We have really a lots of projects in Workfront. That's why it would be very useful if we could filter on active projects when moving tasks. The same with the search. We would really appreciate if not always completed projects would be listed first.
Currently when viewing a week in the Workload Balancer, it shows Sunday - Saturday. To maximize display area, would like the option to show weekdays only. This could be a configurable setting.
Description - At present project conditions (In Trouble, At Risk, and On Target) are controlled at the system level but many groups would prefer to use custom conditions (e.g. Red, Yellow, Green) for their Group. Why is this feature important to you - The default conditions do not align to how our org reports status and the default terminology without color confuses some folks (which is worse In Trouble or At Risk? Hard to know without a color association.). This would allow Group Admins to control the condition and align Workfront more closely with the org processes.. How would you like the feature to work - allow group admins to customize the names of project conditions for their group. For example:our group would prefer a simple Red, Yellow, Green (and gray for projects that are not in progress and where condition is not applicable) Current Behaviour - Conditions are only customizable at the System Level.
Workload balancer is not useful the way it does hours. Today, if you have a task assigned to a user that should start today and is worth 4 hours but the task gets delayed and doesn't start until 2 weeks from now, the task itself will show on Workload balancer but the 4 hours will be stuck back on the original date. This is even if using projected dates. This makes the workload balancer unusable to "balance work" as it will look like the user has 4 extra hours of capacity. If a task gets delayed, I would carry the 4 hours over to the projected date on Workload balancer so it has an accurate representation of a user's actual workload. Until this is fixed, I have no use for Workload balancer or Resource Planner. We should not have to edit the planned start date of the task if it falls behind. That is the purpose of the projected start date.
The Workload balancer is not very intuitive compared to other products available on the market. We really need additional functionality to bring this to par with Harvest, legacy 10K, even Paprika etc.Drag & Drop AssignmentThe resource manager should be able to drag a non-assigned work item onto an available resource.Drag & Slide to Update DurationThe resource manager should be able to adapt the duration of a work item to enable a booking. This is a very common behaviour and the project manager should receive a notification if the duration changes but standard practice.LevellingThe resource manager should be able to level the work without having to update the planned hours. Again, very common behaviour and the project manager should receive a notification if the planned hours change but standard practice.I see these as basic features and asking individuals to painfully collaborate or update work objects each time they need to make a minor adaptation is incredibly cumbersome. For large departments, the current solution does not offer the tools other software does to enable trafficking/resourcing of work.Hope this makes sense, happy to address questions.Best regards,Christian
Description - Add in a capability to allow there to be a way to display a running capacity line on the workload balancer for individuals. Why is this feature important to you - We need to be able to visually show through a quick graph where the hours are falling over daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly periods of time. Adding in the capacity line would make it easy to see where there are issues with a users workload against there set capacity number. How would you like the feature to work - Add a setting option that can be turned on or off on the balancer page. Add in a field on the user to be able to add in a capacity number that pulls into the balancer. If there are holidays or PTO, the capacity number and line does not display. Current Behaviour - Does not exist.
We would like to include the WLB on dashboards by using the external link. The Unassigned are currently does not display but it is information we would like to have available there.
A way to group the assignments in the Workload Balancer by portfolio or client to make it easier when having planning meetings with Resource Management. Currently you can only group by project.
We use the phone more and more for ENG - and now also frequently to edit. Unfortunately, audio transitions are too complicated on Rush on the iPhone. Simple audio transitions by default would be a huge advantage over iMovie and others. Separating audio and video tracks is of course easy, but when producing very fast and frantically, it is still a very cumbersome way. Please implement "Audio transition only" as a preset!
Feature request to add click through rate for the entire page, in addition to the existing dimension that analyzes the click through rate for each button on the page. Would be great to have both as out-of-the-box metrics.
Description - When trying to select a project (cross-project dependency, adding projects to a program, etc.), the search dialog only allows filtering by name. It would be helpful to add project filters to the dialog box so that I can limit the matching projects. For example, I want to only filter for projects that I own or that I created rather than seeing every project that matches the name. Also, the name matching is not doing a contains for the whole string. It is only matching by each keyword. This should be fixed as well. Why is this feature important to you - It's difficult to find projects that are mine and not someone else's with the same name How would you like the feature to work - Need additional project filter option to scope the name search Current Behaviour - Name search match each word instead of the whole string as a "Contains". This doesn't filter the project set enough to know which project is mine and it generates a long list to scroll through.
Description - When you notice an error after you post an update, there is not a way to edit it. Instead, you have to delete it, re-type/paste the content, fix, and re-submit, which also sends an additional email notification to any tagged users.It'd also be nice to allow for attachments in an Update. For example, when training new users, it'd be beneficial to show screenshots of where to navigate to. This isn't pertinent to the project/tasks so it doesn't need to be added to the Documents (and if it's a new user who needs visual support, they won't know how to get to the Documents anyway!). I can see many use cases for this. Why is this feature important to you - It would improve efficiency instead of re-doing work. It'd also allow for better user experience, no matter the level of knowledge. How would you like the feature to work - To edit an Update, there should be an option to edit when you select the 3 ellipses next to the Like button.In the Updates field, add an upload or attach button (paperclip icon).
When I user segmentation and analytics report, I can't find an operator to support regular expression. The "match" operator only supports wildcard(*), that can't satisify too much business. The issue puzzles me a lot. The RegEx is so wildely used, but why it not be used in adobe analytics(the segment in reports&analytics).
We often run into situations where there are additional users tagged in conversations in Updates tab in projects/tasks and we might need to remove these users to exclude them from conversation. Currently, there is no way to remove users from a conversation and these users keep getting email notifications for every update reply.
It would be VERY helpful if we had the ability to REMOVE users from the distribution/notification/inclusion list of an existing Updates/comments thread within WF.This would help b/c there are times when we want to retain the history of the conversation while continuing that conversation only with a smaller group of people than those people who were tagged within that thread early in that thread's lifecycle. I am aware that a new Update/comments thread can be started within that same area on WF, but that can be confusing for some of our users and frankly it makes finding historical elements of a conversation sloppy.This would also help b/c we have people in our organization who get accidentally tagged on a thread which they should not be on and the notifications that they receive can be very annoying to them if they're not relevant. We then need to make a choice to either start a new thread without that person which means that the historicals of the conversation are then less accessible to the folks who need it (OR) we choose to continue the conversation with that person tagged on it and continue to annoy them but retain the historicals. We often choose the route of keeping the person who should be removed on the thread so that we don't lose the historicals but that annoyance that results becomes a deterrent for WF adoption in our org.If/when this is added, it should be done in such a way that is not easy to accidentally remove someone.Thank you!
Ability to remove users from the notifications of a thread in the updates
Description - Add a GUID or ID for custom field values Why is this feature important to you - When you change a name because of say a typing error and Logic was based on the name How would you like the feature to work - Update to the system to link custom field values based on the ID rather than the name Current Behaviour - All relationships to a custom field or custom field values use the Name
Description - Currently the Scrum Board only shows tasks assigned to a Team. I want to see two different scrum boards. 1. BY TEAM: A board to show tasks assigned to anyone on that team. This will allow resource assignment to tasks to team members while seeing everything else they are assigned to on all issues and projects. Changes to tasks on a project can be restricted to that project owner, but during team meetings that persons full allocation would be understood and planned. b. BY PROJECT: A board to show tasks within a project. New tasks go into the project backlog. This will allow projects to managed in a agile fashion without being built in a waterfall project plan. When a task is assigned to a resource, it would be on the project agile board, but also appear on that person's team board. Project tasks can be planned at the project level on this board. Burndown chart should show velocity for all iterations of the project and predict project end date based on velocity and remaining tasks. Both of these Agile boards should have the ability to drag and drop tasks to and from the Backlog, and between current Iterations or future Iterations. This will allow iteration planning without jumping between screens and views, so iteration planning meetings will go faster and feel less cumbersome.
My company would love to be able to use this feature, but we are on SSO and it sounds like at this point that is not possible
While this is available on the browser, as someone who converts projects using project templates on a regular basis, I was under the impression I could do so on the app. Recently, I discovered I cannot. Due to the flexibility and availability required in my job, and the fact this feature is available otherwise, I think I should just be added into the app with the already available project conversion capabilities. Currently, I can only convert without a project template and I run into issues bringing over the information from my custom forms as well, while using the app.
I'd love to be able to report on objects in the recycle bin. Not the objects associated with them, but the object itself. So projects existing in the recycle bin, tasks, etc.
Description - Currently it's only available to system admins or the other option is to give it to everyone. Our organization instance is setup by groups due to security and privacy. It would be great to have this option available to all group admins.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Integation of Adobe photoshop with AEM Use-case: Teams can use it to design assets and design files and also have an ability to share it with diiferent team and instances , This also helps manage business designs and revisions. to have direct connect with xd on the product to access number of assets project wise. Current/Experienced Behavior: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHjRk7dw9rI Improved/Expected Behavior: To have not just assets customization, to also have page level similar xd. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): NA Customer-name/Organization name: NA Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Description - Add ability to have / transfer ownership of reports Why is this feature important to you - The ownership of a report currently exists only by who entered a report. Often the report was written for a person/team but even when a person leaves the company they still are listed as the owner because they created it. As a result new reports are often created that are the same as other reports How would you like the feature to work - Add a Report Owner field in Report Settings. They then have the rights (provided their license gives it) that the person who entered the report had. Current Behaviour - Only have an entered by
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
