We have several types of projects that require different types of dashboards. Some users access both types of projects. Currently I can add the custom tabs to a users Layout but that tab then shows as available on all projects. So I'll have a QC custom tab with QC related reports show in a Development Project. I'd like the ability to customize the tabs at a object level - say on a specific project template - and any user with access to the dashboard then see that dashboard only on that project. Not on all their projects.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - Currently everytime an offer is presented or shown to customer, there is no traceability/audit feature we have. How would you like the feature to work - It will be good to have a tracking feature/audit trail in AEP. With offer preposition data available in AEP, we would be able to use that to built eligibility logic based on offer proposition data/date/status etc. Current Behaviour - Nothing exist as of now to support this feature.
Users are complaining that the 7-second undo 'pause' is disruptive, especially since the comment they just posted disappears during this time. Can we either a) add a global setting to allow us to toggle this setting off and on or b) change it so the text to appears during this 7-second window? TY!
Currently, when an aggregator function is used to display a calculated total for a particular custom field in a result set, only the the displayed page is included in the calculation. This means that IF the entire data set is 5000 records, the user will see the aggregated total in the grouping headers for the first 100 results or 2000 max (if they figure out how to adjust the default limit). This can be rather confusing to users due to the fact that the user expects the aggregated total to include the entire data and not the default 100 records or at most 2000 records per page. It's particularly problematic when it comes to an Hours report where the result set can include well over 2000 records, meaning that the user has to have their calculator app handy and then paginate through the result set while adding the totals from each page to get the total across the complete data set OR they must export the data set into Excel and continue their calculations there. What we need is an enhancement which would allow users to see the aggregated values in grouping headers for the entire data set (no matter how large that set is) without having to rely on exporting data into Excel.Here's an example of a large data set and what the user sees by default:and here's what they CAN see if they expand the default result set to the max of 2000 records... completely different totals for the same groupings AND there are additional groupings that got added because the displayed data set now includes them... ...even still, there are 1700+ records on the next page that were not included in the total which may have data not aggregated on the displayed page, thus rendering the Total Cost column useless for large data sets unless the user exports the data into Excel.
When managing stories on an Agile Kanban board and moving a story from one status to the next in a sequence, we need the ability to drop the story in the next status at a certain location within the list of stories. Current functionality is for the story to retain it's comparative position that it had when it was in the backlog.We are a production support organization for a data warehouse and may have a new story come into the backlog that is a higher priority than an existing, in-flight, story. Under current functionality, as the story moves through the release process, the story will be put at the bottom of the list of existing stories (in each status) and we must then manually move the story to the top of the list so it will be worked on next by the Agile team. In another situation, if a backlog story's priority changes and it needs to be expedited, it will be placed in the list of existing stories in the same order it appeared in the backlog. That location is rarely where we now want it listed. We must also find the story in the list and then manually move it to the correct position.We current spend time after nearly every Kanban stand-up reordering the stories so that they reflect the actual priority of work.What we need is the ability to drop the story into a specific location in the list of stories. That position is not related to the position it was on the backlog. Basically, we would like to replicate the manual Post-it notes where a story is inserted into the list of stories already on the board.The current functionality does not compare well with other products who manage Kanban boards.
When in the Storyboard view of my sprint, i'd like the ability to move a story from the current sprint to either another sprint or to the backlog. Currently you have to navigate up a few levels to "All Iterations", find the story (again) in that list view, then click Move>To Backlog (or to a diff sprint). Way too many clicks.
Agile teams suggestions: 1.Kanban - See Stories on the kanban board as we can see on Scrum view or on Kanban view on projects 2.Kanban - See issues directly on backloag on Kanban teams as we can see on Scrum; 3.Scrum - See Backloag buttom on the board to Scrum teams, as we can see on Kanban view; 4.Kanban - Control the number of Closed tasks on the kanban board; 5.Kanban & Scrum - Automaticaly slipt estimative value when you break down an story; 6.Kanban & Scrum - Change priority directly on the card; 7.Scrum - Setup date on a storie - It's very importante for us to be able of set up dates for our stories inside a scrum iteration, even if the dates are between the iteration start/end. 8.Kanban & Scrum - Setup status by teams, as we can do for Groups, it would be very helpfull for agil teams.
Scrum Team Board - Setting a team as scrum vs Kanban removes the ability to see the backlog while in a card view. This makes it difficult during Sprint planning because you have to find each task in a grid view, then move them into an active or future Sprint (as opposed to just dragging them over from a backlog).
Observing his three excellent Ideas today reminded me how much @william-- is a fountain of knowledge an generosity within our community, so I propose he be awarded the first "Level 11" as per this cited historical document, in recognition of his exemplary service. If you've received his help and/or enjoy his comments, I invite you to Like this Idea and leave him a Thank You below. Regards, Doug
Description - We would like to require our users to rename objects like reports, custom forms, templates, etc when they are copying them. Why is this feature important to you - As an admin my job is to go through our system regularly to clean it up. I'm noticing a significant amount of objects with the word copy in them which doesn't really tell the whole story of what the object is. This would lessen an admins duties of not having to clean up this data or send notes to users to clean it up if they were just doing it from the start. How would you like the feature to work - instead of auto-populating the object with the name leave it blank and not allow users to save it without naming it.Current Behaviour - auto-populating the object with the name with "copy" at the end.
The Approval Process function shows an "IF" statement for if it is not approved but it does not show for if it is approved We are asking for the IF approved with a status field to be added
DescriptionAllow users to subscribe to Project Templates so they can receive email notifications when an other user makes an update on the template.Not to be confused with this idea, which is great and allows the templatization of subscriptions to new projects. Why is this feature important to youWe want users to be better informed when changes are made to their workflows, and templates are a big part of that. How would you like the feature to workAllow someone to subscribe to the Template object type and send notifications to them as you would if they are subscribed to a Project. Current BehaviourUsers cannot subscribe to Template records and therefore get no notification when updates are entered on one (unless mentioned by name, which tends not to happen.)
Please fix the .PDF export of columns with rich text. Right now if you export a report that has columns with rich text all of the formatting disappears. Worse, if you've used text mode to combine columns with rich text, it will not show all of the combined columns! The rich text looks great on screen, but our executive team and other users rely on printed documents for markup and retention.
It would however be helpful if we can see details for the test variants with subject line/send date time, etc. tests in the smart list filters - this will help us select the apt. test variant w/o having the need to reference the Dashboard panel of the email send program for the variant details. Ex. in the above snap, I think it would be great if we can see the actual test variants' subject lines instead of Subject A, Subject B, and Subject C, if possible. This may not be possible for the whole email test, but I think that's fine, if we can at least view test variant details for other tests.
I would like to see a % change calculation - or summary change calculation - across multiple metrics. Right now, we can do this across a single metric, but I'd like to beable to do this MoM for example. In the screenshot included below, I'd love to include a % change column that runs down the right-hand side to show the change MoM across each device type I've pulled into the table.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - we would like to receive only error notifications rather than all notofications so that we can focus only when the TID import got failed. How would you like the feature to work - when the TID is imported , we should receive only error email notifications from adobe's servers (ie we should receive notifications only when the TID import is failed Current Behaviour - we are receiving all the email notifiations notthe error notifications
Currently there is no option on the system or group level to set the tick for "Keep the planned completion date of the issue" when converting an issue to a task. We have the option to set defaults for "Keep the original issue and tie its resolution to this task" and "Allow Primary Contact to have access to this task", but not for the last option. Even in the documentation this feature is listed as possible: "Keep the planned completion date of the issue If unselected, the Planned Completion Date of the new task is calculated from the Planned Start Date of the task. The Planned Start Date of the new task is set according to the system preferences for new tasks. NOTE The options that display here depend on how the Workfront administrator configured them for everyone in the system. For more information, see Configure system-wide task and issue preferences. Or, if the top-level groups in your organization configured them separately, the options that display here depend on which group is associated with the project you selected in step 6. For more information, see Configure task and issue preferences for a group." A default setting would be very helpful and time saving for setups where a lot of requests/issues are converted.
Hi team, currently the administration of Marketo Calendar licenses is a pain in the neck, because you cannot grant the licenses at user creation, but only after they have activated their accounts. Only then the option to assign a cal license becomes available. Neither is there an API we could use to set up a daily job to auto-assign the cal licenses, nor can you select multiple users at once and assign licenses to all of them in one go. Here’s a how-to: Issue/Revoke a Marketing Calendar License | Adobe Marketo Engage. Suggestions: Allow cal licenses to be applied at user creation already, not having to come back after activation. Add boolean flag in Admin to select if you would like to automatically assign a cal license at user creation. Enable multi-select of users and assign/remove cal licenses in bulk. Add API endpoint or enhance existing endpoint to assign/remove cal licenses. Include cal licenses as part of Roles Pick any of these and it'll make our life so much easier. Thank you! Kind regards, Thorsten
Right now you can only group a Board's cards by tags or assignee. Really hoping part of Boards enhancements is the ability to group cards by a custom form field that is on the objects you're filtering into the Board. My use case would be too many options for tags (only 13 color options for tags), and I want to use tags for something else. Thanks for upvoting!
You are able to supposedly add as many tags as you like with WF Boards, but there are only 13 tag color options. This basically means you only have 13 options to prevent using the same color for multiple tags. Please add more color options so we can add more tag options without causing confusion. Would be great to have custom color color options like you do when using a custom color in report charts.
Selecting a new template within Workflow--add template is difficult when the template name is long. The window needs to be wider to show the longer template names.
Description - Our workfront instance has a report that shows all projects that have not been improved. We wanted the option to approve the project through the report to make it less work on our project manager, instead out going into each project individually Why is this feature important to you - This would have improve our process and make it easier on our project managers. How would you like the feature to work - I would like the ability to approve projects within a report of project that have not been approved would like it to be a quick dropdown for our project managers. Current Behaviour - This is something you can not do at the moment for workfront.
We would like to have a new (optional) native typeahead field attached to all queue topics in the system, called "Queue Topic Owner." This is where we would put the point of contact for that particular request queue. Having this would allow us to aggregate and share this information with our requestors, so they know who to reach out to for questions. This update would also help us (system admins) figure out who needs to review/approve request queue changes, and who we need to collaborate with during our annual request queue audit. Currently, the Project Owner field in the request queue project is serving a similar purpose. However, several of our request queue Projects contain many different queue topics that are associated with various teams. As such, the person in the Project Owner field isn't always the most appropriate point of contact for all of those queue topics.
I am currently working on a custom integration and the standard Marketo field for an opportunity's creation date is displayed as "SFDC Created Date" in the UI. This is confusing since we do not have a Salesforce integration. I think the field should simply be "CRM Created Date" or "External Created Date" or even just "Created Date".
Description - Being able to create a report to pull data from the recycle bin, by portfolio, project, know who deleted it and when would be a fantastic Add Why is this feature important to you - For regulatory controls, is important to know what happened to a record and be able to pull a report on a regular basis in order to effectively manage a process. How would you like the feature to work - Have a section under reporting where "Recycle Bin" and be able to select fields from every object, deleted date, deleted by name, last updated date, last updated by, portfolio, project, etc Current Behaviour - non existent, system does not have the ability to report on recycled bin items
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
