upload or attach button (paperclip icon).
When I user segmentation and analytics report, I can't find an operator to support regular expression. The "match" operator only supports wildcard(*), that can't satisify too much business. The issue puzzles me a lot. The RegEx is so wildely used, but why it not be used in adobe analytics(the segment in reports&analytics).
We often run into situations where there are additional users tagged in conversations in Updates tab in projects/tasks and we might need to remove these users to exclude them from conversation. Currently, there is no way to remove users from a conversation and these users keep getting email notifications for every update reply.
It would be VERY helpful if we had the ability to REMOVE users from the distribution/notification/inclusion list of an existing Updates/comments thread within WF.This would help b/c there are times when we want to retain the history of the conversation while continuing that conversation only with a smaller group of people than those people who were tagged within that thread early in that thread's lifecycle. I am aware that a new Update/comments thread can be started within that same area on WF, but that can be confusing for some of our users and frankly it makes finding historical elements of a conversation sloppy.This would also help b/c we have people in our organization who get accidentally tagged on a thread which they should not be on and the notifications that they receive can be very annoying to them if they're not relevant. We then need to make a choice to either start a new thread without that person which means that the historicals of the conversation are then less accessible to the folks who need it (OR) we choose to continue the conversation with that person tagged on it and continue to annoy them but retain the historicals. We often choose the route of keeping the person who should be removed on the thread so that we don't lose the historicals but that annoyance that results becomes a deterrent for WF adoption in our org.If/when this is added, it should be done in such a way that is not easy to accidentally remove someone.Thank you!
Ability to remove users from the notifications of a thread in the updates
Description - Add a GUID or ID for custom field values Why is this feature important to you - When you change a name because of say a typing error and Logic was based on the name How would you like the feature to work - Update to the system to link custom field values based on the ID rather than the name Current Behaviour - All relationships to a custom field or custom field values use the Name
Description - Currently the Scrum Board only shows tasks assigned to a Team. I want to see two different scrum boards. 1. BY TEAM: A board to show tasks assigned to anyone on that team. This will allow resource assignment to tasks to team members while seeing everything else they are assigned to on all issues and projects. Changes to tasks on a project can be restricted to that project owner, but during team meetings that persons full allocation would be understood and planned. b. BY PROJECT: A board to show tasks within a project. New tasks go into the project backlog. This will allow projects to managed in a agile fashion without being built in a waterfall project plan. When a task is assigned to a resource, it would be on the project agile board, but also appear on that person's team board. Project tasks can be planned at the project level on this board. Burndown chart should show velocity for all iterations of the project and predict project end date based on velocity and remaining tasks. Both of these Agile boards should have the ability to drag and drop tasks to and from the Backlog, and between current Iterations or future Iterations. This will allow iteration planning without jumping between screens and views, so iteration planning meetings will go faster and feel less cumbersome.
My company would love to be able to use this feature, but we are on SSO and it sounds like at this point that is not possible
While this is available on the browser, as someone who converts projects using project templates on a regular basis, I was under the impression I could do so on the app. Recently, I discovered I cannot. Due to the flexibility and availability required in my job, and the fact this feature is available otherwise, I think I should just be added into the app with the already available project conversion capabilities. Currently, I can only convert without a project template and I run into issues bringing over the information from my custom forms as well, while using the app.
I'd love to be able to report on objects in the recycle bin. Not the objects associated with them, but the object itself. So projects existing in the recycle bin, tasks, etc.
Description - Currently it's only available to system admins or the other option is to give it to everyone. Our organization instance is setup by groups due to security and privacy. It would be great to have this option available to all group admins.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Integation of Adobe photoshop with AEM Use-case: Teams can use it to design assets and design files and also have an ability to share it with diiferent team and instances , This also helps manage business designs and revisions. to have direct connect with xd on the product to access number of assets project wise. Current/Experienced Behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHjRk7dw9rI Improved/Expected Behavior: To have not just assets customization, to also have page level similar xd. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Description - Add ability to have / transfer ownership of reports Why is this feature important to you - The ownership of a report currently exists only by who entered a report. Often the report was written for a person/team but even when a person leaves the company they still are listed as the owner because they created it. As a result new reports are often created that are the same as other reports How would you like the feature to work - Add a Report Owner field in Report Settings. They then have the rights (provided their license gives it) that the person who entered the report had. Current Behaviour - Only have an entered by
Description - Filters for the Workload Balancer do not stay locked when we would like to target them on different team dashboards. It instead saves the last used filter by that user for all dashboards that have the balancer on them. Why is this feature important to you - We need to be able to have filters stay "sticky" when they are targeted to a dashboard. We have built many dashboards for different creative teams, but we cannot effectively use them as the filters do not stay targeted on that page and always divert to the last filter that was used across the board by that user. This makes it very confusing for our users and they have to continually switch the filters to get the view they would like. How would you like the feature to work - Once a filter is created, Workfront should create a unique URL link. Or if this is not possible, could the balancer act like a report and be added to a dashboard as an object? Current Behaviour - We currently use the link to add the balancer to dashboards, but since the link is not unique enough it reverts to what was last used/filtered on the balancer page.
Hello, I wanted to share an idea of having an automatic time tracker per project. If there could be a way to add time tracked as a base work time tracked per projects once they get opened. For example, add 1.5 Hrs. as a base time track to each project as soon we open them, since we would like start charging a base standard fee to open and manage each project. Maybe can that be something we could add in one of the tasks in the task list templates thank you!
Description: Workfront uses the Event Subscription API to transmit changes to our services when a document in created or updated on a project. Currently, when a file is moved (drag-and-drop) from one folder to another, it does not fire any event to indicate that this action occurred. The argument i got from support was that this just "changes the folderID field 'on' a document", and that their product was functioning as intended. However, changing the folder ID for a document is in fact a change TO the document, as you are changing critical information associated directly with the document. In computers, a file/document always exists within a folder. When you change where the document lives, in computer operating systems and workfront, it is always done by doing operations on the file icon itself, or specifying the file's path and/or name. Thus, it makes sense that changing the folder a document is in should be an notable enough be considered an "UPDATE" event in the Events Subscription API. Why is this feature important to you: This feature will be used heavily by the Marketing department at our University. Documents will be initially created in a "Campaign Notes" folder, and will later need to be transferred into a "Finalized Files" folder. After the transfer to Finalized Files, an event should be fired to our services that downloads said folder into storage in our University's infrastructure. It is necessary that an event fires to signify that an existing file was moved into that folder. How would you like the feature to work: When any document is drag-and-dropped between folders in a Workfront project, a Document UPDATE event should be sent using the Event Subscription API described in following link: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/adobe-workfront-api/event-subscriptions/event-subs-api.html?lang=en Current Behaviour: Currently, UPDATE events are only sent when a new version is uploaded from an external source, and CREATE is only sent when a new document is uploaded from an external source. As an upload is simply a "move" operation from an external source into workfront, I'm not sure why the same logic wouldn't apply to fire an event for "moves" of the file within workfront, also.
Form submit button is activated when Date-Time-my.token-Based is system date.
Description - Request Link Why is this feature important to you - Creates efficiencies around getting requests and briefs from our external contacts How would you like the feature to work - I want to be able to send the "share path" link on a request over to an external contact and it direct them to the correct log-in page Current Behaviour - Currently the link sends them to my company's internal single sign on page instead of their log-in page
Following the implementation of autosave, it would be advisable to include the possibility of enabling and disabling it if necessary, preferably directly within the WS project. It is very important to add this functionality: 1) to avoid modifying scheduled or shared reports during presentations by mistake; 2) to avoid saving many copies of the same report; 3) to avoid making continuous report switches between the original and the copy in case of live changes during a presentation.
Marketo offer to the functionality to publish the pages to Facebook. However as this social platform are becoming less relevant for some B2B clients it would be great to have this functionality for other channels like LinkedIn. We should reach to more audience in more channels.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
